Proof that monotone functions are integrable with the classical definition of the Riemann Integral












5














Let $f:[a,b]to mathbb{R}$ be a monotone function (say strictly increasing).



Then, do for every $epsilon>0$ exist two step functions $h,g$ so that $gle fle h$ and $0le h-gle epsilon$?



Does there exist some closed form of these functions like the one below?



I encountered the problem when trying to prove the Riemann Integrability of monotone functions via the traditional definition of the Riemann Integral (not the one with Darboux sums). The book I am reading proves that a continuous function is integrable via the process below:



Let $mathcal{P}=left{ a=x_0<...<x_n=b right}$ be a partition of $[a,b]$. Define $m_i=min_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$ and $M_i=max_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$. By the Extreme Value theorem $M_i,m_i$ are well defined. We approximate $f$ with step functions:
begin{gather}g=m_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nm_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}\
h=M_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nM_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}end{gather}

It is easily seen that they satisfy the "step function approximation" and as $0le int_a^bh-gle epsilon$ (uniform continuity) by a previous theorem $f$ is integrable.



The book then goes on to generalise by discussing regulated functions. I would like however to see a self contained proof similar to the previous one if $f$ is monotone. This question is reduced to the two questions asked in the beggining of the post










share|cite|improve this question





























    5














    Let $f:[a,b]to mathbb{R}$ be a monotone function (say strictly increasing).



    Then, do for every $epsilon>0$ exist two step functions $h,g$ so that $gle fle h$ and $0le h-gle epsilon$?



    Does there exist some closed form of these functions like the one below?



    I encountered the problem when trying to prove the Riemann Integrability of monotone functions via the traditional definition of the Riemann Integral (not the one with Darboux sums). The book I am reading proves that a continuous function is integrable via the process below:



    Let $mathcal{P}=left{ a=x_0<...<x_n=b right}$ be a partition of $[a,b]$. Define $m_i=min_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$ and $M_i=max_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$. By the Extreme Value theorem $M_i,m_i$ are well defined. We approximate $f$ with step functions:
    begin{gather}g=m_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nm_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}\
    h=M_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nM_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}end{gather}

    It is easily seen that they satisfy the "step function approximation" and as $0le int_a^bh-gle epsilon$ (uniform continuity) by a previous theorem $f$ is integrable.



    The book then goes on to generalise by discussing regulated functions. I would like however to see a self contained proof similar to the previous one if $f$ is monotone. This question is reduced to the two questions asked in the beggining of the post










    share|cite|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5







      Let $f:[a,b]to mathbb{R}$ be a monotone function (say strictly increasing).



      Then, do for every $epsilon>0$ exist two step functions $h,g$ so that $gle fle h$ and $0le h-gle epsilon$?



      Does there exist some closed form of these functions like the one below?



      I encountered the problem when trying to prove the Riemann Integrability of monotone functions via the traditional definition of the Riemann Integral (not the one with Darboux sums). The book I am reading proves that a continuous function is integrable via the process below:



      Let $mathcal{P}=left{ a=x_0<...<x_n=b right}$ be a partition of $[a,b]$. Define $m_i=min_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$ and $M_i=max_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$. By the Extreme Value theorem $M_i,m_i$ are well defined. We approximate $f$ with step functions:
      begin{gather}g=m_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nm_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}\
      h=M_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nM_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}end{gather}

      It is easily seen that they satisfy the "step function approximation" and as $0le int_a^bh-gle epsilon$ (uniform continuity) by a previous theorem $f$ is integrable.



      The book then goes on to generalise by discussing regulated functions. I would like however to see a self contained proof similar to the previous one if $f$ is monotone. This question is reduced to the two questions asked in the beggining of the post










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $f:[a,b]to mathbb{R}$ be a monotone function (say strictly increasing).



      Then, do for every $epsilon>0$ exist two step functions $h,g$ so that $gle fle h$ and $0le h-gle epsilon$?



      Does there exist some closed form of these functions like the one below?



      I encountered the problem when trying to prove the Riemann Integrability of monotone functions via the traditional definition of the Riemann Integral (not the one with Darboux sums). The book I am reading proves that a continuous function is integrable via the process below:



      Let $mathcal{P}=left{ a=x_0<...<x_n=b right}$ be a partition of $[a,b]$. Define $m_i=min_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$ and $M_i=max_{xin [x_{i-1},x_i]}f(x)$. By the Extreme Value theorem $M_i,m_i$ are well defined. We approximate $f$ with step functions:
      begin{gather}g=m_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nm_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}\
      h=M_1chi_{[x_0,x_1]}+sum_{i=2}^nM_ichi_{(x_{i-1},x_i]}end{gather}

      It is easily seen that they satisfy the "step function approximation" and as $0le int_a^bh-gle epsilon$ (uniform continuity) by a previous theorem $f$ is integrable.



      The book then goes on to generalise by discussing regulated functions. I would like however to see a self contained proof similar to the previous one if $f$ is monotone. This question is reduced to the two questions asked in the beggining of the post







      calculus real-analysis integration definite-integrals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 5 at 19:52









      azimut

      16.2k1051100




      16.2k1051100










      asked Jan 21 '13 at 18:59









      OptionalOptional

      297312




      297312






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          Let $varepsilon>0$ and $N_varepsilon$ the smallest $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
          $$
          frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a)) le varepsilon
          $$
          For $n ge max{2,N_varepsilon}$ consider the following partition of $[a,b]$:
          $$
          mathcal{P}={a=x_0<x_1<ldots<x_n=b}, x_i=a+ifrac{b-a}{n} 0 le i le n.
          $$
          Set
          $$
          A_i=begin{cases}
          [x_0,x_1] & text{ for } i=0\
          (x_i,x_{i+1}]& text{ for } 1 le i le n-1
          end{cases}
          $$
          Since $f$ is strictly increasing for each $i in {0,ldots,n-1}$ we have
          $$
          f(x_i) le f(x) le f(x_{i+1}) quad forall x_i le x le x_{i+1}.
          $$
          Setting
          $$
          h=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_{i+1})chi_{A_i}, g=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i)chi_{A_i}
          $$
          we have
          $$
          g(x)le f(x) le h(x) quad forall x in [a,b],
          $$
          and
          $$
          h(x)-g(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}Big(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i)Big)chi_{A_i}(x)>0 quad forall x in [a,b].
          $$
          In addition
          begin{eqnarray}
          int_a^b(h-g)&=&sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))int_a^bchi_{A_i}=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))(x_{i+1}-x_i)\
          &=&frac{b-a}{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))=frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))\
          &le&frac{1}{N_varepsilon}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))le varepsilon.
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
            – Optional
            Jan 22 '13 at 11:19



















          2














          Let $P$ be a finite partition of $[f(a),f(b)]$ into subintervals of length at most $epsilon$. For $Ain P$, write $m_A<M_A$ for the endpoints of $A$ and define $$g=sum_{Ain P}m_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}qquadmbox{and}qquad h=sum_{Ain P} M_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:19












          • Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:23










          • Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:28










          • Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:29












          • But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:31













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f283679%2fproof-that-monotone-functions-are-integrable-with-the-classical-definition-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          Let $varepsilon>0$ and $N_varepsilon$ the smallest $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
          $$
          frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a)) le varepsilon
          $$
          For $n ge max{2,N_varepsilon}$ consider the following partition of $[a,b]$:
          $$
          mathcal{P}={a=x_0<x_1<ldots<x_n=b}, x_i=a+ifrac{b-a}{n} 0 le i le n.
          $$
          Set
          $$
          A_i=begin{cases}
          [x_0,x_1] & text{ for } i=0\
          (x_i,x_{i+1}]& text{ for } 1 le i le n-1
          end{cases}
          $$
          Since $f$ is strictly increasing for each $i in {0,ldots,n-1}$ we have
          $$
          f(x_i) le f(x) le f(x_{i+1}) quad forall x_i le x le x_{i+1}.
          $$
          Setting
          $$
          h=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_{i+1})chi_{A_i}, g=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i)chi_{A_i}
          $$
          we have
          $$
          g(x)le f(x) le h(x) quad forall x in [a,b],
          $$
          and
          $$
          h(x)-g(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}Big(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i)Big)chi_{A_i}(x)>0 quad forall x in [a,b].
          $$
          In addition
          begin{eqnarray}
          int_a^b(h-g)&=&sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))int_a^bchi_{A_i}=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))(x_{i+1}-x_i)\
          &=&frac{b-a}{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))=frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))\
          &le&frac{1}{N_varepsilon}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))le varepsilon.
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
            – Optional
            Jan 22 '13 at 11:19
















          5














          Let $varepsilon>0$ and $N_varepsilon$ the smallest $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
          $$
          frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a)) le varepsilon
          $$
          For $n ge max{2,N_varepsilon}$ consider the following partition of $[a,b]$:
          $$
          mathcal{P}={a=x_0<x_1<ldots<x_n=b}, x_i=a+ifrac{b-a}{n} 0 le i le n.
          $$
          Set
          $$
          A_i=begin{cases}
          [x_0,x_1] & text{ for } i=0\
          (x_i,x_{i+1}]& text{ for } 1 le i le n-1
          end{cases}
          $$
          Since $f$ is strictly increasing for each $i in {0,ldots,n-1}$ we have
          $$
          f(x_i) le f(x) le f(x_{i+1}) quad forall x_i le x le x_{i+1}.
          $$
          Setting
          $$
          h=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_{i+1})chi_{A_i}, g=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i)chi_{A_i}
          $$
          we have
          $$
          g(x)le f(x) le h(x) quad forall x in [a,b],
          $$
          and
          $$
          h(x)-g(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}Big(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i)Big)chi_{A_i}(x)>0 quad forall x in [a,b].
          $$
          In addition
          begin{eqnarray}
          int_a^b(h-g)&=&sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))int_a^bchi_{A_i}=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))(x_{i+1}-x_i)\
          &=&frac{b-a}{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))=frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))\
          &le&frac{1}{N_varepsilon}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))le varepsilon.
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer

















          • 1




            You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
            – Optional
            Jan 22 '13 at 11:19














          5












          5








          5






          Let $varepsilon>0$ and $N_varepsilon$ the smallest $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
          $$
          frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a)) le varepsilon
          $$
          For $n ge max{2,N_varepsilon}$ consider the following partition of $[a,b]$:
          $$
          mathcal{P}={a=x_0<x_1<ldots<x_n=b}, x_i=a+ifrac{b-a}{n} 0 le i le n.
          $$
          Set
          $$
          A_i=begin{cases}
          [x_0,x_1] & text{ for } i=0\
          (x_i,x_{i+1}]& text{ for } 1 le i le n-1
          end{cases}
          $$
          Since $f$ is strictly increasing for each $i in {0,ldots,n-1}$ we have
          $$
          f(x_i) le f(x) le f(x_{i+1}) quad forall x_i le x le x_{i+1}.
          $$
          Setting
          $$
          h=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_{i+1})chi_{A_i}, g=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i)chi_{A_i}
          $$
          we have
          $$
          g(x)le f(x) le h(x) quad forall x in [a,b],
          $$
          and
          $$
          h(x)-g(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}Big(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i)Big)chi_{A_i}(x)>0 quad forall x in [a,b].
          $$
          In addition
          begin{eqnarray}
          int_a^b(h-g)&=&sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))int_a^bchi_{A_i}=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))(x_{i+1}-x_i)\
          &=&frac{b-a}{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))=frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))\
          &le&frac{1}{N_varepsilon}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))le varepsilon.
          end{eqnarray}






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $varepsilon>0$ and $N_varepsilon$ the smallest $n in mathbb{N}$ such that
          $$
          frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a)) le varepsilon
          $$
          For $n ge max{2,N_varepsilon}$ consider the following partition of $[a,b]$:
          $$
          mathcal{P}={a=x_0<x_1<ldots<x_n=b}, x_i=a+ifrac{b-a}{n} 0 le i le n.
          $$
          Set
          $$
          A_i=begin{cases}
          [x_0,x_1] & text{ for } i=0\
          (x_i,x_{i+1}]& text{ for } 1 le i le n-1
          end{cases}
          $$
          Since $f$ is strictly increasing for each $i in {0,ldots,n-1}$ we have
          $$
          f(x_i) le f(x) le f(x_{i+1}) quad forall x_i le x le x_{i+1}.
          $$
          Setting
          $$
          h=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_{i+1})chi_{A_i}, g=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}f(x_i)chi_{A_i}
          $$
          we have
          $$
          g(x)le f(x) le h(x) quad forall x in [a,b],
          $$
          and
          $$
          h(x)-g(x)=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}Big(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i)Big)chi_{A_i}(x)>0 quad forall x in [a,b].
          $$
          In addition
          begin{eqnarray}
          int_a^b(h-g)&=&sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))int_a^bchi_{A_i}=sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))(x_{i+1}-x_i)\
          &=&frac{b-a}{n}sum_{i=0}^{n-1}(f(x_{i+1})-f(x_i))=frac{1}{n}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))\
          &le&frac{1}{N_varepsilon}(b-a)(f(b)-f(a))le varepsilon.
          end{eqnarray}







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 21 '13 at 22:10









          Mercy KingMercy King

          14k11328




          14k11328








          • 1




            You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
            – Optional
            Jan 22 '13 at 11:19














          • 1




            You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
            – Optional
            Jan 22 '13 at 11:19








          1




          1




          You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
          – Optional
          Jan 22 '13 at 11:19




          You didn't have to include so many details but thank you sincerely
          – Optional
          Jan 22 '13 at 11:19











          2














          Let $P$ be a finite partition of $[f(a),f(b)]$ into subintervals of length at most $epsilon$. For $Ain P$, write $m_A<M_A$ for the endpoints of $A$ and define $$g=sum_{Ain P}m_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}qquadmbox{and}qquad h=sum_{Ain P} M_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:19












          • Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:23










          • Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:28










          • Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:29












          • But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:31


















          2














          Let $P$ be a finite partition of $[f(a),f(b)]$ into subintervals of length at most $epsilon$. For $Ain P$, write $m_A<M_A$ for the endpoints of $A$ and define $$g=sum_{Ain P}m_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}qquadmbox{and}qquad h=sum_{Ain P} M_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:19












          • Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:23










          • Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:28










          • Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:29












          • But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:31
















          2












          2








          2






          Let $P$ be a finite partition of $[f(a),f(b)]$ into subintervals of length at most $epsilon$. For $Ain P$, write $m_A<M_A$ for the endpoints of $A$ and define $$g=sum_{Ain P}m_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}qquadmbox{and}qquad h=sum_{Ain P} M_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Let $P$ be a finite partition of $[f(a),f(b)]$ into subintervals of length at most $epsilon$. For $Ain P$, write $m_A<M_A$ for the endpoints of $A$ and define $$g=sum_{Ain P}m_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}qquadmbox{and}qquad h=sum_{Ain P} M_Achi_{f^{-1}(A)}.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 21 '13 at 19:13









          user108903user108903

          1,09578




          1,09578












          • Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:19












          • Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:23










          • Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:28










          • Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:29












          • But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:31




















          • Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:19












          • Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:23










          • Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:28










          • Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
            – user108903
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:29












          • But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
            – Optional
            Jan 21 '13 at 19:31


















          Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:19






          Thanks for the answer. Can you suggest such a partition $P$ (that is preferably simple)?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:19














          Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
          – user108903
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:23




          Sure. Pick $nge1$ large enough that $delta:=(f(b)-f(a))/nle epsilon$, and take $P={A_1,A_2,dots,A_n}$ where $A_1=[f(a),f(a)+delta)$, $A_2=[f(a)+delta,f(a)+2delta)$, ... , $A_{n-1}=[f(a)+(n-2)delta,f(a)+(n-1)delta)$, $A_n=[f(a)+(n-1)delta,f(a)+ndelta]$.
          – user108903
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:23












          Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:28




          Yeah, thats what I had in mind. The whole process of partitioning the range instead of the domain is a little complicated. Can we partition the domain instead?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:28












          Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
          – user108903
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:29






          Well you are partitioning the domain (even into intervals), but you're using a partition of the range to find the partition of the domain.
          – user108903
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:29














          But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:31






          But how do we know $f^{-1}(A)$ is an interval and so the two functions are integrable?
          – Optional
          Jan 21 '13 at 19:31




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f283679%2fproof-that-monotone-functions-are-integrable-with-the-classical-definition-of-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

          Antonio Litta Visconti Arese