When is a real-valued continuous function on the unit circle the real part of a holomorphic function on the...












1














This is known, but it is taking me some time to find the relevant result. Let $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $D$ is the open unit disk in the complex plane. What are necessary and sufficient conditions on $u$, so that there exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ which extends continuously to a function from $bar{D}$ to $mathbb{C}$, and such that



$Re(f|_{partial D}) = u$ on $partial D$.



A related question is this. Suppose I apply the Schwarz integral formula to $u$. Under what conditions will this give me a function $f$ satisfying the properties above?



Edit: Thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy, who referred me to a theorem in Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, I know that there is a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ such that $Re(f)$ extends continuously to a continuous function from $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$ and agrees with $u$ on $partial D$. My concern is this. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends continuously to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$?



The issue I am worrying about is the following. Let $f: D to mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, such that $Re(f)$ extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$? Maybe the question is trivial, but I don't see the answer immediately.



Edit 2: Using Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis book, more specifically the chapter on $H^p$ spaces, that Kavi Rama Murthy referred me to in his (edited) answer (thank you once more!), one can say that necessary and sufficient conditions for a continuous complex-valued function on $partial D$ to be the radial limit of a holomorphic function defined in $D$, is for it to have vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies (this follows from a theorem by Titchmarsh). But this does not exactly answer my original question yet.



When is a continuous real function on $partial D$ the real part of a complex-valued continuous function on $partial D$ with vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies? I feel that this is much easier to answer though than my original question.



Edit 3: Towards answering my question in edit 2, can't one do a folding of the Fourier coefficients? What I mean is the following. Let $u$ be a real continuous function on $partial D$. Write



$u = u_- + u_0 + u_+$



where $u_-$ is the negative frequency part of $u$, $u_+$ is its positive frequency part, and $u_0$ is its constant part. Note that $u_-$ is the complex conjugate of $u_+$.



Then define the function $u_0 + 2 u_+$ on $partial D$. Its real part is $u$ and, moreover, all its negative frequency terms vanish. This shows that given a continuous function $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$, there always exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$, whose radial limits $f^*(theta)$ exist almost everywhere on $partial D$ and such that $Re(f) = u$ on the boundary $partial D$. Can someone please confirm if the argument outlined here makes sense? Many thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy! The only subtlety remaining here is that $f^*$ is obtained from $f$ by radial limits. If one defines a new function $F$ by $f$ on $D$ and by $f^*$ on $partial D$, is $F$ necessarily continuous? Or, what extra conditions can we impose on $u$ to guarantee continuity of $F$?



Edit 4: it turns out, after a private communication with a complex analysis expert, that the answer to my original question is in general "no". Indeed, one can construct a Riemann map from the open unit disk onto a kind of vertical strip, which gets narrower and narrower as you approach infinity. Its real part extends continuously to the boundary, yet its imaginary part is discontinuous at two points (which get mapped to infinity).










share|cite|improve this question
























  • When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:06












  • The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 9:09










  • @JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:10












  • @Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:13










  • @KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:14


















1














This is known, but it is taking me some time to find the relevant result. Let $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $D$ is the open unit disk in the complex plane. What are necessary and sufficient conditions on $u$, so that there exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ which extends continuously to a function from $bar{D}$ to $mathbb{C}$, and such that



$Re(f|_{partial D}) = u$ on $partial D$.



A related question is this. Suppose I apply the Schwarz integral formula to $u$. Under what conditions will this give me a function $f$ satisfying the properties above?



Edit: Thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy, who referred me to a theorem in Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, I know that there is a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ such that $Re(f)$ extends continuously to a continuous function from $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$ and agrees with $u$ on $partial D$. My concern is this. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends continuously to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$?



The issue I am worrying about is the following. Let $f: D to mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, such that $Re(f)$ extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$? Maybe the question is trivial, but I don't see the answer immediately.



Edit 2: Using Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis book, more specifically the chapter on $H^p$ spaces, that Kavi Rama Murthy referred me to in his (edited) answer (thank you once more!), one can say that necessary and sufficient conditions for a continuous complex-valued function on $partial D$ to be the radial limit of a holomorphic function defined in $D$, is for it to have vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies (this follows from a theorem by Titchmarsh). But this does not exactly answer my original question yet.



When is a continuous real function on $partial D$ the real part of a complex-valued continuous function on $partial D$ with vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies? I feel that this is much easier to answer though than my original question.



Edit 3: Towards answering my question in edit 2, can't one do a folding of the Fourier coefficients? What I mean is the following. Let $u$ be a real continuous function on $partial D$. Write



$u = u_- + u_0 + u_+$



where $u_-$ is the negative frequency part of $u$, $u_+$ is its positive frequency part, and $u_0$ is its constant part. Note that $u_-$ is the complex conjugate of $u_+$.



Then define the function $u_0 + 2 u_+$ on $partial D$. Its real part is $u$ and, moreover, all its negative frequency terms vanish. This shows that given a continuous function $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$, there always exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$, whose radial limits $f^*(theta)$ exist almost everywhere on $partial D$ and such that $Re(f) = u$ on the boundary $partial D$. Can someone please confirm if the argument outlined here makes sense? Many thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy! The only subtlety remaining here is that $f^*$ is obtained from $f$ by radial limits. If one defines a new function $F$ by $f$ on $D$ and by $f^*$ on $partial D$, is $F$ necessarily continuous? Or, what extra conditions can we impose on $u$ to guarantee continuity of $F$?



Edit 4: it turns out, after a private communication with a complex analysis expert, that the answer to my original question is in general "no". Indeed, one can construct a Riemann map from the open unit disk onto a kind of vertical strip, which gets narrower and narrower as you approach infinity. Its real part extends continuously to the boundary, yet its imaginary part is discontinuous at two points (which get mapped to infinity).










share|cite|improve this question
























  • When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:06












  • The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 9:09










  • @JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:10












  • @Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:13










  • @KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:14
















1












1








1







This is known, but it is taking me some time to find the relevant result. Let $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $D$ is the open unit disk in the complex plane. What are necessary and sufficient conditions on $u$, so that there exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ which extends continuously to a function from $bar{D}$ to $mathbb{C}$, and such that



$Re(f|_{partial D}) = u$ on $partial D$.



A related question is this. Suppose I apply the Schwarz integral formula to $u$. Under what conditions will this give me a function $f$ satisfying the properties above?



Edit: Thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy, who referred me to a theorem in Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, I know that there is a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ such that $Re(f)$ extends continuously to a continuous function from $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$ and agrees with $u$ on $partial D$. My concern is this. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends continuously to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$?



The issue I am worrying about is the following. Let $f: D to mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, such that $Re(f)$ extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$? Maybe the question is trivial, but I don't see the answer immediately.



Edit 2: Using Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis book, more specifically the chapter on $H^p$ spaces, that Kavi Rama Murthy referred me to in his (edited) answer (thank you once more!), one can say that necessary and sufficient conditions for a continuous complex-valued function on $partial D$ to be the radial limit of a holomorphic function defined in $D$, is for it to have vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies (this follows from a theorem by Titchmarsh). But this does not exactly answer my original question yet.



When is a continuous real function on $partial D$ the real part of a complex-valued continuous function on $partial D$ with vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies? I feel that this is much easier to answer though than my original question.



Edit 3: Towards answering my question in edit 2, can't one do a folding of the Fourier coefficients? What I mean is the following. Let $u$ be a real continuous function on $partial D$. Write



$u = u_- + u_0 + u_+$



where $u_-$ is the negative frequency part of $u$, $u_+$ is its positive frequency part, and $u_0$ is its constant part. Note that $u_-$ is the complex conjugate of $u_+$.



Then define the function $u_0 + 2 u_+$ on $partial D$. Its real part is $u$ and, moreover, all its negative frequency terms vanish. This shows that given a continuous function $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$, there always exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$, whose radial limits $f^*(theta)$ exist almost everywhere on $partial D$ and such that $Re(f) = u$ on the boundary $partial D$. Can someone please confirm if the argument outlined here makes sense? Many thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy! The only subtlety remaining here is that $f^*$ is obtained from $f$ by radial limits. If one defines a new function $F$ by $f$ on $D$ and by $f^*$ on $partial D$, is $F$ necessarily continuous? Or, what extra conditions can we impose on $u$ to guarantee continuity of $F$?



Edit 4: it turns out, after a private communication with a complex analysis expert, that the answer to my original question is in general "no". Indeed, one can construct a Riemann map from the open unit disk onto a kind of vertical strip, which gets narrower and narrower as you approach infinity. Its real part extends continuously to the boundary, yet its imaginary part is discontinuous at two points (which get mapped to infinity).










share|cite|improve this question















This is known, but it is taking me some time to find the relevant result. Let $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$ be a continuous function, where $D$ is the open unit disk in the complex plane. What are necessary and sufficient conditions on $u$, so that there exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ which extends continuously to a function from $bar{D}$ to $mathbb{C}$, and such that



$Re(f|_{partial D}) = u$ on $partial D$.



A related question is this. Suppose I apply the Schwarz integral formula to $u$. Under what conditions will this give me a function $f$ satisfying the properties above?



Edit: Thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy, who referred me to a theorem in Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis, I know that there is a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$ such that $Re(f)$ extends continuously to a continuous function from $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$ and agrees with $u$ on $partial D$. My concern is this. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends continuously to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$?



The issue I am worrying about is the following. Let $f: D to mathbb{C}$ be holomorphic, such that $Re(f)$ extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$. Are we guaranteed that $Im(f)$ also extends to a continuous function $bar{D} to mathbb{R}$? Maybe the question is trivial, but I don't see the answer immediately.



Edit 2: Using Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis book, more specifically the chapter on $H^p$ spaces, that Kavi Rama Murthy referred me to in his (edited) answer (thank you once more!), one can say that necessary and sufficient conditions for a continuous complex-valued function on $partial D$ to be the radial limit of a holomorphic function defined in $D$, is for it to have vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies (this follows from a theorem by Titchmarsh). But this does not exactly answer my original question yet.



When is a continuous real function on $partial D$ the real part of a complex-valued continuous function on $partial D$ with vanishing Fourier coefficients for all negative frequencies? I feel that this is much easier to answer though than my original question.



Edit 3: Towards answering my question in edit 2, can't one do a folding of the Fourier coefficients? What I mean is the following. Let $u$ be a real continuous function on $partial D$. Write



$u = u_- + u_0 + u_+$



where $u_-$ is the negative frequency part of $u$, $u_+$ is its positive frequency part, and $u_0$ is its constant part. Note that $u_-$ is the complex conjugate of $u_+$.



Then define the function $u_0 + 2 u_+$ on $partial D$. Its real part is $u$ and, moreover, all its negative frequency terms vanish. This shows that given a continuous function $u: partial D to mathbb{R}$, there always exists a holomorphic function $f: D to mathbb{C}$, whose radial limits $f^*(theta)$ exist almost everywhere on $partial D$ and such that $Re(f) = u$ on the boundary $partial D$. Can someone please confirm if the argument outlined here makes sense? Many thanks to Kavi Rama Murthy! The only subtlety remaining here is that $f^*$ is obtained from $f$ by radial limits. If one defines a new function $F$ by $f$ on $D$ and by $f^*$ on $partial D$, is $F$ necessarily continuous? Or, what extra conditions can we impose on $u$ to guarantee continuity of $F$?



Edit 4: it turns out, after a private communication with a complex analysis expert, that the answer to my original question is in general "no". Indeed, one can construct a Riemann map from the open unit disk onto a kind of vertical strip, which gets narrower and narrower as you approach infinity. Its real part extends continuously to the boundary, yet its imaginary part is discontinuous at two points (which get mapped to infinity).







complex-analysis holomorphic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 1 at 16:35

























asked Jan 1 at 9:04









Malkoun

1,8411612




1,8411612












  • When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:06












  • The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 9:09










  • @JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:10












  • @Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:13










  • @KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:14




















  • When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:06












  • The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 9:09










  • @JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:10












  • @Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
    – Jacky Chong
    Jan 1 at 9:13










  • @KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 9:14


















When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
– Jacky Chong
Jan 1 at 9:06






When it satisfies the laplace equation, i.e. $Delta u = 0$.
– Jacky Chong
Jan 1 at 9:06














The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 1 at 9:09




The first question is the Dirichlet problem and it always has a solution. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_problem
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 1 at 9:09












@JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
– Malkoun
Jan 1 at 9:10






@JackyChong, $u$ may not be smooth at some points of the boundary. For instance, you can take $u$ to be the real part of a Schwarz-Christoffel mapping. Then in this case, $u$ may not be differentiable at some preimages.
– Malkoun
Jan 1 at 9:10














@Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
– Jacky Chong
Jan 1 at 9:13




@Malkoun Do you mean on the boundary? The condition only applies in the interior. Since $u$ must be the real part of an analytic function then $u$ is pretty smooth.
– Jacky Chong
Jan 1 at 9:13












@KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
– Malkoun
Jan 1 at 9:14






@KaviRamaMurthy, the Dirichlet problem allows us to find a harmonic $u$ on the disk, which extends continuously to $bar{D}$, and is the original function on the boundary. One can then find its conjugate $v$ inside the disk. But are we guaranteed that such a $v$ extends continuously to the boundary $partial D$?
– Malkoun
Jan 1 at 9:14












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














The question in the title is a standard result in Complex Analysis and the holomorphic function can be constructed using Poisson integrals. Rudin's RCA has a theorem which proves this. See the section on Poisson integral (second theorem in that section). However not every continuous function on the boundary is the boundary function of a holomorphic function that extends continuously to the boundary. In particular if the function is zero on a set of positive measure it must be identically zero. See the chapter on $H_p$ spaces in Rudin for conditions on $f$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 11:22












  • @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 12:10










  • Thank you once more!
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 12:26










  • This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
    – zhw.
    Jan 1 at 17:21










  • @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 2 at 13:10



















0














After exchanging some emails with an expert in complex analysis (Chris Bishop), he informed me of the following.



C. Bishop wrote "Consider the Riemann map $f$ from the unit disk to the unbounded simply connected region $W = { x+iy: 0 < x< 1/(1+y^2)}$; this is like an infinite vertical strip, except that the ends get thinner as we move up or down to infinity. The real part u of f is bounded and continuous, but the imaginary part v is unbounded at two points, hence discontinuous.



In general, the boundary values of u and v are related by the Hilbert transform (this is given by a certain singular integral formal, or has a simple expression in terms of the Fourier transform and is one of the most well studied operators in analysis) and it turns out that (as in the example above), the Hilbert transform of a continuous function need not be continuous. If one strengthens the continuity assumption to something like Holder continuous, then there is a positive result: the Hilbert transform of a Holder continuous function is also Holder continuous. The sharpest condition of this type is given by what is called a 'Dini condition' (e.g., see Theorem II.1.3 of John Garnett's book 'Bounded Analytic Functions'); most continuous functions arising in practice will satisfy this, so the answer to your originally question is that very often f will extend continuously to the circle, but there are a few, slightly exotic, examples where it does not.



For the definitions of Hilbert transform and Dini continuous see (or many books on Harmonic or Euclidean analysis)



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dini_continuity"



I am uneasy with getting points for information someone else gave, so please do not upvote this answer. I did get C. Bishop's consent though, and I am only posting it because it could be useful to others.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    0














    If you are lucky enough to have



    $$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}|hat u (n)|<infty,$$



    where $hat u (n)$ is the $n$th Fourier coefficient of $u,$ then the unique harmonic conjugate $v$ of $u$ with $v(0)=0$ has the same property. This is simple: $hat v (n) = -i(text {sgn }n)hat u (n)$ for each $n.$ It follows that $u+iv$ is continuous on the closed disc.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 21:18










    • A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 21:19










    • The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
      – zhw.
      yesterday












    • Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
      – Malkoun
      yesterday











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058302%2fwhen-is-a-real-valued-continuous-function-on-the-unit-circle-the-real-part-of-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The question in the title is a standard result in Complex Analysis and the holomorphic function can be constructed using Poisson integrals. Rudin's RCA has a theorem which proves this. See the section on Poisson integral (second theorem in that section). However not every continuous function on the boundary is the boundary function of a holomorphic function that extends continuously to the boundary. In particular if the function is zero on a set of positive measure it must be identically zero. See the chapter on $H_p$ spaces in Rudin for conditions on $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 11:22












    • @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Jan 1 at 12:10










    • Thank you once more!
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 12:26










    • This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
      – zhw.
      Jan 1 at 17:21










    • @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 13:10
















    1














    The question in the title is a standard result in Complex Analysis and the holomorphic function can be constructed using Poisson integrals. Rudin's RCA has a theorem which proves this. See the section on Poisson integral (second theorem in that section). However not every continuous function on the boundary is the boundary function of a holomorphic function that extends continuously to the boundary. In particular if the function is zero on a set of positive measure it must be identically zero. See the chapter on $H_p$ spaces in Rudin for conditions on $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 11:22












    • @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Jan 1 at 12:10










    • Thank you once more!
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 12:26










    • This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
      – zhw.
      Jan 1 at 17:21










    • @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 13:10














    1












    1








    1






    The question in the title is a standard result in Complex Analysis and the holomorphic function can be constructed using Poisson integrals. Rudin's RCA has a theorem which proves this. See the section on Poisson integral (second theorem in that section). However not every continuous function on the boundary is the boundary function of a holomorphic function that extends continuously to the boundary. In particular if the function is zero on a set of positive measure it must be identically zero. See the chapter on $H_p$ spaces in Rudin for conditions on $f$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    The question in the title is a standard result in Complex Analysis and the holomorphic function can be constructed using Poisson integrals. Rudin's RCA has a theorem which proves this. See the section on Poisson integral (second theorem in that section). However not every continuous function on the boundary is the boundary function of a holomorphic function that extends continuously to the boundary. In particular if the function is zero on a set of positive measure it must be identically zero. See the chapter on $H_p$ spaces in Rudin for conditions on $f$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 1 at 12:09

























    answered Jan 1 at 9:21









    Kavi Rama Murthy

    51.2k31855




    51.2k31855












    • Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 11:22












    • @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Jan 1 at 12:10










    • Thank you once more!
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 12:26










    • This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
      – zhw.
      Jan 1 at 17:21










    • @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 13:10


















    • Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 11:22












    • @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
      – Kavi Rama Murthy
      Jan 1 at 12:10










    • Thank you once more!
      – Malkoun
      Jan 1 at 12:26










    • This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
      – zhw.
      Jan 1 at 17:21










    • @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
      – Malkoun
      Jan 2 at 13:10
















    Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 11:22






    Dear Kavi Rama Murthy, I saw the theorem you mentioned, as well as the proof, but strictly speaking, it only shows that there is a holomorphic function on the open unit disk whose real part extends continuously to the boundary and is equal to the original continous function on the boundary. The proof does not show that the imaginary part of this holomorphic function also extends continuously to the boundary. It is a subtlety, but I do want to make sure that this a 100% true, because I would like to use the result in an article.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 11:22














    @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 12:10




    @Malkoun I have edited my answer.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 1 at 12:10












    Thank you once more!
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 12:26




    Thank you once more!
    – Malkoun
    Jan 1 at 12:26












    This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
    – zhw.
    Jan 1 at 17:21




    This doesn't answer the OP's question; it provides ancillary information.
    – zhw.
    Jan 1 at 17:21












    @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 2 at 13:10




    @zhw., I have posted C. Bishop's email as an answer, hoping it would be useful to others.
    – Malkoun
    Jan 2 at 13:10











    0














    After exchanging some emails with an expert in complex analysis (Chris Bishop), he informed me of the following.



    C. Bishop wrote "Consider the Riemann map $f$ from the unit disk to the unbounded simply connected region $W = { x+iy: 0 < x< 1/(1+y^2)}$; this is like an infinite vertical strip, except that the ends get thinner as we move up or down to infinity. The real part u of f is bounded and continuous, but the imaginary part v is unbounded at two points, hence discontinuous.



    In general, the boundary values of u and v are related by the Hilbert transform (this is given by a certain singular integral formal, or has a simple expression in terms of the Fourier transform and is one of the most well studied operators in analysis) and it turns out that (as in the example above), the Hilbert transform of a continuous function need not be continuous. If one strengthens the continuity assumption to something like Holder continuous, then there is a positive result: the Hilbert transform of a Holder continuous function is also Holder continuous. The sharpest condition of this type is given by what is called a 'Dini condition' (e.g., see Theorem II.1.3 of John Garnett's book 'Bounded Analytic Functions'); most continuous functions arising in practice will satisfy this, so the answer to your originally question is that very often f will extend continuously to the circle, but there are a few, slightly exotic, examples where it does not.



    For the definitions of Hilbert transform and Dini continuous see (or many books on Harmonic or Euclidean analysis)



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition



    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dini_continuity"



    I am uneasy with getting points for information someone else gave, so please do not upvote this answer. I did get C. Bishop's consent though, and I am only posting it because it could be useful to others.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      After exchanging some emails with an expert in complex analysis (Chris Bishop), he informed me of the following.



      C. Bishop wrote "Consider the Riemann map $f$ from the unit disk to the unbounded simply connected region $W = { x+iy: 0 < x< 1/(1+y^2)}$; this is like an infinite vertical strip, except that the ends get thinner as we move up or down to infinity. The real part u of f is bounded and continuous, but the imaginary part v is unbounded at two points, hence discontinuous.



      In general, the boundary values of u and v are related by the Hilbert transform (this is given by a certain singular integral formal, or has a simple expression in terms of the Fourier transform and is one of the most well studied operators in analysis) and it turns out that (as in the example above), the Hilbert transform of a continuous function need not be continuous. If one strengthens the continuity assumption to something like Holder continuous, then there is a positive result: the Hilbert transform of a Holder continuous function is also Holder continuous. The sharpest condition of this type is given by what is called a 'Dini condition' (e.g., see Theorem II.1.3 of John Garnett's book 'Bounded Analytic Functions'); most continuous functions arising in practice will satisfy this, so the answer to your originally question is that very often f will extend continuously to the circle, but there are a few, slightly exotic, examples where it does not.



      For the definitions of Hilbert transform and Dini continuous see (or many books on Harmonic or Euclidean analysis)



      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform



      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition



      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dini_continuity"



      I am uneasy with getting points for information someone else gave, so please do not upvote this answer. I did get C. Bishop's consent though, and I am only posting it because it could be useful to others.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        After exchanging some emails with an expert in complex analysis (Chris Bishop), he informed me of the following.



        C. Bishop wrote "Consider the Riemann map $f$ from the unit disk to the unbounded simply connected region $W = { x+iy: 0 < x< 1/(1+y^2)}$; this is like an infinite vertical strip, except that the ends get thinner as we move up or down to infinity. The real part u of f is bounded and continuous, but the imaginary part v is unbounded at two points, hence discontinuous.



        In general, the boundary values of u and v are related by the Hilbert transform (this is given by a certain singular integral formal, or has a simple expression in terms of the Fourier transform and is one of the most well studied operators in analysis) and it turns out that (as in the example above), the Hilbert transform of a continuous function need not be continuous. If one strengthens the continuity assumption to something like Holder continuous, then there is a positive result: the Hilbert transform of a Holder continuous function is also Holder continuous. The sharpest condition of this type is given by what is called a 'Dini condition' (e.g., see Theorem II.1.3 of John Garnett's book 'Bounded Analytic Functions'); most continuous functions arising in practice will satisfy this, so the answer to your originally question is that very often f will extend continuously to the circle, but there are a few, slightly exotic, examples where it does not.



        For the definitions of Hilbert transform and Dini continuous see (or many books on Harmonic or Euclidean analysis)



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dini_continuity"



        I am uneasy with getting points for information someone else gave, so please do not upvote this answer. I did get C. Bishop's consent though, and I am only posting it because it could be useful to others.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        After exchanging some emails with an expert in complex analysis (Chris Bishop), he informed me of the following.



        C. Bishop wrote "Consider the Riemann map $f$ from the unit disk to the unbounded simply connected region $W = { x+iy: 0 < x< 1/(1+y^2)}$; this is like an infinite vertical strip, except that the ends get thinner as we move up or down to infinity. The real part u of f is bounded and continuous, but the imaginary part v is unbounded at two points, hence discontinuous.



        In general, the boundary values of u and v are related by the Hilbert transform (this is given by a certain singular integral formal, or has a simple expression in terms of the Fourier transform and is one of the most well studied operators in analysis) and it turns out that (as in the example above), the Hilbert transform of a continuous function need not be continuous. If one strengthens the continuity assumption to something like Holder continuous, then there is a positive result: the Hilbert transform of a Holder continuous function is also Holder continuous. The sharpest condition of this type is given by what is called a 'Dini condition' (e.g., see Theorem II.1.3 of John Garnett's book 'Bounded Analytic Functions'); most continuous functions arising in practice will satisfy this, so the answer to your originally question is that very often f will extend continuously to the circle, but there are a few, slightly exotic, examples where it does not.



        For the definitions of Hilbert transform and Dini continuous see (or many books on Harmonic or Euclidean analysis)



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert_transform



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H%C3%B6lder_condition



        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dini_continuity"



        I am uneasy with getting points for information someone else gave, so please do not upvote this answer. I did get C. Bishop's consent though, and I am only posting it because it could be useful to others.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 2 at 13:09









        Malkoun

        1,8411612




        1,8411612























            0














            If you are lucky enough to have



            $$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}|hat u (n)|<infty,$$



            where $hat u (n)$ is the $n$th Fourier coefficient of $u,$ then the unique harmonic conjugate $v$ of $u$ with $v(0)=0$ has the same property. This is simple: $hat v (n) = -i(text {sgn }n)hat u (n)$ for each $n.$ It follows that $u+iv$ is continuous on the closed disc.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:18










            • A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:19










            • The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
              – zhw.
              yesterday












            • Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
              – Malkoun
              yesterday
















            0














            If you are lucky enough to have



            $$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}|hat u (n)|<infty,$$



            where $hat u (n)$ is the $n$th Fourier coefficient of $u,$ then the unique harmonic conjugate $v$ of $u$ with $v(0)=0$ has the same property. This is simple: $hat v (n) = -i(text {sgn }n)hat u (n)$ for each $n.$ It follows that $u+iv$ is continuous on the closed disc.






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:18










            • A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:19










            • The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
              – zhw.
              yesterday












            • Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
              – Malkoun
              yesterday














            0












            0








            0






            If you are lucky enough to have



            $$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}|hat u (n)|<infty,$$



            where $hat u (n)$ is the $n$th Fourier coefficient of $u,$ then the unique harmonic conjugate $v$ of $u$ with $v(0)=0$ has the same property. This is simple: $hat v (n) = -i(text {sgn }n)hat u (n)$ for each $n.$ It follows that $u+iv$ is continuous on the closed disc.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            If you are lucky enough to have



            $$sum_{n=-infty}^{infty}|hat u (n)|<infty,$$



            where $hat u (n)$ is the $n$th Fourier coefficient of $u,$ then the unique harmonic conjugate $v$ of $u$ with $v(0)=0$ has the same property. This is simple: $hat v (n) = -i(text {sgn }n)hat u (n)$ for each $n.$ It follows that $u+iv$ is continuous on the closed disc.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered Jan 2 at 20:24









            zhw.

            71.7k43075




            71.7k43075












            • Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:18










            • A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:19










            • The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
              – zhw.
              yesterday












            • Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
              – Malkoun
              yesterday


















            • Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:18










            • A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
              – Malkoun
              Jan 2 at 21:19










            • The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
              – zhw.
              yesterday












            • Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
              – Malkoun
              yesterday
















            Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
            – Malkoun
            Jan 2 at 21:18




            Interesting addition to the discussion! Thank you. I am a bit rusty on my Fourier analysis. Could you please explain a bit how you get that $v$ is continuous in this case please?
            – Malkoun
            Jan 2 at 21:18












            A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
            – Malkoun
            Jan 2 at 21:19




            A minor typo, you mean $sgn(n)$.
            – Malkoun
            Jan 2 at 21:19












            The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
            – zhw.
            yesterday






            The continuity of $v$ on $bar D$ follows from the Weierstrass M test.
            – zhw.
            yesterday














            Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
            – Malkoun
            yesterday




            Yes true! It is even uniformly continuous.
            – Malkoun
            yesterday


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058302%2fwhen-is-a-real-valued-continuous-function-on-the-unit-circle-the-real-part-of-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?