Functional analysis: locally compact hausdorff space












1












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Show that every function in $C_0(X)$ (continuous functions that vanish at infinity) can be arbitrarily uniformly approximated by functions in $C_{00}(X)$ (continuous functions of compact support).
In other words, show that the closure of $C_{00}(x)=C_0(X)$



My work so far: Let $fin C_{0}rightarrow |f|$ is continuous.



Let $K_{n}=|f|^{-1}([1/n,+infty[) n in N$



$A_{n}=|f|^{-1}([0,1/2n])$



Urysohn`s lemma states that $exists$ a continuous function $g_{n} : X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $g_n(K_n)=1$ and $g_n(A_n)=0$



We now define $f_n=g_n*f$



I can't show that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and each $f_n in C_{00}.$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Show that every function in $C_0(X)$ (continuous functions that vanish at infinity) can be arbitrarily uniformly approximated by functions in $C_{00}(X)$ (continuous functions of compact support).
    In other words, show that the closure of $C_{00}(x)=C_0(X)$



    My work so far: Let $fin C_{0}rightarrow |f|$ is continuous.



    Let $K_{n}=|f|^{-1}([1/n,+infty[) n in N$



    $A_{n}=|f|^{-1}([0,1/2n])$



    Urysohn`s lemma states that $exists$ a continuous function $g_{n} : X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $g_n(K_n)=1$ and $g_n(A_n)=0$



    We now define $f_n=g_n*f$



    I can't show that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and each $f_n in C_{00}.$










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Show that every function in $C_0(X)$ (continuous functions that vanish at infinity) can be arbitrarily uniformly approximated by functions in $C_{00}(X)$ (continuous functions of compact support).
      In other words, show that the closure of $C_{00}(x)=C_0(X)$



      My work so far: Let $fin C_{0}rightarrow |f|$ is continuous.



      Let $K_{n}=|f|^{-1}([1/n,+infty[) n in N$



      $A_{n}=|f|^{-1}([0,1/2n])$



      Urysohn`s lemma states that $exists$ a continuous function $g_{n} : X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $g_n(K_n)=1$ and $g_n(A_n)=0$



      We now define $f_n=g_n*f$



      I can't show that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and each $f_n in C_{00}.$










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space. Show that every function in $C_0(X)$ (continuous functions that vanish at infinity) can be arbitrarily uniformly approximated by functions in $C_{00}(X)$ (continuous functions of compact support).
      In other words, show that the closure of $C_{00}(x)=C_0(X)$



      My work so far: Let $fin C_{0}rightarrow |f|$ is continuous.



      Let $K_{n}=|f|^{-1}([1/n,+infty[) n in N$



      $A_{n}=|f|^{-1}([0,1/2n])$



      Urysohn`s lemma states that $exists$ a continuous function $g_{n} : X rightarrow [0,1]$ such that $g_n(K_n)=1$ and $g_n(A_n)=0$



      We now define $f_n=g_n*f$



      I can't show that $f_n$ converges uniformly to $f$ and each $f_n in C_{00}.$







      functional-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 11 at 16:00









      amWhy

      192k28225439




      192k28225439










      asked Jan 11 at 15:35









      Carlos RogerCarlos Roger

      112




      112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $f in C_0(X)$, set ${|f| ge varepsilon} subseteq X$ is compact so by Urysohn's lemma there exists $phi in C_{00}(X)$ such that $phi(X) subseteq [0,1]$ and $phi|_{{|f| ge varepsilon}} = 1$.



          Define $h = fphi in C_{00}(X)$ and we claim that $|f-h|_infty le varepsilon$. Indeed, on ${|f| ge varepsilon}$ we have $h = f$, and for $x in {|f| < varepsilon}$ we have
          $$|f(x) - h(x)| = |f(x) - f(x)phi(x)| = |f(x)||1-phi(x)| le |f(x)| le varepsilon$$
          so the claim follows.






          Lemma:


          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.




          1. Let $x in X$ and let $U subseteq X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then there exists a precompact open neighbourhood $V subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $overline{V} subseteq U$.

          2. Assume $K subseteq X$ is compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a precompact open set $V subseteq X$ such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$.




          Proof:





          1. $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ so by local compactness there exists a compact neighbourhood $F subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $F subseteq U$. Define $U_1 = U cap operatorname{Int}(F)$. Notice that $overline{U_1}$ is a closed subspace of a compact set $F$ so it is also compact. Hence $overline{U_1}$ is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is regular. $partial U_1$ is closed in $overline{U_1}$ so there exist $V,W subseteq overline{U_1}$ disjoint and open in $overline{U_1}$ such that $x in V, partial U_1 subseteq W$. Since $Vsubseteq overline{U_1} subseteq F subseteq U$, $V$ is open in $X$ and $overline{V}$ is a closed subspace of $F$ and hence compact, which proves the lemma.

          2. For every $x in K$ there exists a precompact open set $V_x$ such that $x in V_x subseteq U$. $(V_x)_{x in K}$ is an open cover of $K$ so there exist $x_1, ldots, x_n in K$ such that $K subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i} := V$. Then $V$ is the desired set since $overline{V} = bigcup_{i=1}^n overline{V_{x_i}} subseteq U$ and is compact as a finite union of compact sets.


          Urysohn's lemma for LCH spaces:




          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, $K subseteq X$ compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ such that $phi|_K = 1$ and $operatorname{supp} phi subseteq U$ is compact (i.e. $phi in C_{00}(X)$).




          Proof:
          Let $tilde{X}$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Let $Vsubseteq X$ be the open precompact set such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$. Then $K$ and $tilde{X}setminus V$ are disjoint closed subspaces of $tilde{X}$, which is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is normal. Hence by the classical Urysohn's lemma there exists a continuous function $psi : tilde{X} to [0,1]$ such that $psi|_K = 1$ and $psi|_{Xsetminus overline{V}} = 0$. Define a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ as $phi = psi|_{X}$. Then $phi|_K = 1$ and $phi(x) = 0, forall x in Xsetminus V$ so
          $$operatorname{supp}phi = overline{phi ne 0} subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$$
          and it is compact as a closed subspace of the compact set $overline{V}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
            $endgroup$
            – Carlos Roger
            Jan 12 at 2:19










          • $begingroup$
            @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Jan 12 at 15:34











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069972%2ffunctional-analysis-locally-compact-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $f in C_0(X)$, set ${|f| ge varepsilon} subseteq X$ is compact so by Urysohn's lemma there exists $phi in C_{00}(X)$ such that $phi(X) subseteq [0,1]$ and $phi|_{{|f| ge varepsilon}} = 1$.



          Define $h = fphi in C_{00}(X)$ and we claim that $|f-h|_infty le varepsilon$. Indeed, on ${|f| ge varepsilon}$ we have $h = f$, and for $x in {|f| < varepsilon}$ we have
          $$|f(x) - h(x)| = |f(x) - f(x)phi(x)| = |f(x)||1-phi(x)| le |f(x)| le varepsilon$$
          so the claim follows.






          Lemma:


          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.




          1. Let $x in X$ and let $U subseteq X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then there exists a precompact open neighbourhood $V subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $overline{V} subseteq U$.

          2. Assume $K subseteq X$ is compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a precompact open set $V subseteq X$ such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$.




          Proof:





          1. $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ so by local compactness there exists a compact neighbourhood $F subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $F subseteq U$. Define $U_1 = U cap operatorname{Int}(F)$. Notice that $overline{U_1}$ is a closed subspace of a compact set $F$ so it is also compact. Hence $overline{U_1}$ is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is regular. $partial U_1$ is closed in $overline{U_1}$ so there exist $V,W subseteq overline{U_1}$ disjoint and open in $overline{U_1}$ such that $x in V, partial U_1 subseteq W$. Since $Vsubseteq overline{U_1} subseteq F subseteq U$, $V$ is open in $X$ and $overline{V}$ is a closed subspace of $F$ and hence compact, which proves the lemma.

          2. For every $x in K$ there exists a precompact open set $V_x$ such that $x in V_x subseteq U$. $(V_x)_{x in K}$ is an open cover of $K$ so there exist $x_1, ldots, x_n in K$ such that $K subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i} := V$. Then $V$ is the desired set since $overline{V} = bigcup_{i=1}^n overline{V_{x_i}} subseteq U$ and is compact as a finite union of compact sets.


          Urysohn's lemma for LCH spaces:




          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, $K subseteq X$ compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ such that $phi|_K = 1$ and $operatorname{supp} phi subseteq U$ is compact (i.e. $phi in C_{00}(X)$).




          Proof:
          Let $tilde{X}$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Let $Vsubseteq X$ be the open precompact set such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$. Then $K$ and $tilde{X}setminus V$ are disjoint closed subspaces of $tilde{X}$, which is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is normal. Hence by the classical Urysohn's lemma there exists a continuous function $psi : tilde{X} to [0,1]$ such that $psi|_K = 1$ and $psi|_{Xsetminus overline{V}} = 0$. Define a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ as $phi = psi|_{X}$. Then $phi|_K = 1$ and $phi(x) = 0, forall x in Xsetminus V$ so
          $$operatorname{supp}phi = overline{phi ne 0} subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$$
          and it is compact as a closed subspace of the compact set $overline{V}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
            $endgroup$
            – Carlos Roger
            Jan 12 at 2:19










          • $begingroup$
            @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Jan 12 at 15:34
















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $f in C_0(X)$, set ${|f| ge varepsilon} subseteq X$ is compact so by Urysohn's lemma there exists $phi in C_{00}(X)$ such that $phi(X) subseteq [0,1]$ and $phi|_{{|f| ge varepsilon}} = 1$.



          Define $h = fphi in C_{00}(X)$ and we claim that $|f-h|_infty le varepsilon$. Indeed, on ${|f| ge varepsilon}$ we have $h = f$, and for $x in {|f| < varepsilon}$ we have
          $$|f(x) - h(x)| = |f(x) - f(x)phi(x)| = |f(x)||1-phi(x)| le |f(x)| le varepsilon$$
          so the claim follows.






          Lemma:


          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.




          1. Let $x in X$ and let $U subseteq X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then there exists a precompact open neighbourhood $V subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $overline{V} subseteq U$.

          2. Assume $K subseteq X$ is compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a precompact open set $V subseteq X$ such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$.




          Proof:





          1. $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ so by local compactness there exists a compact neighbourhood $F subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $F subseteq U$. Define $U_1 = U cap operatorname{Int}(F)$. Notice that $overline{U_1}$ is a closed subspace of a compact set $F$ so it is also compact. Hence $overline{U_1}$ is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is regular. $partial U_1$ is closed in $overline{U_1}$ so there exist $V,W subseteq overline{U_1}$ disjoint and open in $overline{U_1}$ such that $x in V, partial U_1 subseteq W$. Since $Vsubseteq overline{U_1} subseteq F subseteq U$, $V$ is open in $X$ and $overline{V}$ is a closed subspace of $F$ and hence compact, which proves the lemma.

          2. For every $x in K$ there exists a precompact open set $V_x$ such that $x in V_x subseteq U$. $(V_x)_{x in K}$ is an open cover of $K$ so there exist $x_1, ldots, x_n in K$ such that $K subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i} := V$. Then $V$ is the desired set since $overline{V} = bigcup_{i=1}^n overline{V_{x_i}} subseteq U$ and is compact as a finite union of compact sets.


          Urysohn's lemma for LCH spaces:




          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, $K subseteq X$ compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ such that $phi|_K = 1$ and $operatorname{supp} phi subseteq U$ is compact (i.e. $phi in C_{00}(X)$).




          Proof:
          Let $tilde{X}$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Let $Vsubseteq X$ be the open precompact set such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$. Then $K$ and $tilde{X}setminus V$ are disjoint closed subspaces of $tilde{X}$, which is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is normal. Hence by the classical Urysohn's lemma there exists a continuous function $psi : tilde{X} to [0,1]$ such that $psi|_K = 1$ and $psi|_{Xsetminus overline{V}} = 0$. Define a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ as $phi = psi|_{X}$. Then $phi|_K = 1$ and $phi(x) = 0, forall x in Xsetminus V$ so
          $$operatorname{supp}phi = overline{phi ne 0} subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$$
          and it is compact as a closed subspace of the compact set $overline{V}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
            $endgroup$
            – Carlos Roger
            Jan 12 at 2:19










          • $begingroup$
            @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Jan 12 at 15:34














          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $f in C_0(X)$, set ${|f| ge varepsilon} subseteq X$ is compact so by Urysohn's lemma there exists $phi in C_{00}(X)$ such that $phi(X) subseteq [0,1]$ and $phi|_{{|f| ge varepsilon}} = 1$.



          Define $h = fphi in C_{00}(X)$ and we claim that $|f-h|_infty le varepsilon$. Indeed, on ${|f| ge varepsilon}$ we have $h = f$, and for $x in {|f| < varepsilon}$ we have
          $$|f(x) - h(x)| = |f(x) - f(x)phi(x)| = |f(x)||1-phi(x)| le |f(x)| le varepsilon$$
          so the claim follows.






          Lemma:


          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.




          1. Let $x in X$ and let $U subseteq X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then there exists a precompact open neighbourhood $V subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $overline{V} subseteq U$.

          2. Assume $K subseteq X$ is compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a precompact open set $V subseteq X$ such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$.




          Proof:





          1. $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ so by local compactness there exists a compact neighbourhood $F subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $F subseteq U$. Define $U_1 = U cap operatorname{Int}(F)$. Notice that $overline{U_1}$ is a closed subspace of a compact set $F$ so it is also compact. Hence $overline{U_1}$ is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is regular. $partial U_1$ is closed in $overline{U_1}$ so there exist $V,W subseteq overline{U_1}$ disjoint and open in $overline{U_1}$ such that $x in V, partial U_1 subseteq W$. Since $Vsubseteq overline{U_1} subseteq F subseteq U$, $V$ is open in $X$ and $overline{V}$ is a closed subspace of $F$ and hence compact, which proves the lemma.

          2. For every $x in K$ there exists a precompact open set $V_x$ such that $x in V_x subseteq U$. $(V_x)_{x in K}$ is an open cover of $K$ so there exist $x_1, ldots, x_n in K$ such that $K subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i} := V$. Then $V$ is the desired set since $overline{V} = bigcup_{i=1}^n overline{V_{x_i}} subseteq U$ and is compact as a finite union of compact sets.


          Urysohn's lemma for LCH spaces:




          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, $K subseteq X$ compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ such that $phi|_K = 1$ and $operatorname{supp} phi subseteq U$ is compact (i.e. $phi in C_{00}(X)$).




          Proof:
          Let $tilde{X}$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Let $Vsubseteq X$ be the open precompact set such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$. Then $K$ and $tilde{X}setminus V$ are disjoint closed subspaces of $tilde{X}$, which is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is normal. Hence by the classical Urysohn's lemma there exists a continuous function $psi : tilde{X} to [0,1]$ such that $psi|_K = 1$ and $psi|_{Xsetminus overline{V}} = 0$. Define a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ as $phi = psi|_{X}$. Then $phi|_K = 1$ and $phi(x) = 0, forall x in Xsetminus V$ so
          $$operatorname{supp}phi = overline{phi ne 0} subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$$
          and it is compact as a closed subspace of the compact set $overline{V}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Let $varepsilon > 0$. Since $f in C_0(X)$, set ${|f| ge varepsilon} subseteq X$ is compact so by Urysohn's lemma there exists $phi in C_{00}(X)$ such that $phi(X) subseteq [0,1]$ and $phi|_{{|f| ge varepsilon}} = 1$.



          Define $h = fphi in C_{00}(X)$ and we claim that $|f-h|_infty le varepsilon$. Indeed, on ${|f| ge varepsilon}$ we have $h = f$, and for $x in {|f| < varepsilon}$ we have
          $$|f(x) - h(x)| = |f(x) - f(x)phi(x)| = |f(x)||1-phi(x)| le |f(x)| le varepsilon$$
          so the claim follows.






          Lemma:


          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space.




          1. Let $x in X$ and let $U subseteq X$ be an open neighbourhood of $x$. Then there exists a precompact open neighbourhood $V subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $overline{V} subseteq U$.

          2. Assume $K subseteq X$ is compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a precompact open set $V subseteq X$ such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$.




          Proof:





          1. $U$ is an open neighbourhood of $x$ so by local compactness there exists a compact neighbourhood $F subseteq X$ of $x$ such that $F subseteq U$. Define $U_1 = U cap operatorname{Int}(F)$. Notice that $overline{U_1}$ is a closed subspace of a compact set $F$ so it is also compact. Hence $overline{U_1}$ is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is regular. $partial U_1$ is closed in $overline{U_1}$ so there exist $V,W subseteq overline{U_1}$ disjoint and open in $overline{U_1}$ such that $x in V, partial U_1 subseteq W$. Since $Vsubseteq overline{U_1} subseteq F subseteq U$, $V$ is open in $X$ and $overline{V}$ is a closed subspace of $F$ and hence compact, which proves the lemma.

          2. For every $x in K$ there exists a precompact open set $V_x$ such that $x in V_x subseteq U$. $(V_x)_{x in K}$ is an open cover of $K$ so there exist $x_1, ldots, x_n in K$ such that $K subseteq bigcup_{i=1}^n V_{x_i} := V$. Then $V$ is the desired set since $overline{V} = bigcup_{i=1}^n overline{V_{x_i}} subseteq U$ and is compact as a finite union of compact sets.


          Urysohn's lemma for LCH spaces:




          Let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, $K subseteq X$ compact and $Usubseteq X$ open such that $K subseteq U$. Then there exists a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ such that $phi|_K = 1$ and $operatorname{supp} phi subseteq U$ is compact (i.e. $phi in C_{00}(X)$).




          Proof:
          Let $tilde{X}$ be the one-point compactification of $X$. Let $Vsubseteq X$ be the open precompact set such that $K subseteq V subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$. Then $K$ and $tilde{X}setminus V$ are disjoint closed subspaces of $tilde{X}$, which is a compact Hausdorff space so in particular it is normal. Hence by the classical Urysohn's lemma there exists a continuous function $psi : tilde{X} to [0,1]$ such that $psi|_K = 1$ and $psi|_{Xsetminus overline{V}} = 0$. Define a continuous function $phi : X to [0,1]$ as $phi = psi|_{X}$. Then $phi|_K = 1$ and $phi(x) = 0, forall x in Xsetminus V$ so
          $$operatorname{supp}phi = overline{phi ne 0} subseteq overline{V} subseteq U$$
          and it is compact as a closed subspace of the compact set $overline{V}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 12 at 15:33

























          answered Jan 11 at 20:12









          mechanodroidmechanodroid

          27.2k62446




          27.2k62446












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
            $endgroup$
            – Carlos Roger
            Jan 12 at 2:19










          • $begingroup$
            @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Jan 12 at 15:34


















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
            $endgroup$
            – Carlos Roger
            Jan 12 at 2:19










          • $begingroup$
            @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
            $endgroup$
            – mechanodroid
            Jan 12 at 15:34
















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
          $endgroup$
          – Carlos Roger
          Jan 12 at 2:19




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for your answer. I think my problem is that I don't know what Urysohn's lemma says because i can't see why $phi in C_{00}(X)$
          $endgroup$
          – Carlos Roger
          Jan 12 at 2:19












          $begingroup$
          @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Jan 12 at 15:34




          $begingroup$
          @CarlosRoger We need a stronger version of Urysohn's lemma to ensure $phi in C_{00}(X)$. I have added the details, have a look.
          $endgroup$
          – mechanodroid
          Jan 12 at 15:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069972%2ffunctional-analysis-locally-compact-hausdorff-space%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese