Calculating improper integral $intlimits_0^1 frac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx$












0












$begingroup$


Calculate improper integral $displaystyle int_0^1dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx$



We had the following equation to calculate improper integrals (2nd style):

Let f in$left(a,bright]$ unbounded, but $forall varepsilon >0$ in every subinterval $left[a+varepsilon,bright]$ is bounded, we define:



$displaystyle int_a^b f(x),dx:=lim_{varepsilonto0^+}displaystyle int_{a+varepsilon}^b f(x), dx$



However, I only came up with this solution:
begin{align}
&displaystyle int_0^1 dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx && mid u=arcsin x to dx=sqrt{1-x^2}, duquad u=arcsin0=0 quad u=arcsin1=pi/2\
&=displaystyle int_0^{fracpi2}u,du\
&= left[frac{u^2}{2}right]^{fracpi2}_0\
&=frac{pi^2}{8}
end{align}
My question is now, which is more accurate (and is this even correct)?






integration analysis definite-integrals improper-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Its one, I'm sorry.
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 23 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Marine Galantin
    Jan 23 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback!
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 23 at 20:31
















0












$begingroup$


Calculate improper integral $displaystyle int_0^1dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx$



We had the following equation to calculate improper integrals (2nd style):

Let f in$left(a,bright]$ unbounded, but $forall varepsilon >0$ in every subinterval $left[a+varepsilon,bright]$ is bounded, we define:



$displaystyle int_a^b f(x),dx:=lim_{varepsilonto0^+}displaystyle int_{a+varepsilon}^b f(x), dx$



However, I only came up with this solution:
begin{align}
&displaystyle int_0^1 dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx && mid u=arcsin x to dx=sqrt{1-x^2}, duquad u=arcsin0=0 quad u=arcsin1=pi/2\
&=displaystyle int_0^{fracpi2}u,du\
&= left[frac{u^2}{2}right]^{fracpi2}_0\
&=frac{pi^2}{8}
end{align}
My question is now, which is more accurate (and is this even correct)?






integration analysis definite-integrals improper-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Its one, I'm sorry.
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 23 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Marine Galantin
    Jan 23 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback!
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 23 at 20:31














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Calculate improper integral $displaystyle int_0^1dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx$



We had the following equation to calculate improper integrals (2nd style):

Let f in$left(a,bright]$ unbounded, but $forall varepsilon >0$ in every subinterval $left[a+varepsilon,bright]$ is bounded, we define:



$displaystyle int_a^b f(x),dx:=lim_{varepsilonto0^+}displaystyle int_{a+varepsilon}^b f(x), dx$



However, I only came up with this solution:
begin{align}
&displaystyle int_0^1 dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx && mid u=arcsin x to dx=sqrt{1-x^2}, duquad u=arcsin0=0 quad u=arcsin1=pi/2\
&=displaystyle int_0^{fracpi2}u,du\
&= left[frac{u^2}{2}right]^{fracpi2}_0\
&=frac{pi^2}{8}
end{align}
My question is now, which is more accurate (and is this even correct)?






integration analysis definite-integrals improper-integrals







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Calculate improper integral $displaystyle int_0^1dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx$



We had the following equation to calculate improper integrals (2nd style):

Let f in$left(a,bright]$ unbounded, but $forall varepsilon >0$ in every subinterval $left[a+varepsilon,bright]$ is bounded, we define:



$displaystyle int_a^b f(x),dx:=lim_{varepsilonto0^+}displaystyle int_{a+varepsilon}^b f(x), dx$



However, I only came up with this solution:
begin{align}
&displaystyle int_0^1 dfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx && mid u=arcsin x to dx=sqrt{1-x^2}, duquad u=arcsin0=0 quad u=arcsin1=pi/2\
&=displaystyle int_0^{fracpi2}u,du\
&= left[frac{u^2}{2}right]^{fracpi2}_0\
&=frac{pi^2}{8}
end{align}
My question is now, which is more accurate (and is this even correct)?






integration analysis definite-integrals improper-integrals




integration analysis definite-integrals improper-integrals






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 1 at 13:44









Martin Sleziak

44.8k10119272




44.8k10119272










asked Jan 23 at 20:14









DoesbaddelDoesbaddel

34011




34011












  • $begingroup$
    Its one, I'm sorry.
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 23 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Marine Galantin
    Jan 23 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback!
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 23 at 20:31


















  • $begingroup$
    Its one, I'm sorry.
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
    $endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jan 23 at 20:25






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
    $endgroup$
    – Marine Galantin
    Jan 23 at 20:25










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for your feedback!
    $endgroup$
    – Doesbaddel
    Jan 23 at 20:28










  • $begingroup$
    Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
    $endgroup$
    – Cheerful Parsnip
    Jan 23 at 20:31
















$begingroup$
Its one, I'm sorry.
$endgroup$
– Doesbaddel
Jan 23 at 20:18




$begingroup$
Its one, I'm sorry.
$endgroup$
– Doesbaddel
Jan 23 at 20:18




1




1




$begingroup$
What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 23 at 20:25




$begingroup$
What you did at the end is fine, because the substitution is correct and thus the improper integral becomes a proper Riemann one.
$endgroup$
– DonAntonio
Jan 23 at 20:25




1




1




$begingroup$
I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
$endgroup$
– Marine Galantin
Jan 23 at 20:25




$begingroup$
I would also have done this integral this way, very well ;)
$endgroup$
– Marine Galantin
Jan 23 at 20:25












$begingroup$
Thanks for your feedback!
$endgroup$
– Doesbaddel
Jan 23 at 20:28




$begingroup$
Thanks for your feedback!
$endgroup$
– Doesbaddel
Jan 23 at 20:28












$begingroup$
Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Jan 23 at 20:31




$begingroup$
Technically you have to rewrite your improper integral as a limit, then make the substitution. Since everything in sight is continuous though, it works out to be the same thing in the end.
$endgroup$
– Cheerful Parsnip
Jan 23 at 20:31










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

In fact you show only one solution, because the first approach remains theoretical. The only way that I know to handle this integral is by the arc sine change of variable, which makes the "improperness" disappear.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    The problem isn't at $x=0$, but instead at $x=1$.
    However, your substitution seems to have eliminated this issue, so yes, your answer is correct.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      As mentioned in another answer, the "improperness" occurs at $x=1.$ So you should let $0<b<1$ and consider



      $$int_0^bfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx,$$
      then take the limit as $bto 1^-.$ This will lead to the answer you found.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085014%2fcalculating-improper-integral-int-limits-01-frac-arcsinx-sqrt1-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        1












        $begingroup$

        In fact you show only one solution, because the first approach remains theoretical. The only way that I know to handle this integral is by the arc sine change of variable, which makes the "improperness" disappear.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          1












          $begingroup$

          In fact you show only one solution, because the first approach remains theoretical. The only way that I know to handle this integral is by the arc sine change of variable, which makes the "improperness" disappear.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            In fact you show only one solution, because the first approach remains theoretical. The only way that I know to handle this integral is by the arc sine change of variable, which makes the "improperness" disappear.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            In fact you show only one solution, because the first approach remains theoretical. The only way that I know to handle this integral is by the arc sine change of variable, which makes the "improperness" disappear.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jan 23 at 20:25









            Yves DaoustYves Daoust

            129k676227




            129k676227























                1












                $begingroup$

                The problem isn't at $x=0$, but instead at $x=1$.
                However, your substitution seems to have eliminated this issue, so yes, your answer is correct.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  The problem isn't at $x=0$, but instead at $x=1$.
                  However, your substitution seems to have eliminated this issue, so yes, your answer is correct.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    The problem isn't at $x=0$, but instead at $x=1$.
                    However, your substitution seems to have eliminated this issue, so yes, your answer is correct.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The problem isn't at $x=0$, but instead at $x=1$.
                    However, your substitution seems to have eliminated this issue, so yes, your answer is correct.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 23 at 20:28









                    AlexandrosAlexandros

                    9281412




                    9281412























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        As mentioned in another answer, the "improperness" occurs at $x=1.$ So you should let $0<b<1$ and consider



                        $$int_0^bfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx,$$
                        then take the limit as $bto 1^-.$ This will lead to the answer you found.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          As mentioned in another answer, the "improperness" occurs at $x=1.$ So you should let $0<b<1$ and consider



                          $$int_0^bfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx,$$
                          then take the limit as $bto 1^-.$ This will lead to the answer you found.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            As mentioned in another answer, the "improperness" occurs at $x=1.$ So you should let $0<b<1$ and consider



                            $$int_0^bfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx,$$
                            then take the limit as $bto 1^-.$ This will lead to the answer you found.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            As mentioned in another answer, the "improperness" occurs at $x=1.$ So you should let $0<b<1$ and consider



                            $$int_0^bfrac{arcsin(x)}{sqrt{1-x^2}},dx,$$
                            then take the limit as $bto 1^-.$ This will lead to the answer you found.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Jan 23 at 20:34









                            zhw.zhw.

                            73.8k43175




                            73.8k43175






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid …



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3085014%2fcalculating-improper-integral-int-limits-01-frac-arcsinx-sqrt1-x2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                -

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Mario Kart Wii

                                Image
                                Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
                                Read more

                                What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                                Image
                                5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
                                Read more

                                Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

                                Image
                                Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
                                Read more