Prove or disprove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x)-f(y)|leq K |x-y|,;forall;;x,yin[0,1],$ edited...












2














Let $f$ be a function on $[0,1]$ into $Bbb{R}$. Suppose that if $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].end{align}
Prove or disprove that there exists $K$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K |x-y|,;forall;;x,yin[0,1].end{align}



DISPROOF



Consider the function begin{align} f:[0&,1]to
Bbb{R}, \&xmapsto sqrt{x} end{align}



Let $x=0$ and $yin (0,1]$ be fixed. Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-f(y) right|&=left|0-sqrt{y} right| end{align}
Take $y=1/(4n^2)$ for all $n.$ Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=left|0-dfrac{1}{sqrt{4n^2}} right| \&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
By assumption, there exists $K_0$ such that
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right|leq K_0left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
Sending $ntoinfty,$ we have
begin{align} infty leq K_0<infty,;;text{contradiction}. end{align}
Hence, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$.



QUESTION: Is my disproof correct?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 days ago






  • 1




    It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
    – 6005
    2 days ago












  • Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
    – 6005
    2 days ago










  • related
    – Omnomnomnom
    2 days ago
















2














Let $f$ be a function on $[0,1]$ into $Bbb{R}$. Suppose that if $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].end{align}
Prove or disprove that there exists $K$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K |x-y|,;forall;;x,yin[0,1].end{align}



DISPROOF



Consider the function begin{align} f:[0&,1]to
Bbb{R}, \&xmapsto sqrt{x} end{align}



Let $x=0$ and $yin (0,1]$ be fixed. Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-f(y) right|&=left|0-sqrt{y} right| end{align}
Take $y=1/(4n^2)$ for all $n.$ Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=left|0-dfrac{1}{sqrt{4n^2}} right| \&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
By assumption, there exists $K_0$ such that
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right|leq K_0left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
Sending $ntoinfty,$ we have
begin{align} infty leq K_0<infty,;;text{contradiction}. end{align}
Hence, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$.



QUESTION: Is my disproof correct?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 days ago






  • 1




    It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
    – 6005
    2 days ago












  • Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
    – 6005
    2 days ago










  • related
    – Omnomnomnom
    2 days ago














2












2








2


1





Let $f$ be a function on $[0,1]$ into $Bbb{R}$. Suppose that if $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].end{align}
Prove or disprove that there exists $K$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K |x-y|,;forall;;x,yin[0,1].end{align}



DISPROOF



Consider the function begin{align} f:[0&,1]to
Bbb{R}, \&xmapsto sqrt{x} end{align}



Let $x=0$ and $yin (0,1]$ be fixed. Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-f(y) right|&=left|0-sqrt{y} right| end{align}
Take $y=1/(4n^2)$ for all $n.$ Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=left|0-dfrac{1}{sqrt{4n^2}} right| \&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
By assumption, there exists $K_0$ such that
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right|leq K_0left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
Sending $ntoinfty,$ we have
begin{align} infty leq K_0<infty,;;text{contradiction}. end{align}
Hence, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$.



QUESTION: Is my disproof correct?










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f$ be a function on $[0,1]$ into $Bbb{R}$. Suppose that if $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].end{align}
Prove or disprove that there exists $K$ such that begin{align}|f(x)-f(y)|leq K |x-y|,;forall;;x,yin[0,1].end{align}



DISPROOF



Consider the function begin{align} f:[0&,1]to
Bbb{R}, \&xmapsto sqrt{x} end{align}



Let $x=0$ and $yin (0,1]$ be fixed. Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-f(y) right|&=left|0-sqrt{y} right| end{align}
Take $y=1/(4n^2)$ for all $n.$ Then,
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=left|0-dfrac{1}{sqrt{4n^2}} right| \&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
By assumption, there exists $K_0$ such that
begin{align} left| f(0)-fleft(dfrac{1}{4n^2}right) right|&=2n^{3/2}left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right|leq K_0left|dfrac{1}{4n^2} -0 right| end{align}
Sending $ntoinfty,$ we have
begin{align} infty leq K_0<infty,;;text{contradiction}. end{align}
Hence, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$.



QUESTION: Is my disproof correct?







real-analysis analysis lipschitz-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago







Mike

















asked 2 days ago









MikeMike

1,534321




1,534321








  • 1




    I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 days ago






  • 1




    It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
    – 6005
    2 days ago












  • Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
    – 6005
    2 days ago










  • related
    – Omnomnomnom
    2 days ago














  • 1




    I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
    – Andrés E. Caicedo
    2 days ago






  • 1




    It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
    – 6005
    2 days ago












  • Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
    – 6005
    2 days ago










  • related
    – Omnomnomnom
    2 days ago








1




1




I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago




I would suggest that before you start the computation you actually write explicitly the claim whose truth you need to decide. Is $f$ supposed to be continuous? Are there any other assumptions? Once that is explicit, say what you are going to do: "We will show that the statement fails in general by providing a counterexample. Note that it is enough to show that there is a differentiable $f$ with unbounded derivative, because ..." Only after you've done that, proceed with your counterexample. People don't want to put up with a wall of symbols if they don't know its purpose.
– Andrés E. Caicedo
2 days ago




1




1




It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
– Cameron Buie
2 days ago




It would be much simpler to just define $f:[0,1]toBbb R$ by $f(x)=sqrt{x}.$ There is no need for a piecewise definition.
– Cameron Buie
2 days ago




1




1




Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
– 6005
2 days ago






Nice proof, but you forgot to mention the question. I assume the question was: if $f$ is continuous, then prove that there exists $K$ such that $|f(x) - f(y)| le K |x - y|$ for all $x, y$, or else find a counterexample $f$.
– 6005
2 days ago














Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
– 6005
2 days ago




Also, $f$ is not differentiable at $0$. So you should say that $f|_{(0,1)}$ is differentiable but the derivative is unbounded, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f|_{(0,1)}$, thus a constant $K$ cannot exist for $f$ either.
– 6005
2 days ago












related
– Omnomnomnom
2 days ago




related
– Omnomnomnom
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














You are correct, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but your argument should be modified. You may simply say that
$$frac{f(1/n)-f(0)}{frac{1}{n}-0}=sqrt{n}to +infty$$
which contradicts the fact that $|f(x)-f(y)|/|x-y|$ is bounded by a constant $K$.



On the other hand this is not a counterexample for your statement. For the same reason as above (Just take $y=1/n$), for $x=0$ there is no constant $K_0$ such that
$$|f(0)-f(y)|leq K_0 |0-y|,;;forall yin[0,1].$$
Instead consider the function
$$f(x)=cases{xsin(1/x)& if $xnot=0$\0& if $x=0$,}$$
If $x_n=1/(2pi n)$ and $y_n=1/(2pi n+pi/2)$.
then $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|/|x_n-y_n|$ is unbounded which implies that $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but for any $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that $$|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].$$
In fact take $K_0=1$ and for $xin(0,1]$ the existence of $K_x$ follows from
$f'in C^1((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
    – Robert Z
    2 days ago










  • You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
    – David C. Ullrich
    2 days ago



















3














This isn't incorrect per se, but its unnecessarily convoluted. To show that $f'$ is unbounded, just observe that $f'(x)=frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$ so that $lim_{xto 0^+}f'(x)=infty$. Hence, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$, which is precisely what you want to prove. That's all you need to say.



The last part is a little hand-wavy though. Technically, you should say something like this: $f$ is Lipschitz on $[epsilon,1]$ with constant $K_epsilon:=sup_{epsilonleq xleq 1}|f'(x)|$. Since $K_epsilontoinfty$ as $epsilonto 0^+$, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$.



Better still just to do an explicit calculation, as the other fellow did.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
    – Mike
    2 days ago













Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062809%2fprove-or-disprove-that-there-exists-k-such-that-fx-fy-leq-k-x-y-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You are correct, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but your argument should be modified. You may simply say that
$$frac{f(1/n)-f(0)}{frac{1}{n}-0}=sqrt{n}to +infty$$
which contradicts the fact that $|f(x)-f(y)|/|x-y|$ is bounded by a constant $K$.



On the other hand this is not a counterexample for your statement. For the same reason as above (Just take $y=1/n$), for $x=0$ there is no constant $K_0$ such that
$$|f(0)-f(y)|leq K_0 |0-y|,;;forall yin[0,1].$$
Instead consider the function
$$f(x)=cases{xsin(1/x)& if $xnot=0$\0& if $x=0$,}$$
If $x_n=1/(2pi n)$ and $y_n=1/(2pi n+pi/2)$.
then $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|/|x_n-y_n|$ is unbounded which implies that $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but for any $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that $$|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].$$
In fact take $K_0=1$ and for $xin(0,1]$ the existence of $K_x$ follows from
$f'in C^1((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
    – Robert Z
    2 days ago










  • You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
    – David C. Ullrich
    2 days ago
















4














You are correct, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but your argument should be modified. You may simply say that
$$frac{f(1/n)-f(0)}{frac{1}{n}-0}=sqrt{n}to +infty$$
which contradicts the fact that $|f(x)-f(y)|/|x-y|$ is bounded by a constant $K$.



On the other hand this is not a counterexample for your statement. For the same reason as above (Just take $y=1/n$), for $x=0$ there is no constant $K_0$ such that
$$|f(0)-f(y)|leq K_0 |0-y|,;;forall yin[0,1].$$
Instead consider the function
$$f(x)=cases{xsin(1/x)& if $xnot=0$\0& if $x=0$,}$$
If $x_n=1/(2pi n)$ and $y_n=1/(2pi n+pi/2)$.
then $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|/|x_n-y_n|$ is unbounded which implies that $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but for any $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that $$|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].$$
In fact take $K_0=1$ and for $xin(0,1]$ the existence of $K_x$ follows from
$f'in C^1((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
    – Robert Z
    2 days ago










  • You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
    – David C. Ullrich
    2 days ago














4












4








4






You are correct, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but your argument should be modified. You may simply say that
$$frac{f(1/n)-f(0)}{frac{1}{n}-0}=sqrt{n}to +infty$$
which contradicts the fact that $|f(x)-f(y)|/|x-y|$ is bounded by a constant $K$.



On the other hand this is not a counterexample for your statement. For the same reason as above (Just take $y=1/n$), for $x=0$ there is no constant $K_0$ such that
$$|f(0)-f(y)|leq K_0 |0-y|,;;forall yin[0,1].$$
Instead consider the function
$$f(x)=cases{xsin(1/x)& if $xnot=0$\0& if $x=0$,}$$
If $x_n=1/(2pi n)$ and $y_n=1/(2pi n+pi/2)$.
then $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|/|x_n-y_n|$ is unbounded which implies that $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but for any $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that $$|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].$$
In fact take $K_0=1$ and for $xin(0,1]$ the existence of $K_x$ follows from
$f'in C^1((0,1])$.






share|cite|improve this answer














You are correct, the function $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but your argument should be modified. You may simply say that
$$frac{f(1/n)-f(0)}{frac{1}{n}-0}=sqrt{n}to +infty$$
which contradicts the fact that $|f(x)-f(y)|/|x-y|$ is bounded by a constant $K$.



On the other hand this is not a counterexample for your statement. For the same reason as above (Just take $y=1/n$), for $x=0$ there is no constant $K_0$ such that
$$|f(0)-f(y)|leq K_0 |0-y|,;;forall yin[0,1].$$
Instead consider the function
$$f(x)=cases{xsin(1/x)& if $xnot=0$\0& if $x=0$,}$$
If $x_n=1/(2pi n)$ and $y_n=1/(2pi n+pi/2)$.
then $|f(x_n)-f(y_n)|/|x_n-y_n|$ is unbounded which implies that $f$ is not Lipschitz in $[0,1]$, but for any $xin[0,1],$ there exists $K_x$ such that $$|f(x)-f(y)|leq K_x |x-y|,;;forall;;yin[0,1].$$
In fact take $K_0=1$ and for $xin(0,1]$ the existence of $K_x$ follows from
$f'in C^1((0,1])$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered 2 days ago









Robert ZRobert Z

93.8k1061132




93.8k1061132












  • @Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
    – Robert Z
    2 days ago










  • You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
    – David C. Ullrich
    2 days ago


















  • @Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
    – Robert Z
    2 days ago










  • You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
    – David C. Ullrich
    2 days ago
















@Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
– Robert Z
2 days ago




@Mike I added a few lines. Your disproof is incorrect.
– Robert Z
2 days ago












You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
– David C. Ullrich
2 days ago




You might mention why the correct counterexample does satisfy the hypothesis. (If $f$ is differentiable at $$ then $K_x$ exists...)
– David C. Ullrich
2 days ago











3














This isn't incorrect per se, but its unnecessarily convoluted. To show that $f'$ is unbounded, just observe that $f'(x)=frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$ so that $lim_{xto 0^+}f'(x)=infty$. Hence, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$, which is precisely what you want to prove. That's all you need to say.



The last part is a little hand-wavy though. Technically, you should say something like this: $f$ is Lipschitz on $[epsilon,1]$ with constant $K_epsilon:=sup_{epsilonleq xleq 1}|f'(x)|$. Since $K_epsilontoinfty$ as $epsilonto 0^+$, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$.



Better still just to do an explicit calculation, as the other fellow did.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
    – Mike
    2 days ago


















3














This isn't incorrect per se, but its unnecessarily convoluted. To show that $f'$ is unbounded, just observe that $f'(x)=frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$ so that $lim_{xto 0^+}f'(x)=infty$. Hence, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$, which is precisely what you want to prove. That's all you need to say.



The last part is a little hand-wavy though. Technically, you should say something like this: $f$ is Lipschitz on $[epsilon,1]$ with constant $K_epsilon:=sup_{epsilonleq xleq 1}|f'(x)|$. Since $K_epsilontoinfty$ as $epsilonto 0^+$, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$.



Better still just to do an explicit calculation, as the other fellow did.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
    – Mike
    2 days ago
















3












3








3






This isn't incorrect per se, but its unnecessarily convoluted. To show that $f'$ is unbounded, just observe that $f'(x)=frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$ so that $lim_{xto 0^+}f'(x)=infty$. Hence, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$, which is precisely what you want to prove. That's all you need to say.



The last part is a little hand-wavy though. Technically, you should say something like this: $f$ is Lipschitz on $[epsilon,1]$ with constant $K_epsilon:=sup_{epsilonleq xleq 1}|f'(x)|$. Since $K_epsilontoinfty$ as $epsilonto 0^+$, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$.



Better still just to do an explicit calculation, as the other fellow did.






share|cite|improve this answer














This isn't incorrect per se, but its unnecessarily convoluted. To show that $f'$ is unbounded, just observe that $f'(x)=frac{1}{2sqrt{x}}$ so that $lim_{xto 0^+}f'(x)=infty$. Hence, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$, which is precisely what you want to prove. That's all you need to say.



The last part is a little hand-wavy though. Technically, you should say something like this: $f$ is Lipschitz on $[epsilon,1]$ with constant $K_epsilon:=sup_{epsilonleq xleq 1}|f'(x)|$. Since $K_epsilontoinfty$ as $epsilonto 0^+$, $f$ is not Lipschitz on $[0,1]$.



Better still just to do an explicit calculation, as the other fellow did.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Ben WBen W

1,995615




1,995615












  • Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
    – Mike
    2 days ago




















  • Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
    – Mike
    2 days ago


















Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
– Mike
2 days ago






Thanks a lot, Ben W! I really learnt a lot from you! Kindly check my post, I edited it! (+1)
– Mike
2 days ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062809%2fprove-or-disprove-that-there-exists-k-such-that-fx-fy-leq-k-x-y-fo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?