Computing an Inverse Fourier Transform [on hold]












0














I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago










  • I could not find the table
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago










  • According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    – Noble Mushtak
    2 days ago










  • could you explain how you did it? with steps
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago
















0














I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago










  • I could not find the table
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago










  • According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    – Noble Mushtak
    2 days ago










  • could you explain how you did it? with steps
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago














0












0








0







I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.




The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$








fourier-transform






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









mrtaurho

4,05921133




4,05921133






New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









Arnold PetterssonArnold Pettersson

1




1




New contributor




Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Arnold Pettersson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago










  • I could not find the table
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago










  • According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    – Noble Mushtak
    2 days ago










  • could you explain how you did it? with steps
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
    – mrtaurho
    2 days ago










  • I could not find the table
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago










  • According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
    – Noble Mushtak
    2 days ago










  • could you explain how you did it? with steps
    – Arnold Pettersson
    2 days ago








1




1




Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago




Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago












I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago




I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago












According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago




According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago












could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago




could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






share|cite|improve this answer




























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



    $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



    However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



    $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



    Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



    $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



    At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



    $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



    Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      2














      One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



      $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



      However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



      $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



      Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



      $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



      At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



      $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



      Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        2












        2








        2






        One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



        $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



        However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



        $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



        Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



        $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



        At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



        $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



        Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:



        $$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$



        However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:



        $$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$



        Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:



        $$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$



        At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:



        $$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$



        Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak

        15.2k1735




        15.2k1735















            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            The Binding of Isaac: Rebirth/Afterbirth

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?