Quotient ring local if Ring is local












1














I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.



We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^{times} = {rin R , | r notin R^times }$ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.



I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.






abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
    – rschwieb
    2 days ago
















1














I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.



We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^{times} = {rin R , | r notin R^times }$ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.



I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.






abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings







share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
    – rschwieb
    2 days ago














1












1








1







I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.



We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^{times} = {rin R , | r notin R^times }$ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.



I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.






abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings







share|cite|improve this question













I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.



We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^{times} = {rin R , | r notin R^times }$ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.



I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.






abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings




abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









KingDingelingKingDingeling

856




856








  • 2




    This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
    – rschwieb
    2 days ago














  • 2




    This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
    – rschwieb
    2 days ago








2




2




This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
– rschwieb
2 days ago




This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
– rschwieb
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^{-1}(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you a lot, that really helped.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • @King You're welcome.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago



















3














By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.



Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrak{m}$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrak{m}$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrak{m})$. $widetilde{mathfrak{m}}=pi(mathfrak{m})$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.



So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrak{m})$ and hence is local.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • Not a problem. Good luck
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063196%2fquotient-ring-local-if-ring-is-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^{-1}(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you a lot, that really helped.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • @King You're welcome.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago
















2














The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^{-1}(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thank you a lot, that really helped.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • @King You're welcome.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago














2












2








2






The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^{-1}(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer












The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^{-1}(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

37.4k63665




37.4k63665












  • Thank you a lot, that really helped.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • @King You're welcome.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago


















  • Thank you a lot, that really helped.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • @King You're welcome.
    – Matt Samuel
    2 days ago
















Thank you a lot, that really helped.
– KingDingeling
2 days ago




Thank you a lot, that really helped.
– KingDingeling
2 days ago












@King You're welcome.
– Matt Samuel
2 days ago




@King You're welcome.
– Matt Samuel
2 days ago











3














By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.



Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrak{m}$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrak{m}$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrak{m})$. $widetilde{mathfrak{m}}=pi(mathfrak{m})$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.



So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrak{m})$ and hence is local.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • Not a problem. Good luck
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    2 days ago
















3














By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.



Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrak{m}$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrak{m}$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrak{m})$. $widetilde{mathfrak{m}}=pi(mathfrak{m})$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.



So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrak{m})$ and hence is local.






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • Not a problem. Good luck
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    2 days ago














3












3








3






By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.



Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrak{m}$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrak{m}$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrak{m})$. $widetilde{mathfrak{m}}=pi(mathfrak{m})$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.



So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrak{m})$ and hence is local.






share|cite|improve this answer












By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrak{m}.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.



Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrak{m}$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrak{m}$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrak{m})$. $widetilde{mathfrak{m}}=pi(mathfrak{m})$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.



So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrak{m})$ and hence is local.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Antonios-Alexandros RobotisAntonios-Alexandros Robotis

9,63241640




9,63241640












  • Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • Not a problem. Good luck
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    2 days ago


















  • Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
    – KingDingeling
    2 days ago










  • Not a problem. Good luck
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    2 days ago
















Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
– KingDingeling
2 days ago




Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
– KingDingeling
2 days ago












Not a problem. Good luck
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
2 days ago




Not a problem. Good luck
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063196%2fquotient-ring-local-if-ring-is-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
Read more

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

Image
Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
Read more