Where does the bias come from in LogLog and HyperLoglog?
Multi tool use
In the original LogLog paper from P. Flajolet, the cardinality estimation function is presented as
$$E := alpha_m m2^{1 over m} {^{sum_{j} M^{(j)}}}$$
Where $alpha$ is needed to correct the systematic bias in the asymptotic limit which cause overestimates.
However I am having trouble identifying where does this bias come from.
My intuition tells me this is related to the fact we retain the $max$ count of leading zeros, which is probably skewed to higher values.
Wikipedia states this is due to the risk of hash collisions, but that seems wrong as hash collision would underestimate not overestimates (this is actually an improvement in the HyperLogLog paper)
Has anyone a more explicit definition (ideally in layman terms) or reason explaining this bias?
Thank you!
probability-theory probability-limit-theorems
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Pierre Lacave ending in 7 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
add a comment |
In the original LogLog paper from P. Flajolet, the cardinality estimation function is presented as
$$E := alpha_m m2^{1 over m} {^{sum_{j} M^{(j)}}}$$
Where $alpha$ is needed to correct the systematic bias in the asymptotic limit which cause overestimates.
However I am having trouble identifying where does this bias come from.
My intuition tells me this is related to the fact we retain the $max$ count of leading zeros, which is probably skewed to higher values.
Wikipedia states this is due to the risk of hash collisions, but that seems wrong as hash collision would underestimate not overestimates (this is actually an improvement in the HyperLogLog paper)
Has anyone a more explicit definition (ideally in layman terms) or reason explaining this bias?
Thank you!
probability-theory probability-limit-theorems
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Pierre Lacave ending in 7 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
In the original LogLog paper from P. Flajolet, the cardinality estimation function is presented as
$$E := alpha_m m2^{1 over m} {^{sum_{j} M^{(j)}}}$$
Where $alpha$ is needed to correct the systematic bias in the asymptotic limit which cause overestimates.
However I am having trouble identifying where does this bias come from.
My intuition tells me this is related to the fact we retain the $max$ count of leading zeros, which is probably skewed to higher values.
Wikipedia states this is due to the risk of hash collisions, but that seems wrong as hash collision would underestimate not overestimates (this is actually an improvement in the HyperLogLog paper)
Has anyone a more explicit definition (ideally in layman terms) or reason explaining this bias?
Thank you!
probability-theory probability-limit-theorems
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In the original LogLog paper from P. Flajolet, the cardinality estimation function is presented as
$$E := alpha_m m2^{1 over m} {^{sum_{j} M^{(j)}}}$$
Where $alpha$ is needed to correct the systematic bias in the asymptotic limit which cause overestimates.
However I am having trouble identifying where does this bias come from.
My intuition tells me this is related to the fact we retain the $max$ count of leading zeros, which is probably skewed to higher values.
Wikipedia states this is due to the risk of hash collisions, but that seems wrong as hash collision would underestimate not overestimates (this is actually an improvement in the HyperLogLog paper)
Has anyone a more explicit definition (ideally in layman terms) or reason explaining this bias?
Thank you!
probability-theory probability-limit-theorems
probability-theory probability-limit-theorems
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Pierre Lacave
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
asked 2 days ago
Pierre LacavePierre Lacave
114
114
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Pierre Lacave ending in 7 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Pierre Lacave ending in 7 days.
Looking for an answer drawing from credible and/or official sources.
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063194%2fwhere-does-the-bias-come-from-in-loglog-and-hyperloglog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Pierre Lacave is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063194%2fwhere-does-the-bias-come-from-in-loglog-and-hyperloglog%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1o6qnohNd4s,QoVAzh,Enjpu 35SeL5 Bpcx5AhYfQ5 wPvdA P2BzZwSs7C pv7MtLPO,V35tA lNgh
The two papers discussed here contrast LL and HLL; note in particular their respective uses of arithmetic and harmonic means. By the AM-HM inequality, you'd expect at least one - probably both - to be biased.
– J.G.
2 days ago