Grothendieck group of tensor products












2












$begingroup$


For two unital rings $R,S$, one can form the ring $Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$
(this is the coproduct in the category of rings). I was wondering whether the following formula holds for the Grothendieck group of projective modules over these rings:
$K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ) cong K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S)$ as abelian groups (or as rings if $R,S$ are commutative rings).



Since there are ring maps $R rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$ and $S rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$, there are induced maps $K_0(R) rightarrow
K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ), K_0(R) rightarrow
K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$
; if $R,S$ are commutative rings, these are maps of commutative rings and hence there is an induced map
$K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S) rightarrow K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$. Is this an isomorphism? Note that $K_0(R times S) cong K_0(R) times K_0(S)$ but I am interested in the tensor product of rings.



More generally, is there a description of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$ in terms of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$. In another direction, what about if there is an extra ring $T$: is $K_0(R otimes_T S) cong K_0(R) otimes_{K_0(T)} K_0(S)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    For two unital rings $R,S$, one can form the ring $Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$
    (this is the coproduct in the category of rings). I was wondering whether the following formula holds for the Grothendieck group of projective modules over these rings:
    $K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ) cong K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S)$ as abelian groups (or as rings if $R,S$ are commutative rings).



    Since there are ring maps $R rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$ and $S rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$, there are induced maps $K_0(R) rightarrow
    K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ), K_0(R) rightarrow
    K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$
    ; if $R,S$ are commutative rings, these are maps of commutative rings and hence there is an induced map
    $K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S) rightarrow K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$. Is this an isomorphism? Note that $K_0(R times S) cong K_0(R) times K_0(S)$ but I am interested in the tensor product of rings.



    More generally, is there a description of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$ in terms of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$. In another direction, what about if there is an extra ring $T$: is $K_0(R otimes_T S) cong K_0(R) otimes_{K_0(T)} K_0(S)$?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      For two unital rings $R,S$, one can form the ring $Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$
      (this is the coproduct in the category of rings). I was wondering whether the following formula holds for the Grothendieck group of projective modules over these rings:
      $K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ) cong K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S)$ as abelian groups (or as rings if $R,S$ are commutative rings).



      Since there are ring maps $R rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$ and $S rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$, there are induced maps $K_0(R) rightarrow
      K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ), K_0(R) rightarrow
      K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$
      ; if $R,S$ are commutative rings, these are maps of commutative rings and hence there is an induced map
      $K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S) rightarrow K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$. Is this an isomorphism? Note that $K_0(R times S) cong K_0(R) times K_0(S)$ but I am interested in the tensor product of rings.



      More generally, is there a description of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$ in terms of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$. In another direction, what about if there is an extra ring $T$: is $K_0(R otimes_T S) cong K_0(R) otimes_{K_0(T)} K_0(S)$?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      For two unital rings $R,S$, one can form the ring $Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$
      (this is the coproduct in the category of rings). I was wondering whether the following formula holds for the Grothendieck group of projective modules over these rings:
      $K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ) cong K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S)$ as abelian groups (or as rings if $R,S$ are commutative rings).



      Since there are ring maps $R rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$ and $S rightarrow Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S$, there are induced maps $K_0(R) rightarrow
      K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S ), K_0(R) rightarrow
      K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$
      ; if $R,S$ are commutative rings, these are maps of commutative rings and hence there is an induced map
      $K_0(R) otimes_mathbb{Z} K_0(S) rightarrow K_0(Rotimes_mathbb{Z} S )$. Is this an isomorphism? Note that $K_0(R times S) cong K_0(R) times K_0(S)$ but I am interested in the tensor product of rings.



      More generally, is there a description of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$ in terms of $Proj(R otimes_mathbb{Z} S)$. In another direction, what about if there is an extra ring $T$: is $K_0(R otimes_T S) cong K_0(R) otimes_{K_0(T)} K_0(S)$?







      ring-theory modules k-theory






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 23 at 20:03







      user39598

















      asked Jan 23 at 19:54









      user39598user39598

      174213




      174213






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          No, this is not true in general. For instance, suppose $R=S=mathbb{Q}(i)$. Then $K_0(R)=K_0(S)congmathbb{Z}$, but $Rotimes Scong mathbb{Q}(i)times mathbb{Q}(i)$ so $K_0(Rotimes S)congmathbb{Z}^2$.



          In that example, the natural map $K_0(R)otimes K_0(S)to K_0(Rotimes S)$ fails to be surjective. It can also fail to be injective. For instance, if $R$ and $S$ are fields of different characteristic, then $Rotimes S=0$ so $K(Rotimes S)=0$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084985%2fgrothendieck-group-of-tensor-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            No, this is not true in general. For instance, suppose $R=S=mathbb{Q}(i)$. Then $K_0(R)=K_0(S)congmathbb{Z}$, but $Rotimes Scong mathbb{Q}(i)times mathbb{Q}(i)$ so $K_0(Rotimes S)congmathbb{Z}^2$.



            In that example, the natural map $K_0(R)otimes K_0(S)to K_0(Rotimes S)$ fails to be surjective. It can also fail to be injective. For instance, if $R$ and $S$ are fields of different characteristic, then $Rotimes S=0$ so $K(Rotimes S)=0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              2












              $begingroup$

              No, this is not true in general. For instance, suppose $R=S=mathbb{Q}(i)$. Then $K_0(R)=K_0(S)congmathbb{Z}$, but $Rotimes Scong mathbb{Q}(i)times mathbb{Q}(i)$ so $K_0(Rotimes S)congmathbb{Z}^2$.



              In that example, the natural map $K_0(R)otimes K_0(S)to K_0(Rotimes S)$ fails to be surjective. It can also fail to be injective. For instance, if $R$ and $S$ are fields of different characteristic, then $Rotimes S=0$ so $K(Rotimes S)=0$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                No, this is not true in general. For instance, suppose $R=S=mathbb{Q}(i)$. Then $K_0(R)=K_0(S)congmathbb{Z}$, but $Rotimes Scong mathbb{Q}(i)times mathbb{Q}(i)$ so $K_0(Rotimes S)congmathbb{Z}^2$.



                In that example, the natural map $K_0(R)otimes K_0(S)to K_0(Rotimes S)$ fails to be surjective. It can also fail to be injective. For instance, if $R$ and $S$ are fields of different characteristic, then $Rotimes S=0$ so $K(Rotimes S)=0$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                No, this is not true in general. For instance, suppose $R=S=mathbb{Q}(i)$. Then $K_0(R)=K_0(S)congmathbb{Z}$, but $Rotimes Scong mathbb{Q}(i)times mathbb{Q}(i)$ so $K_0(Rotimes S)congmathbb{Z}^2$.



                In that example, the natural map $K_0(R)otimes K_0(S)to K_0(Rotimes S)$ fails to be surjective. It can also fail to be injective. For instance, if $R$ and $S$ are fields of different characteristic, then $Rotimes S=0$ so $K(Rotimes S)=0$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 23 at 21:54









                Eric WofseyEric Wofsey

                188k14216346




                188k14216346






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3084985%2fgrothendieck-group-of-tensor-products%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese