Convert from one tensor canonical form to another












1














Suppose we have two canonical forms $A, B in mathbb{F}_2^{2 times 2 times 2}$ of a 3-dimensional tensor product space over the finite field with two elements, where



$A = e_1 otimes e_2 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_1 otimes e_1$ and $B = e_1 otimes e_1 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_2 otimes e_2$,



and $e_1, e_2$ are the usual standard basis of a 2-d vector space. Is it possible to "convert" from A to B? I am wondering if there are transformations that convert A to B (and vice versa)? Both $A$ and $B$ have the same tensor rank (i.e. they both have rank-2 because they can be written as the sum of two rank-1 tensors), so is this transformation rank-preserving? And if, say, I had two canonical forms that were not rank-equivalent, is there a transformation that takes me from one canonical form to another? Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    1














    Suppose we have two canonical forms $A, B in mathbb{F}_2^{2 times 2 times 2}$ of a 3-dimensional tensor product space over the finite field with two elements, where



    $A = e_1 otimes e_2 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_1 otimes e_1$ and $B = e_1 otimes e_1 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_2 otimes e_2$,



    and $e_1, e_2$ are the usual standard basis of a 2-d vector space. Is it possible to "convert" from A to B? I am wondering if there are transformations that convert A to B (and vice versa)? Both $A$ and $B$ have the same tensor rank (i.e. they both have rank-2 because they can be written as the sum of two rank-1 tensors), so is this transformation rank-preserving? And if, say, I had two canonical forms that were not rank-equivalent, is there a transformation that takes me from one canonical form to another? Thank you.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1












      1








      1







      Suppose we have two canonical forms $A, B in mathbb{F}_2^{2 times 2 times 2}$ of a 3-dimensional tensor product space over the finite field with two elements, where



      $A = e_1 otimes e_2 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_1 otimes e_1$ and $B = e_1 otimes e_1 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_2 otimes e_2$,



      and $e_1, e_2$ are the usual standard basis of a 2-d vector space. Is it possible to "convert" from A to B? I am wondering if there are transformations that convert A to B (and vice versa)? Both $A$ and $B$ have the same tensor rank (i.e. they both have rank-2 because they can be written as the sum of two rank-1 tensors), so is this transformation rank-preserving? And if, say, I had two canonical forms that were not rank-equivalent, is there a transformation that takes me from one canonical form to another? Thank you.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Suppose we have two canonical forms $A, B in mathbb{F}_2^{2 times 2 times 2}$ of a 3-dimensional tensor product space over the finite field with two elements, where



      $A = e_1 otimes e_2 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_1 otimes e_1$ and $B = e_1 otimes e_1 otimes e_1 + e_2 otimes e_2 otimes e_2$,



      and $e_1, e_2$ are the usual standard basis of a 2-d vector space. Is it possible to "convert" from A to B? I am wondering if there are transformations that convert A to B (and vice versa)? Both $A$ and $B$ have the same tensor rank (i.e. they both have rank-2 because they can be written as the sum of two rank-1 tensors), so is this transformation rank-preserving? And if, say, I had two canonical forms that were not rank-equivalent, is there a transformation that takes me from one canonical form to another? Thank you.







      finite-fields tensor-products multilinear-algebra tensor-rank tensor-decomposition






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 days ago









      SteveSteve

      61




      61




      New contributor




      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Steve is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          If you remove the origin, every vector space is homogenous, meaning for any two nonzero vectors $u, v$ there is an invertible linear map $A$ with $Au=v$. So the answer is yes.



          If they're not rank equivalent, then unless you force them to they don't lie in the same vector space. However, without imposing restrictions on the maps the answer is still yes, because we can construct maps between vector spaces that send an arbitrary nonzero vector anywhere we want, as long as they are over the same field.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            Steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063104%2fconvert-from-one-tensor-canonical-form-to-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            If you remove the origin, every vector space is homogenous, meaning for any two nonzero vectors $u, v$ there is an invertible linear map $A$ with $Au=v$. So the answer is yes.



            If they're not rank equivalent, then unless you force them to they don't lie in the same vector space. However, without imposing restrictions on the maps the answer is still yes, because we can construct maps between vector spaces that send an arbitrary nonzero vector anywhere we want, as long as they are over the same field.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              If you remove the origin, every vector space is homogenous, meaning for any two nonzero vectors $u, v$ there is an invertible linear map $A$ with $Au=v$. So the answer is yes.



              If they're not rank equivalent, then unless you force them to they don't lie in the same vector space. However, without imposing restrictions on the maps the answer is still yes, because we can construct maps between vector spaces that send an arbitrary nonzero vector anywhere we want, as long as they are over the same field.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                If you remove the origin, every vector space is homogenous, meaning for any two nonzero vectors $u, v$ there is an invertible linear map $A$ with $Au=v$. So the answer is yes.



                If they're not rank equivalent, then unless you force them to they don't lie in the same vector space. However, without imposing restrictions on the maps the answer is still yes, because we can construct maps between vector spaces that send an arbitrary nonzero vector anywhere we want, as long as they are over the same field.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                If you remove the origin, every vector space is homogenous, meaning for any two nonzero vectors $u, v$ there is an invertible linear map $A$ with $Au=v$. So the answer is yes.



                If they're not rank equivalent, then unless you force them to they don't lie in the same vector space. However, without imposing restrictions on the maps the answer is still yes, because we can construct maps between vector spaces that send an arbitrary nonzero vector anywhere we want, as long as they are over the same field.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Matt SamuelMatt Samuel

                37.5k63665




                37.5k63665






















                    Steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    Steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    Steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    Steve is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063104%2fconvert-from-one-tensor-canonical-form-to-another%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese