Sums of Reciprocals of Polynomials and Harmonic Numbers
$begingroup$
This is question based on a pattern I have noticed while using mathematica. Let $P(x)$ be a polynomial with real, simple, negative roots $r_n$ ($n:1,2,...,k$) and define
$$Q_n=lim_{xto r_n}frac{P(x)}{x-r_n}.$$
Then the pattern seems to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{P(n)}=-sum_{i=1}^kfrac{H(-r_i)}{Q_i}$$
where $H(x)$ denotes the analytic continuation of the harmonic nubmers:
$$H(x)=int_0^1frac{1-t^x}{1-t}dt.$$
For example, for $P(x)=(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)$, we have
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)}=0.0841731$$
while
$$-frac{H(1/2)}{(1/2-pi)(1/2-e)}-frac{H(-pi)}{(pi-1/2)(pi-e)}-frac{H(-e)}{(e-1/2)(e-pi)}=0.0841731.$$
For clarification, the reason the roots must be negative is to sidestep any convergence issues in the infinite sum. My question is, does anyone know where I can find a proof of this fact or what some good topics/terms might be to search for? I have been handily using this fact in my current research, but upon starting the writeup today, I realized that I had never actually proved it.
If it helps, I believe this source deals with a more generalized version of this problem (as the digamma function and harmonic number are intimately linked). Unfortunately, they did not include a description of their coefficients (as far as I can tell) and only showed that it was a combination of a finite number of digamma functions.
sequences-and-series polynomials harmonic-numbers digamma-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is question based on a pattern I have noticed while using mathematica. Let $P(x)$ be a polynomial with real, simple, negative roots $r_n$ ($n:1,2,...,k$) and define
$$Q_n=lim_{xto r_n}frac{P(x)}{x-r_n}.$$
Then the pattern seems to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{P(n)}=-sum_{i=1}^kfrac{H(-r_i)}{Q_i}$$
where $H(x)$ denotes the analytic continuation of the harmonic nubmers:
$$H(x)=int_0^1frac{1-t^x}{1-t}dt.$$
For example, for $P(x)=(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)$, we have
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)}=0.0841731$$
while
$$-frac{H(1/2)}{(1/2-pi)(1/2-e)}-frac{H(-pi)}{(pi-1/2)(pi-e)}-frac{H(-e)}{(e-1/2)(e-pi)}=0.0841731.$$
For clarification, the reason the roots must be negative is to sidestep any convergence issues in the infinite sum. My question is, does anyone know where I can find a proof of this fact or what some good topics/terms might be to search for? I have been handily using this fact in my current research, but upon starting the writeup today, I realized that I had never actually proved it.
If it helps, I believe this source deals with a more generalized version of this problem (as the digamma function and harmonic number are intimately linked). Unfortunately, they did not include a description of their coefficients (as far as I can tell) and only showed that it was a combination of a finite number of digamma functions.
sequences-and-series polynomials harmonic-numbers digamma-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is question based on a pattern I have noticed while using mathematica. Let $P(x)$ be a polynomial with real, simple, negative roots $r_n$ ($n:1,2,...,k$) and define
$$Q_n=lim_{xto r_n}frac{P(x)}{x-r_n}.$$
Then the pattern seems to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{P(n)}=-sum_{i=1}^kfrac{H(-r_i)}{Q_i}$$
where $H(x)$ denotes the analytic continuation of the harmonic nubmers:
$$H(x)=int_0^1frac{1-t^x}{1-t}dt.$$
For example, for $P(x)=(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)$, we have
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)}=0.0841731$$
while
$$-frac{H(1/2)}{(1/2-pi)(1/2-e)}-frac{H(-pi)}{(pi-1/2)(pi-e)}-frac{H(-e)}{(e-1/2)(e-pi)}=0.0841731.$$
For clarification, the reason the roots must be negative is to sidestep any convergence issues in the infinite sum. My question is, does anyone know where I can find a proof of this fact or what some good topics/terms might be to search for? I have been handily using this fact in my current research, but upon starting the writeup today, I realized that I had never actually proved it.
If it helps, I believe this source deals with a more generalized version of this problem (as the digamma function and harmonic number are intimately linked). Unfortunately, they did not include a description of their coefficients (as far as I can tell) and only showed that it was a combination of a finite number of digamma functions.
sequences-and-series polynomials harmonic-numbers digamma-function
$endgroup$
This is question based on a pattern I have noticed while using mathematica. Let $P(x)$ be a polynomial with real, simple, negative roots $r_n$ ($n:1,2,...,k$) and define
$$Q_n=lim_{xto r_n}frac{P(x)}{x-r_n}.$$
Then the pattern seems to be
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{P(n)}=-sum_{i=1}^kfrac{H(-r_i)}{Q_i}$$
where $H(x)$ denotes the analytic continuation of the harmonic nubmers:
$$H(x)=int_0^1frac{1-t^x}{1-t}dt.$$
For example, for $P(x)=(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)$, we have
$$sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{1}{(x+frac{1}{2})(x+pi)(x+e)}=0.0841731$$
while
$$-frac{H(1/2)}{(1/2-pi)(1/2-e)}-frac{H(-pi)}{(pi-1/2)(pi-e)}-frac{H(-e)}{(e-1/2)(e-pi)}=0.0841731.$$
For clarification, the reason the roots must be negative is to sidestep any convergence issues in the infinite sum. My question is, does anyone know where I can find a proof of this fact or what some good topics/terms might be to search for? I have been handily using this fact in my current research, but upon starting the writeup today, I realized that I had never actually proved it.
If it helps, I believe this source deals with a more generalized version of this problem (as the digamma function and harmonic number are intimately linked). Unfortunately, they did not include a description of their coefficients (as far as I can tell) and only showed that it was a combination of a finite number of digamma functions.
sequences-and-series polynomials harmonic-numbers digamma-function
sequences-and-series polynomials harmonic-numbers digamma-function
asked Jan 11 at 15:37
Nick GuerreroNick Guerrero
544411
544411
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Using the reciprocals of your $Q_n$,
$$
begin{align}
Q_n
&=lim_{xto r_n}frac{x-r_n}{P(x)}
end{align}
$$
The Heaviside Method for Partial Fractions says.
$$
frac1{P(x)}=sum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{x-r_n}
$$
Note that if $kge2$,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^kQ_n
&=lim_{xtoinfty}sum_{n=1}^kfrac{x,Q_n}{x-r_n}\
&=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{P(x)}\[6pt]
&=0
end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{j=1}^inftyfrac1{P(j)}
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{j-r_n}\
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kQ_nleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=sum_{n=1}^kQ_nsum_{j=1}^inftyleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=-sum_{n=1}^kQ_nH(-r_n)
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069978%2fsums-of-reciprocals-of-polynomials-and-harmonic-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Using the reciprocals of your $Q_n$,
$$
begin{align}
Q_n
&=lim_{xto r_n}frac{x-r_n}{P(x)}
end{align}
$$
The Heaviside Method for Partial Fractions says.
$$
frac1{P(x)}=sum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{x-r_n}
$$
Note that if $kge2$,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^kQ_n
&=lim_{xtoinfty}sum_{n=1}^kfrac{x,Q_n}{x-r_n}\
&=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{P(x)}\[6pt]
&=0
end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{j=1}^inftyfrac1{P(j)}
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{j-r_n}\
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kQ_nleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=sum_{n=1}^kQ_nsum_{j=1}^inftyleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=-sum_{n=1}^kQ_nH(-r_n)
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the reciprocals of your $Q_n$,
$$
begin{align}
Q_n
&=lim_{xto r_n}frac{x-r_n}{P(x)}
end{align}
$$
The Heaviside Method for Partial Fractions says.
$$
frac1{P(x)}=sum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{x-r_n}
$$
Note that if $kge2$,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^kQ_n
&=lim_{xtoinfty}sum_{n=1}^kfrac{x,Q_n}{x-r_n}\
&=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{P(x)}\[6pt]
&=0
end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{j=1}^inftyfrac1{P(j)}
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{j-r_n}\
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kQ_nleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=sum_{n=1}^kQ_nsum_{j=1}^inftyleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=-sum_{n=1}^kQ_nH(-r_n)
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using the reciprocals of your $Q_n$,
$$
begin{align}
Q_n
&=lim_{xto r_n}frac{x-r_n}{P(x)}
end{align}
$$
The Heaviside Method for Partial Fractions says.
$$
frac1{P(x)}=sum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{x-r_n}
$$
Note that if $kge2$,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^kQ_n
&=lim_{xtoinfty}sum_{n=1}^kfrac{x,Q_n}{x-r_n}\
&=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{P(x)}\[6pt]
&=0
end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{j=1}^inftyfrac1{P(j)}
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{j-r_n}\
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kQ_nleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=sum_{n=1}^kQ_nsum_{j=1}^inftyleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=-sum_{n=1}^kQ_nH(-r_n)
end{align}
$$
$endgroup$
Using the reciprocals of your $Q_n$,
$$
begin{align}
Q_n
&=lim_{xto r_n}frac{x-r_n}{P(x)}
end{align}
$$
The Heaviside Method for Partial Fractions says.
$$
frac1{P(x)}=sum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{x-r_n}
$$
Note that if $kge2$,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{n=1}^kQ_n
&=lim_{xtoinfty}sum_{n=1}^kfrac{x,Q_n}{x-r_n}\
&=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{x}{P(x)}\[6pt]
&=0
end{align}
$$
Therefore,
$$
begin{align}
sum_{j=1}^inftyfrac1{P(j)}
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kfrac{Q_n}{j-r_n}\
&=sum_{j=1}^inftysum_{n=1}^kQ_nleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=sum_{n=1}^kQ_nsum_{j=1}^inftyleft(frac1{j-r_n}-frac1jright)\
&=-sum_{n=1}^kQ_nH(-r_n)
end{align}
$$
edited Jan 12 at 20:35
answered Jan 11 at 16:13
robjohn♦robjohn
266k27305628
266k27305628
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
$begingroup$
Perfect, this is exactly what I was looking for
$endgroup$
– Nick Guerrero
Jan 11 at 17:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3069978%2fsums-of-reciprocals-of-polynomials-and-harmonic-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown