Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$...












0












$begingroup$


I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:



Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.



I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
    $endgroup$
    – Amitai Yuval
    Jan 23 at 6:49










  • $begingroup$
    It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 11:35
















0












$begingroup$


I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:



Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.



I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
    $endgroup$
    – Amitai Yuval
    Jan 23 at 6:49










  • $begingroup$
    It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 11:35














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:



Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.



I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.



Thank you in advance!










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have encounter some difficulties while looking at an exercise online. It basically goes as follows:



Given $E:Nto M$ an embedding and $V,Win mathfrak{X}(M)$ tangent to $N$, we claim that the commutator of $V$ and $W$ is also tangent to $N$.



I would like to have some ideas about how to attack the problem effectively.



Thank you in advance!







differential-geometry smooth-manifolds vector-fields






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 23 at 5:34









Le Théoricien.Le Théoricien.

789




789












  • $begingroup$
    There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
    $endgroup$
    – Amitai Yuval
    Jan 23 at 6:49










  • $begingroup$
    It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 11:35


















  • $begingroup$
    There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
    $endgroup$
    – Amitai Yuval
    Jan 23 at 6:49










  • $begingroup$
    It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 11:35
















$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49




$begingroup$
There are a few possible approaches, depending on your definition of the commutator.
$endgroup$
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 23 at 6:49












$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35




$begingroup$
It is just the usual one: $[A,B]=AB-BA$.
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 11:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.



Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.



But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$



Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 15:51










  • $begingroup$
    Nevermind! That,s fine,
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 16:00











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084122%2fgiven-en-to-m-an-embedding-and-v-w-in-mathfrakxm-tangent-to-n-we-cl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.



Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.



But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$



Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 15:51










  • $begingroup$
    Nevermind! That,s fine,
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 16:00
















2












$begingroup$

If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.



Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.



But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$



Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 15:51










  • $begingroup$
    Nevermind! That,s fine,
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 16:00














2












2








2





$begingroup$

If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.



Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.



But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$



Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If $V$ and $W$ are tangent to N, it means that there are vector fields $v$ and $w$ in $mathfrak X(N)$ such that for any $xin N$ we have $V_{E(x)}=E_*v_x$ and the same is true for $W$. To be able to interpret things properly, assume that $V$ and $W$ are smoothly extended off $E(N)$.



Then $v$ and $V$ are $E$-related and so are $w$ and $W$.



But we know that for $E$-related vector fields the commutators are also $E$-related, so we have (restricted to $E(N)$) $$ [V,W]=E_*[v,w],$$



Implying that the commutator is tangent and is independent of the extensions.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 23 at 12:54









Bence RacskóBence Racskó

3,393823




3,393823












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 15:51










  • $begingroup$
    Nevermind! That,s fine,
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 16:00


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 15:51










  • $begingroup$
    Nevermind! That,s fine,
    $endgroup$
    – Le Théoricien.
    Jan 23 at 16:00
















$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51




$begingroup$
Thanks for the comment! But where do we use the fact that $mathfrak{X}(M)ni V,W$?
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 15:51












$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00




$begingroup$
Nevermind! That,s fine,
$endgroup$
– Le Théoricien.
Jan 23 at 16:00


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084122%2fgiven-en-to-m-an-embedding-and-v-w-in-mathfrakxm-tangent-to-n-we-cl%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?