What is this newcommand argument? [duplicate]












2
















This question already has an answer here:




  • newcommand argument confusion

    4 answers




newcommand*{name}[1][C]{%


I have come very familiar with newcommand however, I came across this line of code and i do not know what the [C] is for.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Alan Munn, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt, Henri Menke, Andrew Swann Jan 21 at 8:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:30











  • latexref.xyz/…

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 3:39











  • @HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:54











  • @marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 4:08











  • @HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 4:13
















2
















This question already has an answer here:




  • newcommand argument confusion

    4 answers




newcommand*{name}[1][C]{%


I have come very familiar with newcommand however, I came across this line of code and i do not know what the [C] is for.










share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Alan Munn, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt, Henri Menke, Andrew Swann Jan 21 at 8:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:30











  • latexref.xyz/…

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 3:39











  • @HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:54











  • @marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 4:08











  • @HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 4:13














2












2








2









This question already has an answer here:




  • newcommand argument confusion

    4 answers




newcommand*{name}[1][C]{%


I have come very familiar with newcommand however, I came across this line of code and i do not know what the [C] is for.










share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:




  • newcommand argument confusion

    4 answers




newcommand*{name}[1][C]{%


I have come very familiar with newcommand however, I came across this line of code and i do not know what the [C] is for.





This question already has an answer here:




  • newcommand argument confusion

    4 answers








macros arguments






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 21 at 6:21









Werner

445k699801684




445k699801684










asked Jan 21 at 3:30









Jesus EscarenoJesus Escareno

111




111




marked as duplicate by Alan Munn, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt, Henri Menke, Andrew Swann Jan 21 at 8:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Alan Munn, Stefan Pinnow, Kurt, Henri Menke, Andrew Swann Jan 21 at 8:18


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:30











  • latexref.xyz/…

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 3:39











  • @HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:54











  • @marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 4:08











  • @HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 4:13














  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:30











  • latexref.xyz/…

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 3:39











  • @HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 3:54











  • @marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

    – Henri Menke
    Jan 21 at 4:08











  • @HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

    – marmot
    Jan 21 at 4:13








2




2





Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

– marmot
Jan 21 at 3:30





Welcome to TeX.SE! This means in this case that name has one optional argument whose default value is C.

– marmot
Jan 21 at 3:30













latexref.xyz/…

– Henri Menke
Jan 21 at 3:39





latexref.xyz/…

– Henri Menke
Jan 21 at 3:39













@HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

– marmot
Jan 21 at 3:54





@HenriMenke Is there a more modern link in which things like it do not get advertized?

– marmot
Jan 21 at 3:54













@marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

– Henri Menke
Jan 21 at 4:08





@marmot Well, it etc. are commands provided by the standard LaTeX classes, so naturally they would be listed in a reference manual. However, you can contribute and remove them latexref.xyz/dev/writing.html

– Henri Menke
Jan 21 at 4:08













@HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

– marmot
Jan 21 at 4:13





@HenriMenke Please don't get me wrong, this was not meant to criticize you. I have just seen so many cases in which users, especially new users, got interesting comments when they were using it and so on. Therefore I am really wondering if there are sources of the same information which a free of such relics.

– marmot
Jan 21 at 4:13










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4














LaTeX's newcommand has the following syntax:




newcommand *{<FOO>}[<i>]{<TEXT>}


User command to define FOO to be a macro with i arguments (i = 0 if missing)
having the definition <TEXT>. Produces an error if FOO already defined.
Normally the command is defined to be long (i.e. it may take multiple paragraphs in its argument). In the star-form, the command is not defined as long
and a blank line in any argument to the command would generate an error.




If you define a command with at least one argument (i > 0), you can specify an additional (optional) argument before the definition <TEXT>. This optional argument will be used as the "default" value for a first optional argument to FOO.



So, as an example, consider



newcommand{FOO}[2]{<TEXT>}


This command has two mandatory arguments and is therefore used as FOO{<one>}{<two>}. However,



newcommand{FOO}[2][X]{<TEXT>}


takes two (2) arguments, the first of which is optional and has a default of X (if not supplied). You can use it as FOO{<one>} (which is equivalent to FOO[X]{<one>}) or FOO[<one>]{<two>}. Similarly,



newcommand{FOO}[1][X]{<TEXT>}


takes a single (1) optional argument that has a default value of X (if not supplied) and can be used as FOO (which is equivalent to FOO[X]) or FOO[<one>].





In your particular case,



newcommand*{name}[1][C]{<TEXT>}


defines name to (be non-long; that is, <TEXT> cannot have blank lines and) take a single (1) optional argument that defaults to C if not supplied. You can use it as name (which is equivalent to name[C]) or name[<one>].



Reference:




  • LaTeX2e sources


  • What do newcommand, renewcommand, and providecommand do, and how do they differ?


  • What is the difference between def and newcommand?







share|improve this answer






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    LaTeX's newcommand has the following syntax:




    newcommand *{<FOO>}[<i>]{<TEXT>}


    User command to define FOO to be a macro with i arguments (i = 0 if missing)
    having the definition <TEXT>. Produces an error if FOO already defined.
    Normally the command is defined to be long (i.e. it may take multiple paragraphs in its argument). In the star-form, the command is not defined as long
    and a blank line in any argument to the command would generate an error.




    If you define a command with at least one argument (i > 0), you can specify an additional (optional) argument before the definition <TEXT>. This optional argument will be used as the "default" value for a first optional argument to FOO.



    So, as an example, consider



    newcommand{FOO}[2]{<TEXT>}


    This command has two mandatory arguments and is therefore used as FOO{<one>}{<two>}. However,



    newcommand{FOO}[2][X]{<TEXT>}


    takes two (2) arguments, the first of which is optional and has a default of X (if not supplied). You can use it as FOO{<one>} (which is equivalent to FOO[X]{<one>}) or FOO[<one>]{<two>}. Similarly,



    newcommand{FOO}[1][X]{<TEXT>}


    takes a single (1) optional argument that has a default value of X (if not supplied) and can be used as FOO (which is equivalent to FOO[X]) or FOO[<one>].





    In your particular case,



    newcommand*{name}[1][C]{<TEXT>}


    defines name to (be non-long; that is, <TEXT> cannot have blank lines and) take a single (1) optional argument that defaults to C if not supplied. You can use it as name (which is equivalent to name[C]) or name[<one>].



    Reference:




    • LaTeX2e sources


    • What do newcommand, renewcommand, and providecommand do, and how do they differ?


    • What is the difference between def and newcommand?







    share|improve this answer




























      4














      LaTeX's newcommand has the following syntax:




      newcommand *{<FOO>}[<i>]{<TEXT>}


      User command to define FOO to be a macro with i arguments (i = 0 if missing)
      having the definition <TEXT>. Produces an error if FOO already defined.
      Normally the command is defined to be long (i.e. it may take multiple paragraphs in its argument). In the star-form, the command is not defined as long
      and a blank line in any argument to the command would generate an error.




      If you define a command with at least one argument (i > 0), you can specify an additional (optional) argument before the definition <TEXT>. This optional argument will be used as the "default" value for a first optional argument to FOO.



      So, as an example, consider



      newcommand{FOO}[2]{<TEXT>}


      This command has two mandatory arguments and is therefore used as FOO{<one>}{<two>}. However,



      newcommand{FOO}[2][X]{<TEXT>}


      takes two (2) arguments, the first of which is optional and has a default of X (if not supplied). You can use it as FOO{<one>} (which is equivalent to FOO[X]{<one>}) or FOO[<one>]{<two>}. Similarly,



      newcommand{FOO}[1][X]{<TEXT>}


      takes a single (1) optional argument that has a default value of X (if not supplied) and can be used as FOO (which is equivalent to FOO[X]) or FOO[<one>].





      In your particular case,



      newcommand*{name}[1][C]{<TEXT>}


      defines name to (be non-long; that is, <TEXT> cannot have blank lines and) take a single (1) optional argument that defaults to C if not supplied. You can use it as name (which is equivalent to name[C]) or name[<one>].



      Reference:




      • LaTeX2e sources


      • What do newcommand, renewcommand, and providecommand do, and how do they differ?


      • What is the difference between def and newcommand?







      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        LaTeX's newcommand has the following syntax:




        newcommand *{<FOO>}[<i>]{<TEXT>}


        User command to define FOO to be a macro with i arguments (i = 0 if missing)
        having the definition <TEXT>. Produces an error if FOO already defined.
        Normally the command is defined to be long (i.e. it may take multiple paragraphs in its argument). In the star-form, the command is not defined as long
        and a blank line in any argument to the command would generate an error.




        If you define a command with at least one argument (i > 0), you can specify an additional (optional) argument before the definition <TEXT>. This optional argument will be used as the "default" value for a first optional argument to FOO.



        So, as an example, consider



        newcommand{FOO}[2]{<TEXT>}


        This command has two mandatory arguments and is therefore used as FOO{<one>}{<two>}. However,



        newcommand{FOO}[2][X]{<TEXT>}


        takes two (2) arguments, the first of which is optional and has a default of X (if not supplied). You can use it as FOO{<one>} (which is equivalent to FOO[X]{<one>}) or FOO[<one>]{<two>}. Similarly,



        newcommand{FOO}[1][X]{<TEXT>}


        takes a single (1) optional argument that has a default value of X (if not supplied) and can be used as FOO (which is equivalent to FOO[X]) or FOO[<one>].





        In your particular case,



        newcommand*{name}[1][C]{<TEXT>}


        defines name to (be non-long; that is, <TEXT> cannot have blank lines and) take a single (1) optional argument that defaults to C if not supplied. You can use it as name (which is equivalent to name[C]) or name[<one>].



        Reference:




        • LaTeX2e sources


        • What do newcommand, renewcommand, and providecommand do, and how do they differ?


        • What is the difference between def and newcommand?







        share|improve this answer













        LaTeX's newcommand has the following syntax:




        newcommand *{<FOO>}[<i>]{<TEXT>}


        User command to define FOO to be a macro with i arguments (i = 0 if missing)
        having the definition <TEXT>. Produces an error if FOO already defined.
        Normally the command is defined to be long (i.e. it may take multiple paragraphs in its argument). In the star-form, the command is not defined as long
        and a blank line in any argument to the command would generate an error.




        If you define a command with at least one argument (i > 0), you can specify an additional (optional) argument before the definition <TEXT>. This optional argument will be used as the "default" value for a first optional argument to FOO.



        So, as an example, consider



        newcommand{FOO}[2]{<TEXT>}


        This command has two mandatory arguments and is therefore used as FOO{<one>}{<two>}. However,



        newcommand{FOO}[2][X]{<TEXT>}


        takes two (2) arguments, the first of which is optional and has a default of X (if not supplied). You can use it as FOO{<one>} (which is equivalent to FOO[X]{<one>}) or FOO[<one>]{<two>}. Similarly,



        newcommand{FOO}[1][X]{<TEXT>}


        takes a single (1) optional argument that has a default value of X (if not supplied) and can be used as FOO (which is equivalent to FOO[X]) or FOO[<one>].





        In your particular case,



        newcommand*{name}[1][C]{<TEXT>}


        defines name to (be non-long; that is, <TEXT> cannot have blank lines and) take a single (1) optional argument that defaults to C if not supplied. You can use it as name (which is equivalent to name[C]) or name[<one>].



        Reference:




        • LaTeX2e sources


        • What do newcommand, renewcommand, and providecommand do, and how do they differ?


        • What is the difference between def and newcommand?








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jan 21 at 6:21









        WernerWerner

        445k699801684




        445k699801684















            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese