Don't understand how to use trig sub on $intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}}dx$
In my textbook it says
First we note that $(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2} = (sqrt{4x^2+9})^3$ so trigonometric substitution is appropriate. Although $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is not quite one of the expressions in the table of trigonometric substitutions, it becomes one of them if we make the preliminary substitution $u=2x$. When we combine this with the tangent substitution, we have $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$, which gives $dx=frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$
I understand the basic trig substitutions in integrals, and I recognize that this is going to turn into some kind of $tan$ substitution since the denominator $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is equivalent to $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why he is subbing $u=2x$. Does it have something to do with the fact that $sqrt{4x^2}=2x$? After that, then he subs in $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$ which I don't see relating to anything except for that maybe when the $4$ gets factored out of the radical the $9$ somehow becomes $9/2$? The only relation to $frac{3}{2}$ in this integral I see is the denominator's exponent, which I doubt is actually the reason for subbing $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$
I'm not asking for the entire problem to be solved, I know I can do that looking at my textbook as the parts after this "preliminary" step make sense, I just have no idea how to start this. If I'm missing some obvious algebraic step I'm sorry, but if anyone can shed some light on what's happening with the $u=2x$ and the $tan$ sub, I would appreciate it so so much.
calculus integration trigonometric-integrals
add a comment |
In my textbook it says
First we note that $(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2} = (sqrt{4x^2+9})^3$ so trigonometric substitution is appropriate. Although $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is not quite one of the expressions in the table of trigonometric substitutions, it becomes one of them if we make the preliminary substitution $u=2x$. When we combine this with the tangent substitution, we have $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$, which gives $dx=frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$
I understand the basic trig substitutions in integrals, and I recognize that this is going to turn into some kind of $tan$ substitution since the denominator $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is equivalent to $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why he is subbing $u=2x$. Does it have something to do with the fact that $sqrt{4x^2}=2x$? After that, then he subs in $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$ which I don't see relating to anything except for that maybe when the $4$ gets factored out of the radical the $9$ somehow becomes $9/2$? The only relation to $frac{3}{2}$ in this integral I see is the denominator's exponent, which I doubt is actually the reason for subbing $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$
I'm not asking for the entire problem to be solved, I know I can do that looking at my textbook as the parts after this "preliminary" step make sense, I just have no idea how to start this. If I'm missing some obvious algebraic step I'm sorry, but if anyone can shed some light on what's happening with the $u=2x$ and the $tan$ sub, I would appreciate it so so much.
calculus integration trigonometric-integrals
1
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
1
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00
add a comment |
In my textbook it says
First we note that $(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2} = (sqrt{4x^2+9})^3$ so trigonometric substitution is appropriate. Although $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is not quite one of the expressions in the table of trigonometric substitutions, it becomes one of them if we make the preliminary substitution $u=2x$. When we combine this with the tangent substitution, we have $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$, which gives $dx=frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$
I understand the basic trig substitutions in integrals, and I recognize that this is going to turn into some kind of $tan$ substitution since the denominator $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is equivalent to $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why he is subbing $u=2x$. Does it have something to do with the fact that $sqrt{4x^2}=2x$? After that, then he subs in $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$ which I don't see relating to anything except for that maybe when the $4$ gets factored out of the radical the $9$ somehow becomes $9/2$? The only relation to $frac{3}{2}$ in this integral I see is the denominator's exponent, which I doubt is actually the reason for subbing $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$
I'm not asking for the entire problem to be solved, I know I can do that looking at my textbook as the parts after this "preliminary" step make sense, I just have no idea how to start this. If I'm missing some obvious algebraic step I'm sorry, but if anyone can shed some light on what's happening with the $u=2x$ and the $tan$ sub, I would appreciate it so so much.
calculus integration trigonometric-integrals
In my textbook it says
First we note that $(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2} = (sqrt{4x^2+9})^3$ so trigonometric substitution is appropriate. Although $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is not quite one of the expressions in the table of trigonometric substitutions, it becomes one of them if we make the preliminary substitution $u=2x$. When we combine this with the tangent substitution, we have $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$, which gives $dx=frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$
I understand the basic trig substitutions in integrals, and I recognize that this is going to turn into some kind of $tan$ substitution since the denominator $sqrt{4x^2+9}$ is equivalent to $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$, but for the life of me I cannot figure out why he is subbing $u=2x$. Does it have something to do with the fact that $sqrt{4x^2}=2x$? After that, then he subs in $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$ which I don't see relating to anything except for that maybe when the $4$ gets factored out of the radical the $9$ somehow becomes $9/2$? The only relation to $frac{3}{2}$ in this integral I see is the denominator's exponent, which I doubt is actually the reason for subbing $x=frac{3}{2}tan(theta)$
I'm not asking for the entire problem to be solved, I know I can do that looking at my textbook as the parts after this "preliminary" step make sense, I just have no idea how to start this. If I'm missing some obvious algebraic step I'm sorry, but if anyone can shed some light on what's happening with the $u=2x$ and the $tan$ sub, I would appreciate it so so much.
calculus integration trigonometric-integrals
calculus integration trigonometric-integrals
edited Jan 5 at 23:13
M. Nestor
741113
741113
asked Jan 5 at 21:24
Ben DreslinskiBen Dreslinski
154
154
1
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
1
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00
add a comment |
1
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
1
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00
1
1
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
1
1
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Probably the textbook first defines $u=2x$ and then $u=3tan w$ for some $w$ to avoid confusion (of course probably!), though here we merge the two substitutions together to obtain $$x={3over 2}tan theta$$which by substitution leads to $$int{x^3over (4x^2+9)sqrt{4x^2+9}}dx=int {{27over 8}tan^3thetaover 27(1+tan^2theta)sectheta}cdot {3over 2}(1+tan^2theta)dtheta\={3over 16}int{tan^3thetaover sec theta}dtheta$$
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
add a comment |
You could avoid the extra substitution altogether (and greatly simplify other trig substitution problems) if you construct a right triangle to inform your substitutions.
Imagine a right triangle whose opposite (to $theta$) leg has length $2x$, adjacent leg has length $3$, and hypotenuse has length $sqrt{4x^2 + 9}$. From this I can deduce that $x = frac{3}{2}tantheta$, and therefore $dx = frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$. I can also determine that $sqrt{4x^2 + 9} = 3sectheta$. Substituting all this in gives:
$$
intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}} = int frac{left(frac{3}{2}tanthetaright)^3}{left(3secthetaright)^3} cdot frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta = frac{3}{16}intfrac{tan^3theta}{sectheta}dtheta.
$$
add a comment |
The answers provided so far already outline exactly how to approach your question with trigonometric substitutions. Here I will speak more broadly about the common trig substitutions. The general goal is to take some rational function of multiple terms and reduce it down to a single term. For instance, here you want to have $4x^2 + 9$ to be represented by a single term.
This motivation of using trigonometry to reduce multiple terms to a single (or overall a much reduced amount) is quite common within integration. Although there are many different identities used, the majority are centred around the principle identity:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
end{equation}
From here three core forms can be derived. The first is just a simple rearrangement:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 rightarrow cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)
end{equation}
The next two are formed by dividing the principle identity through by $cos^2(x)$
begin{equation}
frac{1}{cos^2(x)}left(sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) right) = frac{1}{cos^2(x)} rightarrow tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x)
end{equation}
Combining the three we have:
- $sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1$
- $tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1$
- $sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)$
So here we two three different situations in which multiple terms can be reduced into a single term. These are (and to match the ordering of the list above)
- $a^2 + x^2$
- $x^2 - a^2$
- $a^2 - x^2$
For your question you are working with (1).
Edit - Sorry I should have said that not only are you looking to replace multiple terms with a single term but you are also often looking to get rid of a 'square root'. You will see in the list above that in all three cases the resultant term is a squared term and thus when taking the square root you get rid of it!
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063211%2fdont-understand-how-to-use-trig-sub-on-int-fracx34x29-frac32dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Probably the textbook first defines $u=2x$ and then $u=3tan w$ for some $w$ to avoid confusion (of course probably!), though here we merge the two substitutions together to obtain $$x={3over 2}tan theta$$which by substitution leads to $$int{x^3over (4x^2+9)sqrt{4x^2+9}}dx=int {{27over 8}tan^3thetaover 27(1+tan^2theta)sectheta}cdot {3over 2}(1+tan^2theta)dtheta\={3over 16}int{tan^3thetaover sec theta}dtheta$$
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
add a comment |
Probably the textbook first defines $u=2x$ and then $u=3tan w$ for some $w$ to avoid confusion (of course probably!), though here we merge the two substitutions together to obtain $$x={3over 2}tan theta$$which by substitution leads to $$int{x^3over (4x^2+9)sqrt{4x^2+9}}dx=int {{27over 8}tan^3thetaover 27(1+tan^2theta)sectheta}cdot {3over 2}(1+tan^2theta)dtheta\={3over 16}int{tan^3thetaover sec theta}dtheta$$
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
add a comment |
Probably the textbook first defines $u=2x$ and then $u=3tan w$ for some $w$ to avoid confusion (of course probably!), though here we merge the two substitutions together to obtain $$x={3over 2}tan theta$$which by substitution leads to $$int{x^3over (4x^2+9)sqrt{4x^2+9}}dx=int {{27over 8}tan^3thetaover 27(1+tan^2theta)sectheta}cdot {3over 2}(1+tan^2theta)dtheta\={3over 16}int{tan^3thetaover sec theta}dtheta$$
Probably the textbook first defines $u=2x$ and then $u=3tan w$ for some $w$ to avoid confusion (of course probably!), though here we merge the two substitutions together to obtain $$x={3over 2}tan theta$$which by substitution leads to $$int{x^3over (4x^2+9)sqrt{4x^2+9}}dx=int {{27over 8}tan^3thetaover 27(1+tan^2theta)sectheta}cdot {3over 2}(1+tan^2theta)dtheta\={3over 16}int{tan^3thetaover sec theta}dtheta$$
answered Jan 5 at 21:43
Mostafa AyazMostafa Ayaz
14.2k3937
14.2k3937
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
add a comment |
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
So cases where the radicand's constants are not in the $sqrt{x^2+a^2}$ (or any other trig sub format) tend to result in multiple $u$ substitutions leaving you to solve for $x$ by setting them equal? In that case, I suppose that's what the book meant when he said "combine," well now I feel silly; much thanks.
– Ben Dreslinski
Jan 5 at 23:35
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
You're welcome. That's right. For example a $sqrt{x^2-a^2}$ term requires a $x=acosh u$ substitution....
– Mostafa Ayaz
2 days ago
add a comment |
You could avoid the extra substitution altogether (and greatly simplify other trig substitution problems) if you construct a right triangle to inform your substitutions.
Imagine a right triangle whose opposite (to $theta$) leg has length $2x$, adjacent leg has length $3$, and hypotenuse has length $sqrt{4x^2 + 9}$. From this I can deduce that $x = frac{3}{2}tantheta$, and therefore $dx = frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$. I can also determine that $sqrt{4x^2 + 9} = 3sectheta$. Substituting all this in gives:
$$
intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}} = int frac{left(frac{3}{2}tanthetaright)^3}{left(3secthetaright)^3} cdot frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta = frac{3}{16}intfrac{tan^3theta}{sectheta}dtheta.
$$
add a comment |
You could avoid the extra substitution altogether (and greatly simplify other trig substitution problems) if you construct a right triangle to inform your substitutions.
Imagine a right triangle whose opposite (to $theta$) leg has length $2x$, adjacent leg has length $3$, and hypotenuse has length $sqrt{4x^2 + 9}$. From this I can deduce that $x = frac{3}{2}tantheta$, and therefore $dx = frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$. I can also determine that $sqrt{4x^2 + 9} = 3sectheta$. Substituting all this in gives:
$$
intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}} = int frac{left(frac{3}{2}tanthetaright)^3}{left(3secthetaright)^3} cdot frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta = frac{3}{16}intfrac{tan^3theta}{sectheta}dtheta.
$$
add a comment |
You could avoid the extra substitution altogether (and greatly simplify other trig substitution problems) if you construct a right triangle to inform your substitutions.
Imagine a right triangle whose opposite (to $theta$) leg has length $2x$, adjacent leg has length $3$, and hypotenuse has length $sqrt{4x^2 + 9}$. From this I can deduce that $x = frac{3}{2}tantheta$, and therefore $dx = frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$. I can also determine that $sqrt{4x^2 + 9} = 3sectheta$. Substituting all this in gives:
$$
intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}} = int frac{left(frac{3}{2}tanthetaright)^3}{left(3secthetaright)^3} cdot frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta = frac{3}{16}intfrac{tan^3theta}{sectheta}dtheta.
$$
You could avoid the extra substitution altogether (and greatly simplify other trig substitution problems) if you construct a right triangle to inform your substitutions.
Imagine a right triangle whose opposite (to $theta$) leg has length $2x$, adjacent leg has length $3$, and hypotenuse has length $sqrt{4x^2 + 9}$. From this I can deduce that $x = frac{3}{2}tantheta$, and therefore $dx = frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta$. I can also determine that $sqrt{4x^2 + 9} = 3sectheta$. Substituting all this in gives:
$$
intfrac{x^3}{(4x^2+9)^frac{3}{2}} = int frac{left(frac{3}{2}tanthetaright)^3}{left(3secthetaright)^3} cdot frac{3}{2}sec^2theta dtheta = frac{3}{16}intfrac{tan^3theta}{sectheta}dtheta.
$$
edited Jan 5 at 22:23
answered Jan 5 at 22:00
Austin MohrAustin Mohr
20.1k35098
20.1k35098
add a comment |
add a comment |
The answers provided so far already outline exactly how to approach your question with trigonometric substitutions. Here I will speak more broadly about the common trig substitutions. The general goal is to take some rational function of multiple terms and reduce it down to a single term. For instance, here you want to have $4x^2 + 9$ to be represented by a single term.
This motivation of using trigonometry to reduce multiple terms to a single (or overall a much reduced amount) is quite common within integration. Although there are many different identities used, the majority are centred around the principle identity:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
end{equation}
From here three core forms can be derived. The first is just a simple rearrangement:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 rightarrow cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)
end{equation}
The next two are formed by dividing the principle identity through by $cos^2(x)$
begin{equation}
frac{1}{cos^2(x)}left(sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) right) = frac{1}{cos^2(x)} rightarrow tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x)
end{equation}
Combining the three we have:
- $sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1$
- $tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1$
- $sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)$
So here we two three different situations in which multiple terms can be reduced into a single term. These are (and to match the ordering of the list above)
- $a^2 + x^2$
- $x^2 - a^2$
- $a^2 - x^2$
For your question you are working with (1).
Edit - Sorry I should have said that not only are you looking to replace multiple terms with a single term but you are also often looking to get rid of a 'square root'. You will see in the list above that in all three cases the resultant term is a squared term and thus when taking the square root you get rid of it!
add a comment |
The answers provided so far already outline exactly how to approach your question with trigonometric substitutions. Here I will speak more broadly about the common trig substitutions. The general goal is to take some rational function of multiple terms and reduce it down to a single term. For instance, here you want to have $4x^2 + 9$ to be represented by a single term.
This motivation of using trigonometry to reduce multiple terms to a single (or overall a much reduced amount) is quite common within integration. Although there are many different identities used, the majority are centred around the principle identity:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
end{equation}
From here three core forms can be derived. The first is just a simple rearrangement:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 rightarrow cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)
end{equation}
The next two are formed by dividing the principle identity through by $cos^2(x)$
begin{equation}
frac{1}{cos^2(x)}left(sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) right) = frac{1}{cos^2(x)} rightarrow tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x)
end{equation}
Combining the three we have:
- $sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1$
- $tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1$
- $sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)$
So here we two three different situations in which multiple terms can be reduced into a single term. These are (and to match the ordering of the list above)
- $a^2 + x^2$
- $x^2 - a^2$
- $a^2 - x^2$
For your question you are working with (1).
Edit - Sorry I should have said that not only are you looking to replace multiple terms with a single term but you are also often looking to get rid of a 'square root'. You will see in the list above that in all three cases the resultant term is a squared term and thus when taking the square root you get rid of it!
add a comment |
The answers provided so far already outline exactly how to approach your question with trigonometric substitutions. Here I will speak more broadly about the common trig substitutions. The general goal is to take some rational function of multiple terms and reduce it down to a single term. For instance, here you want to have $4x^2 + 9$ to be represented by a single term.
This motivation of using trigonometry to reduce multiple terms to a single (or overall a much reduced amount) is quite common within integration. Although there are many different identities used, the majority are centred around the principle identity:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
end{equation}
From here three core forms can be derived. The first is just a simple rearrangement:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 rightarrow cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)
end{equation}
The next two are formed by dividing the principle identity through by $cos^2(x)$
begin{equation}
frac{1}{cos^2(x)}left(sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) right) = frac{1}{cos^2(x)} rightarrow tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x)
end{equation}
Combining the three we have:
- $sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1$
- $tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1$
- $sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)$
So here we two three different situations in which multiple terms can be reduced into a single term. These are (and to match the ordering of the list above)
- $a^2 + x^2$
- $x^2 - a^2$
- $a^2 - x^2$
For your question you are working with (1).
Edit - Sorry I should have said that not only are you looking to replace multiple terms with a single term but you are also often looking to get rid of a 'square root'. You will see in the list above that in all three cases the resultant term is a squared term and thus when taking the square root you get rid of it!
The answers provided so far already outline exactly how to approach your question with trigonometric substitutions. Here I will speak more broadly about the common trig substitutions. The general goal is to take some rational function of multiple terms and reduce it down to a single term. For instance, here you want to have $4x^2 + 9$ to be represented by a single term.
This motivation of using trigonometry to reduce multiple terms to a single (or overall a much reduced amount) is quite common within integration. Although there are many different identities used, the majority are centred around the principle identity:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1
end{equation}
From here three core forms can be derived. The first is just a simple rearrangement:
begin{equation}
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 rightarrow cos^2(x) = 1 - sin^2(x)
end{equation}
The next two are formed by dividing the principle identity through by $cos^2(x)$
begin{equation}
frac{1}{cos^2(x)}left(sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) right) = frac{1}{cos^2(x)} rightarrow tan^2(x) + 1 = sec^2(x)
end{equation}
Combining the three we have:
- $sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1$
- $tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1$
- $sin^2(x) = 1 - cos^2(x)$
So here we two three different situations in which multiple terms can be reduced into a single term. These are (and to match the ordering of the list above)
- $a^2 + x^2$
- $x^2 - a^2$
- $a^2 - x^2$
For your question you are working with (1).
Edit - Sorry I should have said that not only are you looking to replace multiple terms with a single term but you are also often looking to get rid of a 'square root'. You will see in the list above that in all three cases the resultant term is a squared term and thus when taking the square root you get rid of it!
edited Jan 5 at 23:01
answered Jan 5 at 22:48
DavidGDavidG
1,907620
1,907620
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063211%2fdont-understand-how-to-use-trig-sub-on-int-fracx34x29-frac32dx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
theta gives $theta$
– Shrey Joshi
Jan 5 at 21:26
1
What substitution would you use for the case $u^2+9$? Now, by what substitution would you get $u^2+9$ from $4x^2+9$?
– Ennar
Jan 5 at 22:00