Absolute extrema of $f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$ on the paraboloid $x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$












1












$begingroup$


I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.



First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.



At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?



Thanks for your help !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Baheti
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:20












  • $begingroup$
    @SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Jan 7 at 20:30
















1












$begingroup$


I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.



First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.



At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?



Thanks for your help !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Baheti
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:20












  • $begingroup$
    @SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Jan 7 at 20:30














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.



First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.



At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?



Thanks for your help !










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.



First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.



At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?



Thanks for your help !







real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 19:24







Poujh

















asked Dec 15 '18 at 19:09









PoujhPoujh

569516




569516








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Baheti
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:20












  • $begingroup$
    @SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Jan 7 at 20:30














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    (Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Sameer Baheti
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:20












  • $begingroup$
    @SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 19:23












  • $begingroup$
    This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:19








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
    $endgroup$
    – Connor Harris
    Jan 7 at 20:30








1




1




$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20






$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20














$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23






$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23














$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19






$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19






1




1




$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25




$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25




1




1




$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30




$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.



Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$



We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$



To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.



Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 20:41












  • $begingroup$
    Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 21:07








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 21:11










  • $begingroup$
    Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
    $endgroup$
    – Poujh
    Dec 15 '18 at 21:35












  • $begingroup$
    You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
    $endgroup$
    – Will M.
    Dec 15 '18 at 21:49



















1












$begingroup$

Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.



Analysis of the minimum.



If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.



Analysis of the maximum.



The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}

For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Interior Critical Points



    Let
    $$
    f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
    $$

    To find an interior critical point, we need
    $$
    begin{align}
    0
    &=delta f\
    &=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
    end{align}
    $$

    for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
    $$
    bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
    $$





    Surface of the Paraboloid



    On the paraboloid
    $$
    x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
    $$

    the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
    $$
    2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
    $$

    Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
    $$
    frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
    $$

    Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
    $$
    3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
    $$

    Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
    $$
    x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
    $$

    Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
    $$
    (x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
    $$

    Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
    $$
    2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
    $$

    which has no real solutions.



    Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
    $$
    6x^2-x=0tag{11}
    $$

    which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
    $$
    bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
    $$





    Interior of the Base



    On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.





    Edge of the Base



    Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
    $$
    y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
    $$

    Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
    $$
    x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
    $$

    Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
    $$
    left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
    $$

    where
    $$
    begin{align}
    &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
    &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
    &bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
    &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
    end{align}tag{16}
    $$

    The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
    $$
    -sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041826%2fabsolute-extrema-of-fx-y-z-xy-yzxz-on-the-paraboloid-x2y2-leq-z-leq1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.



      Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$



      We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$



      To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.



      Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 20:41












      • $begingroup$
        Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:07








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:11










      • $begingroup$
        Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:35












      • $begingroup$
        You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
















      1












      $begingroup$

      We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.



      Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$



      We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$



      To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.



      Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













      • $begingroup$
        Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 20:41












      • $begingroup$
        Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:07








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:11










      • $begingroup$
        Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:35












      • $begingroup$
        You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:49














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$

      We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.



      Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$



      We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$



      To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.



      Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.



      Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$



      We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$



      To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.



      Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.







      share|cite|improve this answer












      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer










      answered Dec 15 '18 at 20:39









      Will M.Will M.

      2,445314




      2,445314












      • $begingroup$
        Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 20:41












      • $begingroup$
        Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:07








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:11










      • $begingroup$
        Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:35












      • $begingroup$
        You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:49


















      • $begingroup$
        Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 20:41












      • $begingroup$
        Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:07








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:11










      • $begingroup$
        Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
        $endgroup$
        – Poujh
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:35












      • $begingroup$
        You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
        $endgroup$
        – Will M.
        Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
















      $begingroup$
      Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 20:41






      $begingroup$
      Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 20:41














      $begingroup$
      Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:07






      $begingroup$
      Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:07






      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:11




      $begingroup$
      I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:11












      $begingroup$
      Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:35






      $begingroup$
      Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
      $endgroup$
      – Poujh
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:35














      $begingroup$
      You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:49




      $begingroup$
      You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
      $endgroup$
      – Will M.
      Dec 15 '18 at 21:49











      1












      $begingroup$

      Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
      subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.



      Analysis of the minimum.



      If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.



      Analysis of the maximum.



      The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
      begin{align*}
      f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
      &= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
      &= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
      end{align*}

      For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
        subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.



        Analysis of the minimum.



        If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.



        Analysis of the maximum.



        The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
        begin{align*}
        f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
        &= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
        &= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
        end{align*}

        For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
          subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.



          Analysis of the minimum.



          If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.



          Analysis of the maximum.



          The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
          begin{align*}
          f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
          &= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
          &= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
          end{align*}

          For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
          subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.



          Analysis of the minimum.



          If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.



          Analysis of the maximum.



          The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
          begin{align*}
          f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
          &= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
          &= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
          end{align*}

          For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 7 at 20:34

























          answered Jan 7 at 20:20









          Connor HarrisConnor Harris

          4,350724




          4,350724























              1












              $begingroup$

              Interior Critical Points



              Let
              $$
              f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
              $$

              To find an interior critical point, we need
              $$
              begin{align}
              0
              &=delta f\
              &=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
              end{align}
              $$

              for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
              $$
              bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
              $$





              Surface of the Paraboloid



              On the paraboloid
              $$
              x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
              $$

              the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
              $$
              2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
              $$

              Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
              $$
              frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
              $$

              Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
              $$
              3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
              $$

              Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
              $$
              x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
              $$

              Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
              $$
              (x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
              $$

              Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
              $$
              2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
              $$

              which has no real solutions.



              Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
              $$
              6x^2-x=0tag{11}
              $$

              which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
              $$
              bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
              $$





              Interior of the Base



              On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.





              Edge of the Base



              Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
              $$
              y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
              $$

              Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
              $$
              x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
              $$

              Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
              $$
              left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
              $$

              where
              $$
              begin{align}
              &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
              &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
              &bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
              &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
              end{align}tag{16}
              $$

              The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
              $$
              -sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
              $$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                Interior Critical Points



                Let
                $$
                f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
                $$

                To find an interior critical point, we need
                $$
                begin{align}
                0
                &=delta f\
                &=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
                end{align}
                $$

                for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
                $$
                bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
                $$





                Surface of the Paraboloid



                On the paraboloid
                $$
                x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
                $$

                the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
                $$
                2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
                $$

                Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
                $$
                frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
                $$

                Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
                $$
                3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
                $$

                Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
                $$
                x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
                $$

                Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
                $$
                (x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
                $$

                Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
                $$
                2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
                $$

                which has no real solutions.



                Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
                $$
                6x^2-x=0tag{11}
                $$

                which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
                $$
                bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
                $$





                Interior of the Base



                On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.





                Edge of the Base



                Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
                $$
                y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
                $$

                Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
                $$
                x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
                $$

                Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
                $$
                left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
                $$

                where
                $$
                begin{align}
                &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
                &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
                &bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
                &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
                end{align}tag{16}
                $$

                The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
                $$
                -sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
                $$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Interior Critical Points



                  Let
                  $$
                  f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
                  $$

                  To find an interior critical point, we need
                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  0
                  &=delta f\
                  &=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
                  end{align}
                  $$

                  for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
                  $$
                  bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
                  $$





                  Surface of the Paraboloid



                  On the paraboloid
                  $$
                  x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
                  $$

                  the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
                  $$
                  2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
                  $$

                  Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
                  $$
                  frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
                  $$

                  Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
                  $$
                  3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
                  $$

                  Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
                  $$
                  x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
                  $$

                  Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
                  $$
                  (x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
                  $$

                  Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
                  $$
                  2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
                  $$

                  which has no real solutions.



                  Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
                  $$
                  6x^2-x=0tag{11}
                  $$

                  which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
                  $$
                  bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
                  $$





                  Interior of the Base



                  On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.





                  Edge of the Base



                  Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
                  $$
                  y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
                  $$

                  Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
                  $$
                  x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
                  $$

                  Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
                  $$
                  left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
                  $$

                  where
                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
                  end{align}tag{16}
                  $$

                  The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
                  $$
                  -sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
                  $$






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Interior Critical Points



                  Let
                  $$
                  f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
                  $$

                  To find an interior critical point, we need
                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  0
                  &=delta f\
                  &=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
                  end{align}
                  $$

                  for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
                  $$
                  bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
                  $$





                  Surface of the Paraboloid



                  On the paraboloid
                  $$
                  x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
                  $$

                  the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
                  $$
                  2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
                  $$

                  Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
                  $$
                  frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
                  $$

                  Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
                  $$
                  3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
                  $$

                  Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
                  $$
                  x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
                  $$

                  Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
                  $$
                  (x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
                  $$

                  Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
                  $$
                  2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
                  $$

                  which has no real solutions.



                  Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
                  $$
                  6x^2-x=0tag{11}
                  $$

                  which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
                  $$
                  bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
                  $$





                  Interior of the Base



                  On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.





                  Edge of the Base



                  Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
                  $$
                  y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
                  $$

                  Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
                  $$
                  x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
                  $$

                  Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
                  $$
                  left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
                  $$

                  where
                  $$
                  begin{align}
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
                  &bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
                  end{align}tag{16}
                  $$

                  The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
                  $$
                  -sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
                  $$







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 8 at 18:56

























                  answered Jan 8 at 18:09









                  robjohnrobjohn

                  265k27304626




                  265k27304626






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041826%2fabsolute-extrema-of-fx-y-z-xy-yzxz-on-the-paraboloid-x2y2-leq-z-leq1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Mario Kart Wii

                      The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

                      What does “Dominus providebit” mean?