Proving that these four vectors form a parallelogramm












0














I am given four vectors in three-dimensional space and I want to check if they form a parallelogramm. The vectors are:



$$vec{p}=begin{pmatrix}2 \ 0\3 end {pmatrix},vec{q}=begin{pmatrix}8 \ 1\1 end {pmatrix},vec{r}=begin{pmatrix}6 \ -2\-1 end {pmatrix},vec{s}=begin{pmatrix}12 \ -1\-3 end {pmatrix}$$



I read this answer where Jack D'Aurizio states:




The convex quadrilateral $ABCD$ is a parallelogram if and only if the midpoint of $AC$ is the midpoint of $BD$, too. Hence you just need to compute $binom{4}{2}=6$ midpoints and check that two of them are the same point.




I tried to use this and computed all the line segment joining the vertices of the parallelogramm by subtracting the vectors.



$$vec{p}-vec{q}=(-6,-1,2)^T \ vec{p}-vec{r}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{p}-vec{s}=(-10,1,6)^T \ vec{q}-vec{r}=(2,3,2)^T \ vec{q}-vec{s}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{r}-vec{s}=(-6,-1,2)^T$$



I am not sure how to continue now. Also, I wasn't sure if the order of vector subtraction matters here. Any ideas?










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    I am given four vectors in three-dimensional space and I want to check if they form a parallelogramm. The vectors are:



    $$vec{p}=begin{pmatrix}2 \ 0\3 end {pmatrix},vec{q}=begin{pmatrix}8 \ 1\1 end {pmatrix},vec{r}=begin{pmatrix}6 \ -2\-1 end {pmatrix},vec{s}=begin{pmatrix}12 \ -1\-3 end {pmatrix}$$



    I read this answer where Jack D'Aurizio states:




    The convex quadrilateral $ABCD$ is a parallelogram if and only if the midpoint of $AC$ is the midpoint of $BD$, too. Hence you just need to compute $binom{4}{2}=6$ midpoints and check that two of them are the same point.




    I tried to use this and computed all the line segment joining the vertices of the parallelogramm by subtracting the vectors.



    $$vec{p}-vec{q}=(-6,-1,2)^T \ vec{p}-vec{r}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{p}-vec{s}=(-10,1,6)^T \ vec{q}-vec{r}=(2,3,2)^T \ vec{q}-vec{s}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{r}-vec{s}=(-6,-1,2)^T$$



    I am not sure how to continue now. Also, I wasn't sure if the order of vector subtraction matters here. Any ideas?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      I am given four vectors in three-dimensional space and I want to check if they form a parallelogramm. The vectors are:



      $$vec{p}=begin{pmatrix}2 \ 0\3 end {pmatrix},vec{q}=begin{pmatrix}8 \ 1\1 end {pmatrix},vec{r}=begin{pmatrix}6 \ -2\-1 end {pmatrix},vec{s}=begin{pmatrix}12 \ -1\-3 end {pmatrix}$$



      I read this answer where Jack D'Aurizio states:




      The convex quadrilateral $ABCD$ is a parallelogram if and only if the midpoint of $AC$ is the midpoint of $BD$, too. Hence you just need to compute $binom{4}{2}=6$ midpoints and check that two of them are the same point.




      I tried to use this and computed all the line segment joining the vertices of the parallelogramm by subtracting the vectors.



      $$vec{p}-vec{q}=(-6,-1,2)^T \ vec{p}-vec{r}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{p}-vec{s}=(-10,1,6)^T \ vec{q}-vec{r}=(2,3,2)^T \ vec{q}-vec{s}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{r}-vec{s}=(-6,-1,2)^T$$



      I am not sure how to continue now. Also, I wasn't sure if the order of vector subtraction matters here. Any ideas?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am given four vectors in three-dimensional space and I want to check if they form a parallelogramm. The vectors are:



      $$vec{p}=begin{pmatrix}2 \ 0\3 end {pmatrix},vec{q}=begin{pmatrix}8 \ 1\1 end {pmatrix},vec{r}=begin{pmatrix}6 \ -2\-1 end {pmatrix},vec{s}=begin{pmatrix}12 \ -1\-3 end {pmatrix}$$



      I read this answer where Jack D'Aurizio states:




      The convex quadrilateral $ABCD$ is a parallelogram if and only if the midpoint of $AC$ is the midpoint of $BD$, too. Hence you just need to compute $binom{4}{2}=6$ midpoints and check that two of them are the same point.




      I tried to use this and computed all the line segment joining the vertices of the parallelogramm by subtracting the vectors.



      $$vec{p}-vec{q}=(-6,-1,2)^T \ vec{p}-vec{r}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{p}-vec{s}=(-10,1,6)^T \ vec{q}-vec{r}=(2,3,2)^T \ vec{q}-vec{s}=(-4,2,4)^T \ vec{r}-vec{s}=(-6,-1,2)^T$$



      I am not sure how to continue now. Also, I wasn't sure if the order of vector subtraction matters here. Any ideas?







      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 6 at 11:22









      NullspaceNullspace

      326110




      326110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Notice that $$frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$



          Hence $PQSR$ is a parallelogram.



          That is we have $vec{p}-vec{q} = vec{r}-vec{s}$ and $vec{p}-vec{r}=vec{q}-vec{s}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:45












          • I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:50











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063735%2fproving-that-these-four-vectors-form-a-parallelogramm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Notice that $$frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$



          Hence $PQSR$ is a parallelogram.



          That is we have $vec{p}-vec{q} = vec{r}-vec{s}$ and $vec{p}-vec{r}=vec{q}-vec{s}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:45












          • I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:50
















          1














          Notice that $$frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$



          Hence $PQSR$ is a parallelogram.



          That is we have $vec{p}-vec{q} = vec{r}-vec{s}$ and $vec{p}-vec{r}=vec{q}-vec{s}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:45












          • I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:50














          1












          1








          1






          Notice that $$frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$



          Hence $PQSR$ is a parallelogram.



          That is we have $vec{p}-vec{q} = vec{r}-vec{s}$ and $vec{p}-vec{r}=vec{q}-vec{s}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Notice that $$frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$



          Hence $PQSR$ is a parallelogram.



          That is we have $vec{p}-vec{q} = vec{r}-vec{s}$ and $vec{p}-vec{r}=vec{q}-vec{s}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 6 at 11:27









          Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh

          99.9k1465117




          99.9k1465117












          • Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:45












          • I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:50


















          • Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:45












          • I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
            – Nullspace
            Jan 6 at 11:50
















          Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
          – Nullspace
          Jan 6 at 11:45






          Thank you for your answer. This might be a stupid question but how do I know that: $$text{PQRS is a parallelogramm} iff frac{vec{p}+vec{s}}2 = frac{vec{q}+vec{r}}2$$
          – Nullspace
          Jan 6 at 11:45














          I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
          – Nullspace
          Jan 6 at 11:50




          I will check that out and come back if I have any more questions. Thanks again.
          – Nullspace
          Jan 6 at 11:50


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063735%2fproving-that-these-four-vectors-form-a-parallelogramm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?