Space of all complex structures on $V$ is homotopy equivalent to the space of (linear) symplectic forms on...












4












$begingroup$


How can I prove that the space of all complex structures $Icolon Vto V$ is homotopy equivalent to the space of all non-degenerate skew-symmetric $2$-forms $omega in Lambda^2V$?



Skew-symmetry is seems to be related with the property $I^2=-operatorname{id}_V$, but I can't formalize it to complete proof.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:10






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:13








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:38
















4












$begingroup$


How can I prove that the space of all complex structures $Icolon Vto V$ is homotopy equivalent to the space of all non-degenerate skew-symmetric $2$-forms $omega in Lambda^2V$?



Skew-symmetry is seems to be related with the property $I^2=-operatorname{id}_V$, but I can't formalize it to complete proof.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:10






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:13








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:38














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


How can I prove that the space of all complex structures $Icolon Vto V$ is homotopy equivalent to the space of all non-degenerate skew-symmetric $2$-forms $omega in Lambda^2V$?



Skew-symmetry is seems to be related with the property $I^2=-operatorname{id}_V$, but I can't formalize it to complete proof.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




How can I prove that the space of all complex structures $Icolon Vto V$ is homotopy equivalent to the space of all non-degenerate skew-symmetric $2$-forms $omega in Lambda^2V$?



Skew-symmetry is seems to be related with the property $I^2=-operatorname{id}_V$, but I can't formalize it to complete proof.







vector-spaces homotopy-theory complex-geometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 21 '17 at 18:47









Danu

1,29911120




1,29911120










asked Apr 21 '17 at 10:24









HasekHasek

1,102617




1,102617








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:10






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:13








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:38














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:10






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:13








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
    $endgroup$
    – Olivier Bégassat
    Apr 21 '17 at 12:38








3




3




$begingroup$
I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:10




$begingroup$
I don't know if this can be made into a proof, and I don't know if the assertions are true (I took ideas from Denis Auroux' Symplectic Geometry, lecture 8, I found online) : consider the space $P$ of all compatible pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is a complex structure on $V$, and $omega$ a symplectic form, and compatibility means, I believe, that $omega(JX,Y)$ is a scalar product on $V$. It seems that both maps $$Clongleftarrow Plongrightarrow S$$ are fiber bundles with convex / contractible fibers respectively, where $C$ is the space of complex structures, and $S$ that of symplectic ones.
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:10




2




2




$begingroup$
If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:13






$begingroup$
If these assertions are true, then both projections are homotopy equivalences (at least weak equivalences by the long exact sequences of a fibration), and so $C$ and $S$ would be homotopy equivalent. The convexity / contractibility results can probably be found, or adapted from, ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/…
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:13






2




2




$begingroup$
You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:38




$begingroup$
You could also check Symplectic and Almost Complex Manifolds by Michèle Audin, she considers the space of pairs $(J,omega)$ where $J$ is calibrated by $omega$, and proves that the projection onto what she calls $Omega_n$, the space of symplectic structures, is a homotopy equivalence.
$endgroup$
– Olivier Bégassat
Apr 21 '17 at 12:38










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

First of all, recall that a vector space admits a complex structure if and only if it is even-dimensional, which also means it admits symplectic forms.



The proof outlined by Olivier Bégassat in the comments is correct. In this answer, I give some more details but fall short of providing a full proof. As Olivier argued, the idea is to show that the space $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp}Omega (V)$ of pairs $(J,omega)$, where $J$ is $omega$-compatible (meaning $omega(-,J-)$ is a scalar product) is a fibration over $mathcal J(V)$ and $Omega(V)$, the spaces of complex structures and symplectic forms on $V$, respectively, with contractible fibers. This should yield a homotopy equivalence $mathcal J(V)simeq Omega(V)$ after applying the long exact sequence associated to a fibration. In this post, I will focus on the contractibility of the fibers. I invite anyone willing to complete the proof, in which case I will turn this answer into a community wiki.



First, we consider the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to mathcal J(V)$. The fiber over $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is the space of symplectic forms that $J$ is compatible with, $Omega(V,J)$. Note that the fiber over any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is not the empty set, since any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is compatible with some symplectic form: Using induction, it is not hard to show that every $V^{2n}$ equipped with a complex structure $J$ admits a basis of the form ${x_1,J x_1,dots, x_n,J x_n}$. Declaring this basis to be orthonormal, we obtain a scalar product $g(-,-)$ on $V$ such that $J$ is orthogonal with respect to it. Then $omega(-,-)=g(J-,-)$ is a symplectic form on $V$ and $J$ is compatible with $omega$.



It is easy to see that each fiber is a convex space: If $J$ is compatible with $omega$ and $omega'$, then for $tin[0,1]$ the combination $(1-t)omega(-,J-)+tomega'(-,J-)$ is an inner product. Thus, the fiber over $J$ is contractible.



Now, consider the fiber of the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to Omega(V)$, i.e. the space of $omega$-compatible complex structures $mathcal J(V,omega)$. Proving contractibility of this space is more cumbersome, and I will not prove all the details. It is shown in e.g. proposition 2.50 of McDuff and Salamon's book Introduction to Symplectic Geometry. The idea is to show that $mathcal J(V,omega)$ is homeomorphic to the space of symmetric, positive-definite symplectic matrices. After picking a standard basis such that $omega$ is the standard symplectic form on $Bbb R^{2n}$, this map is given by $Jmapsto J_0J$ where
$$ J_0=begin{pmatrix}0 & -operatorname{id}_n \ operatorname{id}_n & 0 end{pmatrix}$$ represents multiplication by $i$. The inverse map sends $Pmapsto -J_0 P$. To prove contractibility, use the fact that if $P$ is a symmetric, positive-definite and symplectic matrix, then $P^alpha$ for any $alphain Bbb R_+$ is also a symplectic matrix, and hence this space is contractible by letting $alpha$ run from $1$ to $0$, mapping $P$ to the identity matrix.



Now, once we establish that the maps from $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)$ are indeed fibrations you obtain the result we were after.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2244810%2fspace-of-all-complex-structures-on-v-is-homotopy-equivalent-to-the-space-of-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    First of all, recall that a vector space admits a complex structure if and only if it is even-dimensional, which also means it admits symplectic forms.



    The proof outlined by Olivier Bégassat in the comments is correct. In this answer, I give some more details but fall short of providing a full proof. As Olivier argued, the idea is to show that the space $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp}Omega (V)$ of pairs $(J,omega)$, where $J$ is $omega$-compatible (meaning $omega(-,J-)$ is a scalar product) is a fibration over $mathcal J(V)$ and $Omega(V)$, the spaces of complex structures and symplectic forms on $V$, respectively, with contractible fibers. This should yield a homotopy equivalence $mathcal J(V)simeq Omega(V)$ after applying the long exact sequence associated to a fibration. In this post, I will focus on the contractibility of the fibers. I invite anyone willing to complete the proof, in which case I will turn this answer into a community wiki.



    First, we consider the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to mathcal J(V)$. The fiber over $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is the space of symplectic forms that $J$ is compatible with, $Omega(V,J)$. Note that the fiber over any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is not the empty set, since any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is compatible with some symplectic form: Using induction, it is not hard to show that every $V^{2n}$ equipped with a complex structure $J$ admits a basis of the form ${x_1,J x_1,dots, x_n,J x_n}$. Declaring this basis to be orthonormal, we obtain a scalar product $g(-,-)$ on $V$ such that $J$ is orthogonal with respect to it. Then $omega(-,-)=g(J-,-)$ is a symplectic form on $V$ and $J$ is compatible with $omega$.



    It is easy to see that each fiber is a convex space: If $J$ is compatible with $omega$ and $omega'$, then for $tin[0,1]$ the combination $(1-t)omega(-,J-)+tomega'(-,J-)$ is an inner product. Thus, the fiber over $J$ is contractible.



    Now, consider the fiber of the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to Omega(V)$, i.e. the space of $omega$-compatible complex structures $mathcal J(V,omega)$. Proving contractibility of this space is more cumbersome, and I will not prove all the details. It is shown in e.g. proposition 2.50 of McDuff and Salamon's book Introduction to Symplectic Geometry. The idea is to show that $mathcal J(V,omega)$ is homeomorphic to the space of symmetric, positive-definite symplectic matrices. After picking a standard basis such that $omega$ is the standard symplectic form on $Bbb R^{2n}$, this map is given by $Jmapsto J_0J$ where
    $$ J_0=begin{pmatrix}0 & -operatorname{id}_n \ operatorname{id}_n & 0 end{pmatrix}$$ represents multiplication by $i$. The inverse map sends $Pmapsto -J_0 P$. To prove contractibility, use the fact that if $P$ is a symmetric, positive-definite and symplectic matrix, then $P^alpha$ for any $alphain Bbb R_+$ is also a symplectic matrix, and hence this space is contractible by letting $alpha$ run from $1$ to $0$, mapping $P$ to the identity matrix.



    Now, once we establish that the maps from $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)$ are indeed fibrations you obtain the result we were after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      3












      $begingroup$

      First of all, recall that a vector space admits a complex structure if and only if it is even-dimensional, which also means it admits symplectic forms.



      The proof outlined by Olivier Bégassat in the comments is correct. In this answer, I give some more details but fall short of providing a full proof. As Olivier argued, the idea is to show that the space $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp}Omega (V)$ of pairs $(J,omega)$, where $J$ is $omega$-compatible (meaning $omega(-,J-)$ is a scalar product) is a fibration over $mathcal J(V)$ and $Omega(V)$, the spaces of complex structures and symplectic forms on $V$, respectively, with contractible fibers. This should yield a homotopy equivalence $mathcal J(V)simeq Omega(V)$ after applying the long exact sequence associated to a fibration. In this post, I will focus on the contractibility of the fibers. I invite anyone willing to complete the proof, in which case I will turn this answer into a community wiki.



      First, we consider the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to mathcal J(V)$. The fiber over $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is the space of symplectic forms that $J$ is compatible with, $Omega(V,J)$. Note that the fiber over any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is not the empty set, since any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is compatible with some symplectic form: Using induction, it is not hard to show that every $V^{2n}$ equipped with a complex structure $J$ admits a basis of the form ${x_1,J x_1,dots, x_n,J x_n}$. Declaring this basis to be orthonormal, we obtain a scalar product $g(-,-)$ on $V$ such that $J$ is orthogonal with respect to it. Then $omega(-,-)=g(J-,-)$ is a symplectic form on $V$ and $J$ is compatible with $omega$.



      It is easy to see that each fiber is a convex space: If $J$ is compatible with $omega$ and $omega'$, then for $tin[0,1]$ the combination $(1-t)omega(-,J-)+tomega'(-,J-)$ is an inner product. Thus, the fiber over $J$ is contractible.



      Now, consider the fiber of the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to Omega(V)$, i.e. the space of $omega$-compatible complex structures $mathcal J(V,omega)$. Proving contractibility of this space is more cumbersome, and I will not prove all the details. It is shown in e.g. proposition 2.50 of McDuff and Salamon's book Introduction to Symplectic Geometry. The idea is to show that $mathcal J(V,omega)$ is homeomorphic to the space of symmetric, positive-definite symplectic matrices. After picking a standard basis such that $omega$ is the standard symplectic form on $Bbb R^{2n}$, this map is given by $Jmapsto J_0J$ where
      $$ J_0=begin{pmatrix}0 & -operatorname{id}_n \ operatorname{id}_n & 0 end{pmatrix}$$ represents multiplication by $i$. The inverse map sends $Pmapsto -J_0 P$. To prove contractibility, use the fact that if $P$ is a symmetric, positive-definite and symplectic matrix, then $P^alpha$ for any $alphain Bbb R_+$ is also a symplectic matrix, and hence this space is contractible by letting $alpha$ run from $1$ to $0$, mapping $P$ to the identity matrix.



      Now, once we establish that the maps from $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)$ are indeed fibrations you obtain the result we were after.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        3












        3








        3





        $begingroup$

        First of all, recall that a vector space admits a complex structure if and only if it is even-dimensional, which also means it admits symplectic forms.



        The proof outlined by Olivier Bégassat in the comments is correct. In this answer, I give some more details but fall short of providing a full proof. As Olivier argued, the idea is to show that the space $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp}Omega (V)$ of pairs $(J,omega)$, where $J$ is $omega$-compatible (meaning $omega(-,J-)$ is a scalar product) is a fibration over $mathcal J(V)$ and $Omega(V)$, the spaces of complex structures and symplectic forms on $V$, respectively, with contractible fibers. This should yield a homotopy equivalence $mathcal J(V)simeq Omega(V)$ after applying the long exact sequence associated to a fibration. In this post, I will focus on the contractibility of the fibers. I invite anyone willing to complete the proof, in which case I will turn this answer into a community wiki.



        First, we consider the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to mathcal J(V)$. The fiber over $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is the space of symplectic forms that $J$ is compatible with, $Omega(V,J)$. Note that the fiber over any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is not the empty set, since any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is compatible with some symplectic form: Using induction, it is not hard to show that every $V^{2n}$ equipped with a complex structure $J$ admits a basis of the form ${x_1,J x_1,dots, x_n,J x_n}$. Declaring this basis to be orthonormal, we obtain a scalar product $g(-,-)$ on $V$ such that $J$ is orthogonal with respect to it. Then $omega(-,-)=g(J-,-)$ is a symplectic form on $V$ and $J$ is compatible with $omega$.



        It is easy to see that each fiber is a convex space: If $J$ is compatible with $omega$ and $omega'$, then for $tin[0,1]$ the combination $(1-t)omega(-,J-)+tomega'(-,J-)$ is an inner product. Thus, the fiber over $J$ is contractible.



        Now, consider the fiber of the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to Omega(V)$, i.e. the space of $omega$-compatible complex structures $mathcal J(V,omega)$. Proving contractibility of this space is more cumbersome, and I will not prove all the details. It is shown in e.g. proposition 2.50 of McDuff and Salamon's book Introduction to Symplectic Geometry. The idea is to show that $mathcal J(V,omega)$ is homeomorphic to the space of symmetric, positive-definite symplectic matrices. After picking a standard basis such that $omega$ is the standard symplectic form on $Bbb R^{2n}$, this map is given by $Jmapsto J_0J$ where
        $$ J_0=begin{pmatrix}0 & -operatorname{id}_n \ operatorname{id}_n & 0 end{pmatrix}$$ represents multiplication by $i$. The inverse map sends $Pmapsto -J_0 P$. To prove contractibility, use the fact that if $P$ is a symmetric, positive-definite and symplectic matrix, then $P^alpha$ for any $alphain Bbb R_+$ is also a symplectic matrix, and hence this space is contractible by letting $alpha$ run from $1$ to $0$, mapping $P$ to the identity matrix.



        Now, once we establish that the maps from $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)$ are indeed fibrations you obtain the result we were after.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        First of all, recall that a vector space admits a complex structure if and only if it is even-dimensional, which also means it admits symplectic forms.



        The proof outlined by Olivier Bégassat in the comments is correct. In this answer, I give some more details but fall short of providing a full proof. As Olivier argued, the idea is to show that the space $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp}Omega (V)$ of pairs $(J,omega)$, where $J$ is $omega$-compatible (meaning $omega(-,J-)$ is a scalar product) is a fibration over $mathcal J(V)$ and $Omega(V)$, the spaces of complex structures and symplectic forms on $V$, respectively, with contractible fibers. This should yield a homotopy equivalence $mathcal J(V)simeq Omega(V)$ after applying the long exact sequence associated to a fibration. In this post, I will focus on the contractibility of the fibers. I invite anyone willing to complete the proof, in which case I will turn this answer into a community wiki.



        First, we consider the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to mathcal J(V)$. The fiber over $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is the space of symplectic forms that $J$ is compatible with, $Omega(V,J)$. Note that the fiber over any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is not the empty set, since any $Jin mathcal J(V)$ is compatible with some symplectic form: Using induction, it is not hard to show that every $V^{2n}$ equipped with a complex structure $J$ admits a basis of the form ${x_1,J x_1,dots, x_n,J x_n}$. Declaring this basis to be orthonormal, we obtain a scalar product $g(-,-)$ on $V$ such that $J$ is orthogonal with respect to it. Then $omega(-,-)=g(J-,-)$ is a symplectic form on $V$ and $J$ is compatible with $omega$.



        It is easy to see that each fiber is a convex space: If $J$ is compatible with $omega$ and $omega'$, then for $tin[0,1]$ the combination $(1-t)omega(-,J-)+tomega'(-,J-)$ is an inner product. Thus, the fiber over $J$ is contractible.



        Now, consider the fiber of the map $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)to Omega(V)$, i.e. the space of $omega$-compatible complex structures $mathcal J(V,omega)$. Proving contractibility of this space is more cumbersome, and I will not prove all the details. It is shown in e.g. proposition 2.50 of McDuff and Salamon's book Introduction to Symplectic Geometry. The idea is to show that $mathcal J(V,omega)$ is homeomorphic to the space of symmetric, positive-definite symplectic matrices. After picking a standard basis such that $omega$ is the standard symplectic form on $Bbb R^{2n}$, this map is given by $Jmapsto J_0J$ where
        $$ J_0=begin{pmatrix}0 & -operatorname{id}_n \ operatorname{id}_n & 0 end{pmatrix}$$ represents multiplication by $i$. The inverse map sends $Pmapsto -J_0 P$. To prove contractibility, use the fact that if $P$ is a symmetric, positive-definite and symplectic matrix, then $P^alpha$ for any $alphain Bbb R_+$ is also a symplectic matrix, and hence this space is contractible by letting $alpha$ run from $1$ to $0$, mapping $P$ to the identity matrix.



        Now, once we establish that the maps from $mathcal J(V)times_text{comp} Omega(V)$ are indeed fibrations you obtain the result we were after.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Jan 7 at 16:48

























        answered Apr 22 '17 at 12:27









        DanuDanu

        1,29911120




        1,29911120






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2244810%2fspace-of-all-complex-structures-on-v-is-homotopy-equivalent-to-the-space-of-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese