Find the geodesic and normal curvatures of a surface
For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:
(i) a meridian $v$ = constant,
(ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.
Which of these curves are geodesics?
I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.
From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.
How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature geodesic
add a comment |
For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:
(i) a meridian $v$ = constant,
(ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.
Which of these curves are geodesics?
I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.
From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.
How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature geodesic
add a comment |
For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:
(i) a meridian $v$ = constant,
(ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.
Which of these curves are geodesics?
I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.
From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.
How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature geodesic
For the surface $sigma(u,v)= (frac{cos v}{cosh u}, frac{sin v}{cosh u}, tanh u)$, compute the geodesic curvature and the normal curvature of:
(i) a meridian $v$ = constant,
(ii) a parallel $u$ = constant.
Which of these curves are geodesics?
I know that a meridian is a geodesic and its geodesic curvature $kappa_g = 0$.
From the textbook, the normal curvature $kappa_n = gamma''·N$ and the geodesic curvature $kappa_g = gamma'' · (N times gamma')$, where $N$ is the unit normal of the surface, and $gamma$ is a unit-speed curve in $mathbb{R}^3$.
How can I find the $gamma$ in the formula? Thanks!
differential-geometry curvature geodesic
differential-geometry curvature geodesic
asked Nov 2 '18 at 5:09
Evelyn VenneEvelyn Venne
607
607
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.
For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
$$
gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
$$
In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.
add a comment |
Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
begin{equation}
k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
end{equation}
where
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.
- v=const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2 \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
end{equation}
- u =const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
end{equation}
When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
1. v=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=0
end{equation}
because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.
- u=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
end{equation}
where $u_0$ is the constant.
The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981352%2ffind-the-geodesic-and-normal-curvatures-of-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.
For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
$$
gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
$$
In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.
add a comment |
By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.
For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
$$
gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
$$
In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.
add a comment |
By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.
For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
$$
gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
$$
In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.
By keeping $u$ or $v$ constant in the parametrisation $sigma$ of the surface and keeping the other parameter "variable", you obtain the parametrisation of the coordinate lines.
For instance, to parametrise a meridian, keeping $v$ constant gives
$$
gamma(t) = sigma(t, v_0) = left(frac{cos v_0}{cosh t}, frac{sin v_0}{cosh t}, tanh tright).
$$
In the same way, if you keep $u$ fixed and let the other parameter of $sigma$ be the variable of the curve, you get parametrisations of the parallels.
edited Nov 4 '18 at 1:14
answered Nov 4 '18 at 0:36
Ernie060Ernie060
2,555319
2,555319
add a comment |
add a comment |
Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
begin{equation}
k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
end{equation}
where
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.
- v=const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2 \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
end{equation}
- u =const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
end{equation}
When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
1. v=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=0
end{equation}
because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.
- u=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
end{equation}
where $u_0$ is the constant.
The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.
add a comment |
Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
begin{equation}
k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
end{equation}
where
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.
- v=const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2 \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
end{equation}
- u =const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
end{equation}
When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
1. v=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=0
end{equation}
because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.
- u=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
end{equation}
where $u_0$ is the constant.
The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.
add a comment |
Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
begin{equation}
k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
end{equation}
where
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.
- v=const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2 \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
end{equation}
- u =const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
end{equation}
When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
1. v=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=0
end{equation}
because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.
- u=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
end{equation}
where $u_0$ is the constant.
The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.
Normal and geodesic curvature of curves on a surface can be computed using the following formulae:
begin{equation}
k_n=frac{q}{s'^2} \
k_g=frac{p}{s'^3}
end{equation}
where
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+2 u' v' L_{12}+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3+(Gamma_{22}^2-2 Gamma_{12}^1) u' v'^2+(u' v''-u'' v')+(2 Gamma_{12}^2-Gamma_{11}^1)u'^2v'-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
where $Gamma_{jk}^i$ are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind, $L_{ij}$ the coefficient of the second fundamental form and g the first fundamental form. Independently of the case u=const or v=const, the product $u' v'$ are zero since or v is constant or u is constant. Thus, the above expressions reduce to:
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2+v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
end{equation}
In addition $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+2 g_{12} u'v'+g_{22}v'^2}$ reduces to $s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2+g_{22}v'^2}$. We can now consider the two cases.
- v=const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=L_{11} u'^2 \
p=left[Gamma_{11}^2 u'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}\
s'=sqrt{g_{11}u'^2}
end{equation}
- u =const
In such a case we have
begin{equation}
q=v'^2 L_{22} \
p=left[-Gamma_{22}^1 v'^3right] sqrt{Det(g)}
s'=sqrt{g_{22}v'^2}
end{equation}
When computing the non zero coefficient of the first fundamental form for $sigma$, we have $g_{11}=g_{22}=rm sech^2(u)$, while non zero coefficient of the second fundamental form are $L_{11}=L_{22}=-rm sech^2(u)$. When replacing these coefficient in the above expression we have
1. v=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=0
end{equation}
because $Gamma_{11}^2=0$. Since the geodesic curvature is zero, the curve is a geodesic.
- u=const
begin{equation}
k_n=-1 \
k_g=-rm sech{(u_0)}
end{equation}
where $u_0$ is the constant.
The definition of normal and geodesic curvature in your textbook can be written in term of p and q for practical computation.
answered 2 days ago
UpaxUpax
1,497613
1,497613
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2981352%2ffind-the-geodesic-and-normal-curvatures-of-a-surface%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown