$Y$ relatively compact in non-cpct riemann surface $X$. Choose domain $Y_1subset X$ s.t. $Y_1$ relatively...












0














Let $X$ be a non-compact riemann surface and $Y$ relatively compact open subset of $X$. The book says "Choose domain $Y_1$ s.t. $Ysubset Y_1subset X$ and a point $ain Y_1-Y$.(Since $X$ is non-compact and connected, $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty.)"



$textbf{Q:}$ The following is my thought process. Since $Y$ is relatively compact, there can only be finite number of path components. Since $Ysubset X$ and $X$ is connected, $X$ is path connected. So connect path components of $bar{Y}$ by path and add tubular neighborhood of those path s.t. it locally looks like product of intervals. Use those tubular neighborhood and original $bar{Y}$ to form $Y_1$. Clearly $Y_1$ is relatively compact in $X$ and $Y$ is relatively compact in $Y_1$. Furthermore $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty as I need to add extra points away from $bar{Y}$. How should I interpret the statement? How to choose domain $Y_1$ and show there is a point $ain Y_1-Y$? It seems the book says this is supposed to be obvious.



Ref. Forster Lectures on Riemann Surface Chpt 14, Cor 14.14










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Let $X$ be a non-compact riemann surface and $Y$ relatively compact open subset of $X$. The book says "Choose domain $Y_1$ s.t. $Ysubset Y_1subset X$ and a point $ain Y_1-Y$.(Since $X$ is non-compact and connected, $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty.)"



    $textbf{Q:}$ The following is my thought process. Since $Y$ is relatively compact, there can only be finite number of path components. Since $Ysubset X$ and $X$ is connected, $X$ is path connected. So connect path components of $bar{Y}$ by path and add tubular neighborhood of those path s.t. it locally looks like product of intervals. Use those tubular neighborhood and original $bar{Y}$ to form $Y_1$. Clearly $Y_1$ is relatively compact in $X$ and $Y$ is relatively compact in $Y_1$. Furthermore $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty as I need to add extra points away from $bar{Y}$. How should I interpret the statement? How to choose domain $Y_1$ and show there is a point $ain Y_1-Y$? It seems the book says this is supposed to be obvious.



    Ref. Forster Lectures on Riemann Surface Chpt 14, Cor 14.14










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Let $X$ be a non-compact riemann surface and $Y$ relatively compact open subset of $X$. The book says "Choose domain $Y_1$ s.t. $Ysubset Y_1subset X$ and a point $ain Y_1-Y$.(Since $X$ is non-compact and connected, $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty.)"



      $textbf{Q:}$ The following is my thought process. Since $Y$ is relatively compact, there can only be finite number of path components. Since $Ysubset X$ and $X$ is connected, $X$ is path connected. So connect path components of $bar{Y}$ by path and add tubular neighborhood of those path s.t. it locally looks like product of intervals. Use those tubular neighborhood and original $bar{Y}$ to form $Y_1$. Clearly $Y_1$ is relatively compact in $X$ and $Y$ is relatively compact in $Y_1$. Furthermore $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty as I need to add extra points away from $bar{Y}$. How should I interpret the statement? How to choose domain $Y_1$ and show there is a point $ain Y_1-Y$? It seems the book says this is supposed to be obvious.



      Ref. Forster Lectures on Riemann Surface Chpt 14, Cor 14.14










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $X$ be a non-compact riemann surface and $Y$ relatively compact open subset of $X$. The book says "Choose domain $Y_1$ s.t. $Ysubset Y_1subset X$ and a point $ain Y_1-Y$.(Since $X$ is non-compact and connected, $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty.)"



      $textbf{Q:}$ The following is my thought process. Since $Y$ is relatively compact, there can only be finite number of path components. Since $Ysubset X$ and $X$ is connected, $X$ is path connected. So connect path components of $bar{Y}$ by path and add tubular neighborhood of those path s.t. it locally looks like product of intervals. Use those tubular neighborhood and original $bar{Y}$ to form $Y_1$. Clearly $Y_1$ is relatively compact in $X$ and $Y$ is relatively compact in $Y_1$. Furthermore $Y_1-Y$ is non-empty as I need to add extra points away from $bar{Y}$. How should I interpret the statement? How to choose domain $Y_1$ and show there is a point $ain Y_1-Y$? It seems the book says this is supposed to be obvious.



      Ref. Forster Lectures on Riemann Surface Chpt 14, Cor 14.14







      general-topology complex-analysis differential-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 2 days ago









      user45765user45765

      2,6422722




      2,6422722






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          I would not say it is obvious.



          You have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. Now choose a relatively compact open neighborhhod $U$ of $C$. Riemann surfaces are locally path connected (i.e. have a base consisting of path connected open sets). In locally connected path spaces the path components of open sets are open. See the answers to Definition of locally pathwise connected.



          Now let $Y_1$ be the path component of $U$ containing the path connected $C$. Clearly $Y_1 subset overline{U} ne X$.



          Edited:



          I was wrong when I said that you have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. The statement ist true, but your argument was that a relatively compact set can only have a finite number of path components. Here is a counterexample: Let $Y subset mathbb{C}$ be the set of all $z$ such that $text{Im} z in (0,1)$ and $text{Re} z in (0,1) setminus { 1/n mid n in mathbb{N} }$.



          So let us give a complete proof. We assume that $X$ is a path connected topological space such that each point has a path connected open neighborhood $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact and path connected. Each Riemann surfaces has this property (take suitable disks around the points).



          (1) Each relatively compact $Y subset X$ is contained in a path connected compact $C subset X$.



          $overline{Y}$ is covered by path connected open sets $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact. Choose a finite subcover $U_0,dots,U_n$. Choose paths $u_i$ connecting $U_0$ and $U_i$ for $i =1,dots,n$. Then $C = bigcup_{i=0}^n overline{U_i} cup bigcup_{i=1}^n u_i([0,1])$ will do.



          (2) Each compact path connected $C subset X$ has a relatively compact path connected open neighborhood $Y'$.



          $C$ is covered by finitely many path connected open sets $V_j$ such that $V_j cap C ne emptyset$ and $overline{V_j}$ is compact. Then $Y' = bigcup_j V_j = C cup bigcup_j V_j$ will do.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062947%2fy-relatively-compact-in-non-cpct-riemann-surface-x-choose-domain-y-1-subse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            I would not say it is obvious.



            You have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. Now choose a relatively compact open neighborhhod $U$ of $C$. Riemann surfaces are locally path connected (i.e. have a base consisting of path connected open sets). In locally connected path spaces the path components of open sets are open. See the answers to Definition of locally pathwise connected.



            Now let $Y_1$ be the path component of $U$ containing the path connected $C$. Clearly $Y_1 subset overline{U} ne X$.



            Edited:



            I was wrong when I said that you have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. The statement ist true, but your argument was that a relatively compact set can only have a finite number of path components. Here is a counterexample: Let $Y subset mathbb{C}$ be the set of all $z$ such that $text{Im} z in (0,1)$ and $text{Re} z in (0,1) setminus { 1/n mid n in mathbb{N} }$.



            So let us give a complete proof. We assume that $X$ is a path connected topological space such that each point has a path connected open neighborhood $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact and path connected. Each Riemann surfaces has this property (take suitable disks around the points).



            (1) Each relatively compact $Y subset X$ is contained in a path connected compact $C subset X$.



            $overline{Y}$ is covered by path connected open sets $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact. Choose a finite subcover $U_0,dots,U_n$. Choose paths $u_i$ connecting $U_0$ and $U_i$ for $i =1,dots,n$. Then $C = bigcup_{i=0}^n overline{U_i} cup bigcup_{i=1}^n u_i([0,1])$ will do.



            (2) Each compact path connected $C subset X$ has a relatively compact path connected open neighborhood $Y'$.



            $C$ is covered by finitely many path connected open sets $V_j$ such that $V_j cap C ne emptyset$ and $overline{V_j}$ is compact. Then $Y' = bigcup_j V_j = C cup bigcup_j V_j$ will do.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              1














              I would not say it is obvious.



              You have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. Now choose a relatively compact open neighborhhod $U$ of $C$. Riemann surfaces are locally path connected (i.e. have a base consisting of path connected open sets). In locally connected path spaces the path components of open sets are open. See the answers to Definition of locally pathwise connected.



              Now let $Y_1$ be the path component of $U$ containing the path connected $C$. Clearly $Y_1 subset overline{U} ne X$.



              Edited:



              I was wrong when I said that you have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. The statement ist true, but your argument was that a relatively compact set can only have a finite number of path components. Here is a counterexample: Let $Y subset mathbb{C}$ be the set of all $z$ such that $text{Im} z in (0,1)$ and $text{Re} z in (0,1) setminus { 1/n mid n in mathbb{N} }$.



              So let us give a complete proof. We assume that $X$ is a path connected topological space such that each point has a path connected open neighborhood $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact and path connected. Each Riemann surfaces has this property (take suitable disks around the points).



              (1) Each relatively compact $Y subset X$ is contained in a path connected compact $C subset X$.



              $overline{Y}$ is covered by path connected open sets $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact. Choose a finite subcover $U_0,dots,U_n$. Choose paths $u_i$ connecting $U_0$ and $U_i$ for $i =1,dots,n$. Then $C = bigcup_{i=0}^n overline{U_i} cup bigcup_{i=1}^n u_i([0,1])$ will do.



              (2) Each compact path connected $C subset X$ has a relatively compact path connected open neighborhood $Y'$.



              $C$ is covered by finitely many path connected open sets $V_j$ such that $V_j cap C ne emptyset$ and $overline{V_j}$ is compact. Then $Y' = bigcup_j V_j = C cup bigcup_j V_j$ will do.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                1












                1








                1






                I would not say it is obvious.



                You have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. Now choose a relatively compact open neighborhhod $U$ of $C$. Riemann surfaces are locally path connected (i.e. have a base consisting of path connected open sets). In locally connected path spaces the path components of open sets are open. See the answers to Definition of locally pathwise connected.



                Now let $Y_1$ be the path component of $U$ containing the path connected $C$. Clearly $Y_1 subset overline{U} ne X$.



                Edited:



                I was wrong when I said that you have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. The statement ist true, but your argument was that a relatively compact set can only have a finite number of path components. Here is a counterexample: Let $Y subset mathbb{C}$ be the set of all $z$ such that $text{Im} z in (0,1)$ and $text{Re} z in (0,1) setminus { 1/n mid n in mathbb{N} }$.



                So let us give a complete proof. We assume that $X$ is a path connected topological space such that each point has a path connected open neighborhood $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact and path connected. Each Riemann surfaces has this property (take suitable disks around the points).



                (1) Each relatively compact $Y subset X$ is contained in a path connected compact $C subset X$.



                $overline{Y}$ is covered by path connected open sets $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact. Choose a finite subcover $U_0,dots,U_n$. Choose paths $u_i$ connecting $U_0$ and $U_i$ for $i =1,dots,n$. Then $C = bigcup_{i=0}^n overline{U_i} cup bigcup_{i=1}^n u_i([0,1])$ will do.



                (2) Each compact path connected $C subset X$ has a relatively compact path connected open neighborhood $Y'$.



                $C$ is covered by finitely many path connected open sets $V_j$ such that $V_j cap C ne emptyset$ and $overline{V_j}$ is compact. Then $Y' = bigcup_j V_j = C cup bigcup_j V_j$ will do.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                I would not say it is obvious.



                You have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. Now choose a relatively compact open neighborhhod $U$ of $C$. Riemann surfaces are locally path connected (i.e. have a base consisting of path connected open sets). In locally connected path spaces the path components of open sets are open. See the answers to Definition of locally pathwise connected.



                Now let $Y_1$ be the path component of $U$ containing the path connected $C$. Clearly $Y_1 subset overline{U} ne X$.



                Edited:



                I was wrong when I said that you have correctly shown that $Y$ is contained in a compact path connected set $C$. The statement ist true, but your argument was that a relatively compact set can only have a finite number of path components. Here is a counterexample: Let $Y subset mathbb{C}$ be the set of all $z$ such that $text{Im} z in (0,1)$ and $text{Re} z in (0,1) setminus { 1/n mid n in mathbb{N} }$.



                So let us give a complete proof. We assume that $X$ is a path connected topological space such that each point has a path connected open neighborhood $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact and path connected. Each Riemann surfaces has this property (take suitable disks around the points).



                (1) Each relatively compact $Y subset X$ is contained in a path connected compact $C subset X$.



                $overline{Y}$ is covered by path connected open sets $U$ such that $overline{U}$ is compact. Choose a finite subcover $U_0,dots,U_n$. Choose paths $u_i$ connecting $U_0$ and $U_i$ for $i =1,dots,n$. Then $C = bigcup_{i=0}^n overline{U_i} cup bigcup_{i=1}^n u_i([0,1])$ will do.



                (2) Each compact path connected $C subset X$ has a relatively compact path connected open neighborhood $Y'$.



                $C$ is covered by finitely many path connected open sets $V_j$ such that $V_j cap C ne emptyset$ and $overline{V_j}$ is compact. Then $Y' = bigcup_j V_j = C cup bigcup_j V_j$ will do.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                Paul FrostPaul Frost

                9,5802632




                9,5802632






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062947%2fy-relatively-compact-in-non-cpct-riemann-surface-x-choose-domain-y-1-subse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese