Application of the Sylow Theorems to groups of order $p^2q$
$begingroup$
I am trying to show that any group of order $p^2q$ has a normal Sylow subgroup where $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes.
In the case $p>q$ I have no problem.. By Sylow $n_p|q$, so $n_p$ is either $1$ or $q$. But we also have $n_pequiv1mod p$ which rules out $q$. So in the case $p>q$, $n_p=1$ and the unique p-Sylow subgroup is normal.
In the case $p<q$ however, I run into a problem.. Again we have $n_q|p^2$ (so $n_qin{1,p,p^2}$). Again, the condition $n_qequiv1mod q$ rules out $p$.
Now I am attempting to rule out the case $n_q=p^2$: Assume $n_q=p^2$. Then $p^2equiv1mod qimplies (p+1)(p-1)equiv0mod qimplies q$ must divide $(p+1)$ since $p<q$ and $q$ prime. But since $p<q$ and $q|(p+1)$ we see $q=p+1$. For primes this only happens when $p=2, q=3$.
Does this mean I need to check groups of order $2^2cdot3=12$ or did I miss something along the way that lets me conclude $n_qneq p^2$ and thus that $n_q=1$.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to show that any group of order $p^2q$ has a normal Sylow subgroup where $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes.
In the case $p>q$ I have no problem.. By Sylow $n_p|q$, so $n_p$ is either $1$ or $q$. But we also have $n_pequiv1mod p$ which rules out $q$. So in the case $p>q$, $n_p=1$ and the unique p-Sylow subgroup is normal.
In the case $p<q$ however, I run into a problem.. Again we have $n_q|p^2$ (so $n_qin{1,p,p^2}$). Again, the condition $n_qequiv1mod q$ rules out $p$.
Now I am attempting to rule out the case $n_q=p^2$: Assume $n_q=p^2$. Then $p^2equiv1mod qimplies (p+1)(p-1)equiv0mod qimplies q$ must divide $(p+1)$ since $p<q$ and $q$ prime. But since $p<q$ and $q|(p+1)$ we see $q=p+1$. For primes this only happens when $p=2, q=3$.
Does this mean I need to check groups of order $2^2cdot3=12$ or did I miss something along the way that lets me conclude $n_qneq p^2$ and thus that $n_q=1$.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to show that any group of order $p^2q$ has a normal Sylow subgroup where $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes.
In the case $p>q$ I have no problem.. By Sylow $n_p|q$, so $n_p$ is either $1$ or $q$. But we also have $n_pequiv1mod p$ which rules out $q$. So in the case $p>q$, $n_p=1$ and the unique p-Sylow subgroup is normal.
In the case $p<q$ however, I run into a problem.. Again we have $n_q|p^2$ (so $n_qin{1,p,p^2}$). Again, the condition $n_qequiv1mod q$ rules out $p$.
Now I am attempting to rule out the case $n_q=p^2$: Assume $n_q=p^2$. Then $p^2equiv1mod qimplies (p+1)(p-1)equiv0mod qimplies q$ must divide $(p+1)$ since $p<q$ and $q$ prime. But since $p<q$ and $q|(p+1)$ we see $q=p+1$. For primes this only happens when $p=2, q=3$.
Does this mean I need to check groups of order $2^2cdot3=12$ or did I miss something along the way that lets me conclude $n_qneq p^2$ and thus that $n_q=1$.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups
$endgroup$
I am trying to show that any group of order $p^2q$ has a normal Sylow subgroup where $p$ and $q$ are distinct primes.
In the case $p>q$ I have no problem.. By Sylow $n_p|q$, so $n_p$ is either $1$ or $q$. But we also have $n_pequiv1mod p$ which rules out $q$. So in the case $p>q$, $n_p=1$ and the unique p-Sylow subgroup is normal.
In the case $p<q$ however, I run into a problem.. Again we have $n_q|p^2$ (so $n_qin{1,p,p^2}$). Again, the condition $n_qequiv1mod q$ rules out $p$.
Now I am attempting to rule out the case $n_q=p^2$: Assume $n_q=p^2$. Then $p^2equiv1mod qimplies (p+1)(p-1)equiv0mod qimplies q$ must divide $(p+1)$ since $p<q$ and $q$ prime. But since $p<q$ and $q|(p+1)$ we see $q=p+1$. For primes this only happens when $p=2, q=3$.
Does this mean I need to check groups of order $2^2cdot3=12$ or did I miss something along the way that lets me conclude $n_qneq p^2$ and thus that $n_q=1$.
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups
abstract-algebra group-theory finite-groups
asked Aug 16 '11 at 23:35
RHPRHP
1,40811525
1,40811525
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's another approach: suppose $n_q=p^2$. The $p^2$ $q$-Sylows each have $q-1$ nonidentity elements, and since a group of prime order is generated by any of its nonidentity elements, these sets are disjoint. So our group has $p^2(q-1)$ elements of order $q$, and so only $p^2$ elements of any other order. There's thus only room for one $p$-Sylow, which is thus normal.
This possibiity does in fact occur: $A_4$ has order 12, has the Klein group as a normal $2$-Sylow, and all $8$ other elements are $3$-cycles.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everything you've written seems to be correct. But you don't necessarily have to know the groups of order $12$.
To finish questions like this one off, it's often helpful to count elements. Here, if a group of order $12$ has more than one Sylow $3$-subgroup then there are four, and these intersect trivially. If you remove the elements of period $3$ from the group, then you aren't left with much!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the case of $q > p$. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ or $1$ and
$n_p = q$ or $1$.
Let G have no non-trivial normal subgroup. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ and $n_p=q$. Then there are $p^2 (q-1) $ elements of order $q$ and $q(p-1) $ elements of order $p$. So, we have the following ,
begin{align}
p^2q &geq p^2(q-1) + q(p-1) + 1 \
& geq p^2q+pq-p^2-q+1 \
& geq p^2q + (p-1) (q-1)
end{align}
$$implies (p-1)(q-1) = 0 implies p=1 text{ or } q=1$$
But $p$ and $q$ are primes.
Hence $G$ has a non-trivial normal subgroup.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57938%2fapplication-of-the-sylow-theorems-to-groups-of-order-p2q%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here's another approach: suppose $n_q=p^2$. The $p^2$ $q$-Sylows each have $q-1$ nonidentity elements, and since a group of prime order is generated by any of its nonidentity elements, these sets are disjoint. So our group has $p^2(q-1)$ elements of order $q$, and so only $p^2$ elements of any other order. There's thus only room for one $p$-Sylow, which is thus normal.
This possibiity does in fact occur: $A_4$ has order 12, has the Klein group as a normal $2$-Sylow, and all $8$ other elements are $3$-cycles.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another approach: suppose $n_q=p^2$. The $p^2$ $q$-Sylows each have $q-1$ nonidentity elements, and since a group of prime order is generated by any of its nonidentity elements, these sets are disjoint. So our group has $p^2(q-1)$ elements of order $q$, and so only $p^2$ elements of any other order. There's thus only room for one $p$-Sylow, which is thus normal.
This possibiity does in fact occur: $A_4$ has order 12, has the Klein group as a normal $2$-Sylow, and all $8$ other elements are $3$-cycles.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another approach: suppose $n_q=p^2$. The $p^2$ $q$-Sylows each have $q-1$ nonidentity elements, and since a group of prime order is generated by any of its nonidentity elements, these sets are disjoint. So our group has $p^2(q-1)$ elements of order $q$, and so only $p^2$ elements of any other order. There's thus only room for one $p$-Sylow, which is thus normal.
This possibiity does in fact occur: $A_4$ has order 12, has the Klein group as a normal $2$-Sylow, and all $8$ other elements are $3$-cycles.
$endgroup$
Here's another approach: suppose $n_q=p^2$. The $p^2$ $q$-Sylows each have $q-1$ nonidentity elements, and since a group of prime order is generated by any of its nonidentity elements, these sets are disjoint. So our group has $p^2(q-1)$ elements of order $q$, and so only $p^2$ elements of any other order. There's thus only room for one $p$-Sylow, which is thus normal.
This possibiity does in fact occur: $A_4$ has order 12, has the Klein group as a normal $2$-Sylow, and all $8$ other elements are $3$-cycles.
answered Aug 16 '11 at 23:56
Chris EagleChris Eagle
29k26997
29k26997
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everything you've written seems to be correct. But you don't necessarily have to know the groups of order $12$.
To finish questions like this one off, it's often helpful to count elements. Here, if a group of order $12$ has more than one Sylow $3$-subgroup then there are four, and these intersect trivially. If you remove the elements of period $3$ from the group, then you aren't left with much!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everything you've written seems to be correct. But you don't necessarily have to know the groups of order $12$.
To finish questions like this one off, it's often helpful to count elements. Here, if a group of order $12$ has more than one Sylow $3$-subgroup then there are four, and these intersect trivially. If you remove the elements of period $3$ from the group, then you aren't left with much!
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Everything you've written seems to be correct. But you don't necessarily have to know the groups of order $12$.
To finish questions like this one off, it's often helpful to count elements. Here, if a group of order $12$ has more than one Sylow $3$-subgroup then there are four, and these intersect trivially. If you remove the elements of period $3$ from the group, then you aren't left with much!
$endgroup$
Everything you've written seems to be correct. But you don't necessarily have to know the groups of order $12$.
To finish questions like this one off, it's often helpful to count elements. Here, if a group of order $12$ has more than one Sylow $3$-subgroup then there are four, and these intersect trivially. If you remove the elements of period $3$ from the group, then you aren't left with much!
edited Aug 17 '11 at 0:06
answered Aug 16 '11 at 23:55
Dylan MorelandDylan Moreland
16.8k23563
16.8k23563
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the case of $q > p$. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ or $1$ and
$n_p = q$ or $1$.
Let G have no non-trivial normal subgroup. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ and $n_p=q$. Then there are $p^2 (q-1) $ elements of order $q$ and $q(p-1) $ elements of order $p$. So, we have the following ,
begin{align}
p^2q &geq p^2(q-1) + q(p-1) + 1 \
& geq p^2q+pq-p^2-q+1 \
& geq p^2q + (p-1) (q-1)
end{align}
$$implies (p-1)(q-1) = 0 implies p=1 text{ or } q=1$$
But $p$ and $q$ are primes.
Hence $G$ has a non-trivial normal subgroup.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the case of $q > p$. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ or $1$ and
$n_p = q$ or $1$.
Let G have no non-trivial normal subgroup. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ and $n_p=q$. Then there are $p^2 (q-1) $ elements of order $q$ and $q(p-1) $ elements of order $p$. So, we have the following ,
begin{align}
p^2q &geq p^2(q-1) + q(p-1) + 1 \
& geq p^2q+pq-p^2-q+1 \
& geq p^2q + (p-1) (q-1)
end{align}
$$implies (p-1)(q-1) = 0 implies p=1 text{ or } q=1$$
But $p$ and $q$ are primes.
Hence $G$ has a non-trivial normal subgroup.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Consider the case of $q > p$. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ or $1$ and
$n_p = q$ or $1$.
Let G have no non-trivial normal subgroup. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ and $n_p=q$. Then there are $p^2 (q-1) $ elements of order $q$ and $q(p-1) $ elements of order $p$. So, we have the following ,
begin{align}
p^2q &geq p^2(q-1) + q(p-1) + 1 \
& geq p^2q+pq-p^2-q+1 \
& geq p^2q + (p-1) (q-1)
end{align}
$$implies (p-1)(q-1) = 0 implies p=1 text{ or } q=1$$
But $p$ and $q$ are primes.
Hence $G$ has a non-trivial normal subgroup.
$endgroup$
Consider the case of $q > p$. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ or $1$ and
$n_p = q$ or $1$.
Let G have no non-trivial normal subgroup. Then,
$n_q = p^2$ and $n_p=q$. Then there are $p^2 (q-1) $ elements of order $q$ and $q(p-1) $ elements of order $p$. So, we have the following ,
begin{align}
p^2q &geq p^2(q-1) + q(p-1) + 1 \
& geq p^2q+pq-p^2-q+1 \
& geq p^2q + (p-1) (q-1)
end{align}
$$implies (p-1)(q-1) = 0 implies p=1 text{ or } q=1$$
But $p$ and $q$ are primes.
Hence $G$ has a non-trivial normal subgroup.
answered Jan 8 at 7:08
pavanpavan
314
314
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57938%2fapplication-of-the-sylow-theorems-to-groups-of-order-p2q%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown