Find work of the vector field $K(x,y,z)=(-y,x+z,-y+y^3+z)$ along the curve which is the intersection of the...
I'm asked to calculate the work of the vector field $K(x,y,z)=(-y,x+z,-y+y^3+z)$ along the curve which is the intersection of the sphere of radius 1 and the plane $x=z$ :
a) directly
b) using Stoke's theorem
My problem is that I obtain different results in both cases.
For a) (correction : see edit 1 below), I use as parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta))$. The gradient is $(-sin(theta),cos(theta),-sin(theta))$. The dot product of that with our vector field in polar coordinates $(-sin(theta),2cos(theta),-sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+cos(theta))$ is simply $2-sin^4(theta)-sin(theta)cos(theta)$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, we get $frac{13pi}{4}$ noting that $sin(theta)cos(theta)$ vanishes.
For b), the curl of our vector field is $(3y^2-2,0,2)$. Our parametrization is $(rcos(theta),rsin(theta),rcos(theta))$. The cross product of the partial derivatives is simply $(-r,0,r)$. The dot product of that with our curl in polar coordinates is $4r-3r^3sin^2(theta)$. So now, we have $$int_{0}^{2pi}int_{0}^{1}(4r-3r^3sin^2(theta))rdrdtheta=piint_{0}^{1}(8r^2-3r^4)rdr=frac{31pi}{15}$$
So I don't see where I did something wrong, or where I forgot something.
Thanks for your help !
Edit 1:
Okay, as was pointed out in the comments and in one answer, I used a wrong parametrization in a). I should use $frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ instead of $cos(theta)$ for the parametrization of $x$ and $z$.
In this case, we get the dot product of $(-sin(theta), sqrt{2}cos(theta), -sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ and $(frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}, cos(theta),frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}) $ which yields $$frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}+sqrt{2}cos^2(theta)+frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin(theta)cos(theta)}{2}$$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, the last term vanishes and using the common trig identity, we simply integrate $sqrt{2}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$. So we get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$. But it's still different fom b) though.
Edit 2 :
As was pointed out in the comments, I also need to use the new parametrization for part b). But even so, I get $frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
The cross product of the derivatives is $(frac{-r}{sqrt{2}},0,frac{r}{sqrt{2}})$. We need to integrate from $0$ to $2pi$ $dtheta$ and from $0$ to $1$ $dr$ the following (the curl remains the same): $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r=frac{4r^2}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^4sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ which yields $frac{8pi r^3}{3sqrt{2}}-frac{3pi r^5}{5sqrt{2}}$ evaluated from $0$ to $1$ and so we get
$frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
Edit 3 : problem solved. I multiplied by an extra $r$ in b). I should not have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ See my answer below.
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis
|
show 7 more comments
I'm asked to calculate the work of the vector field $K(x,y,z)=(-y,x+z,-y+y^3+z)$ along the curve which is the intersection of the sphere of radius 1 and the plane $x=z$ :
a) directly
b) using Stoke's theorem
My problem is that I obtain different results in both cases.
For a) (correction : see edit 1 below), I use as parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta))$. The gradient is $(-sin(theta),cos(theta),-sin(theta))$. The dot product of that with our vector field in polar coordinates $(-sin(theta),2cos(theta),-sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+cos(theta))$ is simply $2-sin^4(theta)-sin(theta)cos(theta)$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, we get $frac{13pi}{4}$ noting that $sin(theta)cos(theta)$ vanishes.
For b), the curl of our vector field is $(3y^2-2,0,2)$. Our parametrization is $(rcos(theta),rsin(theta),rcos(theta))$. The cross product of the partial derivatives is simply $(-r,0,r)$. The dot product of that with our curl in polar coordinates is $4r-3r^3sin^2(theta)$. So now, we have $$int_{0}^{2pi}int_{0}^{1}(4r-3r^3sin^2(theta))rdrdtheta=piint_{0}^{1}(8r^2-3r^4)rdr=frac{31pi}{15}$$
So I don't see where I did something wrong, or where I forgot something.
Thanks for your help !
Edit 1:
Okay, as was pointed out in the comments and in one answer, I used a wrong parametrization in a). I should use $frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ instead of $cos(theta)$ for the parametrization of $x$ and $z$.
In this case, we get the dot product of $(-sin(theta), sqrt{2}cos(theta), -sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ and $(frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}, cos(theta),frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}) $ which yields $$frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}+sqrt{2}cos^2(theta)+frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin(theta)cos(theta)}{2}$$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, the last term vanishes and using the common trig identity, we simply integrate $sqrt{2}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$. So we get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$. But it's still different fom b) though.
Edit 2 :
As was pointed out in the comments, I also need to use the new parametrization for part b). But even so, I get $frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
The cross product of the derivatives is $(frac{-r}{sqrt{2}},0,frac{r}{sqrt{2}})$. We need to integrate from $0$ to $2pi$ $dtheta$ and from $0$ to $1$ $dr$ the following (the curl remains the same): $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r=frac{4r^2}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^4sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ which yields $frac{8pi r^3}{3sqrt{2}}-frac{3pi r^5}{5sqrt{2}}$ evaluated from $0$ to $1$ and so we get
$frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
Edit 3 : problem solved. I multiplied by an extra $r$ in b). I should not have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ See my answer below.
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis
1
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
I'm asked to calculate the work of the vector field $K(x,y,z)=(-y,x+z,-y+y^3+z)$ along the curve which is the intersection of the sphere of radius 1 and the plane $x=z$ :
a) directly
b) using Stoke's theorem
My problem is that I obtain different results in both cases.
For a) (correction : see edit 1 below), I use as parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta))$. The gradient is $(-sin(theta),cos(theta),-sin(theta))$. The dot product of that with our vector field in polar coordinates $(-sin(theta),2cos(theta),-sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+cos(theta))$ is simply $2-sin^4(theta)-sin(theta)cos(theta)$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, we get $frac{13pi}{4}$ noting that $sin(theta)cos(theta)$ vanishes.
For b), the curl of our vector field is $(3y^2-2,0,2)$. Our parametrization is $(rcos(theta),rsin(theta),rcos(theta))$. The cross product of the partial derivatives is simply $(-r,0,r)$. The dot product of that with our curl in polar coordinates is $4r-3r^3sin^2(theta)$. So now, we have $$int_{0}^{2pi}int_{0}^{1}(4r-3r^3sin^2(theta))rdrdtheta=piint_{0}^{1}(8r^2-3r^4)rdr=frac{31pi}{15}$$
So I don't see where I did something wrong, or where I forgot something.
Thanks for your help !
Edit 1:
Okay, as was pointed out in the comments and in one answer, I used a wrong parametrization in a). I should use $frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ instead of $cos(theta)$ for the parametrization of $x$ and $z$.
In this case, we get the dot product of $(-sin(theta), sqrt{2}cos(theta), -sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ and $(frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}, cos(theta),frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}) $ which yields $$frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}+sqrt{2}cos^2(theta)+frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin(theta)cos(theta)}{2}$$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, the last term vanishes and using the common trig identity, we simply integrate $sqrt{2}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$. So we get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$. But it's still different fom b) though.
Edit 2 :
As was pointed out in the comments, I also need to use the new parametrization for part b). But even so, I get $frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
The cross product of the derivatives is $(frac{-r}{sqrt{2}},0,frac{r}{sqrt{2}})$. We need to integrate from $0$ to $2pi$ $dtheta$ and from $0$ to $1$ $dr$ the following (the curl remains the same): $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r=frac{4r^2}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^4sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ which yields $frac{8pi r^3}{3sqrt{2}}-frac{3pi r^5}{5sqrt{2}}$ evaluated from $0$ to $1$ and so we get
$frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
Edit 3 : problem solved. I multiplied by an extra $r$ in b). I should not have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ See my answer below.
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis
I'm asked to calculate the work of the vector field $K(x,y,z)=(-y,x+z,-y+y^3+z)$ along the curve which is the intersection of the sphere of radius 1 and the plane $x=z$ :
a) directly
b) using Stoke's theorem
My problem is that I obtain different results in both cases.
For a) (correction : see edit 1 below), I use as parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta))$. The gradient is $(-sin(theta),cos(theta),-sin(theta))$. The dot product of that with our vector field in polar coordinates $(-sin(theta),2cos(theta),-sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+cos(theta))$ is simply $2-sin^4(theta)-sin(theta)cos(theta)$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, we get $frac{13pi}{4}$ noting that $sin(theta)cos(theta)$ vanishes.
For b), the curl of our vector field is $(3y^2-2,0,2)$. Our parametrization is $(rcos(theta),rsin(theta),rcos(theta))$. The cross product of the partial derivatives is simply $(-r,0,r)$. The dot product of that with our curl in polar coordinates is $4r-3r^3sin^2(theta)$. So now, we have $$int_{0}^{2pi}int_{0}^{1}(4r-3r^3sin^2(theta))rdrdtheta=piint_{0}^{1}(8r^2-3r^4)rdr=frac{31pi}{15}$$
So I don't see where I did something wrong, or where I forgot something.
Thanks for your help !
Edit 1:
Okay, as was pointed out in the comments and in one answer, I used a wrong parametrization in a). I should use $frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ instead of $cos(theta)$ for the parametrization of $x$ and $z$.
In this case, we get the dot product of $(-sin(theta), sqrt{2}cos(theta), -sin(theta)+sin^3(theta)+frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ and $(frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}, cos(theta),frac{-sin(theta)}{sqrt{2}}) $ which yields $$frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}+sqrt{2}cos^2(theta)+frac{sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}-frac{sin(theta)cos(theta)}{2}$$. If we integrate that from $0$ to $2pi$, the last term vanishes and using the common trig identity, we simply integrate $sqrt{2}-frac{sin^4(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$. So we get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$. But it's still different fom b) though.
Edit 2 :
As was pointed out in the comments, I also need to use the new parametrization for part b). But even so, I get $frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
The cross product of the derivatives is $(frac{-r}{sqrt{2}},0,frac{r}{sqrt{2}})$. We need to integrate from $0$ to $2pi$ $dtheta$ and from $0$ to $1$ $dr$ the following (the curl remains the same): $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r=frac{4r^2}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^4sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}$ which yields $frac{8pi r^3}{3sqrt{2}}-frac{3pi r^5}{5sqrt{2}}$ evaluated from $0$ to $1$ and so we get
$frac{31pi}{15sqrt{2}}$
Edit 3 : problem solved. I multiplied by an extra $r$ in b). I should not have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ See my answer below.
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis
edited yesterday
Poujh
asked 2 days ago
PoujhPoujh
545416
545416
1
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
1
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
1
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
1
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
1
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
1
1
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
1
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago
|
show 7 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Hint
Your parametrization is wrong in a) since it should be $$left({cos thetaoversqrt 2},{sintheta},{cos thetaoversqrt 2}right)$$
add a comment |
Okay, with the help of the comments, I found the error.
The first error in a) was that I should have used $(frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}},sin(theta),frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ as parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints, i.e. $x=z$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$. My parametrization only satisfied $x=z$.
With that, we get the correct answer, which is $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$
In b), my error was the same. I should also have used this parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints.
My second error in b) was to multiply the resulting dot product by an extra $r$. I thought this $r$ is the area element like in $rdrdtheta$. But if I take the cross product of the partial derivatives of the parametrization, this $r$ is already "included" in the entire thing (think of the determinant of the Jacobian) , so I don't need to multiply the entire thing again by that $r$. So I shouldn't have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$. With that, once integrated, I also get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$.
I hope that this will help someone in the future facing a similar problem.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062985%2ffind-work-of-the-vector-field-kx-y-z-y-xz-yy3z-along-the-curve-which%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint
Your parametrization is wrong in a) since it should be $$left({cos thetaoversqrt 2},{sintheta},{cos thetaoversqrt 2}right)$$
add a comment |
Hint
Your parametrization is wrong in a) since it should be $$left({cos thetaoversqrt 2},{sintheta},{cos thetaoversqrt 2}right)$$
add a comment |
Hint
Your parametrization is wrong in a) since it should be $$left({cos thetaoversqrt 2},{sintheta},{cos thetaoversqrt 2}right)$$
Hint
Your parametrization is wrong in a) since it should be $$left({cos thetaoversqrt 2},{sintheta},{cos thetaoversqrt 2}right)$$
answered 2 days ago
Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz
14.1k3937
14.1k3937
add a comment |
add a comment |
Okay, with the help of the comments, I found the error.
The first error in a) was that I should have used $(frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}},sin(theta),frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ as parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints, i.e. $x=z$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$. My parametrization only satisfied $x=z$.
With that, we get the correct answer, which is $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$
In b), my error was the same. I should also have used this parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints.
My second error in b) was to multiply the resulting dot product by an extra $r$. I thought this $r$ is the area element like in $rdrdtheta$. But if I take the cross product of the partial derivatives of the parametrization, this $r$ is already "included" in the entire thing (think of the determinant of the Jacobian) , so I don't need to multiply the entire thing again by that $r$. So I shouldn't have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$. With that, once integrated, I also get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$.
I hope that this will help someone in the future facing a similar problem.
add a comment |
Okay, with the help of the comments, I found the error.
The first error in a) was that I should have used $(frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}},sin(theta),frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ as parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints, i.e. $x=z$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$. My parametrization only satisfied $x=z$.
With that, we get the correct answer, which is $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$
In b), my error was the same. I should also have used this parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints.
My second error in b) was to multiply the resulting dot product by an extra $r$. I thought this $r$ is the area element like in $rdrdtheta$. But if I take the cross product of the partial derivatives of the parametrization, this $r$ is already "included" in the entire thing (think of the determinant of the Jacobian) , so I don't need to multiply the entire thing again by that $r$. So I shouldn't have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$. With that, once integrated, I also get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$.
I hope that this will help someone in the future facing a similar problem.
add a comment |
Okay, with the help of the comments, I found the error.
The first error in a) was that I should have used $(frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}},sin(theta),frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ as parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints, i.e. $x=z$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$. My parametrization only satisfied $x=z$.
With that, we get the correct answer, which is $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$
In b), my error was the same. I should also have used this parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints.
My second error in b) was to multiply the resulting dot product by an extra $r$. I thought this $r$ is the area element like in $rdrdtheta$. But if I take the cross product of the partial derivatives of the parametrization, this $r$ is already "included" in the entire thing (think of the determinant of the Jacobian) , so I don't need to multiply the entire thing again by that $r$. So I shouldn't have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$. With that, once integrated, I also get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$.
I hope that this will help someone in the future facing a similar problem.
Okay, with the help of the comments, I found the error.
The first error in a) was that I should have used $(frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}},sin(theta),frac{cos(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$ as parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints, i.e. $x=z$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$. My parametrization only satisfied $x=z$.
With that, we get the correct answer, which is $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$
In b), my error was the same. I should also have used this parametrization in order to satisfy both constraints.
My second error in b) was to multiply the resulting dot product by an extra $r$. I thought this $r$ is the area element like in $rdrdtheta$. But if I take the cross product of the partial derivatives of the parametrization, this $r$ is already "included" in the entire thing (think of the determinant of the Jacobian) , so I don't need to multiply the entire thing again by that $r$. So I shouldn't have $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r$ but simply $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})$. With that, once integrated, I also get $frac{13pi}{4sqrt{2}}$.
I hope that this will help someone in the future facing a similar problem.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
PoujhPoujh
545416
545416
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062985%2ffind-work-of-the-vector-field-kx-y-z-y-xz-yy3z-along-the-curve-which%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You have tried the parametrization $(cos(theta),sin(theta),cos(theta)).$ This parametrization satisfies $x=z,$ but it also needs to satisfy the equation $x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}=1,$ the implicit equation of the unit sphere. But it doesn't.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Please update the question with your work.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Have you checked your parametrization for (b)?
– Will R
2 days ago
1
Again, it would be much easier to point out where you might be going wrong if you showed your working.
– Will R
2 days ago
1
I don't think you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}})r.$ I think instead you should be integrating $(frac{4r}{sqrt{2}}-frac{3r^3sin^2(theta)}{sqrt{2}}).$ You've counted your factor of $r$ twice, that's all. This adjustment should lead to agreement between the two calculations. If you agree, you might want to type-up your new, fully corrected solution as an answer.
– Will R
2 days ago