Picard number and topology of Kähler manifolds
Let $(X,omega)$ be a compact Kähler manifold.
The line bundles $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ with respect to tensor product $otimes$ determine the Picard group $Pic(X)$ of $X$; let $Pic^0(X)$ be the subgroup of degree $0$ line bundles over $X$, where $displaystyledeg(mathcal{L})=int_Xc_1(mathcal{L})wedgeomega^{dim X-1}$; the Néron-Severi group $NS(X)$ is the quotient group $Pic(X)_{displaystyle/Pic^0(X)}$.
One proves that $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group, and its rank $rho(X)$ is called Picard number of $X$.
From the topological point of view: $Pic(X)=H^1left(X,mathcal{O}_X^{times}right)$, where $mathcal{O}_X^{times}$ is the sheaf of nowhere zero holomorphic functions on $X$; $NS(X)=Imleft(Pic(X)xrightarrow{c_1}H^2(X,mathbb{Z})right)=H^2(X,mathbb{Z})cap H^{(1,1)}(X)$ by Lefschetz $(1,1)$-part theorem, where $c_1$ is the first connection morphism in the long exact sequence in cohomology of the exponential sheaf sequence, in other words is the first Chern class.
I am not able to connect these two diffent point of view; for exact, when I know some information about $Pic(X)$ or $rho(X)$ I am not able to extract topological informations about $X$.
Can someone suggest me books, lecture notes, "toy examples" and other useful material for this complicated (for me) linkage?
Thanks, in advance.
AddendumExample: if $X$ is a projective variety then $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group (Severi-Néron theorem of the base); so when $rho(X)=1$ any effective (Weil) divisor $D$ determines an ample line bundle $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ (see Mohan's comment below).
algebraic-geometry reference-request kahler-manifolds
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
|
show 1 more comment
Let $(X,omega)$ be a compact Kähler manifold.
The line bundles $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ with respect to tensor product $otimes$ determine the Picard group $Pic(X)$ of $X$; let $Pic^0(X)$ be the subgroup of degree $0$ line bundles over $X$, where $displaystyledeg(mathcal{L})=int_Xc_1(mathcal{L})wedgeomega^{dim X-1}$; the Néron-Severi group $NS(X)$ is the quotient group $Pic(X)_{displaystyle/Pic^0(X)}$.
One proves that $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group, and its rank $rho(X)$ is called Picard number of $X$.
From the topological point of view: $Pic(X)=H^1left(X,mathcal{O}_X^{times}right)$, where $mathcal{O}_X^{times}$ is the sheaf of nowhere zero holomorphic functions on $X$; $NS(X)=Imleft(Pic(X)xrightarrow{c_1}H^2(X,mathbb{Z})right)=H^2(X,mathbb{Z})cap H^{(1,1)}(X)$ by Lefschetz $(1,1)$-part theorem, where $c_1$ is the first connection morphism in the long exact sequence in cohomology of the exponential sheaf sequence, in other words is the first Chern class.
I am not able to connect these two diffent point of view; for exact, when I know some information about $Pic(X)$ or $rho(X)$ I am not able to extract topological informations about $X$.
Can someone suggest me books, lecture notes, "toy examples" and other useful material for this complicated (for me) linkage?
Thanks, in advance.
AddendumExample: if $X$ is a projective variety then $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group (Severi-Néron theorem of the base); so when $rho(X)=1$ any effective (Weil) divisor $D$ determines an ample line bundle $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ (see Mohan's comment below).
algebraic-geometry reference-request kahler-manifolds
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
1
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
1
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03
|
show 1 more comment
Let $(X,omega)$ be a compact Kähler manifold.
The line bundles $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ with respect to tensor product $otimes$ determine the Picard group $Pic(X)$ of $X$; let $Pic^0(X)$ be the subgroup of degree $0$ line bundles over $X$, where $displaystyledeg(mathcal{L})=int_Xc_1(mathcal{L})wedgeomega^{dim X-1}$; the Néron-Severi group $NS(X)$ is the quotient group $Pic(X)_{displaystyle/Pic^0(X)}$.
One proves that $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group, and its rank $rho(X)$ is called Picard number of $X$.
From the topological point of view: $Pic(X)=H^1left(X,mathcal{O}_X^{times}right)$, where $mathcal{O}_X^{times}$ is the sheaf of nowhere zero holomorphic functions on $X$; $NS(X)=Imleft(Pic(X)xrightarrow{c_1}H^2(X,mathbb{Z})right)=H^2(X,mathbb{Z})cap H^{(1,1)}(X)$ by Lefschetz $(1,1)$-part theorem, where $c_1$ is the first connection morphism in the long exact sequence in cohomology of the exponential sheaf sequence, in other words is the first Chern class.
I am not able to connect these two diffent point of view; for exact, when I know some information about $Pic(X)$ or $rho(X)$ I am not able to extract topological informations about $X$.
Can someone suggest me books, lecture notes, "toy examples" and other useful material for this complicated (for me) linkage?
Thanks, in advance.
AddendumExample: if $X$ is a projective variety then $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group (Severi-Néron theorem of the base); so when $rho(X)=1$ any effective (Weil) divisor $D$ determines an ample line bundle $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ (see Mohan's comment below).
algebraic-geometry reference-request kahler-manifolds
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
Let $(X,omega)$ be a compact Kähler manifold.
The line bundles $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ with respect to tensor product $otimes$ determine the Picard group $Pic(X)$ of $X$; let $Pic^0(X)$ be the subgroup of degree $0$ line bundles over $X$, where $displaystyledeg(mathcal{L})=int_Xc_1(mathcal{L})wedgeomega^{dim X-1}$; the Néron-Severi group $NS(X)$ is the quotient group $Pic(X)_{displaystyle/Pic^0(X)}$.
One proves that $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group, and its rank $rho(X)$ is called Picard number of $X$.
From the topological point of view: $Pic(X)=H^1left(X,mathcal{O}_X^{times}right)$, where $mathcal{O}_X^{times}$ is the sheaf of nowhere zero holomorphic functions on $X$; $NS(X)=Imleft(Pic(X)xrightarrow{c_1}H^2(X,mathbb{Z})right)=H^2(X,mathbb{Z})cap H^{(1,1)}(X)$ by Lefschetz $(1,1)$-part theorem, where $c_1$ is the first connection morphism in the long exact sequence in cohomology of the exponential sheaf sequence, in other words is the first Chern class.
I am not able to connect these two diffent point of view; for exact, when I know some information about $Pic(X)$ or $rho(X)$ I am not able to extract topological informations about $X$.
Can someone suggest me books, lecture notes, "toy examples" and other useful material for this complicated (for me) linkage?
Thanks, in advance.
AddendumExample: if $X$ is a projective variety then $NS(X)$ is a finitely generated (Abelian) group (Severi-Néron theorem of the base); so when $rho(X)=1$ any effective (Weil) divisor $D$ determines an ample line bundle $mathcal{L}$ over $X$ (see Mohan's comment below).
algebraic-geometry reference-request kahler-manifolds
algebraic-geometry reference-request kahler-manifolds
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
edited 2 days ago
Armando j18eos
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
asked Dec 30 '18 at 16:41
Armando j18eosArmando j18eos
2,61511328
2,61511328
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
1
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
1
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03
|
show 1 more comment
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
1
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
1
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
1
1
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
1
1
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03
|
show 1 more comment
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057000%2fpicard-number-and-topology-of-k%25c3%25a4hler-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057000%2fpicard-number-and-topology-of-k%25c3%25a4hler-manifolds%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What sort of topological information do you want to extract? For example, if $X$ is simply connected, $Pic^0=0$. Similarly, (let me assume $X$ is projective), if $rho=1$ (it is always at least one), there are no non-constant morphisms to a smaller dimensional variety.
– Mohan
Dec 30 '18 at 21:21
In particular, I'm interested to the case $rho(X)=1$. For example: if $n=2$, do the curves (as complex analytic subspaces) on $X$ (of dimension $1$) satisfy extra conditions?, if $deg(mathcal{L})=0$, does $c_1(mathcal{L})$ vanish, for whatever $n$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 9:30
1
If $rho=1$, every effective curve is ample. For the second question, it depends where $c_1$ takes values. Typically, in algebraic geometry, $c_1$ takes values in Picard group, so $c_1(L)=0$ would mean $L$ is trivial, stronger than degree being zero. For example, everything in $Pic^0$ has degree zero.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 16:09
Thank you for the first answer, it is very enlighted also for other (unasked) questions. I clarify the second question: let $mathcal{L}$ be a degree $0$ line bundle over a compact Kähler manifold $X$ with $rho(X)=1$; is $c_1(mathcal{L})=0$?
– Armando j18eos
Dec 31 '18 at 16:27
1
For $X$ projective, it is correct if you define $c_1$ as you have. In algebraic geometry, as I said, typically chern classes take values in Chow group, then vanishing of degree is not enough.
– Mohan
Dec 31 '18 at 18:03