Hadamard's inequality proof












4












$begingroup$


I have the following inequality to prove.



With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
$$
(det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
$$



What I already have:
I found out that:
$$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$



Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:



$$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$



I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    4












    $begingroup$


    I have the following inequality to prove.



    With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
    $$
    (det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
    $$



    What I already have:
    I found out that:
    $$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$



    Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:



    $$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$



    I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      4












      4








      4


      2



      $begingroup$


      I have the following inequality to prove.



      With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
      $$
      (det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
      $$



      What I already have:
      I found out that:
      $$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$



      Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:



      $$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$



      I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I have the following inequality to prove.



      With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
      $$
      (det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
      $$



      What I already have:
      I found out that:
      $$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$



      Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:



      $$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$



      I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..







      linear-algebra inequality






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited May 29 '17 at 18:30









      Omnomnomnom

      127k790178




      127k790178










      asked May 29 '17 at 15:58









      PhysXPhysX

      1328




      1328






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
          $$
          A = QR
          $$
          where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
          $$
          a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
          $$
          It follows that
          $$
          |a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
          $$
          Finally, we have
          $$
          |det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
          prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:26








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            May 29 '17 at 18:31










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – Jneven
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:10











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2301590%2fhadamards-inequality-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$

          There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
          $$
          A = QR
          $$
          where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
          $$
          a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
          $$
          It follows that
          $$
          |a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
          $$
          Finally, we have
          $$
          |det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
          prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:26








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            May 29 '17 at 18:31










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – Jneven
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
















          4












          $begingroup$

          There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
          $$
          A = QR
          $$
          where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
          $$
          a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
          $$
          It follows that
          $$
          |a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
          $$
          Finally, we have
          $$
          |det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
          prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:26








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            May 29 '17 at 18:31










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – Jneven
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:10














          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
          $$
          A = QR
          $$
          where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
          $$
          a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
          $$
          It follows that
          $$
          |a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
          $$
          Finally, we have
          $$
          |det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
          prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
          $$
          A = QR
          $$
          where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
          $$
          a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
          $$
          It follows that
          $$
          |a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
          $$
          Finally, we have
          $$
          |det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
          prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
          $$
          as desired.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited May 29 '17 at 18:28

























          answered May 29 '17 at 18:19









          OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom

          127k790178




          127k790178












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:26








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            May 29 '17 at 18:31










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – Jneven
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:10


















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:26








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            May 29 '17 at 18:31










          • $begingroup$
            Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
            $endgroup$
            – PhysX
            May 29 '17 at 18:33










          • $begingroup$
            can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
            $endgroup$
            – Jneven
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:07






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Omnomnomnom
            Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
















          $begingroup$
          Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
          $endgroup$
          – PhysX
          May 29 '17 at 18:26






          $begingroup$
          Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
          $endgroup$
          – PhysX
          May 29 '17 at 18:26






          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          May 29 '17 at 18:31




          $begingroup$
          We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          May 29 '17 at 18:31












          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
          $endgroup$
          – PhysX
          May 29 '17 at 18:33




          $begingroup$
          Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
          $endgroup$
          – PhysX
          May 29 '17 at 18:33












          $begingroup$
          can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
          $endgroup$
          – Jneven
          Jul 16 '18 at 10:07




          $begingroup$
          can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
          $endgroup$
          – Jneven
          Jul 16 '18 at 10:07




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Jul 16 '18 at 10:10




          $begingroup$
          @Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Omnomnomnom
          Jul 16 '18 at 10:10


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2301590%2fhadamards-inequality-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Mario Kart Wii

          The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

          What does “Dominus providebit” mean?