The best approximation method to recover original polygon outline before rasterization procedure
$begingroup$
I have a polygon, originally created as a Bézier Curve (black outline on the picture), and then saved as a polygon with enough points to call it smooth (at this scale). Then this polygon was rasterized (binarized), the borders of this polygon were converted to vector format (the red outline on the picture).
I want to restore the original line from rasterized using the approximation method.
What is the best way to do this?
By “best method” I mean a method that will return the same original boundary (black outline) or the closest result to the original line.
____________
approximation polygons
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a polygon, originally created as a Bézier Curve (black outline on the picture), and then saved as a polygon with enough points to call it smooth (at this scale). Then this polygon was rasterized (binarized), the borders of this polygon were converted to vector format (the red outline on the picture).
I want to restore the original line from rasterized using the approximation method.
What is the best way to do this?
By “best method” I mean a method that will return the same original boundary (black outline) or the closest result to the original line.
____________
approximation polygons
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a polygon, originally created as a Bézier Curve (black outline on the picture), and then saved as a polygon with enough points to call it smooth (at this scale). Then this polygon was rasterized (binarized), the borders of this polygon were converted to vector format (the red outline on the picture).
I want to restore the original line from rasterized using the approximation method.
What is the best way to do this?
By “best method” I mean a method that will return the same original boundary (black outline) or the closest result to the original line.
____________
approximation polygons
$endgroup$
I have a polygon, originally created as a Bézier Curve (black outline on the picture), and then saved as a polygon with enough points to call it smooth (at this scale). Then this polygon was rasterized (binarized), the borders of this polygon were converted to vector format (the red outline on the picture).
I want to restore the original line from rasterized using the approximation method.
What is the best way to do this?
By “best method” I mean a method that will return the same original boundary (black outline) or the closest result to the original line.
____________
approximation polygons
approximation polygons
edited Jan 23 at 6:24
Mr. Che
asked Jan 23 at 6:03
Mr. CheMr. Che
1186
1186
1
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29
1
1
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084139%2fthe-best-approximation-method-to-recover-original-polygon-outline-before-rasteri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084139%2fthe-best-approximation-method-to-recover-original-polygon-outline-before-rasteri%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Take a look at Lempitsky, "Surface Extraction from Binary Volumes with Higher-Order Smoothness" (CVPR 2010).
$endgroup$
– Rahul
Jan 23 at 6:08
$begingroup$
You have flagged to have this question moved to gis.stackexchange.com. However, it is not currently a good fit for gis.stackexchange.com. As there are no votes or answers here, an appropriate course of action for you would be to delete this question and just ask a good question on gis.stackexchange.com. Good luck!
$endgroup$
– davidlowryduda♦
Jan 28 at 17:29