Prove that a Jordan measurable set of measure 0 is Riemann integrable












0












$begingroup$


My problem is: I have a set $A$ which is Jordan measurable, and I have a function $f:Arightarrowmathbb{R}$. I need to prove that if the measure of A is $0$, then $f$ is Riemann integrable and furthermore $int_{A}f(x)dx = 0$.


Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 14 at 16:18
















0












$begingroup$


My problem is: I have a set $A$ which is Jordan measurable, and I have a function $f:Arightarrowmathbb{R}$. I need to prove that if the measure of A is $0$, then $f$ is Riemann integrable and furthermore $int_{A}f(x)dx = 0$.


Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 14 at 16:18














0












0








0





$begingroup$


My problem is: I have a set $A$ which is Jordan measurable, and I have a function $f:Arightarrowmathbb{R}$. I need to prove that if the measure of A is $0$, then $f$ is Riemann integrable and furthermore $int_{A}f(x)dx = 0$.


Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




My problem is: I have a set $A$ which is Jordan measurable, and I have a function $f:Arightarrowmathbb{R}$. I need to prove that if the measure of A is $0$, then $f$ is Riemann integrable and furthermore $int_{A}f(x)dx = 0$.


Thank you!







measure-theory riemann-integration






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 14 at 14:58









Raducu MihaiRaducu Mihai

345210




345210












  • $begingroup$
    You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 14 at 16:18


















  • $begingroup$
    You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 14 at 16:18
















$begingroup$
You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 16:18




$begingroup$
You need to show some effort in this and all questions asked here. I sketched a proof below. See if you can fill in the gaps and improve your question.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 14 at 16:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Since $A$ is Jordan measureable it is bounded. The Riemann integral over $A$ is defined as $displaystyle int_Q f chi_A$ where $Q$ is a rectangle containing $A$.



(1) Prove first that the integral of $fchi_A$ over $Q$ actually exists by showing that the integrand is continuous except on a set of measure $0$.



(2) Take any partition $P$ of $Q$. Every subrectangle $R$ of $P$ has nonzero content and cannot be contained in $A$. Thus, $R$ always contains a point where $f(x)chi_A(x) = 0$ and



$$inf_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x) leqslant 0 leqslant sup_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x), $$



This implies that lower and upper Darboux sums satisfy $L(P, fchi_A) leqslant 0 leqslant U(P,f chi_A )$. From here you should be able to prove that the integral (which falls between lower and upper sums) is $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
    $endgroup$
    – Raducu Mihai
    Jan 15 at 11:37












  • $begingroup$
    @RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:58













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073319%2fprove-that-a-jordan-measurable-set-of-measure-0-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Since $A$ is Jordan measureable it is bounded. The Riemann integral over $A$ is defined as $displaystyle int_Q f chi_A$ where $Q$ is a rectangle containing $A$.



(1) Prove first that the integral of $fchi_A$ over $Q$ actually exists by showing that the integrand is continuous except on a set of measure $0$.



(2) Take any partition $P$ of $Q$. Every subrectangle $R$ of $P$ has nonzero content and cannot be contained in $A$. Thus, $R$ always contains a point where $f(x)chi_A(x) = 0$ and



$$inf_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x) leqslant 0 leqslant sup_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x), $$



This implies that lower and upper Darboux sums satisfy $L(P, fchi_A) leqslant 0 leqslant U(P,f chi_A )$. From here you should be able to prove that the integral (which falls between lower and upper sums) is $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
    $endgroup$
    – Raducu Mihai
    Jan 15 at 11:37












  • $begingroup$
    @RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:58


















0












$begingroup$

Since $A$ is Jordan measureable it is bounded. The Riemann integral over $A$ is defined as $displaystyle int_Q f chi_A$ where $Q$ is a rectangle containing $A$.



(1) Prove first that the integral of $fchi_A$ over $Q$ actually exists by showing that the integrand is continuous except on a set of measure $0$.



(2) Take any partition $P$ of $Q$. Every subrectangle $R$ of $P$ has nonzero content and cannot be contained in $A$. Thus, $R$ always contains a point where $f(x)chi_A(x) = 0$ and



$$inf_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x) leqslant 0 leqslant sup_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x), $$



This implies that lower and upper Darboux sums satisfy $L(P, fchi_A) leqslant 0 leqslant U(P,f chi_A )$. From here you should be able to prove that the integral (which falls between lower and upper sums) is $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
    $endgroup$
    – Raducu Mihai
    Jan 15 at 11:37












  • $begingroup$
    @RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:58
















0












0








0





$begingroup$

Since $A$ is Jordan measureable it is bounded. The Riemann integral over $A$ is defined as $displaystyle int_Q f chi_A$ where $Q$ is a rectangle containing $A$.



(1) Prove first that the integral of $fchi_A$ over $Q$ actually exists by showing that the integrand is continuous except on a set of measure $0$.



(2) Take any partition $P$ of $Q$. Every subrectangle $R$ of $P$ has nonzero content and cannot be contained in $A$. Thus, $R$ always contains a point where $f(x)chi_A(x) = 0$ and



$$inf_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x) leqslant 0 leqslant sup_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x), $$



This implies that lower and upper Darboux sums satisfy $L(P, fchi_A) leqslant 0 leqslant U(P,f chi_A )$. From here you should be able to prove that the integral (which falls between lower and upper sums) is $0$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Since $A$ is Jordan measureable it is bounded. The Riemann integral over $A$ is defined as $displaystyle int_Q f chi_A$ where $Q$ is a rectangle containing $A$.



(1) Prove first that the integral of $fchi_A$ over $Q$ actually exists by showing that the integrand is continuous except on a set of measure $0$.



(2) Take any partition $P$ of $Q$. Every subrectangle $R$ of $P$ has nonzero content and cannot be contained in $A$. Thus, $R$ always contains a point where $f(x)chi_A(x) = 0$ and



$$inf_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x) leqslant 0 leqslant sup_{x in R} f(x)chi_A(x), $$



This implies that lower and upper Darboux sums satisfy $L(P, fchi_A) leqslant 0 leqslant U(P,f chi_A )$. From here you should be able to prove that the integral (which falls between lower and upper sums) is $0$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 14 at 16:17









RRLRRL

50.6k42573




50.6k42573












  • $begingroup$
    By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
    $endgroup$
    – Raducu Mihai
    Jan 15 at 11:37












  • $begingroup$
    @RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:58




















  • $begingroup$
    By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
    $endgroup$
    – Raducu Mihai
    Jan 15 at 11:37












  • $begingroup$
    @RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
    $endgroup$
    – RRL
    Jan 15 at 22:58


















$begingroup$
By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
$endgroup$
– Raducu Mihai
Jan 15 at 11:37






$begingroup$
By $chi_A$ you denoted the Jordan measure of $A$, right? I am asking you because I usually denote it by $lambda_A $
$endgroup$
– Raducu Mihai
Jan 15 at 11:37














$begingroup$
@RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 15 at 22:56




$begingroup$
@RaducuMihai: No -- that is not correct. This is the indicator function: $chi_A(x) = 1$ if $x in A$ and $chi_A(x) = 0$ if $x notin A$. We are dealing with Riemann integration. In $mathbb{R}^n$ Riemann integrals are defined first over rectangles where the notion of partitions into subrectangles makes sense. For arbitrary sets the integral is defined as I stated above.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 15 at 22:56












$begingroup$
Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 15 at 22:58






$begingroup$
Also I want to help you but I'm hesitant to take this further. Questions without personal input tend to be closed and ultimately deleted.
$endgroup$
– RRL
Jan 15 at 22:58




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3073319%2fprove-that-a-jordan-measurable-set-of-measure-0-is-riemann-integrable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese