Prove that if $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$ then $f(x) = x^{5} - 2$ has a unique solution in...
To prove the statetament, i thought to define a linear application $$ phi : mathbb{F}_{p}^{*} longmapsto mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$$
Define by : $f(x) = x^{5}$, studying the kernel of $phi$ I noticed that from $x^{5} equiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm}(5)$ $phi$ was injective (Because from the hp. we have $5 nmid p - 1 $, which translates in $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$).
It follows that this $phi$ is an automorphism of $mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$, in particular it is surjective,
From here i know that for every $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$ it exists $x in mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$ such that $x^{5} = 2$.
Now i know my $f(x) = (x - alpha)p(x)$ splits into one linear factor, and one of $deg p = 4$.
I'd like to conclude saying that $p$ doesn't split and so that the solution is unique, but don't see how,
Any help or tip would be appreciated,
Thanks.
group-theory field-theory finite-fields splitting-field automorphism-group
add a comment |
To prove the statetament, i thought to define a linear application $$ phi : mathbb{F}_{p}^{*} longmapsto mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$$
Define by : $f(x) = x^{5}$, studying the kernel of $phi$ I noticed that from $x^{5} equiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm}(5)$ $phi$ was injective (Because from the hp. we have $5 nmid p - 1 $, which translates in $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$).
It follows that this $phi$ is an automorphism of $mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$, in particular it is surjective,
From here i know that for every $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$ it exists $x in mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$ such that $x^{5} = 2$.
Now i know my $f(x) = (x - alpha)p(x)$ splits into one linear factor, and one of $deg p = 4$.
I'd like to conclude saying that $p$ doesn't split and so that the solution is unique, but don't see how,
Any help or tip would be appreciated,
Thanks.
group-theory field-theory finite-fields splitting-field automorphism-group
1
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago
add a comment |
To prove the statetament, i thought to define a linear application $$ phi : mathbb{F}_{p}^{*} longmapsto mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$$
Define by : $f(x) = x^{5}$, studying the kernel of $phi$ I noticed that from $x^{5} equiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm}(5)$ $phi$ was injective (Because from the hp. we have $5 nmid p - 1 $, which translates in $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$).
It follows that this $phi$ is an automorphism of $mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$, in particular it is surjective,
From here i know that for every $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$ it exists $x in mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$ such that $x^{5} = 2$.
Now i know my $f(x) = (x - alpha)p(x)$ splits into one linear factor, and one of $deg p = 4$.
I'd like to conclude saying that $p$ doesn't split and so that the solution is unique, but don't see how,
Any help or tip would be appreciated,
Thanks.
group-theory field-theory finite-fields splitting-field automorphism-group
To prove the statetament, i thought to define a linear application $$ phi : mathbb{F}_{p}^{*} longmapsto mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$$
Define by : $f(x) = x^{5}$, studying the kernel of $phi$ I noticed that from $x^{5} equiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm}(5)$ $phi$ was injective (Because from the hp. we have $5 nmid p - 1 $, which translates in $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$).
It follows that this $phi$ is an automorphism of $mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$, in particular it is surjective,
From here i know that for every $p notequiv 1 hspace{0.2 cm} (5)$ it exists $x in mathbb{F}_{p}^{*}$ such that $x^{5} = 2$.
Now i know my $f(x) = (x - alpha)p(x)$ splits into one linear factor, and one of $deg p = 4$.
I'd like to conclude saying that $p$ doesn't split and so that the solution is unique, but don't see how,
Any help or tip would be appreciated,
Thanks.
group-theory field-theory finite-fields splitting-field automorphism-group
group-theory field-theory finite-fields splitting-field automorphism-group
asked 2 days ago
jacopoburellijacopoburelli
1687
1687
1
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago
1
1
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Hint If $alpha$ is a multiple root, then $f'(alpha)=0$.
Alternate solution Use the fact that there exists a primitive root $b$ modulo $p$.
Write $x=b^k, 2=b^alpha$ and solve for $k$.
add a comment |
Let $p= 5k+r$ where $rin{0,2,3,4}$. Let us prove that $${0^5-2,1^5-2,...,(p-1)^5-2}=_{pmod p} {0,1,2,...,p-1}$$
Say there exist $ane b in mathbb{F}_p$ such that $$a^5-2equiv _p b^5-2 implies a^5equiv _pb^5$$
Since by Fermat theorem we have $a^{5k+r-1}equiv _p1$ we deduce:$$a^{5k}equiv _pb^{5k}implies a^{r-1}equiv_pb^{r-1} $$
Case 1: $r=0$ (so $p=5$) then $a^5equiv_5 a$ and $b^5equiv_5 b$ so $aequiv _5b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 2: $r=2$ then $aequiv_p b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 3: $r=3$ then $a^2equiv_p b^2$, then since $ane b$ we have $aequiv_p -b$ but then $a^5equiv_5 -b^5 implies pmid 2a^5 implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Case 4: $r=4$ then $a^3equiv_p b^3$, then $a^6equiv_5 b^6 equiv a^5b implies pmid a^5(a-b) implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063157%2fprove-that-if-p-not-equiv-1-hspace0-2-cm-5-then-fx-x5-2-has-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hint If $alpha$ is a multiple root, then $f'(alpha)=0$.
Alternate solution Use the fact that there exists a primitive root $b$ modulo $p$.
Write $x=b^k, 2=b^alpha$ and solve for $k$.
add a comment |
Hint If $alpha$ is a multiple root, then $f'(alpha)=0$.
Alternate solution Use the fact that there exists a primitive root $b$ modulo $p$.
Write $x=b^k, 2=b^alpha$ and solve for $k$.
add a comment |
Hint If $alpha$ is a multiple root, then $f'(alpha)=0$.
Alternate solution Use the fact that there exists a primitive root $b$ modulo $p$.
Write $x=b^k, 2=b^alpha$ and solve for $k$.
Hint If $alpha$ is a multiple root, then $f'(alpha)=0$.
Alternate solution Use the fact that there exists a primitive root $b$ modulo $p$.
Write $x=b^k, 2=b^alpha$ and solve for $k$.
answered 2 days ago
N. S.N. S.
102k5111207
102k5111207
add a comment |
add a comment |
Let $p= 5k+r$ where $rin{0,2,3,4}$. Let us prove that $${0^5-2,1^5-2,...,(p-1)^5-2}=_{pmod p} {0,1,2,...,p-1}$$
Say there exist $ane b in mathbb{F}_p$ such that $$a^5-2equiv _p b^5-2 implies a^5equiv _pb^5$$
Since by Fermat theorem we have $a^{5k+r-1}equiv _p1$ we deduce:$$a^{5k}equiv _pb^{5k}implies a^{r-1}equiv_pb^{r-1} $$
Case 1: $r=0$ (so $p=5$) then $a^5equiv_5 a$ and $b^5equiv_5 b$ so $aequiv _5b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 2: $r=2$ then $aequiv_p b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 3: $r=3$ then $a^2equiv_p b^2$, then since $ane b$ we have $aequiv_p -b$ but then $a^5equiv_5 -b^5 implies pmid 2a^5 implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Case 4: $r=4$ then $a^3equiv_p b^3$, then $a^6equiv_5 b^6 equiv a^5b implies pmid a^5(a-b) implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
add a comment |
Let $p= 5k+r$ where $rin{0,2,3,4}$. Let us prove that $${0^5-2,1^5-2,...,(p-1)^5-2}=_{pmod p} {0,1,2,...,p-1}$$
Say there exist $ane b in mathbb{F}_p$ such that $$a^5-2equiv _p b^5-2 implies a^5equiv _pb^5$$
Since by Fermat theorem we have $a^{5k+r-1}equiv _p1$ we deduce:$$a^{5k}equiv _pb^{5k}implies a^{r-1}equiv_pb^{r-1} $$
Case 1: $r=0$ (so $p=5$) then $a^5equiv_5 a$ and $b^5equiv_5 b$ so $aequiv _5b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 2: $r=2$ then $aequiv_p b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 3: $r=3$ then $a^2equiv_p b^2$, then since $ane b$ we have $aequiv_p -b$ but then $a^5equiv_5 -b^5 implies pmid 2a^5 implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Case 4: $r=4$ then $a^3equiv_p b^3$, then $a^6equiv_5 b^6 equiv a^5b implies pmid a^5(a-b) implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
add a comment |
Let $p= 5k+r$ where $rin{0,2,3,4}$. Let us prove that $${0^5-2,1^5-2,...,(p-1)^5-2}=_{pmod p} {0,1,2,...,p-1}$$
Say there exist $ane b in mathbb{F}_p$ such that $$a^5-2equiv _p b^5-2 implies a^5equiv _pb^5$$
Since by Fermat theorem we have $a^{5k+r-1}equiv _p1$ we deduce:$$a^{5k}equiv _pb^{5k}implies a^{r-1}equiv_pb^{r-1} $$
Case 1: $r=0$ (so $p=5$) then $a^5equiv_5 a$ and $b^5equiv_5 b$ so $aequiv _5b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 2: $r=2$ then $aequiv_p b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 3: $r=3$ then $a^2equiv_p b^2$, then since $ane b$ we have $aequiv_p -b$ but then $a^5equiv_5 -b^5 implies pmid 2a^5 implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Case 4: $r=4$ then $a^3equiv_p b^3$, then $a^6equiv_5 b^6 equiv a^5b implies pmid a^5(a-b) implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Let $p= 5k+r$ where $rin{0,2,3,4}$. Let us prove that $${0^5-2,1^5-2,...,(p-1)^5-2}=_{pmod p} {0,1,2,...,p-1}$$
Say there exist $ane b in mathbb{F}_p$ such that $$a^5-2equiv _p b^5-2 implies a^5equiv _pb^5$$
Since by Fermat theorem we have $a^{5k+r-1}equiv _p1$ we deduce:$$a^{5k}equiv _pb^{5k}implies a^{r-1}equiv_pb^{r-1} $$
Case 1: $r=0$ (so $p=5$) then $a^5equiv_5 a$ and $b^5equiv_5 b$ so $aequiv _5b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 2: $r=2$ then $aequiv_p b$ a contradiciton since $ane b$.
Case 3: $r=3$ then $a^2equiv_p b^2$, then since $ane b$ we have $aequiv_p -b$ but then $a^5equiv_5 -b^5 implies pmid 2a^5 implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
Case 4: $r=4$ then $a^3equiv_p b^3$, then $a^6equiv_5 b^6 equiv a^5b implies pmid a^5(a-b) implies pmid a implies pmid b implies a=b$ a contradiction.
answered 2 days ago
greedoidgreedoid
38.4k114797
38.4k114797
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063157%2fprove-that-if-p-not-equiv-1-hspace0-2-cm-5-then-fx-x5-2-has-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Just use that $phi$ is injective.
– Mark Bennet
2 days ago
Since $x in mathbb{F}_p^* longmapsto x^5 in mathbb{F}_p^*$ is bijective, $f$ is a bijection from $mathbb{F}_p$ to itself. So it has a unique root. Compare $f$ with its derivative to prove that the root is simple iff $p neq 5$.
– Mindlack
2 days ago
So you want to prove that equation $$x^5equiv _p2$$ has only one solution if $pne 1pmod 5$?
– greedoid
2 days ago