Alternative proof for $zetaleft(2,frac14right)=psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=pi^2+8G$
On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula
$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$
where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get
$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$
$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$
Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.
I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?
Thanks in advance!
EDIT
As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function
$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$
So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that
$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$
alternative-proof zeta-functions
add a comment |
On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula
$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$
where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get
$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$
$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$
Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.
I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?
Thanks in advance!
EDIT
As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function
$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$
So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that
$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$
alternative-proof zeta-functions
1
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
add a comment |
On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula
$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$
where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get
$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$
$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$
Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.
I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?
Thanks in advance!
EDIT
As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function
$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$
So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that
$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$
alternative-proof zeta-functions
On the German Wikipedia page of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have come across the following formula
$$zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~pi^2+8Gtag1$$
where $G$ is Catalan's Constant. Even though I was able proving $(1)$ I am dissatisfied with my own attempt since it is heavily relying on several special Zeta Functions. However, first of all I will present my own solution. Starting with the series representation of $zeta(2)$ we get
$$begin{align*}
zeta(2)=sum_{n=1}^infty frac1{n^2}&=frac1{1^2}+frac1{2^2}+frac1{3^2}+sum_{n=1}^inftyfrac1{(4n)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+2)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{4(2n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac1{(4n+3)^2}\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}+frac12left[frac1{(2n+1)^2}-frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)^2}right]\
&=frac1{16}zeta(2)+frac14lambda(2)+frac12[lambda(2)-beta(2)]+sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}\
therefore~sum_{n=0}^infty frac1{(4n+1)^2}&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34lambda(2)+frac12beta(2)\
&=frac{15}{16}zeta(2)-frac34frac34zeta(2)+frac12 G\&=frac1{16}pi^2+frac12 G
end{align*}$$
$$therefore~zetaleft(2,frac14right)~=~sum_{n=0}^inftyfrac1{left(n+frac14right)^2}~=~pi^2+8G$$
Where $zeta(s)$ dnotes the Riemann Zeta Function, $lambda(s)$ the Dirichlet Lambda Function, $beta(s)$ the Dirichlet Beta Function. Moreover the relation $lambda(s)=(1-2^{-s})zeta(s)$ and the well-known values $zeta(2)=frac{pi^2}6$ and $beta(2)=G$ were used.
I am suspicious about the heavy usage of the whole Zeta Function machinery and I am curious if there exists a shorter and more elegant way of proving $(1)$?
Thanks in advance!
EDIT
As Zacky pointed out within the comments this special value of the Hurwitz Zeta Function can also be interpreted as a particular value of the Trigamma Function hence in general we got a the following series expansion of the Polygamma Function
$$begin{align*}
psi^{(n)(z)}&=(-1)^{n+1}n!sum_{k=0}^inftyfrac1{(z+k)^{n+1}}\
&=(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)
end{align*}$$
So for $n=1$ and $z=frac14$ it directly follows that
$$(-1)^{1+1}(1!)psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(1+1,frac14right)Rightarrow psi^{(1)}left(frac14right)=zetaleft(2,frac14right)$$
alternative-proof zeta-functions
alternative-proof zeta-functions
edited 2 days ago
mrtaurho
asked 2 days ago
mrtaurhomrtaurho
4,07721133
4,07721133
1
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
1
1
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.
$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
add a comment |
Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that
$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$
Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get
$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$
And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063097%2falternative-proof-for-zeta-left2-frac14-right-psi1-left-frac14-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.
$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
add a comment |
We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.
$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
add a comment |
We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.
$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.
We can use the following representation of the digamma function from here, namely:
$$psi(s+1)=-gamma+int_0^1 frac{1-x^s}{1-x}dxRightarrow psi_1(s+1)=int_0^1 frac{x^{s}ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Above follows since $frac{d}{dz}psi(z)=psi_1{(z)} $, so we can rewrite our desired value as:
$$psi_1left(frac14right)=int_0^1 frac{x^{1/4-1} ln x}{x-1}dx$$
Notice that $frac{d}{dx}left(4x^{frac{1}{4}}right)=x^{frac14-1}$, so we can easily substitute $x^{frac14}=tRightarrow x=t^4$ to get: $$psi_1left(frac14right)=16int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^4-1}dt$$
We might already recall that we saw before something similar, $int_0^1 frac{ln x}{1+x^2}dx=-G$, thus let's try to get there.
$$frac{1}{x^4-1}=frac12 frac{(x^2+1)-(x^2-1)}{(x^2+1)(x^2-1)}=frac12 left(frac1{x^2-1}-frac{1}{x^2+1}right)$$
$$Rightarrow psi_1left(frac14right)=8int_0^1frac{ln t}{t^2-1}dt -8int_0^1 frac{ln t}{t^2+1}dt=boxed{pi^2 +8G}$$
I am pretty sure you can prove that the first integral equals to $frac{pi^2}{8}$, but here are found many proofs.
answered 2 days ago
ZackyZacky
5,2111752
5,2111752
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
1
1
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
Well done (+1) This is the kind of answer I had in mind while formulating my question. Okay, to be honest I was not thinking about the Trigamma Function since I had forgotten about this relation but anyway thank you.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
^_^ Now that I think of it, maybe it was more directly to use this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, but I am more familiar with trigamma function than to Hurwitz's Zeta function.
– Zacky
2 days ago
add a comment |
Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that
$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$
Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get
$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$
And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.
add a comment |
Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that
$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$
Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get
$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$
And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.
add a comment |
Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that
$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$
Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get
$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$
And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.
Inspired by Zacky's comment on the integral representation of the Hurwitz Zeta Function I have found another pretty straightforward way. First we notice that
$$zeta(s,q)~=~frac1{Gamma(s)}int_0^infty frac{t^{s-1}e^{-qt}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dttag1$$
Now substitute $s=2$ and $q=frac14$ followed by $u=e^{-t}$ to get
$$mathfrak I=int_0^{infty}frac{te^{-t/4}}{1-e^{-t}}mathrm dt=int_0^1frac{u^{1/4-1}cdot log(u)}{u-1}mathrm du$$
And now we are at the same point from where Zacky deduced the right value via well-known integrals. Hence his method was quite elegant I will not repeat his solution but just refer to it. Basically using $(1)$ does not force us to rely on the Trigamma Function but instead leaves us all along with the Hurwitz Zeta Function and some nice integrals.
edited 22 hours ago
answered 2 days ago
mrtaurhomrtaurho
4,07721133
4,07721133
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063097%2falternative-proof-for-zeta-left2-frac14-right-psi1-left-frac14-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Isn't this $psi_1 left(frac14right)$ (trigamma function)? See here: mathworld.wolfram.com/TrigammaFunction.html
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky This is due the more general fact that $$psi^{(n)}(z)~=~(-1)^{n+1}n!zeta(n+1,z)$$ which can be shown directly with the series representation of both functions. But thank I you, I have forgotten about this relation.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I see, so basically the question is to prove that $psileft(frac14right) =pi^2 +8G$, right?
– Zacky
2 days ago
@Zacky Yes and no. Basically it is the same question, yes even though I am more interested in Zeta Functions at the moment.
– mrtaurho
2 days ago