Proving Q irreducility without using specific criteria for this [closed]












0












$begingroup$


Given a polynomial $p(x) in mathbb Q[x]$, we know in advance its possible roots in $mathbb Q$. Showing that none of these is a root of $p(x)$, concludes its irreducibility over $mathbb Q$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Jan 9 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • $begingroup$
    No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:42










  • $begingroup$
    In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:44
















0












$begingroup$


Given a polynomial $p(x) in mathbb Q[x]$, we know in advance its possible roots in $mathbb Q$. Showing that none of these is a root of $p(x)$, concludes its irreducibility over $mathbb Q$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$



closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Jan 9 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • $begingroup$
    No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:42










  • $begingroup$
    In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:44














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Given a polynomial $p(x) in mathbb Q[x]$, we know in advance its possible roots in $mathbb Q$. Showing that none of these is a root of $p(x)$, concludes its irreducibility over $mathbb Q$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Given a polynomial $p(x) in mathbb Q[x]$, we know in advance its possible roots in $mathbb Q$. Showing that none of these is a root of $p(x)$, concludes its irreducibility over $mathbb Q$?







abstract-algebra polynomials irreducible-polynomials






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 11:40









math_noobmath_noob

13




13




closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Jan 9 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




closed as off-topic by Saad, Alexander Gruber Jan 9 at 0:46


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Saad, Alexander Gruber

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • $begingroup$
    No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:42










  • $begingroup$
    In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:44


















  • $begingroup$
    No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:42










  • $begingroup$
    In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
    $endgroup$
    – lulu
    Jan 8 at 11:44
















$begingroup$
No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 8 at 11:42




$begingroup$
No. $(x^2+1)^2$ is reducible (clearly) but it has no rational roots.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 8 at 11:42












$begingroup$
In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 8 at 11:44




$begingroup$
In general, it can be very hard to show that a polynomial over $mathbb Q$ is irreducible. There are certain tests like Eisenstein's criterion that work in certain cases, but there isn't any sort of silver bullet.
$endgroup$
– lulu
Jan 8 at 11:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Counter-example:



$(x^2+1)(x^2+2)=x^4+3x^2+2;$ is not irreducible over $mathbf Q$, yet has no rational (nor real) root.



As to general methods, you have the following strategies:




  • Let $alphainmathbf Q$ and $P(X)$ be a polynomial in $mathbf Q[X]$. Then $P(X)$ is irreducible if an only if $P(X+alpha)$ is.


It may happen that by a suitable choice of $alpha$, Eisenstein's criterion applies.




  • One always may reduce the problem to the case a polynomial with integer coefficients. If for some $ninmathbf Z$, and $P(X)inmathbf Z[X]$, $overline P(X)$ is irreducible mod. $n$, then $P(x)$ is irreducible.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Counter-example:



    $(x^2+1)(x^2+2)=x^4+3x^2+2;$ is not irreducible over $mathbf Q$, yet has no rational (nor real) root.



    As to general methods, you have the following strategies:




    • Let $alphainmathbf Q$ and $P(X)$ be a polynomial in $mathbf Q[X]$. Then $P(X)$ is irreducible if an only if $P(X+alpha)$ is.


    It may happen that by a suitable choice of $alpha$, Eisenstein's criterion applies.




    • One always may reduce the problem to the case a polynomial with integer coefficients. If for some $ninmathbf Z$, and $P(X)inmathbf Z[X]$, $overline P(X)$ is irreducible mod. $n$, then $P(x)$ is irreducible.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Counter-example:



      $(x^2+1)(x^2+2)=x^4+3x^2+2;$ is not irreducible over $mathbf Q$, yet has no rational (nor real) root.



      As to general methods, you have the following strategies:




      • Let $alphainmathbf Q$ and $P(X)$ be a polynomial in $mathbf Q[X]$. Then $P(X)$ is irreducible if an only if $P(X+alpha)$ is.


      It may happen that by a suitable choice of $alpha$, Eisenstein's criterion applies.




      • One always may reduce the problem to the case a polynomial with integer coefficients. If for some $ninmathbf Z$, and $P(X)inmathbf Z[X]$, $overline P(X)$ is irreducible mod. $n$, then $P(x)$ is irreducible.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Counter-example:



        $(x^2+1)(x^2+2)=x^4+3x^2+2;$ is not irreducible over $mathbf Q$, yet has no rational (nor real) root.



        As to general methods, you have the following strategies:




        • Let $alphainmathbf Q$ and $P(X)$ be a polynomial in $mathbf Q[X]$. Then $P(X)$ is irreducible if an only if $P(X+alpha)$ is.


        It may happen that by a suitable choice of $alpha$, Eisenstein's criterion applies.




        • One always may reduce the problem to the case a polynomial with integer coefficients. If for some $ninmathbf Z$, and $P(X)inmathbf Z[X]$, $overline P(X)$ is irreducible mod. $n$, then $P(x)$ is irreducible.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Counter-example:



        $(x^2+1)(x^2+2)=x^4+3x^2+2;$ is not irreducible over $mathbf Q$, yet has no rational (nor real) root.



        As to general methods, you have the following strategies:




        • Let $alphainmathbf Q$ and $P(X)$ be a polynomial in $mathbf Q[X]$. Then $P(X)$ is irreducible if an only if $P(X+alpha)$ is.


        It may happen that by a suitable choice of $alpha$, Eisenstein's criterion applies.




        • One always may reduce the problem to the case a polynomial with integer coefficients. If for some $ninmathbf Z$, and $P(X)inmathbf Z[X]$, $overline P(X)$ is irreducible mod. $n$, then $P(x)$ is irreducible.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 8 at 12:02









        BernardBernard

        119k639112




        119k639112















            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?