$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda$ for complex $f$ with $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$












0












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a complex-valued, measurable function defined on $mathbb R$ with $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$



I want to show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$



$(alpha in mathbb R)$



My original attempt was to write $int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda -int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{alpha}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{2pi}f(x)dx=F(alpha+2pi)-F(2pi)-(F(alpha)-F(0))=int_{2pi}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{alpha}f(x)dx=0$



But I think I can't simply write is a Riemann Integral.



How can I show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$ instead?






complex-analysis analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:04










  • $begingroup$
    How does that help?
    $endgroup$
    – user626880
    Jan 12 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    I post a more detailed answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:44
















0












$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a complex-valued, measurable function defined on $mathbb R$ with $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$



I want to show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$



$(alpha in mathbb R)$



My original attempt was to write $int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda -int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{alpha}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{2pi}f(x)dx=F(alpha+2pi)-F(2pi)-(F(alpha)-F(0))=int_{2pi}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{alpha}f(x)dx=0$



But I think I can't simply write is a Riemann Integral.



How can I show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$ instead?






complex-analysis analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:04










  • $begingroup$
    How does that help?
    $endgroup$
    – user626880
    Jan 12 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    I post a more detailed answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:44














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $f$ be a complex-valued, measurable function defined on $mathbb R$ with $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$



I want to show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$



$(alpha in mathbb R)$



My original attempt was to write $int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda -int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{alpha}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{2pi}f(x)dx=F(alpha+2pi)-F(2pi)-(F(alpha)-F(0))=int_{2pi}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{alpha}f(x)dx=0$



But I think I can't simply write is a Riemann Integral.



How can I show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$ instead?






complex-analysis analysis







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $f$ be a complex-valued, measurable function defined on $mathbb R$ with $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$



I want to show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$



$(alpha in mathbb R)$



My original attempt was to write $int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda -int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{alpha}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{2pi}f(x)dx=F(alpha+2pi)-F(2pi)-(F(alpha)-F(0))=int_{2pi}^{alpha+2pi}f(x)dx-int_{0}^{alpha}f(x)dx=0$



But I think I can't simply write is a Riemann Integral.



How can I show $$int_{[0,2pi]}f dlambda=int_{[alpha,alpha+2pi]}f dlambda $$ instead?






complex-analysis analysis




complex-analysis analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 12 at 16:03









user626880user626880

204




204












  • $begingroup$
    Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:04










  • $begingroup$
    How does that help?
    $endgroup$
    – user626880
    Jan 12 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    I post a more detailed answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:44


















  • $begingroup$
    Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:04










  • $begingroup$
    How does that help?
    $endgroup$
    – user626880
    Jan 12 at 16:12










  • $begingroup$
    I post a more detailed answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:16








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:44
















$begingroup$
Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:04




$begingroup$
Simply split $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi] cup [2pi , 2pi+alpha]$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:04












$begingroup$
How does that help?
$endgroup$
– user626880
Jan 12 at 16:12




$begingroup$
How does that help?
$endgroup$
– user626880
Jan 12 at 16:12












$begingroup$
I post a more detailed answer.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:16






$begingroup$
I post a more detailed answer.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:16






1




1




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
$endgroup$
– user587192
Jan 12 at 16:44




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of An integrable and periodic function $f(x)$ satisfies $int_{0}^{T}f(x)dx=int_{a}^{a+T}f(x)dx$.
$endgroup$
– user587192
Jan 12 at 16:44










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

Edit: This proof assumes that $alpha<2pi$. But since $f$ is $2pi$ periodic the function $f$ on $[alpha,2pi+alpha]$ behaves the same as $f$ on $[alpha-2pi,alpha]$ and we can keep removing $2pi$ until $alpha-2mpi<2pi$, then denote $beta=alpha-2mpi$ and argue as below with $beta$ instead of $alpha$:



We can write $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi]cup [2pi,2pi+alpha]$. Since the union is disjoint (up to one element) we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx$$



By assumption $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$ and so by changing variables the second integral becomes



$$int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^alpha f(x+2pi)dx = int_0^alpha f(x)dx$$



Insert to the first equality we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{0}^{alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^{2pi}f(x)dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – paul garrett
    Jan 12 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:54











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071054%2fint-0-2-pif-d-lambda-int-alpha-alpha2-pif-d-lambda-for-complex-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0












$begingroup$

Edit: This proof assumes that $alpha<2pi$. But since $f$ is $2pi$ periodic the function $f$ on $[alpha,2pi+alpha]$ behaves the same as $f$ on $[alpha-2pi,alpha]$ and we can keep removing $2pi$ until $alpha-2mpi<2pi$, then denote $beta=alpha-2mpi$ and argue as below with $beta$ instead of $alpha$:



We can write $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi]cup [2pi,2pi+alpha]$. Since the union is disjoint (up to one element) we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx$$



By assumption $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$ and so by changing variables the second integral becomes



$$int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^alpha f(x+2pi)dx = int_0^alpha f(x)dx$$



Insert to the first equality we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{0}^{alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^{2pi}f(x)dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – paul garrett
    Jan 12 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:54
















0












$begingroup$

Edit: This proof assumes that $alpha<2pi$. But since $f$ is $2pi$ periodic the function $f$ on $[alpha,2pi+alpha]$ behaves the same as $f$ on $[alpha-2pi,alpha]$ and we can keep removing $2pi$ until $alpha-2mpi<2pi$, then denote $beta=alpha-2mpi$ and argue as below with $beta$ instead of $alpha$:



We can write $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi]cup [2pi,2pi+alpha]$. Since the union is disjoint (up to one element) we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx$$



By assumption $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$ and so by changing variables the second integral becomes



$$int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^alpha f(x+2pi)dx = int_0^alpha f(x)dx$$



Insert to the first equality we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{0}^{alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^{2pi}f(x)dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – paul garrett
    Jan 12 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:54














0












0








0





$begingroup$

Edit: This proof assumes that $alpha<2pi$. But since $f$ is $2pi$ periodic the function $f$ on $[alpha,2pi+alpha]$ behaves the same as $f$ on $[alpha-2pi,alpha]$ and we can keep removing $2pi$ until $alpha-2mpi<2pi$, then denote $beta=alpha-2mpi$ and argue as below with $beta$ instead of $alpha$:



We can write $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi]cup [2pi,2pi+alpha]$. Since the union is disjoint (up to one element) we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx$$



By assumption $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$ and so by changing variables the second integral becomes



$$int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^alpha f(x+2pi)dx = int_0^alpha f(x)dx$$



Insert to the first equality we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{0}^{alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^{2pi}f(x)dx$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Edit: This proof assumes that $alpha<2pi$. But since $f$ is $2pi$ periodic the function $f$ on $[alpha,2pi+alpha]$ behaves the same as $f$ on $[alpha-2pi,alpha]$ and we can keep removing $2pi$ until $alpha-2mpi<2pi$, then denote $beta=alpha-2mpi$ and argue as below with $beta$ instead of $alpha$:



We can write $[alpha,alpha+2pi] = [alpha,2pi]cup [2pi,2pi+alpha]$. Since the union is disjoint (up to one element) we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx$$



By assumption $f(x)=f(x+2pi)$ and so by changing variables the second integral becomes



$$int_{2pi}^{2pi+alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^alpha f(x+2pi)dx = int_0^alpha f(x)dx$$



Insert to the first equality we have



$$int_alpha^{alpha+2pi} f(x)dx = int_alpha^{2pi} f(x)dx+int_{0}^{alpha} f(x)dx = int_0^{2pi}f(x)dx$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 12 at 16:57

























answered Jan 12 at 16:16









YankoYanko

6,5471528




6,5471528








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – paul garrett
    Jan 12 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:54














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
    $endgroup$
    – user587192
    Jan 12 at 16:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
    $endgroup$
    – paul garrett
    Jan 12 at 16:40










  • $begingroup$
    @user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 12 at 16:54








1




1




$begingroup$
What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
$endgroup$
– user587192
Jan 12 at 16:37




$begingroup$
What if $alpha>2pi$? How do you make sense of the interval $[alpha,2pi]$?
$endgroup$
– user587192
Jan 12 at 16:37




1




1




$begingroup$
This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Jan 12 at 16:40




$begingroup$
This would work if, instead of your "$2pi$", you used the (unique) integer multiple of $2pi$ between $alpha$ and $alpha+2pi$.
$endgroup$
– paul garrett
Jan 12 at 16:40












$begingroup$
@user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:54




$begingroup$
@user587192 If $alpha>2pi$ then move the entire interval by $2pi$ as many times as needed.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 12 at 16:54


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071054%2fint-0-2-pif-d-lambda-int-alpha-alpha2-pif-d-lambda-for-complex-f%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro...
Read more

The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

Image
Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth From The Cutting Room Floor < The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth Jump to: navigation, search This is a sub-page of The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth . Afterbirth is the first expansion pack for Rebirth and features a variety of improvements. Contents 1 Unused Graphics 1.1 Old Man Keeper 1.2 Skinless Hush 1.3 Miscellaneous Unused Hush Sprites 1.4 Generosity achievement 1.5 Afterbirth+ Room Editor 1.6 Bearded Ultra Greed 1.7 Early Ultra Greed 1.8 Unused Brownie Expression 1.9 Frail's Spinning Head 1.10 Mom's Dead Hand Alt 2 Unused Audio 2.1 Unused Dead Womb Layer 2.2 Unused Hush Battle Outro 2.3 The Stain Grunt Unused Graphics Old Man Keeper Image file: gfxuimain me...
Read more

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Image
5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1 ...
Read more