Linear independence proof of sublist from a list of dependent vectors












1












$begingroup$



Let $lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$, such that no eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$ has a zero entry. Then prove that every list of $n-1$ columns of $A-lambda I$ is linearly independent.




This problem is originally from the book Matrix Analysis (2ed) by Roger A. Horn. It's 1.4.P12 on page 82. I know how to prove the reverse direction, but I have no idea for above direction. Any suggestions?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$



    Let $lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$, such that no eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$ has a zero entry. Then prove that every list of $n-1$ columns of $A-lambda I$ is linearly independent.




    This problem is originally from the book Matrix Analysis (2ed) by Roger A. Horn. It's 1.4.P12 on page 82. I know how to prove the reverse direction, but I have no idea for above direction. Any suggestions?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      0



      $begingroup$



      Let $lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$, such that no eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$ has a zero entry. Then prove that every list of $n-1$ columns of $A-lambda I$ is linearly independent.




      This problem is originally from the book Matrix Analysis (2ed) by Roger A. Horn. It's 1.4.P12 on page 82. I know how to prove the reverse direction, but I have no idea for above direction. Any suggestions?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$





      Let $lambda$ be an eigenvalue of $A$, such that no eigenvector of $A$ associated with $lambda$ has a zero entry. Then prove that every list of $n-1$ columns of $A-lambda I$ is linearly independent.




      This problem is originally from the book Matrix Analysis (2ed) by Roger A. Horn. It's 1.4.P12 on page 82. I know how to prove the reverse direction, but I have no idea for above direction. Any suggestions?







      linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors vectors independence






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 21 at 9:48









      egreg

      182k1486204




      182k1486204










      asked Jan 21 at 8:34









      Ton MreTon Mre

      82




      82






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The null space of $A_{ntimes n}-lambda I$ is the eigenspace of $lambda$. Since no eigenvector corresponding to $lambda$ contains a $0$ entry, the basis of the eigenspace must contain a single eigenvector of $A$. This means the nullity of $A-lambda I$ is $1$, and by the rank-nullity theorem, its rank $n-1$.



          Now recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
            $endgroup$
            – Ton Mre
            Jan 21 at 13:11










          • $begingroup$
            @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Jan 21 at 13:19













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081636%2flinear-independence-proof-of-sublist-from-a-list-of-dependent-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          The null space of $A_{ntimes n}-lambda I$ is the eigenspace of $lambda$. Since no eigenvector corresponding to $lambda$ contains a $0$ entry, the basis of the eigenspace must contain a single eigenvector of $A$. This means the nullity of $A-lambda I$ is $1$, and by the rank-nullity theorem, its rank $n-1$.



          Now recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
            $endgroup$
            – Ton Mre
            Jan 21 at 13:11










          • $begingroup$
            @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Jan 21 at 13:19


















          0












          $begingroup$

          The null space of $A_{ntimes n}-lambda I$ is the eigenspace of $lambda$. Since no eigenvector corresponding to $lambda$ contains a $0$ entry, the basis of the eigenspace must contain a single eigenvector of $A$. This means the nullity of $A-lambda I$ is $1$, and by the rank-nullity theorem, its rank $n-1$.



          Now recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
            $endgroup$
            – Ton Mre
            Jan 21 at 13:11










          • $begingroup$
            @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Jan 21 at 13:19
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          The null space of $A_{ntimes n}-lambda I$ is the eigenspace of $lambda$. Since no eigenvector corresponding to $lambda$ contains a $0$ entry, the basis of the eigenspace must contain a single eigenvector of $A$. This means the nullity of $A-lambda I$ is $1$, and by the rank-nullity theorem, its rank $n-1$.



          Now recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The null space of $A_{ntimes n}-lambda I$ is the eigenspace of $lambda$. Since no eigenvector corresponding to $lambda$ contains a $0$ entry, the basis of the eigenspace must contain a single eigenvector of $A$. This means the nullity of $A-lambda I$ is $1$, and by the rank-nullity theorem, its rank $n-1$.



          Now recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 21 at 13:21

























          answered Jan 21 at 8:51









          Shubham JohriShubham Johri

          5,186717




          5,186717












          • $begingroup$
            Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
            $endgroup$
            – Ton Mre
            Jan 21 at 13:11










          • $begingroup$
            @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Jan 21 at 13:19




















          • $begingroup$
            Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
            $endgroup$
            – Ton Mre
            Jan 21 at 13:11










          • $begingroup$
            @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
            $endgroup$
            – Shubham Johri
            Jan 21 at 13:19


















          $begingroup$
          Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
          $endgroup$
          – Ton Mre
          Jan 21 at 13:11




          $begingroup$
          Simple but effective.I've fidued it out.Tks a lot!
          $endgroup$
          – Ton Mre
          Jan 21 at 13:11












          $begingroup$
          @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Jan 21 at 13:19






          $begingroup$
          @TonMre Recall that $(A-lambda I)v$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A-lambda I$. This means their exists a tuple $(v_1,v_2,...,v_n)$ with $v_ine0$ that satisfies $v_1C_1+v_2C_2+cdotcdotcdot+v_nC_n=0$. Since the rank of these vectors is $n-1$, there is one linearly dependent column $C_j$, and since $v_jne0$ for all $j$, that $C_j$ could be any column
          $endgroup$
          – Shubham Johri
          Jan 21 at 13:19




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3081636%2flinear-independence-proof-of-sublist-from-a-list-of-dependent-vectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?