Is this way of finding $limlimits_{xto +infty}(x-ln(x^2+1))$ valid?
I needed to find: $$limlimits_{xto +infty}(x-ln(x^2+1))$$
So here are the steps I took:
Step 1: Replace $x$ with $ln(e^x)$:
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}left(ln(e^x)-ln(x^2+1)right)$$
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 2: Bring the limit inside of the natural log function since it is continuous on the required interval.
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 3: Apply L'Hospital's rule twice and evaluate:
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}e^xright)$$
$$ln(+infty) = +infty$$
My question is whether step 2 is valid here because $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ doesn't exist (its $+infty$), and in order to move the limit operator inside the function the limit $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ must exist according to this theorem in a book about Calculus (ISBN 978-0-470-64769-1):
If it's not valid, what would be a valid way to find the limit?
real-analysis calculus limits continuity
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
add a comment |
I needed to find: $$limlimits_{xto +infty}(x-ln(x^2+1))$$
So here are the steps I took:
Step 1: Replace $x$ with $ln(e^x)$:
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}left(ln(e^x)-ln(x^2+1)right)$$
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 2: Bring the limit inside of the natural log function since it is continuous on the required interval.
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 3: Apply L'Hospital's rule twice and evaluate:
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}e^xright)$$
$$ln(+infty) = +infty$$
My question is whether step 2 is valid here because $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ doesn't exist (its $+infty$), and in order to move the limit operator inside the function the limit $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ must exist according to this theorem in a book about Calculus (ISBN 978-0-470-64769-1):
If it's not valid, what would be a valid way to find the limit?
real-analysis calculus limits continuity
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
1
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago
add a comment |
I needed to find: $$limlimits_{xto +infty}(x-ln(x^2+1))$$
So here are the steps I took:
Step 1: Replace $x$ with $ln(e^x)$:
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}left(ln(e^x)-ln(x^2+1)right)$$
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 2: Bring the limit inside of the natural log function since it is continuous on the required interval.
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 3: Apply L'Hospital's rule twice and evaluate:
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}e^xright)$$
$$ln(+infty) = +infty$$
My question is whether step 2 is valid here because $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ doesn't exist (its $+infty$), and in order to move the limit operator inside the function the limit $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ must exist according to this theorem in a book about Calculus (ISBN 978-0-470-64769-1):
If it's not valid, what would be a valid way to find the limit?
real-analysis calculus limits continuity
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
I needed to find: $$limlimits_{xto +infty}(x-ln(x^2+1))$$
So here are the steps I took:
Step 1: Replace $x$ with $ln(e^x)$:
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}left(ln(e^x)-ln(x^2+1)right)$$
$$limlimits_{xto +infty}lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 2: Bring the limit inside of the natural log function since it is continuous on the required interval.
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)$$
Step 3: Apply L'Hospital's rule twice and evaluate:
$$lnleft(lim_{xto +infty}e^xright)$$
$$ln(+infty) = +infty$$
My question is whether step 2 is valid here because $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ doesn't exist (its $+infty$), and in order to move the limit operator inside the function the limit $limlimits_{xto infty}frac{e^x}{x^2 + 1}$ must exist according to this theorem in a book about Calculus (ISBN 978-0-470-64769-1):
If it's not valid, what would be a valid way to find the limit?
real-analysis calculus limits continuity
real-analysis calculus limits continuity
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
edited Jan 5 at 23:03
rtybase
10.5k21533
10.5k21533
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
asked Jan 5 at 22:40
user3071028user3071028
826
826
1
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago
1
1
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Let $M>0$ be given. Since $ln(u)to infty$ as $utoinfty$, there exists $K$ such that
for all $x$ with $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>K$ it follows that $lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M$. Since $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}to infty$ as $xto infty$, there exists $N$ such that
$$
x>Nimplies frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>Kimplies lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M.
$$
By definition of a limit it follows that
$$
lim_{xtoinfty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}=infty.
$$
Note we can mimic the same argument to conclude that if $f(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$ and $g(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$, then $g(f(x))to infty$ as $xto infty$.
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
add a comment |
In step 2 all you need is the fact that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$. Since $frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1} to infty$ it follows that $ln (frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1}) to infty$. To prove that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$ assume that this is false. Since $ln , x$is an increasing function, if it doesn't not tend to infinity, it would be bounded for $x>1$, say $ln, x <C$ for all $x>1$. You get a contradiction from this if you take $x=e^{C}$.
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063272%2fis-this-way-of-finding-lim-limits-x-to-inftyx-lnx21-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $M>0$ be given. Since $ln(u)to infty$ as $utoinfty$, there exists $K$ such that
for all $x$ with $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>K$ it follows that $lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M$. Since $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}to infty$ as $xto infty$, there exists $N$ such that
$$
x>Nimplies frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>Kimplies lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M.
$$
By definition of a limit it follows that
$$
lim_{xtoinfty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}=infty.
$$
Note we can mimic the same argument to conclude that if $f(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$ and $g(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$, then $g(f(x))to infty$ as $xto infty$.
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
add a comment |
Let $M>0$ be given. Since $ln(u)to infty$ as $utoinfty$, there exists $K$ such that
for all $x$ with $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>K$ it follows that $lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M$. Since $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}to infty$ as $xto infty$, there exists $N$ such that
$$
x>Nimplies frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>Kimplies lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M.
$$
By definition of a limit it follows that
$$
lim_{xtoinfty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}=infty.
$$
Note we can mimic the same argument to conclude that if $f(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$ and $g(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$, then $g(f(x))to infty$ as $xto infty$.
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
add a comment |
Let $M>0$ be given. Since $ln(u)to infty$ as $utoinfty$, there exists $K$ such that
for all $x$ with $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>K$ it follows that $lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M$. Since $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}to infty$ as $xto infty$, there exists $N$ such that
$$
x>Nimplies frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>Kimplies lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M.
$$
By definition of a limit it follows that
$$
lim_{xtoinfty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}=infty.
$$
Note we can mimic the same argument to conclude that if $f(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$ and $g(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$, then $g(f(x))to infty$ as $xto infty$.
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
Let $M>0$ be given. Since $ln(u)to infty$ as $utoinfty$, there exists $K$ such that
for all $x$ with $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>K$ it follows that $lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M$. Since $frac{e^x}{x^2+1}to infty$ as $xto infty$, there exists $N$ such that
$$
x>Nimplies frac{e^x}{x^2+1}>Kimplies lnleft(frac{e^x}{x^2+1}right)>M.
$$
By definition of a limit it follows that
$$
lim_{xtoinfty}frac{e^x}{x^2+1}=infty.
$$
Note we can mimic the same argument to conclude that if $f(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$ and $g(x)to infty$ as $xto infty$, then $g(f(x))to infty$ as $xto infty$.
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
answered Jan 5 at 22:52
Foobaz JohnFoobaz John
21.4k41351
21.4k41351
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
add a comment |
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
That's a nice clean way, thanks! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:19
add a comment |
In step 2 all you need is the fact that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$. Since $frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1} to infty$ it follows that $ln (frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1}) to infty$. To prove that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$ assume that this is false. Since $ln , x$is an increasing function, if it doesn't not tend to infinity, it would be bounded for $x>1$, say $ln, x <C$ for all $x>1$. You get a contradiction from this if you take $x=e^{C}$.
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
add a comment |
In step 2 all you need is the fact that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$. Since $frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1} to infty$ it follows that $ln (frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1}) to infty$. To prove that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$ assume that this is false. Since $ln , x$is an increasing function, if it doesn't not tend to infinity, it would be bounded for $x>1$, say $ln, x <C$ for all $x>1$. You get a contradiction from this if you take $x=e^{C}$.
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
add a comment |
In step 2 all you need is the fact that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$. Since $frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1} to infty$ it follows that $ln (frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1}) to infty$. To prove that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$ assume that this is false. Since $ln , x$is an increasing function, if it doesn't not tend to infinity, it would be bounded for $x>1$, say $ln, x <C$ for all $x>1$. You get a contradiction from this if you take $x=e^{C}$.
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
In step 2 all you need is the fact that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$. Since $frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1} to infty$ it follows that $ln (frac {e^{x}} {x^{2}+1}) to infty$. To prove that $ln (y) to infty$ as $yto infty$ assume that this is false. Since $ln , x$is an increasing function, if it doesn't not tend to infinity, it would be bounded for $x>1$, say $ln, x <C$ for all $x>1$. You get a contradiction from this if you take $x=e^{C}$.
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
answered Jan 5 at 23:28
Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy
51.8k32055
51.8k32055
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
add a comment |
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
Thank you! Can you please explicitly answer the first question: whether the way I did it is mathematically valid or invalid?
– user3071028
Jan 6 at 0:22
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
@user3071028 Everything you have done is right if you use that fact that $ln , yto infty$ as $ y to infty$.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 6 at 0:35
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063272%2fis-this-way-of-finding-lim-limits-x-to-inftyx-lnx21-valid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your step is valid. The book deals with the theorem where the limit does exist. Similar result holds if the limit does not exist. See the theorem mentioned at the end of this answer: math.stackexchange.com/a/1073047/72031
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago