Portable check empty directory












7















With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
(ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



set *
if [ -e "$1" ]
then
echo 'not empty'
else
echo 'empty'
fi


However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



% set *
zsh: no matches found: *

% echo "$? $#"
1 0


So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



% { set *; echo 2; }
zsh: no matches found: *


Compare with Bash and Dash:



$ { set *; echo 2; }
2


Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    7















    With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
    (ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



    set *
    if [ -e "$1" ]
    then
    echo 'not empty'
    else
    echo 'empty'
    fi


    However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



    % set *
    zsh: no matches found: *

    % echo "$? $#"
    1 0


    So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
    I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



    % { set *; echo 2; }
    zsh: no matches found: *


    Compare with Bash and Dash:



    $ { set *; echo 2; }
    2


    Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      7












      7








      7








      With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
      (ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



      set *
      if [ -e "$1" ]
      then
      echo 'not empty'
      else
      echo 'empty'
      fi


      However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



      % set *
      zsh: no matches found: *

      % echo "$? $#"
      1 0


      So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
      I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



      % { set *; echo 2; }
      zsh: no matches found: *


      Compare with Bash and Dash:



      $ { set *; echo 2; }
      2


      Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      With Bash and Dash, you can check for an empty directory using just the shell
      (ignore dotfiles to keep things simple):



      set *
      if [ -e "$1" ]
      then
      echo 'not empty'
      else
      echo 'empty'
      fi


      However I recently learned that Zsh fails spectacularly in this case:



      % set *
      zsh: no matches found: *

      % echo "$? $#"
      1 0


      So not only does the set command fail, but it doesn't even set $@. I suppose
      I could test if $# is 0, but it appears that Zsh even stops execution:



      % { set *; echo 2; }
      zsh: no matches found: *


      Compare with Bash and Dash:



      $ { set *; echo 2; }
      2


      Can this be done in a way that works in bash, dash and zsh?







      bash zsh wildcards portability dash






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 1:28









      terdon

      129k32253428




      129k32253428






      New contributor




      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Jan 7 at 1:06









      ThreeThree

      362




      362




      New contributor




      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Three is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6














          While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



          setopt -o nonomatch


          While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



          setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


          This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



          As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



            rm -rf empty_dir/
            mkdir empty_dir/
            pwd
            cd empty_dir/
            pwd
            dir_empty(){

            # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
            if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
            # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
            setopt +o nomatch
            fi

            set -- * .*
            echo "$@"
            for i; do
            [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
            [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
            done
            echo "Empty" && return 0
            }
            dir_empty
            touch '*'
            dir_empty


            The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





            Try it online in ksh!



            Try it online in zsh!






            share|improve this answer


























            • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 2:25











            • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

              – thrig
              Jan 7 at 3:02











            • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:16











            • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

              – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
              Jan 7 at 3:18











            • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

              – Three
              Jan 7 at 3:20











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Three is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492912%2fportable-check-empty-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6














            While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



            setopt -o nonomatch


            While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



            setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


            This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



            As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






            share|improve this answer






























              6














              While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



              setopt -o nonomatch


              While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



              setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


              This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



              As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






              share|improve this answer




























                6












                6








                6







                While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



                setopt -o nonomatch


                While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



                setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


                This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



                As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.






                share|improve this answer















                While zsh's default behaviour is to give an error, this is controlled by the nomatch option. You can unset the option to leave the * in place the way that bash and dash do:



                setopt -o nonomatch


                While that command won't work in either of the others, you can just ignore that:



                setopt -o nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true ; set *


                This runs setopt on zsh, and suppresses the error output (2>/dev/null) and return code (|| true) of the failed command on the others.



                As written it's problematic if there is a file, for example, -e: then you will run set -e and change the shell options to terminate whenever a command fails; there are worse outcomes if you're creative. set -- * will be safer and prevent the option changes.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 7 at 2:02

























                answered Jan 7 at 1:55









                Michael HomerMichael Homer

                46.5k8122161




                46.5k8122161

























                    2














                    Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



                    rm -rf empty_dir/
                    mkdir empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    cd empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    dir_empty(){

                    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
                    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
                    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
                    setopt +o nomatch
                    fi

                    set -- * .*
                    echo "$@"
                    for i; do
                    [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
                    [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
                    done
                    echo "Empty" && return 0
                    }
                    dir_empty
                    touch '*'
                    dir_empty


                    The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





                    Try it online in ksh!



                    Try it online in zsh!






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 2:25











                    • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                      – thrig
                      Jan 7 at 3:02











                    • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:16











                    • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:18











                    • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                      – Three
                      Jan 7 at 3:20
















                    2














                    Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



                    rm -rf empty_dir/
                    mkdir empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    cd empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    dir_empty(){

                    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
                    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
                    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
                    setopt +o nomatch
                    fi

                    set -- * .*
                    echo "$@"
                    for i; do
                    [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
                    [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
                    done
                    echo "Empty" && return 0
                    }
                    dir_empty
                    touch '*'
                    dir_empty


                    The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





                    Try it online in ksh!



                    Try it online in zsh!






                    share|improve this answer


























                    • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 2:25











                    • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                      – thrig
                      Jan 7 at 3:02











                    • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:16











                    • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:18











                    • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                      – Three
                      Jan 7 at 3:20














                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



                    rm -rf empty_dir/
                    mkdir empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    cd empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    dir_empty(){

                    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
                    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
                    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
                    setopt +o nomatch
                    fi

                    set -- * .*
                    echo "$@"
                    for i; do
                    [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
                    [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
                    done
                    echo "Empty" && return 0
                    }
                    dir_empty
                    touch '*'
                    dir_empty


                    The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





                    Try it online in ksh!



                    Try it online in zsh!






                    share|improve this answer















                    Most portable way would be via set and globstar for all POSIX-compliant shells. This has been shown in Gilles's answer on a related question. I've adapted the method slightly into a function:



                    rm -rf empty_dir/
                    mkdir empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    cd empty_dir/
                    pwd
                    dir_empty(){

                    # https://stackoverflow.com/a/9911082/3701431
                    if [ -n "$ZSH_VERSION" ]; then
                    # https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/310553/85039
                    setopt +o nomatch
                    fi

                    set -- * .*
                    echo "$@"
                    for i; do
                    [ "$i" = "." ] || [ "$i" = ".." ] && continue
                    [ -e "$i" ] && echo "Not empty" && return 1
                    done
                    echo "Empty" && return 0
                    }
                    dir_empty
                    touch '*'
                    dir_empty


                    The big problem with zsh is that while ksh and bash behave in more or less consistent manner - that is when we do set * .* you will have 3 positional parameters * . .. in really empty directory - in zsh you will get * .* as positional parameters. Luckily at least for i ; do ... done to iterate over positional parameters works consistently. The rest is just iteration and check for existence of the filename, with . and .. skipped.





                    Try it online in ksh!



                    Try it online in zsh!







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 7 at 3:13

























                    answered Jan 7 at 2:02









                    Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy

                    8,53112254




                    8,53112254













                    • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 2:25











                    • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                      – thrig
                      Jan 7 at 3:02











                    • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:16











                    • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:18











                    • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                      – Three
                      Jan 7 at 3:20



















                    • @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 2:25











                    • turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                      – thrig
                      Jan 7 at 3:02











                    • @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:16











                    • @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                      Jan 7 at 3:18











                    • @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                      – Three
                      Jan 7 at 3:20

















                    @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 2:25





                    @Three I've adapted the answer to check for zsh. Unfortunatelly for us zsh decided to go the weird way instead of similar behavior to bash or other shells, since according to POSIX: "If the pattern does not match any pathnames, the returned number of matched paths is set to 0, and the contents of pglob->gl_pathv are implementation-defined." source

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 2:25













                    turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                    – thrig
                    Jan 7 at 3:02





                    turning nomatch everywhere risks breaking code that assumes the default (and very sensible) setting that sh and bash get wrong, so the change really should be localized only to this function

                    – thrig
                    Jan 7 at 3:02













                    @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 3:16





                    @thrig Well, considering that so far others haven't found a way to make glob work without nomatch, that's the best we got. We can also toggle it back before function exits, of course. Or we could just abandon shell ways and just use something else, like find for instance.

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 3:16













                    @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 3:18





                    @Three I've revised the answer again. Probably this is the best I can do, as zsh seems to favor features instead of consistency. Hope this helps somewhat.

                    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
                    Jan 7 at 3:18













                    @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                    – Three
                    Jan 7 at 3:20





                    @SergiyKolodyazhnyy yes thanks - I would just avoid Zsh totally but its used on Manjaro - maybe I will avoid that too :)

                    – Three
                    Jan 7 at 3:20










                    Three is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Three is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Three is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Three is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492912%2fportable-check-empty-directory%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese