How to write this boolean expression using only NOR gates?












0














I'm having some trouble understanding how I can convert a boolean expression to a NOR-gate only expression.



What I'm working with looks like $T = A B' C + A' B C' + A B$. How would I go into implementing it with NOR gates?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
    – jonk
    Jan 5 at 23:07


















0














I'm having some trouble understanding how I can convert a boolean expression to a NOR-gate only expression.



What I'm working with looks like $T = A B' C + A' B C' + A B$. How would I go into implementing it with NOR gates?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
    – jonk
    Jan 5 at 23:07
















0












0








0







I'm having some trouble understanding how I can convert a boolean expression to a NOR-gate only expression.



What I'm working with looks like $T = A B' C + A' B C' + A B$. How would I go into implementing it with NOR gates?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm having some trouble understanding how I can convert a boolean expression to a NOR-gate only expression.



What I'm working with looks like $T = A B' C + A' B C' + A B$. How would I go into implementing it with NOR gates?







digital-logic






share|improve this question









New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 5 at 23:22









Renan

4,29222144




4,29222144






New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 5 at 23:01









Eslem MedEslem Med

63




63




New contributor




Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Eslem Med is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
    – jonk
    Jan 5 at 23:07
















  • 1




    You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
    – jonk
    Jan 5 at 23:07










1




1




You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
– jonk
Jan 5 at 23:07






You might want to start by minimizing the logic expression. It's not a requirement. But it often helps solve the problem faster, if you do that first. Then, ask yourself, "What is the template for a NOR gate?" There is some imagination involved. But it's not hard to just start with that template and work towards it. Can you show any thoughts or work?
– jonk
Jan 5 at 23:07












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















0














NAND and NOR gates are universal. So one way to solve this problem is first reduce the logic using K-maps or whatever, then draw it out with AND, OR, and NOT gates. Then use bubble pushing identity techniques to convert the gates to the desired type.





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






share|improve this answer































    4














    I'll provide some direction to head. Since your question isn't so much about simplification, I'll do the simplification without any further ado. Then I'll provide a direction to head from that point but I'll leave some work you'll need to perform yourself.



    Simplify



    Let's simplify the expression:



    $$begin{align*}
    T &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B\
    &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B,overline{C} + A,B,C\
    &= Aleft(overline{B},C + B,overline{C} + B,Cright) + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
    &= A,overline{overline{B},overline{C}} + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
    &= A,B + A,C + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
    &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{A},overline{C}right)\
    &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{C}right)\
    &= A,C + A,B + B,overline{C}
    end{align*}$$



    I'm not going to explain all the details above. It isn't the only, nor even the best approach to simplification. It's just one I decided to write out, off-hand. Still, you should try to take the time to understand each transition on your own. (Or not. It's up to you.)



    From there, you can see that if $A$ and $B$ are both true, the expression $T=A,C+B,overline{C}$ already captures the term, $A,B$, as one or the other is picked up regardless of $C$.



    So the simplified version is:



    $$T=A,C+B,overline{C}$$



    Applying the NOR gate template



    The basic model of a NOR gate, as I'm sure you know, is $T=overline{R+S}$. That's the template. The question is, how do you take an arbitrary expression and make it conform?



    I'll start you out:



    $$begin{align*}
    T&=A,C+B,overline{C}\\
    &=overline{overline{A,C+B,overline{C}}}\\
    &=overline{overline{A,C}cdotoverline{B,overline{C}}}\\
    &=overline{left(overline{A}+overline{C}right)cdotleft(overline{B}+Cright)}\\
    &=overline{overline{A},overline{B}+overline{A},C+overline{B},overline{C}}\\
    &=overline{overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)+overline{B},overline{C}}
    end{align*}$$



    (If it's not immediately clear, take note that in the first transition I used a double negation. The reason is that I know the basic NOR template requires a negation of the entire underlying expression and that a very obvious and simple way to achieve that is to double-negate the entire expression. This guarantees a negation that I can keep at the top, while applying the remaining negation to the underlying expression.)



    At this point, you can see that if $T=overline{R+S}$ then $R=overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)$ and $S=overline{B},overline{C}$. So you are closer to an answer, now. But you have two new situations to resolve.



    I'll solve $S$:



    $$begin{align*}
    S&=overline{B},overline{C}\\
    &=overline{overline{overline{B},overline{C}}}\\
    &=overline{B+C}\\
    end{align*}$$



    And that easily fits the model of a NOR with no additional work.



    You get to resolve $R$, now. Once you walk yourself through that process, you should find a requirement for exactly five NOR gates. I've only shown you the first two of them. You get to find the other three.






    share|improve this answer























    • The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
      – vicatcu
      Jan 6 at 0:54










    • @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
      – jonk
      Jan 6 at 0:58












    • yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
      – vicatcu
      Jan 6 at 1:16



















    3














    Your Boolean equation has the NOT, AND, and OR operators in it. DeMorgan's Law says that you can perform an AND function with a NOR gate or an OR function with a NAND gate. If you tie the two inputs of a NOR gate together, what kind of function does that give you?



    Since this looks like homework, I'll let you fill in the details.






    share|improve this answer





























      0














      I'll give you a hint. If you missed DeMorgan's Theorem in lecture, you need to look it up. Briefly, the following two gates are identical





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



      The rest is up to you.






      share|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
        StackExchange.schematics.init();
        });
        }, "cicuitlab");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "135"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });






        Eslem Med is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415436%2fhow-to-write-this-boolean-expression-using-only-nor-gates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        0














        NAND and NOR gates are universal. So one way to solve this problem is first reduce the logic using K-maps or whatever, then draw it out with AND, OR, and NOT gates. Then use bubble pushing identity techniques to convert the gates to the desired type.





        schematic





        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






        share|improve this answer




























          0














          NAND and NOR gates are universal. So one way to solve this problem is first reduce the logic using K-maps or whatever, then draw it out with AND, OR, and NOT gates. Then use bubble pushing identity techniques to convert the gates to the desired type.





          schematic





          simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






          share|improve this answer


























            0












            0








            0






            NAND and NOR gates are universal. So one way to solve this problem is first reduce the logic using K-maps or whatever, then draw it out with AND, OR, and NOT gates. Then use bubble pushing identity techniques to convert the gates to the desired type.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






            share|improve this answer














            NAND and NOR gates are universal. So one way to solve this problem is first reduce the logic using K-maps or whatever, then draw it out with AND, OR, and NOT gates. Then use bubble pushing identity techniques to convert the gates to the desired type.





            schematic





            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 6 at 0:49

























            answered Jan 5 at 23:55









            vicatcuvicatcu

            16k861129




            16k861129

























                4














                I'll provide some direction to head. Since your question isn't so much about simplification, I'll do the simplification without any further ado. Then I'll provide a direction to head from that point but I'll leave some work you'll need to perform yourself.



                Simplify



                Let's simplify the expression:



                $$begin{align*}
                T &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B\
                &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B,overline{C} + A,B,C\
                &= Aleft(overline{B},C + B,overline{C} + B,Cright) + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,overline{overline{B},overline{C}} + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,B + A,C + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{A},overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + A,B + B,overline{C}
                end{align*}$$



                I'm not going to explain all the details above. It isn't the only, nor even the best approach to simplification. It's just one I decided to write out, off-hand. Still, you should try to take the time to understand each transition on your own. (Or not. It's up to you.)



                From there, you can see that if $A$ and $B$ are both true, the expression $T=A,C+B,overline{C}$ already captures the term, $A,B$, as one or the other is picked up regardless of $C$.



                So the simplified version is:



                $$T=A,C+B,overline{C}$$



                Applying the NOR gate template



                The basic model of a NOR gate, as I'm sure you know, is $T=overline{R+S}$. That's the template. The question is, how do you take an arbitrary expression and make it conform?



                I'll start you out:



                $$begin{align*}
                T&=A,C+B,overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C+B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C}cdotoverline{B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{left(overline{A}+overline{C}right)cdotleft(overline{B}+Cright)}\\
                &=overline{overline{A},overline{B}+overline{A},C+overline{B},overline{C}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)+overline{B},overline{C}}
                end{align*}$$



                (If it's not immediately clear, take note that in the first transition I used a double negation. The reason is that I know the basic NOR template requires a negation of the entire underlying expression and that a very obvious and simple way to achieve that is to double-negate the entire expression. This guarantees a negation that I can keep at the top, while applying the remaining negation to the underlying expression.)



                At this point, you can see that if $T=overline{R+S}$ then $R=overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)$ and $S=overline{B},overline{C}$. So you are closer to an answer, now. But you have two new situations to resolve.



                I'll solve $S$:



                $$begin{align*}
                S&=overline{B},overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{overline{B},overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{B+C}\\
                end{align*}$$



                And that easily fits the model of a NOR with no additional work.



                You get to resolve $R$, now. Once you walk yourself through that process, you should find a requirement for exactly five NOR gates. I've only shown you the first two of them. You get to find the other three.






                share|improve this answer























                • The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 0:54










                • @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                  – jonk
                  Jan 6 at 0:58












                • yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 1:16
















                4














                I'll provide some direction to head. Since your question isn't so much about simplification, I'll do the simplification without any further ado. Then I'll provide a direction to head from that point but I'll leave some work you'll need to perform yourself.



                Simplify



                Let's simplify the expression:



                $$begin{align*}
                T &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B\
                &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B,overline{C} + A,B,C\
                &= Aleft(overline{B},C + B,overline{C} + B,Cright) + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,overline{overline{B},overline{C}} + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,B + A,C + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{A},overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + A,B + B,overline{C}
                end{align*}$$



                I'm not going to explain all the details above. It isn't the only, nor even the best approach to simplification. It's just one I decided to write out, off-hand. Still, you should try to take the time to understand each transition on your own. (Or not. It's up to you.)



                From there, you can see that if $A$ and $B$ are both true, the expression $T=A,C+B,overline{C}$ already captures the term, $A,B$, as one or the other is picked up regardless of $C$.



                So the simplified version is:



                $$T=A,C+B,overline{C}$$



                Applying the NOR gate template



                The basic model of a NOR gate, as I'm sure you know, is $T=overline{R+S}$. That's the template. The question is, how do you take an arbitrary expression and make it conform?



                I'll start you out:



                $$begin{align*}
                T&=A,C+B,overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C+B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C}cdotoverline{B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{left(overline{A}+overline{C}right)cdotleft(overline{B}+Cright)}\\
                &=overline{overline{A},overline{B}+overline{A},C+overline{B},overline{C}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)+overline{B},overline{C}}
                end{align*}$$



                (If it's not immediately clear, take note that in the first transition I used a double negation. The reason is that I know the basic NOR template requires a negation of the entire underlying expression and that a very obvious and simple way to achieve that is to double-negate the entire expression. This guarantees a negation that I can keep at the top, while applying the remaining negation to the underlying expression.)



                At this point, you can see that if $T=overline{R+S}$ then $R=overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)$ and $S=overline{B},overline{C}$. So you are closer to an answer, now. But you have two new situations to resolve.



                I'll solve $S$:



                $$begin{align*}
                S&=overline{B},overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{overline{B},overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{B+C}\\
                end{align*}$$



                And that easily fits the model of a NOR with no additional work.



                You get to resolve $R$, now. Once you walk yourself through that process, you should find a requirement for exactly five NOR gates. I've only shown you the first two of them. You get to find the other three.






                share|improve this answer























                • The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 0:54










                • @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                  – jonk
                  Jan 6 at 0:58












                • yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 1:16














                4












                4








                4






                I'll provide some direction to head. Since your question isn't so much about simplification, I'll do the simplification without any further ado. Then I'll provide a direction to head from that point but I'll leave some work you'll need to perform yourself.



                Simplify



                Let's simplify the expression:



                $$begin{align*}
                T &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B\
                &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B,overline{C} + A,B,C\
                &= Aleft(overline{B},C + B,overline{C} + B,Cright) + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,overline{overline{B},overline{C}} + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,B + A,C + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{A},overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + A,B + B,overline{C}
                end{align*}$$



                I'm not going to explain all the details above. It isn't the only, nor even the best approach to simplification. It's just one I decided to write out, off-hand. Still, you should try to take the time to understand each transition on your own. (Or not. It's up to you.)



                From there, you can see that if $A$ and $B$ are both true, the expression $T=A,C+B,overline{C}$ already captures the term, $A,B$, as one or the other is picked up regardless of $C$.



                So the simplified version is:



                $$T=A,C+B,overline{C}$$



                Applying the NOR gate template



                The basic model of a NOR gate, as I'm sure you know, is $T=overline{R+S}$. That's the template. The question is, how do you take an arbitrary expression and make it conform?



                I'll start you out:



                $$begin{align*}
                T&=A,C+B,overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C+B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C}cdotoverline{B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{left(overline{A}+overline{C}right)cdotleft(overline{B}+Cright)}\\
                &=overline{overline{A},overline{B}+overline{A},C+overline{B},overline{C}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)+overline{B},overline{C}}
                end{align*}$$



                (If it's not immediately clear, take note that in the first transition I used a double negation. The reason is that I know the basic NOR template requires a negation of the entire underlying expression and that a very obvious and simple way to achieve that is to double-negate the entire expression. This guarantees a negation that I can keep at the top, while applying the remaining negation to the underlying expression.)



                At this point, you can see that if $T=overline{R+S}$ then $R=overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)$ and $S=overline{B},overline{C}$. So you are closer to an answer, now. But you have two new situations to resolve.



                I'll solve $S$:



                $$begin{align*}
                S&=overline{B},overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{overline{B},overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{B+C}\\
                end{align*}$$



                And that easily fits the model of a NOR with no additional work.



                You get to resolve $R$, now. Once you walk yourself through that process, you should find a requirement for exactly five NOR gates. I've only shown you the first two of them. You get to find the other three.






                share|improve this answer














                I'll provide some direction to head. Since your question isn't so much about simplification, I'll do the simplification without any further ado. Then I'll provide a direction to head from that point but I'll leave some work you'll need to perform yourself.



                Simplify



                Let's simplify the expression:



                $$begin{align*}
                T &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B\
                &= A,overline{B},C + overline{A},B,overline{C} + A,B,overline{C} + A,B,C\
                &= Aleft(overline{B},C + B,overline{C} + B,Cright) + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,overline{overline{B},overline{C}} + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,B + A,C + overline{A},B,overline{C}\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{A},overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + Bleft(A + overline{C}right)\
                &= A,C + A,B + B,overline{C}
                end{align*}$$



                I'm not going to explain all the details above. It isn't the only, nor even the best approach to simplification. It's just one I decided to write out, off-hand. Still, you should try to take the time to understand each transition on your own. (Or not. It's up to you.)



                From there, you can see that if $A$ and $B$ are both true, the expression $T=A,C+B,overline{C}$ already captures the term, $A,B$, as one or the other is picked up regardless of $C$.



                So the simplified version is:



                $$T=A,C+B,overline{C}$$



                Applying the NOR gate template



                The basic model of a NOR gate, as I'm sure you know, is $T=overline{R+S}$. That's the template. The question is, how do you take an arbitrary expression and make it conform?



                I'll start you out:



                $$begin{align*}
                T&=A,C+B,overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C+B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A,C}cdotoverline{B,overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{left(overline{A}+overline{C}right)cdotleft(overline{B}+Cright)}\\
                &=overline{overline{A},overline{B}+overline{A},C+overline{B},overline{C}}\\
                &=overline{overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)+overline{B},overline{C}}
                end{align*}$$



                (If it's not immediately clear, take note that in the first transition I used a double negation. The reason is that I know the basic NOR template requires a negation of the entire underlying expression and that a very obvious and simple way to achieve that is to double-negate the entire expression. This guarantees a negation that I can keep at the top, while applying the remaining negation to the underlying expression.)



                At this point, you can see that if $T=overline{R+S}$ then $R=overline{A}left(overline{B}+Cright)$ and $S=overline{B},overline{C}$. So you are closer to an answer, now. But you have two new situations to resolve.



                I'll solve $S$:



                $$begin{align*}
                S&=overline{B},overline{C}\\
                &=overline{overline{overline{B},overline{C}}}\\
                &=overline{B+C}\\
                end{align*}$$



                And that easily fits the model of a NOR with no additional work.



                You get to resolve $R$, now. Once you walk yourself through that process, you should find a requirement for exactly five NOR gates. I've only shown you the first two of them. You get to find the other three.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 6 at 6:47

























                answered Jan 6 at 0:18









                jonkjonk

                32.4k12570




                32.4k12570












                • The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 0:54










                • @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                  – jonk
                  Jan 6 at 0:58












                • yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 1:16


















                • The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 0:54










                • @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                  – jonk
                  Jan 6 at 0:58












                • yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                  – vicatcu
                  Jan 6 at 1:16
















                The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                – vicatcu
                Jan 6 at 0:54




                The original equation simplifies further than you suggest... to AC+BC’
                – vicatcu
                Jan 6 at 0:54












                @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                – jonk
                Jan 6 at 0:58






                @vicatcu If you READ the text I wrote, you will see that expression!!! And you will see me USE IT, too. Take a look, once again. You're not telling me anything new.
                – jonk
                Jan 6 at 0:58














                yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                – vicatcu
                Jan 6 at 1:16




                yes, I see that now, meant no offense just missed it the first read through
                – vicatcu
                Jan 6 at 1:16











                3














                Your Boolean equation has the NOT, AND, and OR operators in it. DeMorgan's Law says that you can perform an AND function with a NOR gate or an OR function with a NAND gate. If you tie the two inputs of a NOR gate together, what kind of function does that give you?



                Since this looks like homework, I'll let you fill in the details.






                share|improve this answer


























                  3














                  Your Boolean equation has the NOT, AND, and OR operators in it. DeMorgan's Law says that you can perform an AND function with a NOR gate or an OR function with a NAND gate. If you tie the two inputs of a NOR gate together, what kind of function does that give you?



                  Since this looks like homework, I'll let you fill in the details.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    3












                    3








                    3






                    Your Boolean equation has the NOT, AND, and OR operators in it. DeMorgan's Law says that you can perform an AND function with a NOR gate or an OR function with a NAND gate. If you tie the two inputs of a NOR gate together, what kind of function does that give you?



                    Since this looks like homework, I'll let you fill in the details.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Your Boolean equation has the NOT, AND, and OR operators in it. DeMorgan's Law says that you can perform an AND function with a NOR gate or an OR function with a NAND gate. If you tie the two inputs of a NOR gate together, what kind of function does that give you?



                    Since this looks like homework, I'll let you fill in the details.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 5 at 23:24









                    Elliot AldersonElliot Alderson

                    5,1271918




                    5,1271918























                        0














                        I'll give you a hint. If you missed DeMorgan's Theorem in lecture, you need to look it up. Briefly, the following two gates are identical





                        schematic





                        simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                        The rest is up to you.






                        share|improve this answer


























                          0














                          I'll give you a hint. If you missed DeMorgan's Theorem in lecture, you need to look it up. Briefly, the following two gates are identical





                          schematic





                          simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                          The rest is up to you.






                          share|improve this answer
























                            0












                            0








                            0






                            I'll give you a hint. If you missed DeMorgan's Theorem in lecture, you need to look it up. Briefly, the following two gates are identical





                            schematic





                            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                            The rest is up to you.






                            share|improve this answer












                            I'll give you a hint. If you missed DeMorgan's Theorem in lecture, you need to look it up. Briefly, the following two gates are identical





                            schematic





                            simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                            The rest is up to you.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 6 at 0:12









                            WhatRoughBeastWhatRoughBeast

                            49.1k22874




                            49.1k22874






















                                Eslem Med is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Eslem Med is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                Eslem Med is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Eslem Med is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415436%2fhow-to-write-this-boolean-expression-using-only-nor-gates%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Mario Kart Wii

                                The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                                What does “Dominus providebit” mean?