Inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?












1















What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?




Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
    – GEdgar
    Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
















1















What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?




Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
    – GEdgar
    Jan 5 '12 at 1:39














1












1








1


1






What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?




Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
















What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?




Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.



Thanks!







generating-functions signal-processing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 5 '12 at 2:12









Srivatsan

20.9k371125




20.9k371125










asked Jan 5 '12 at 0:52









MitchMitch

62




62












  • Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
    – GEdgar
    Jan 5 '12 at 1:39


















  • Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
    – GEdgar
    Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
















Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39




Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7














The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.



In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$





Using the properties.



The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.



Method 1.



Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.



Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$



Alternate method using differentiation.



We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    This is the one that you find in the table:



    $$
    n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
    $$



    Then you find the shift property:



    $$
    x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
    $$



    What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.



    $$
    (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
    $$



    when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
    when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
    now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:



    $$
    (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
    $$



    Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.



    $$
    (n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer























      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96528%2finverse-z-transform-of-frac11-z-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      7














      The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.



      In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
      (1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
      $$
      Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
      $$
      (1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
      $$
      Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
      x[n] = begin{cases}
      n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
      end{cases}
      $$
      Done! $qquad diamond$





      Using the properties.



      The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.



      Method 1.



      Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
      $$
      u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
      $$
      has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.



      Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
      $$
      sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
      $$
      which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$



      Alternate method using differentiation.



      We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
      $$
      u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
      $$
      whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
      $$
      - z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
      $$
      Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        7














        The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.



        In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
        (1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
        $$
        Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
        $$
        (1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
        $$
        Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
        x[n] = begin{cases}
        n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
        end{cases}
        $$
        Done! $qquad diamond$





        Using the properties.



        The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.



        Method 1.



        Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
        $$
        u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
        $$
        has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.



        Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
        $$
        sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
        $$
        which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$



        Alternate method using differentiation.



        We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
        $$
        u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
        $$
        whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
        $$
        - z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
        $$
        Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          7












          7








          7






          The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.



          In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
          (1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
          $$
          Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
          $$
          (1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
          $$
          Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
          x[n] = begin{cases}
          n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
          end{cases}
          $$
          Done! $qquad diamond$





          Using the properties.



          The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.



          Method 1.



          Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
          $$
          u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
          $$
          has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.



          Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
          $$
          sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
          $$
          which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$



          Alternate method using differentiation.



          We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
          $$
          u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
          $$
          whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
          $$
          - z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
          $$
          Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.



          In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
          (1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
          $$
          Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
          $$
          (1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
          $$
          Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
          x[n] = begin{cases}
          n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
          end{cases}
          $$
          Done! $qquad diamond$





          Using the properties.



          The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.



          Method 1.



          Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
          $$
          u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
          $$
          has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.



          Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
          $$
          sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
          $$
          which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$



          Alternate method using differentiation.



          We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
          $$
          u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
          $$
          whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
          $$
          - z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
          $$
          Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 6 '12 at 5:55

























          answered Jan 5 '12 at 1:40









          SrivatsanSrivatsan

          20.9k371125




          20.9k371125























              0














              This is the one that you find in the table:



              $$
              n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
              $$



              Then you find the shift property:



              $$
              x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
              $$



              What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.



              $$
              (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
              $$



              when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
              when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
              now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:



              $$
              (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
              $$



              Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.



              $$
              (n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer




























                0














                This is the one that you find in the table:



                $$
                n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
                $$



                Then you find the shift property:



                $$
                x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
                $$



                What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.



                $$
                (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                $$



                when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
                when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
                now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:



                $$
                (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                $$



                Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.



                $$
                (n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  This is the one that you find in the table:



                  $$
                  n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
                  $$



                  Then you find the shift property:



                  $$
                  x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
                  $$



                  What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$



                  when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
                  when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
                  now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$



                  Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  This is the one that you find in the table:



                  $$
                  n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
                  $$



                  Then you find the shift property:



                  $$
                  x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
                  $$



                  What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$



                  when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
                  when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
                  now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$



                  Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.



                  $$
                  (n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Bill MooreBill Moore

                  1176




                  1176






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96528%2finverse-z-transform-of-frac11-z-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                      Antonio Litta Visconti Arese