Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$...
$begingroup$
I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:
Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.
I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.
Thank you in advance!
differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:
Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.
I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.
Thank you in advance!
differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:
Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.
I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.
Thank you in advance!
differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
$endgroup$
I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:
Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.
I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.
Thank you in advance!
differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields
asked Jan 23 at 5:34
Le Théoricien.Le Théoricien.
789
789
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.
Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.
But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$
Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084122%2fgiven-en-to-m-an-embedding-and-v-w-in-mathfrakxm-tangent-to-n-we-cl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.
Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.
But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$
Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.
Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.
But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$
Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.
Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.
But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$
Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.
$endgroup$
If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.
Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.
But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$
Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.
answered Jan 23 at 12:54
Bence RacskóBence Racskó
3,393823
3,393823
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084122%2fgiven-en-to-m-an-embedding-and-v-w-in-mathfrakxm-tangent-to-n-we-cl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49
$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35