Why is the space of Riemannian metric on a manifold an open set with respect to the Sobolev class of...
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $H^s(T^2_0M)$ be the Sobolev class of symmetric $0,2$ tensors defined by the class of $0,2$ tensors whose derivatives up to order $s$ exist in the sense of distributions and are square integrable. Since it is a vector space, it can be identified as $mathbb{R}^n$ for some $n$, equipped with usual topology.
Let $mathcal{M}^s$ be the subset of $H^s(T^2_0M)$ consisting of Riemannian metrics on $M$. How can I show that it is an open set in $H^s(T^2_0M)$? The usual approach is to construct continuous map whose preimage of some open set in the range of the function is $mathcal{M}^s$. However, I have no idea how to construct such a map.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $H^s(T^2_0M)$ be the Sobolev class of symmetric $0,2$ tensors defined by the class of $0,2$ tensors whose derivatives up to order $s$ exist in the sense of distributions and are square integrable. Since it is a vector space, it can be identified as $mathbb{R}^n$ for some $n$, equipped with usual topology.
Let $mathcal{M}^s$ be the subset of $H^s(T^2_0M)$ consisting of Riemannian metrics on $M$. How can I show that it is an open set in $H^s(T^2_0M)$? The usual approach is to construct continuous map whose preimage of some open set in the range of the function is $mathcal{M}^s$. However, I have no idea how to construct such a map.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $H^s(T^2_0M)$ be the Sobolev class of symmetric $0,2$ tensors defined by the class of $0,2$ tensors whose derivatives up to order $s$ exist in the sense of distributions and are square integrable. Since it is a vector space, it can be identified as $mathbb{R}^n$ for some $n$, equipped with usual topology.
Let $mathcal{M}^s$ be the subset of $H^s(T^2_0M)$ consisting of Riemannian metrics on $M$. How can I show that it is an open set in $H^s(T^2_0M)$? The usual approach is to construct continuous map whose preimage of some open set in the range of the function is $mathcal{M}^s$. However, I have no idea how to construct such a map.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. Let $H^s(T^2_0M)$ be the Sobolev class of symmetric $0,2$ tensors defined by the class of $0,2$ tensors whose derivatives up to order $s$ exist in the sense of distributions and are square integrable. Since it is a vector space, it can be identified as $mathbb{R}^n$ for some $n$, equipped with usual topology.
Let $mathcal{M}^s$ be the subset of $H^s(T^2_0M)$ consisting of Riemannian metrics on $M$. How can I show that it is an open set in $H^s(T^2_0M)$? The usual approach is to construct continuous map whose preimage of some open set in the range of the function is $mathcal{M}^s$. However, I have no idea how to construct such a map.
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
asked Jan 12 at 15:39
JerryJerry
422313
422313
1
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11
1
1
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071020%2fwhy-is-the-space-of-riemannian-metric-on-a-manifold-an-open-set-with-respect-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071020%2fwhy-is-the-space-of-riemannian-metric-on-a-manifold-an-open-set-with-respect-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Two things: note that your Sobolev space is not a finite dimensional one, so it is not isomorphic to any $mathbb{R}^n$. Second, as far as I remember Riemannian metrics are smooth (or at least continuous), so I do not think there would be any Sobolev space where they would be open...
$endgroup$
– Mindlack
Jan 14 at 18:15
$begingroup$
Here Riemannian metrics are assumed to be in the Sobolev space (i.e. those positive definite elements in the space).
$endgroup$
– Jerry
Jan 14 at 18:44
$begingroup$
I think $s$ needs to satisfy at least $s>frac{n}2$. Also, is $M$ bounded?
$endgroup$
– timur
Jan 16 at 3:11