Does exponentiation distribute over the multiplication of trigoneomtric functions?












0












$begingroup$


I see exponentiation distributes over multiplication such as: $(3 . 4)^2 = (3^2 . 4^2)$, but I wonder: do the same rules hold for trigonometric functions? (i.e. is $(asin x)^2$ equal to $a^2sin^2x$)?






algebra-precalculus trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 2 at 3:10
















0












$begingroup$


I see exponentiation distributes over multiplication such as: $(3 . 4)^2 = (3^2 . 4^2)$, but I wonder: do the same rules hold for trigonometric functions? (i.e. is $(asin x)^2$ equal to $a^2sin^2x$)?






algebra-precalculus trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 2 at 3:10














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I see exponentiation distributes over multiplication such as: $(3 . 4)^2 = (3^2 . 4^2)$, but I wonder: do the same rules hold for trigonometric functions? (i.e. is $(asin x)^2$ equal to $a^2sin^2x$)?






algebra-precalculus trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I see exponentiation distributes over multiplication such as: $(3 . 4)^2 = (3^2 . 4^2)$, but I wonder: do the same rules hold for trigonometric functions? (i.e. is $(asin x)^2$ equal to $a^2sin^2x$)?






algebra-precalculus trigonometry




algebra-precalculus trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 8 at 4:29









naveen dankal

4,55921348




4,55921348










asked Jan 2 at 3:08









StartecStartec

1185




1185








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 2 at 3:10














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
    $endgroup$
    – Omnomnomnom
    Jan 2 at 3:10








2




2




$begingroup$
Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 2 at 3:10




$begingroup$
Are you sure about that? $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 12^2 = 144$, and $3^2 cdot 4^2 = 9 cdot 16 = 144$
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 2 at 3:10










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$


Edit: For the sake of posterity, the tenet about $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 3^2 cdot 4^2$ was from a previous version of OP's question. The core of my answer nonetheless answers the question, that being whether exponentiation distributes with trigonometric functions.




$(3 cdot 4)^2$ does indeed equal $(3^2 cdot 4^2)$ (put both into a calculator: both are $144$), so what's the issue? Exponentiation does distribute over multiplication in the context of real numbers; that is to say:



$$(a cdot b)^c = a^c cdot b^c$$



In the case in the OP, note in particular, as a consequence of the commutativity of multiplication:



$$(a cdot sin(x))^2 = (a cdot sin(x))cdot (a cdot sin(x)) = a cdot sin(x) cdot a cdot sin(x) = a cdot a cdot sin(x) cdot sin(x) = a^2 cdot sin^2(x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    What sort of numbers are you dealing with? What sort of function space?



    In general, for $n in N$ over some set $(G,*)$ endowed with some closed operator $*$ then $forall a,b in G$:



    begin{equation}
    (a*b)^n = underbrace{left(a*bright) * (a*b) * (a*b) cdots * (a*b)}_{n mbox{ times}}
    end{equation}



    If it's endowed with associativity:



    begin{equation}
    (a*b)^n = a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b
    end{equation}



    If it's also endowed with commutativity then:



    begin{align}
    (a*b)^n &= a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b = underbrace{(a*a*cdots *a)}_{n mbox{ times}} * underbrace{(b*b*cdots *b)}_{ n mbox{ times}}\
    &= a^n * b^n = b^n * a^n
    end{align}



    I would posit that you are working with the Field of Real Numbers which is a Commutative Field defined on multiplication and addition. Each operator $+$ and $*$ form Abelian Group. Abelian Groups are both associative and commutative.



    I've added a lot of detail here not to try and overcomplicate but to let you know of different types of objects and operators. It's good to get an Abstract Algebra perspective on things early on as it will make your transition into Objecs such as Vectors, Matrices, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number, etc much easier (as many do not satisfy this property in general).



    If you're interested in any good intro to Abstract Algebra books, let me know. There is also some great free online video tutorials on the subject. I myself spent a huge amount of time on said videos this year and it's made my mathematics (in general) much more solid.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059103%2fdoes-exponentiation-distribute-over-the-multiplication-of-trigoneomtric-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0












      $begingroup$


      Edit: For the sake of posterity, the tenet about $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 3^2 cdot 4^2$ was from a previous version of OP's question. The core of my answer nonetheless answers the question, that being whether exponentiation distributes with trigonometric functions.




      $(3 cdot 4)^2$ does indeed equal $(3^2 cdot 4^2)$ (put both into a calculator: both are $144$), so what's the issue? Exponentiation does distribute over multiplication in the context of real numbers; that is to say:



      $$(a cdot b)^c = a^c cdot b^c$$



      In the case in the OP, note in particular, as a consequence of the commutativity of multiplication:



      $$(a cdot sin(x))^2 = (a cdot sin(x))cdot (a cdot sin(x)) = a cdot sin(x) cdot a cdot sin(x) = a cdot a cdot sin(x) cdot sin(x) = a^2 cdot sin^2(x)$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        0












        $begingroup$


        Edit: For the sake of posterity, the tenet about $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 3^2 cdot 4^2$ was from a previous version of OP's question. The core of my answer nonetheless answers the question, that being whether exponentiation distributes with trigonometric functions.




        $(3 cdot 4)^2$ does indeed equal $(3^2 cdot 4^2)$ (put both into a calculator: both are $144$), so what's the issue? Exponentiation does distribute over multiplication in the context of real numbers; that is to say:



        $$(a cdot b)^c = a^c cdot b^c$$



        In the case in the OP, note in particular, as a consequence of the commutativity of multiplication:



        $$(a cdot sin(x))^2 = (a cdot sin(x))cdot (a cdot sin(x)) = a cdot sin(x) cdot a cdot sin(x) = a cdot a cdot sin(x) cdot sin(x) = a^2 cdot sin^2(x)$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$


          Edit: For the sake of posterity, the tenet about $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 3^2 cdot 4^2$ was from a previous version of OP's question. The core of my answer nonetheless answers the question, that being whether exponentiation distributes with trigonometric functions.




          $(3 cdot 4)^2$ does indeed equal $(3^2 cdot 4^2)$ (put both into a calculator: both are $144$), so what's the issue? Exponentiation does distribute over multiplication in the context of real numbers; that is to say:



          $$(a cdot b)^c = a^c cdot b^c$$



          In the case in the OP, note in particular, as a consequence of the commutativity of multiplication:



          $$(a cdot sin(x))^2 = (a cdot sin(x))cdot (a cdot sin(x)) = a cdot sin(x) cdot a cdot sin(x) = a cdot a cdot sin(x) cdot sin(x) = a^2 cdot sin^2(x)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          Edit: For the sake of posterity, the tenet about $(3 cdot 4)^2 = 3^2 cdot 4^2$ was from a previous version of OP's question. The core of my answer nonetheless answers the question, that being whether exponentiation distributes with trigonometric functions.




          $(3 cdot 4)^2$ does indeed equal $(3^2 cdot 4^2)$ (put both into a calculator: both are $144$), so what's the issue? Exponentiation does distribute over multiplication in the context of real numbers; that is to say:



          $$(a cdot b)^c = a^c cdot b^c$$



          In the case in the OP, note in particular, as a consequence of the commutativity of multiplication:



          $$(a cdot sin(x))^2 = (a cdot sin(x))cdot (a cdot sin(x)) = a cdot sin(x) cdot a cdot sin(x) = a cdot a cdot sin(x) cdot sin(x) = a^2 cdot sin^2(x)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 8 at 4:27









          DavidG

          2,022620




          2,022620










          answered Jan 2 at 3:12









          Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer

          5,4431936




          5,4431936























              1












              $begingroup$

              What sort of numbers are you dealing with? What sort of function space?



              In general, for $n in N$ over some set $(G,*)$ endowed with some closed operator $*$ then $forall a,b in G$:



              begin{equation}
              (a*b)^n = underbrace{left(a*bright) * (a*b) * (a*b) cdots * (a*b)}_{n mbox{ times}}
              end{equation}



              If it's endowed with associativity:



              begin{equation}
              (a*b)^n = a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b
              end{equation}



              If it's also endowed with commutativity then:



              begin{align}
              (a*b)^n &= a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b = underbrace{(a*a*cdots *a)}_{n mbox{ times}} * underbrace{(b*b*cdots *b)}_{ n mbox{ times}}\
              &= a^n * b^n = b^n * a^n
              end{align}



              I would posit that you are working with the Field of Real Numbers which is a Commutative Field defined on multiplication and addition. Each operator $+$ and $*$ form Abelian Group. Abelian Groups are both associative and commutative.



              I've added a lot of detail here not to try and overcomplicate but to let you know of different types of objects and operators. It's good to get an Abstract Algebra perspective on things early on as it will make your transition into Objecs such as Vectors, Matrices, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number, etc much easier (as many do not satisfy this property in general).



              If you're interested in any good intro to Abstract Algebra books, let me know. There is also some great free online video tutorials on the subject. I myself spent a huge amount of time on said videos this year and it's made my mathematics (in general) much more solid.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                What sort of numbers are you dealing with? What sort of function space?



                In general, for $n in N$ over some set $(G,*)$ endowed with some closed operator $*$ then $forall a,b in G$:



                begin{equation}
                (a*b)^n = underbrace{left(a*bright) * (a*b) * (a*b) cdots * (a*b)}_{n mbox{ times}}
                end{equation}



                If it's endowed with associativity:



                begin{equation}
                (a*b)^n = a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b
                end{equation}



                If it's also endowed with commutativity then:



                begin{align}
                (a*b)^n &= a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b = underbrace{(a*a*cdots *a)}_{n mbox{ times}} * underbrace{(b*b*cdots *b)}_{ n mbox{ times}}\
                &= a^n * b^n = b^n * a^n
                end{align}



                I would posit that you are working with the Field of Real Numbers which is a Commutative Field defined on multiplication and addition. Each operator $+$ and $*$ form Abelian Group. Abelian Groups are both associative and commutative.



                I've added a lot of detail here not to try and overcomplicate but to let you know of different types of objects and operators. It's good to get an Abstract Algebra perspective on things early on as it will make your transition into Objecs such as Vectors, Matrices, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number, etc much easier (as many do not satisfy this property in general).



                If you're interested in any good intro to Abstract Algebra books, let me know. There is also some great free online video tutorials on the subject. I myself spent a huge amount of time on said videos this year and it's made my mathematics (in general) much more solid.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  What sort of numbers are you dealing with? What sort of function space?



                  In general, for $n in N$ over some set $(G,*)$ endowed with some closed operator $*$ then $forall a,b in G$:



                  begin{equation}
                  (a*b)^n = underbrace{left(a*bright) * (a*b) * (a*b) cdots * (a*b)}_{n mbox{ times}}
                  end{equation}



                  If it's endowed with associativity:



                  begin{equation}
                  (a*b)^n = a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b
                  end{equation}



                  If it's also endowed with commutativity then:



                  begin{align}
                  (a*b)^n &= a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b = underbrace{(a*a*cdots *a)}_{n mbox{ times}} * underbrace{(b*b*cdots *b)}_{ n mbox{ times}}\
                  &= a^n * b^n = b^n * a^n
                  end{align}



                  I would posit that you are working with the Field of Real Numbers which is a Commutative Field defined on multiplication and addition. Each operator $+$ and $*$ form Abelian Group. Abelian Groups are both associative and commutative.



                  I've added a lot of detail here not to try and overcomplicate but to let you know of different types of objects and operators. It's good to get an Abstract Algebra perspective on things early on as it will make your transition into Objecs such as Vectors, Matrices, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number, etc much easier (as many do not satisfy this property in general).



                  If you're interested in any good intro to Abstract Algebra books, let me know. There is also some great free online video tutorials on the subject. I myself spent a huge amount of time on said videos this year and it's made my mathematics (in general) much more solid.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  What sort of numbers are you dealing with? What sort of function space?



                  In general, for $n in N$ over some set $(G,*)$ endowed with some closed operator $*$ then $forall a,b in G$:



                  begin{equation}
                  (a*b)^n = underbrace{left(a*bright) * (a*b) * (a*b) cdots * (a*b)}_{n mbox{ times}}
                  end{equation}



                  If it's endowed with associativity:



                  begin{equation}
                  (a*b)^n = a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b
                  end{equation}



                  If it's also endowed with commutativity then:



                  begin{align}
                  (a*b)^n &= a*b * a*b * a*b cdots * a*b = underbrace{(a*a*cdots *a)}_{n mbox{ times}} * underbrace{(b*b*cdots *b)}_{ n mbox{ times}}\
                  &= a^n * b^n = b^n * a^n
                  end{align}



                  I would posit that you are working with the Field of Real Numbers which is a Commutative Field defined on multiplication and addition. Each operator $+$ and $*$ form Abelian Group. Abelian Groups are both associative and commutative.



                  I've added a lot of detail here not to try and overcomplicate but to let you know of different types of objects and operators. It's good to get an Abstract Algebra perspective on things early on as it will make your transition into Objecs such as Vectors, Matrices, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_number, etc much easier (as many do not satisfy this property in general).



                  If you're interested in any good intro to Abstract Algebra books, let me know. There is also some great free online video tutorials on the subject. I myself spent a huge amount of time on said videos this year and it's made my mathematics (in general) much more solid.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 2 at 7:34

























                  answered Jan 2 at 7:25









                  DavidGDavidG

                  2,022620




                  2,022620






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3059103%2fdoes-exponentiation-distribute-over-the-multiplication-of-trigoneomtric-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      Image
                      Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro...
                      Read more

                      The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                      Image
                      Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth From The Cutting Room Floor < The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth Jump to: navigation, search This is a sub-page of The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth . Afterbirth is the first expansion pack for Rebirth and features a variety of improvements. Contents 1 Unused Graphics 1.1 Old Man Keeper 1.2 Skinless Hush 1.3 Miscellaneous Unused Hush Sprites 1.4 Generosity achievement 1.5 Afterbirth+ Room Editor 1.6 Bearded Ultra Greed 1.7 Early Ultra Greed 1.8 Unused Brownie Expression 1.9 Frail's Spinning Head 1.10 Mom's Dead Hand Alt 2 Unused Audio 2.1 Unused Dead Womb Layer 2.2 Unused Hush Battle Outro 2.3 The Stain Grunt Unused Graphics Old Man Keeper Image file: gfxuimain me...
                      Read more

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Image
                      5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1 ...
                      Read more