Is every map from $mathbb{R}P^2 to S^2$ nullhomotopic?
I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?
algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space
add a comment |
I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?
algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space
6
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
1
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?
algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space
I think the answer is no, but I'm not sure. Consider the CW-structure on $mathbb{R}P^2$ given by one $0$-cell $x$, one oriented $1$-cell $a$ attached to $x$ at both ends, and one $2$-cell whose boundary is glued along the loop $a^2$. Let $X^1 subset mathbb{R}P^2$ be the $1$-skeleton. My spidey senses are suggesting the map $mathbb{R}P^2 to mathbb{R}P^2/X^1 cong S^2$ given by crushing the $1$-skeleton to a point should be homotopically nontrivial. Is this true? If so, how does one prove this?
algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space
algebraic-topology homotopy-theory projective-space
asked Jan 5 at 22:50
Sameer KailasaSameer Kailasa
5,48621843
5,48621843
6
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
1
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago
add a comment |
6
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
1
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago
6
6
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
1
1
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is a cofibration sequence
$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$
where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets
$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$
Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.
Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.
The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.
There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.
The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.
Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by
$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$
Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map
$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$
This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence
$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$
It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063286%2fis-every-map-from-mathbbrp2-to-s2-nullhomotopic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a cofibration sequence
$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$
where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets
$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$
Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.
Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.
The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.
There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.
The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.
Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by
$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$
Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map
$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$
This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence
$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$
It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
add a comment |
There is a cofibration sequence
$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$
where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets
$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$
Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.
Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.
The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.
There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.
The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.
Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by
$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$
Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map
$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$
This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence
$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$
It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
add a comment |
There is a cofibration sequence
$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$
where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets
$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$
Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.
Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.
The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.
There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.
The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.
Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by
$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$
Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map
$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$
This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence
$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$
It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.
There is a cofibration sequence
$$S^1xrightarrow{2} S^1rightarrowmathbb{R}P^2xrightarrow{q}S^2rightarrowdots$$
where $q$ is the map pinching to the top cell. This cofibring leads to an exact Puppe sequence of homotopy sets
$$dotsleftarrowpi_1S^2leftarrow [mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]xleftarrow{q^*}pi_2S^2xleftarrow{times 2}pi_2S^2leftarrowdots$$
Here $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]$ is only a set with $pi_2(S^2)$-action, but the rest of these objects are (abelian) groups. Likewise the map $q^*$ is a map of sets, but the $times 2$ map is a homomorphism.
Now since $pi_1S^2=0$, we identify $[mathbb{R}P^2,S^2]congpi_2(S^2)/(2cdot pi_2(S^2))congmathbb{Z}_2$ as sets with $pi_2(S^2)$-action. Here we have used that $pi_2S^2congmathbb{Z}$. In particular there are two homotopically distinct maps $mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. One is clearly the trivial map, and exactness of the above sequence tells us that the other is $q^*id_{S^2}=q$, since $id_{S^2}$ generates $pi_2S^2$. Hence the pinch map $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
At this point we would like to get our hands dirty and see all this in another way. We want to use the Hopf Degree Theorem for non-orientable manifolds, which, as I understand it, states that two maps $f,g:Mrightarrow S^n$ from a boundaryless n-dimensional non-orientable manifold $M$ are homotopic only if they have the same Brouwer-Hopf degree modulo 2.
The real projective plane $mathbb{R}P^2$ is a 2-dimensional closed non-orientable manifold, which is a quotient of $S^2subseteqmathbb{R}^3$ by the equivalence relation $xsim -x$. We write its points $[x,y,z]=[-x,-y,-z]$, where $(x,y,z)in S^2$.
There are equivalent definitions of the degree of a map $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$. The first takes the mod 2 fundamental class $[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(mathbb{R}P^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$ and studies its image $f_*[mathbb{R}P^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)congmathbb{Z}_2$. From this definition it is clear that the trivial map $ast:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$ has mod 2 degree 0.
The second definition takes a smooth representative for the homotopy class of $f:mathbb{R}P^2rightarrow S^2$, finds a regular value $pin S^2$ for it, and sets $deg_2(f)=|f^{-1}(p)|mod 2$. The preimage $f^{-1}(p)$ should be a finite set, so this makes sense.
Now we will calculate $deg_2(q)$, the degree of the pinch map. Recall that the subspace ${[x,y,0]}subseteq mathbb{R}P^2$ is exactly $mathbb{R}P^1cong S^1$. Hence $q$ sends all of this subspace to the basepoint of $S^2$. This is handy, because we have a chart $phi:Urightarrow mathbb{R}^2$ defined over $U={[x,y,z]mid zne0}$ by
$$phi[x,y,z]=(x/z,y/z).$$
Viewing $S^2$ as the 1-point compactification of $mathbb{R}^2$ by using stereographic projection, this chart gives the pinch map
$$q[x,y,z]=begin{cases}(x/z,y/z)in S^2&zneq 0\infty&z=0 end{cases}$$
This is clearly smooth, and you can verify that any point away from $infty$ is regular. In particular, the point $(0,0)in S^2cong (mathbb{R}^2)^+$ is regular. hence
$$deg_2(q)=|q^{-1}(0,0)|=|{[0,0,1]}|=1$$
It follows that $deg_2(q)=1neq0=deg_2(ast)$, and therefore that $q$ is homotopically non-trivial.
Returning to the first definition, we see that this is in line with Lord Shark's hint, for $q_*[mathbb{R}P^2]=1cdot[S^2]in H_2(S^2;mathbb{Z}_2)$.
answered 2 days ago
TyroneTyrone
4,38511225
4,38511225
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
Your phrasing of the Hopf degree theorem for unoriented manifolds is correct. The proof is the same as usual (annihilation of opposite-signed zeroes in a chart) with the trick that we may push a point along an unoriented loop to change its sign. As is implicit in my comment, it is nice to think of this as the simplest case of Pontryagin-Thom. I feel that I should note for OP's sake that the cellular homology computation of $q_*$ is straightforward.
– Mike Miller
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063286%2fis-every-map-from-mathbbrp2-to-s2-nullhomotopic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
How about considering $H_2$ with coefficients in $Bbb Z_2$?
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Jan 5 at 22:56
1
... Or $H^2$ with integer coefficients.
– Tyrone
2 days ago