vector field of a sphere












1












$begingroup$


I have a problem to understand vector fields on manifolds. Theoretically I get it, but I cannot find a concrete example with numbers.



For example, I have the $S^2$ sphere and I take the classic polar parametriazation ($theta$,$phi$)$to$ r($theta$,$phi$) in order to get the vector fields r$theta$,r$phi$.What are those vector fields?Are they a base of the tangent space?Obviously they are, but why?



Are they the same with the canonical base $frac{partial}{partial theta}$, $frac{partial}{partial phi}$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have a problem to understand vector fields on manifolds. Theoretically I get it, but I cannot find a concrete example with numbers.



    For example, I have the $S^2$ sphere and I take the classic polar parametriazation ($theta$,$phi$)$to$ r($theta$,$phi$) in order to get the vector fields r$theta$,r$phi$.What are those vector fields?Are they a base of the tangent space?Obviously they are, but why?



    Are they the same with the canonical base $frac{partial}{partial theta}$, $frac{partial}{partial phi}$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have a problem to understand vector fields on manifolds. Theoretically I get it, but I cannot find a concrete example with numbers.



      For example, I have the $S^2$ sphere and I take the classic polar parametriazation ($theta$,$phi$)$to$ r($theta$,$phi$) in order to get the vector fields r$theta$,r$phi$.What are those vector fields?Are they a base of the tangent space?Obviously they are, but why?



      Are they the same with the canonical base $frac{partial}{partial theta}$, $frac{partial}{partial phi}$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have a problem to understand vector fields on manifolds. Theoretically I get it, but I cannot find a concrete example with numbers.



      For example, I have the $S^2$ sphere and I take the classic polar parametriazation ($theta$,$phi$)$to$ r($theta$,$phi$) in order to get the vector fields r$theta$,r$phi$.What are those vector fields?Are they a base of the tangent space?Obviously they are, but why?



      Are they the same with the canonical base $frac{partial}{partial theta}$, $frac{partial}{partial phi}$?







      differential-geometry manifolds






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 20 at 8:29









      janejane

      264




      264






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The basis of the tangent space is indeed $fracpartial{partialtheta},fracpartial{partialphi}$. This is an abstracted form, which is also sometimes written as $partial_theta,partial_phi$.



          We can associate the points on the sphere with the coordinates in the map $(theta,phi)$ and then 'read' the basis vectors 'through the coordinate map'. If we do, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(theta,phi)=(1,0)quadtext{and}quadfracpartial{partialphi}(theta,phi)=(0,1)$$
          So we see that they span indeed a 2-dimensional tangent space. The differential map of the coordinate map transforms them to the unit vectors in its coordinate space.



          For comparison, if we look at the embedding of $S^2$ in $mathbb R^3$ with its canonical cartesian coordinate map $(x,y,z)$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta, costheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta, -sintheta)$$
          And if we 'read through the cartesian coordinate map' $(x,y)$ of $S^2$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta)$$
          which is the representation of $fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the cartesian coordinate map.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
            $endgroup$
            – jane
            Jan 20 at 9:34












          • $begingroup$
            @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
            $endgroup$
            – I like Serena
            Jan 20 at 10:46











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080324%2fvector-field-of-a-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The basis of the tangent space is indeed $fracpartial{partialtheta},fracpartial{partialphi}$. This is an abstracted form, which is also sometimes written as $partial_theta,partial_phi$.



          We can associate the points on the sphere with the coordinates in the map $(theta,phi)$ and then 'read' the basis vectors 'through the coordinate map'. If we do, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(theta,phi)=(1,0)quadtext{and}quadfracpartial{partialphi}(theta,phi)=(0,1)$$
          So we see that they span indeed a 2-dimensional tangent space. The differential map of the coordinate map transforms them to the unit vectors in its coordinate space.



          For comparison, if we look at the embedding of $S^2$ in $mathbb R^3$ with its canonical cartesian coordinate map $(x,y,z)$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta, costheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta, -sintheta)$$
          And if we 'read through the cartesian coordinate map' $(x,y)$ of $S^2$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta)$$
          which is the representation of $fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the cartesian coordinate map.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
            $endgroup$
            – jane
            Jan 20 at 9:34












          • $begingroup$
            @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
            $endgroup$
            – I like Serena
            Jan 20 at 10:46
















          0












          $begingroup$

          The basis of the tangent space is indeed $fracpartial{partialtheta},fracpartial{partialphi}$. This is an abstracted form, which is also sometimes written as $partial_theta,partial_phi$.



          We can associate the points on the sphere with the coordinates in the map $(theta,phi)$ and then 'read' the basis vectors 'through the coordinate map'. If we do, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(theta,phi)=(1,0)quadtext{and}quadfracpartial{partialphi}(theta,phi)=(0,1)$$
          So we see that they span indeed a 2-dimensional tangent space. The differential map of the coordinate map transforms them to the unit vectors in its coordinate space.



          For comparison, if we look at the embedding of $S^2$ in $mathbb R^3$ with its canonical cartesian coordinate map $(x,y,z)$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta, costheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta, -sintheta)$$
          And if we 'read through the cartesian coordinate map' $(x,y)$ of $S^2$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta)$$
          which is the representation of $fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the cartesian coordinate map.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
            $endgroup$
            – jane
            Jan 20 at 9:34












          • $begingroup$
            @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
            $endgroup$
            – I like Serena
            Jan 20 at 10:46














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The basis of the tangent space is indeed $fracpartial{partialtheta},fracpartial{partialphi}$. This is an abstracted form, which is also sometimes written as $partial_theta,partial_phi$.



          We can associate the points on the sphere with the coordinates in the map $(theta,phi)$ and then 'read' the basis vectors 'through the coordinate map'. If we do, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(theta,phi)=(1,0)quadtext{and}quadfracpartial{partialphi}(theta,phi)=(0,1)$$
          So we see that they span indeed a 2-dimensional tangent space. The differential map of the coordinate map transforms them to the unit vectors in its coordinate space.



          For comparison, if we look at the embedding of $S^2$ in $mathbb R^3$ with its canonical cartesian coordinate map $(x,y,z)$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta, costheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta, -sintheta)$$
          And if we 'read through the cartesian coordinate map' $(x,y)$ of $S^2$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta)$$
          which is the representation of $fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the cartesian coordinate map.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The basis of the tangent space is indeed $fracpartial{partialtheta},fracpartial{partialphi}$. This is an abstracted form, which is also sometimes written as $partial_theta,partial_phi$.



          We can associate the points on the sphere with the coordinates in the map $(theta,phi)$ and then 'read' the basis vectors 'through the coordinate map'. If we do, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(theta,phi)=(1,0)quadtext{and}quadfracpartial{partialphi}(theta,phi)=(0,1)$$
          So we see that they span indeed a 2-dimensional tangent space. The differential map of the coordinate map transforms them to the unit vectors in its coordinate space.



          For comparison, if we look at the embedding of $S^2$ in $mathbb R^3$ with its canonical cartesian coordinate map $(x,y,z)$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta, costheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta, -sintheta)$$
          And if we 'read through the cartesian coordinate map' $(x,y)$ of $S^2$, we get:
          $$fracpartial{partialtheta}(cosphisintheta, sinphisintheta)=(cosphicostheta, cosphicostheta)$$
          which is the representation of $fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the cartesian coordinate map.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 20 at 9:04

























          answered Jan 20 at 8:58









          I like SerenaI like Serena

          4,2221722




          4,2221722












          • $begingroup$
            I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
            $endgroup$
            – jane
            Jan 20 at 9:34












          • $begingroup$
            @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
            $endgroup$
            – I like Serena
            Jan 20 at 10:46


















          • $begingroup$
            I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
            $endgroup$
            – jane
            Jan 20 at 9:34












          • $begingroup$
            @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
            $endgroup$
            – I like Serena
            Jan 20 at 10:46
















          $begingroup$
          I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
          $endgroup$
          – jane
          Jan 20 at 9:34






          $begingroup$
          I am a bit confused now.Is that wright: r$theta$:$R^2$ $to$ $R^3$ as ($theta$,$phi$) $to$ ($frac{partial x}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial y}{partial theta}$,$frac{partial z}{partial theta}$) and this is the same as e1?
          $endgroup$
          – jane
          Jan 20 at 9:34














          $begingroup$
          @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
          $endgroup$
          – I like Serena
          Jan 20 at 10:46




          $begingroup$
          @jane, yes, the resulting vector is the representation of $mathbf e_1=fracpartial{partialtheta}$ in the embedding given by $f(theta,phi)=(x(theta,phi), y(theta,phi), z(theta,phi))$.
          $endgroup$
          – I like Serena
          Jan 20 at 10:46


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3080324%2fvector-field-of-a-sphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?