Inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?
What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?
Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.
Thanks!
generating-functions signal-processing
add a comment |
What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?
Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.
Thanks!
generating-functions signal-processing
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
add a comment |
What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?
Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.
Thanks!
generating-functions signal-processing
What is the inverse Z-transform of $frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2}$?
Title says it all. I have a one line solution but can't work out how to get there from tables or first principals.
Thanks!
generating-functions signal-processing
generating-functions signal-processing
edited Jan 5 '12 at 2:12
Srivatsan
20.9k371125
20.9k371125
asked Jan 5 '12 at 0:52
MitchMitch
62
62
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
add a comment |
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.
In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$
Using the properties.
The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.
Method 1.
Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.
Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$
Alternate method using differentiation.
We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$
add a comment |
This is the one that you find in the table:
$$
n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
$$
Then you find the shift property:
$$
x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
$$
What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96528%2finverse-z-transform-of-frac11-z-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.
In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$
Using the properties.
The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.
Method 1.
Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.
Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$
Alternate method using differentiation.
We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$
add a comment |
The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.
In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$
Using the properties.
The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.
Method 1.
Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.
Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$
Alternate method using differentiation.
We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$
add a comment |
The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.
In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$
Using the properties.
The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.
Method 1.
Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.
Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$
Alternate method using differentiation.
We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$
The Z-transform of a discrete time-domain signal $x = (x[n])$ is just the generating function $$X(z) = sum limits_{n=-infty}^infty x[n] z^{-n} .$$ Conversely, given a signal in the frequency-domain representation, i.e., given $X(z)$, the inverse Z-transform is simply its power series representation.
In order to compute the inverse Z-transform of $X(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-2}$, we develop this as a power series in $z^{-1}$. This can be done by writing the Taylor series for the function $g(x) = (1-x)^{-2}$ and plugging in $x = z^{-1}$. Alternatively, we can also use the Newton binomial series formula: $$
(1-x)^{-(beta+1)} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+beta}{beta} x^n.
$$
Plugging in $x = z^{-1}$ and $beta=1$, we get
$$
(1-x)^{-2} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} binom{n+1}{1} z^{-n} = sum_{n=0}^{infty} (n+1) z^{-n}.
$$
Comparing with the definition of Z-transform, we conclude that the inverse Z-transform of $X(z)$ is $$
x[n] = begin{cases}
n+1, & ngeqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0.
end{cases}
$$
Done! $qquad diamond$
Using the properties.
The above procedure is quite straightforward, but a bit tedious. Often it is possible to get the answer quicker by exploiting the properties of the Z-transform. To implement this approach effectively, one needs to be familiar with a table of Z-transforms of common series as well as a dictionary to translate elementary operations between the time and frequency domains. The Wikipedia article on Z-transforms contains such an extensive table of properties; my notation closely follows this page.
Method 1.
Given a signal $y[n]$ with Z-transform $Y(z)$, its accumulation $sum limits_{k=-infty}^{n} y[k]$ has the Z-transform $frac{Y(z)}{1 - z^{-1}}$. Now the delta function $delta[n]$ (a unit spike at the origin and zero everywhere else) has the Z-transform $1$. Therefore, its accumulation given by
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
has the Z-transform $(1-z^{-1})^{-1}$.
Applying the accumulation operation once again results in $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$ in the frequency domain; in the time domain, we have
$$
sum_{k=-infty}^{n} u[k] = sum_{k=-infty}^n [k geqslant 0] = begin{cases} n+1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0, end{cases}
$$
which is our desired inverse Z-transform. $qquad diamond$
Alternate method using differentiation.
We can replace the second accumulation operation with a differentiation operation. We again start from the signal
$$
u[n] = begin{cases} 1, &n geqslant 0, \ 0, &n < 0,end{cases}
$$
whose Z-transform is $U(z) = (1 - z^{-1})^{-1}$. Therefore the Z-transform of $n cdot u[n]$ is given by
$$
- z frac{d U(z)}{dz} = -z cdot frac{(-1)}{(1 - z^{-1})^{2}} cdot frac{1}{z^2} = frac{z^{-1}}{(1-z^{-1})^2}.
$$
Notice that we got what we wanted except for an extra $z^{-1}$. We can get rid of this by shifting the series by $1$ in the time domain: i.e., the Z-transform of $(n+1)cdot u[n+1]$ is $(1-z^{-1})^{-2}$. Thus our inverse Z-transform is given by $(n+1) cdot u[n+1]$. $qquad diamond$
edited Jan 6 '12 at 5:55
answered Jan 5 '12 at 1:40
SrivatsanSrivatsan
20.9k371125
20.9k371125
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is the one that you find in the table:
$$
n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
$$
Then you find the shift property:
$$
x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
$$
What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
add a comment |
This is the one that you find in the table:
$$
n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
$$
Then you find the shift property:
$$
x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
$$
What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
add a comment |
This is the one that you find in the table:
$$
n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
$$
Then you find the shift property:
$$
x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
$$
What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
This is the one that you find in the table:
$$
n alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{alpha z^{-1}}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z|>|alpha|
$$
Then you find the shift property:
$$
x[n-k] <=> z^{-k}X(z) ROC: R_x
$$
What happens if you multiply RHS of transform by z? then, LHS of transform has a shift.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n+1] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
when n=-1, (n+1) term equals zero. and u[n+1] = 1
when n=0, (n+1) term equals one and u[n+1] = 1
now we notice that if we substitute u[n] in place of u[n+1], its the same because (n+1) is zero when n= -1. Thus:
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n+1} u[n] <=> frac{alpha}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
Then we divide the RHS of transform by alpha which corresponds to dividing by alpha on RHS of transform.
$$
(n+1) alpha^{n} u[n] <=> frac{1}{(1-alpha z^{-1})^2} ROC: |z| > |alpha|
$$
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Bill MooreBill Moore
1176
1176
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f96528%2finverse-z-transform-of-frac11-z-12%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is this what it means? Find the coefficients $x_n$ in closed form: $$ frac{1}{(1-z^{-1})^2} = sum_{n=0}^infty x_n z^{-n} $$ And if that's not it, tell us what it is!
– GEdgar
Jan 5 '12 at 1:39