Computing an Inverse Fourier Transform [on hold]
I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.
The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$
fourier-transform
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.
The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$
fourier-transform
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.
The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$
fourier-transform
New contributor
I have no understanding of getting an Inverse Fourier Transform. I also if somebody has material of solving Inverse Fourier Transform would be great.
The problem is: $displaystyle F = frac1{w^2 + 9}$
fourier-transform
fourier-transform
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
mrtaurho
4,05921133
4,05921133
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
Arnold PetterssonArnold Pettersson
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – mrtaurho, metamorphy, Ali Caglayan, amWhy, Paul Frost
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
1
1
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$
However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:
$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$
Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:
$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$
At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:
$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$
Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$
However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:
$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$
Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:
$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$
At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:
$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$
Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
add a comment |
One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$
However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:
$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$
Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:
$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$
At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:
$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$
Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
add a comment |
One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$
However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:
$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$
Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:
$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$
At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:
$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$
Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
One way to do this is to set up the inverse Fourier transform formula:
$$f(t)=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty F(omega)e^{iomega t}domega=frac{1}{2pi} int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{iomega t}}{omega^2+9}domega$$
However, this integration turns out to be rather difficult. Therefore, we instead use a table of Fourier transforms, which tells us:
$$f(t)=e^{-a|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{2a}{omega^2+a^2}$$
Now, for $a=3$, this table matches the form of our $F(omega)$ very closely:
$$f(t)=e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{6}{omega^2+9}$$
At this point, we just need to get rid of the $6$ somehow. Since the Fourier transform is linear, this means if we divide $F(omega)$ by $6$, then $f(t)$ also gets divided by $6$. Thus, we have:
$$f(t)=frac 1 6e^{-3|t|} iff F(omega)=frac{1}{omega^2+9}$$
Therefore, the inverse Fourier transform of $frac{1}{omega^2+9}$ is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
answered 2 days ago
Noble MushtakNoble Mushtak
15.2k1735
15.2k1735
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
Well take a look at this table formula $207$?
– mrtaurho
2 days ago
I could not find the table
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago
According to this table, I believe the answer is $frac 1 6 e^{-3|t|}$.
– Noble Mushtak
2 days ago
could you explain how you did it? with steps
– Arnold Pettersson
2 days ago