Hadamard's inequality proof
$begingroup$
I have the following inequality to prove.
With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
$$
(det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
$$
What I already have:
I found out that:
$$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$
Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:
$$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$
I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..
linear-algebra inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following inequality to prove.
With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
$$
(det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
$$
What I already have:
I found out that:
$$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$
Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:
$$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$
I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..
linear-algebra inequality
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have the following inequality to prove.
With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
$$
(det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
$$
What I already have:
I found out that:
$$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$
Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:
$$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$
I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..
linear-algebra inequality
$endgroup$
I have the following inequality to prove.
With $A in M_n(R)$ show that:
$$
(det(A))^2 leq prod_{i=1}^nleft( sum_{k=1}^n A_{k,i}^2right)
$$
What I already have:
I found out that:
$$G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = det(A^T A)=det(A^T)cdotdet(A)=(det(A))^2 $$
Also that with $G(v_1,ldots,v_m) = (det(A))^2$ results that:
$$operatorname{Vol}(v_1,ldots,v_m)= left|det(A)right| =prod_{i=1}^n |s(v_k,u_i)|$$
I don't even now if this is right.. It would be really helpful if someone could help me with the proof..
linear-algebra inequality
linear-algebra inequality
edited May 29 '17 at 18:30
Omnomnomnom
127k790178
127k790178
asked May 29 '17 at 15:58
PhysXPhysX
1328
1328
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
$$
A = QR
$$
where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
$$
a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
$$
It follows that
$$
|a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
$$
Finally, we have
$$
|det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
$$
as desired.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2301590%2fhadamards-inequality-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
$$
A = QR
$$
where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
$$
a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
$$
It follows that
$$
|a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
$$
Finally, we have
$$
|det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
$$
as desired.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
$$
A = QR
$$
where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
$$
a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
$$
It follows that
$$
|a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
$$
Finally, we have
$$
|det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
$$
as desired.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
$$
A = QR
$$
where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
$$
a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
$$
It follows that
$$
|a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
$$
Finally, we have
$$
|det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
$$
as desired.
$endgroup$
There's a quick proof using the $QR$ decomposition. In particular, note that any matrix $A$ can be written as
$$
A = QR
$$
where $Q$ orthogonal and $R$ is upper triangular (in fact, the columns of $Q$ can be taken as the orthonormal basis attained via the Gram-Schmidt process). Let $q_j$ denote the columns of $Q$, let $a_j$ denote the columns of $j$ (for $j = 1,dots,n$), and let $r_{ij}$ denote the entries of $R$. Then
$$
a_j = sum_{i=1}^j r_{ij}q_j
$$
It follows that
$$
|a_j|^2 = sum_{i=1}^j |r_{ij}|^2|q_j| geq |r_{jj}|^2 implies |r_{jj}| leq |a_{j}|
$$
Finally, we have
$$
|det(A)| = |det(Q)| |det(R)| = 1 cdot left|prod_{j=1}^n r_{jj}right| leq
prod_{j=1}^n |a_j|
$$
as desired.
edited May 29 '17 at 18:28
answered May 29 '17 at 18:19
OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom
127k790178
127k790178
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
$begingroup$
Thanks! I did read on Wikipedia that you can use QR decomposition, however I was mainly worried because of the (det(A))^2
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:26
1
1
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
We could have done it using $A^TA$ directly. In particular, note that $A^TA = R^TR$, and from there we can apply the same inequality to $det(R^TR) = det(R)^2$.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
May 29 '17 at 18:31
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
Thanks for the information! It's always good to have an alternative.
$endgroup$
– PhysX
May 29 '17 at 18:33
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
$begingroup$
can you use QR if it's not being said that $A$ is a orthogonal matrix?
$endgroup$
– Jneven
Jul 16 '18 at 10:07
1
1
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
$begingroup$
@Jneven Yes. Any matrix $A$ will have a $QR$ decomposition, as I state in my answer. Perhaps you'd find the wiki page for QR-decomposition helpful.
$endgroup$
– Omnomnomnom
Jul 16 '18 at 10:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2301590%2fhadamards-inequality-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown