I don't understand a part of the solution using the method of shells on this problem












0












$begingroup$


begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Find the volume of the region } sqrt { x } leq y leq 1 , x geq 0 text { revolved around the } y text { -axis } } \ { text { by both the method of shells and the method of disks and washers. } } end{array}



That is the problem. It is from MIT's OCW. It has a solution, which is



begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Shells: } quad int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - y ) d x = int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - sqrt { x } ) d x = pi / 5} end{array}



I don't understand why it's (1−y) and not just y.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Find the volume of the region } sqrt { x } leq y leq 1 , x geq 0 text { revolved around the } y text { -axis } } \ { text { by both the method of shells and the method of disks and washers. } } end{array}



    That is the problem. It is from MIT's OCW. It has a solution, which is



    begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Shells: } quad int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - y ) d x = int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - sqrt { x } ) d x = pi / 5} end{array}



    I don't understand why it's (1−y) and not just y.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0


      1



      $begingroup$


      begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Find the volume of the region } sqrt { x } leq y leq 1 , x geq 0 text { revolved around the } y text { -axis } } \ { text { by both the method of shells and the method of disks and washers. } } end{array}



      That is the problem. It is from MIT's OCW. It has a solution, which is



      begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Shells: } quad int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - y ) d x = int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - sqrt { x } ) d x = pi / 5} end{array}



      I don't understand why it's (1−y) and not just y.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Find the volume of the region } sqrt { x } leq y leq 1 , x geq 0 text { revolved around the } y text { -axis } } \ { text { by both the method of shells and the method of disks and washers. } } end{array}



      That is the problem. It is from MIT's OCW. It has a solution, which is



      begin{array} { l } { 4 mathrm { C } - 3 text { Shells: } quad int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - y ) d x = int _ { 0 } ^ { 1 } 2 pi x ( 1 - sqrt { x } ) d x = pi / 5} end{array}



      I don't understand why it's (1−y) and not just y.







      calculus integration solid-of-revolution






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 20:12









      GNUSupporter 8964民主女神 地下教會

      12.8k72445




      12.8k72445










      asked Jan 7 at 20:09









      T jeyT jey

      102




      102






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The region integrated, in the y-direction, is between $sqrt{x}$ and $1$. If the region being revolved was $0leq yleqsqrt{x}$, then it would be $y$ in the integrand. But when you're integrating two curves, it's top - bottom, which in this case is $1-y$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, that explains it. :)
            $endgroup$
            – T jey
            Jan 7 at 20:30



















          0












          $begingroup$

          If you would draw a picture, in cylindrical coordinates, the volume that you want to integrate is above the surface $h=sqrt r$, but below the surface $h=1$. So the height of the cylindrical shell is not $sqrt r$, which would be below the first surface, but $1-sqrt r$ which is between the two surfaces.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065445%2fi-dont-understand-a-part-of-the-solution-using-the-method-of-shells-on-this-pro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            The region integrated, in the y-direction, is between $sqrt{x}$ and $1$. If the region being revolved was $0leq yleqsqrt{x}$, then it would be $y$ in the integrand. But when you're integrating two curves, it's top - bottom, which in this case is $1-y$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you, that explains it. :)
              $endgroup$
              – T jey
              Jan 7 at 20:30
















            0












            $begingroup$

            The region integrated, in the y-direction, is between $sqrt{x}$ and $1$. If the region being revolved was $0leq yleqsqrt{x}$, then it would be $y$ in the integrand. But when you're integrating two curves, it's top - bottom, which in this case is $1-y$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you, that explains it. :)
              $endgroup$
              – T jey
              Jan 7 at 20:30














            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            The region integrated, in the y-direction, is between $sqrt{x}$ and $1$. If the region being revolved was $0leq yleqsqrt{x}$, then it would be $y$ in the integrand. But when you're integrating two curves, it's top - bottom, which in this case is $1-y$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The region integrated, in the y-direction, is between $sqrt{x}$ and $1$. If the region being revolved was $0leq yleqsqrt{x}$, then it would be $y$ in the integrand. But when you're integrating two curves, it's top - bottom, which in this case is $1-y$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 7 at 20:18









            Calvin GodfreyCalvin Godfrey

            568311




            568311












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you, that explains it. :)
              $endgroup$
              – T jey
              Jan 7 at 20:30


















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you, that explains it. :)
              $endgroup$
              – T jey
              Jan 7 at 20:30
















            $begingroup$
            Thank you, that explains it. :)
            $endgroup$
            – T jey
            Jan 7 at 20:30




            $begingroup$
            Thank you, that explains it. :)
            $endgroup$
            – T jey
            Jan 7 at 20:30











            0












            $begingroup$

            If you would draw a picture, in cylindrical coordinates, the volume that you want to integrate is above the surface $h=sqrt r$, but below the surface $h=1$. So the height of the cylindrical shell is not $sqrt r$, which would be below the first surface, but $1-sqrt r$ which is between the two surfaces.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              If you would draw a picture, in cylindrical coordinates, the volume that you want to integrate is above the surface $h=sqrt r$, but below the surface $h=1$. So the height of the cylindrical shell is not $sqrt r$, which would be below the first surface, but $1-sqrt r$ which is between the two surfaces.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                If you would draw a picture, in cylindrical coordinates, the volume that you want to integrate is above the surface $h=sqrt r$, but below the surface $h=1$. So the height of the cylindrical shell is not $sqrt r$, which would be below the first surface, but $1-sqrt r$ which is between the two surfaces.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                If you would draw a picture, in cylindrical coordinates, the volume that you want to integrate is above the surface $h=sqrt r$, but below the surface $h=1$. So the height of the cylindrical shell is not $sqrt r$, which would be below the first surface, but $1-sqrt r$ which is between the two surfaces.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 7 at 20:18









                AndreiAndrei

                11.6k21026




                11.6k21026






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065445%2fi-dont-understand-a-part-of-the-solution-using-the-method-of-shells-on-this-pro%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese