Volume of intersection of a sphere and a paraboloid












3












$begingroup$


Could I calculate the volume of the intersection of $x^2+y^2+z^2=8$ and $4z=x^2+y^2+4$ using spherical coordinates and treating the paraboloid as a function, as in the following example?



$f(x,y)=frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2)+1=frac{1}{4}(r^2sin^2(theta)cos^2(varphi))+r^2sin^2(theta)sin^2(varphi))+1=frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta)) + 1$



Volume = $int_0^{2pi} int_0^pi int_0^sqrt{8} (frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta))+1)cdot r^2sin(theta) drdtheta dvarphi$



Should that work? I tried it and didn't get the correct result but then I'm sick and might have seen my error.



Edit: I think I am mixing something up here. Basically I just add up the values of $f$ but still integrate over a spherical volume. So the idea to restrict the integrated volume with a function doesn't work - at least not like that. Right?






calculus integration multivariable-calculus volume







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
    $endgroup$
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    Jan 7 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 7 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
    $endgroup$
    – xotix
    Jan 8 at 21:45


















3












$begingroup$


Could I calculate the volume of the intersection of $x^2+y^2+z^2=8$ and $4z=x^2+y^2+4$ using spherical coordinates and treating the paraboloid as a function, as in the following example?



$f(x,y)=frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2)+1=frac{1}{4}(r^2sin^2(theta)cos^2(varphi))+r^2sin^2(theta)sin^2(varphi))+1=frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta)) + 1$



Volume = $int_0^{2pi} int_0^pi int_0^sqrt{8} (frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta))+1)cdot r^2sin(theta) drdtheta dvarphi$



Should that work? I tried it and didn't get the correct result but then I'm sick and might have seen my error.



Edit: I think I am mixing something up here. Basically I just add up the values of $f$ but still integrate over a spherical volume. So the idea to restrict the integrated volume with a function doesn't work - at least not like that. Right?






calculus integration multivariable-calculus volume







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
    $endgroup$
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    Jan 7 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 7 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
    $endgroup$
    – xotix
    Jan 8 at 21:45
















3












3








3





$begingroup$


Could I calculate the volume of the intersection of $x^2+y^2+z^2=8$ and $4z=x^2+y^2+4$ using spherical coordinates and treating the paraboloid as a function, as in the following example?



$f(x,y)=frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2)+1=frac{1}{4}(r^2sin^2(theta)cos^2(varphi))+r^2sin^2(theta)sin^2(varphi))+1=frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta)) + 1$



Volume = $int_0^{2pi} int_0^pi int_0^sqrt{8} (frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta))+1)cdot r^2sin(theta) drdtheta dvarphi$



Should that work? I tried it and didn't get the correct result but then I'm sick and might have seen my error.



Edit: I think I am mixing something up here. Basically I just add up the values of $f$ but still integrate over a spherical volume. So the idea to restrict the integrated volume with a function doesn't work - at least not like that. Right?






calculus integration multivariable-calculus volume







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Could I calculate the volume of the intersection of $x^2+y^2+z^2=8$ and $4z=x^2+y^2+4$ using spherical coordinates and treating the paraboloid as a function, as in the following example?



$f(x,y)=frac{1}{4}(x^2+y^2)+1=frac{1}{4}(r^2sin^2(theta)cos^2(varphi))+r^2sin^2(theta)sin^2(varphi))+1=frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta)) + 1$



Volume = $int_0^{2pi} int_0^pi int_0^sqrt{8} (frac{1}{4}(r^4sin^2(theta))+1)cdot r^2sin(theta) drdtheta dvarphi$



Should that work? I tried it and didn't get the correct result but then I'm sick and might have seen my error.



Edit: I think I am mixing something up here. Basically I just add up the values of $f$ but still integrate over a spherical volume. So the idea to restrict the integrated volume with a function doesn't work - at least not like that. Right?






calculus integration multivariable-calculus volume




calculus integration multivariable-calculus volume






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 15:00









Antonios-Alexandros Robotis

9,71741640




9,71741640










asked Jan 7 at 13:34









xotixxotix

41139




41139












  • $begingroup$
    Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
    $endgroup$
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    Jan 7 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 7 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
    $endgroup$
    – xotix
    Jan 8 at 21:45




















  • $begingroup$
    Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
    $endgroup$
    – Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
    Jan 7 at 14:58










  • $begingroup$
    How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
    $endgroup$
    – Calvin Godfrey
    Jan 7 at 15:11










  • $begingroup$
    you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
    $endgroup$
    – xotix
    Jan 8 at 21:45


















$begingroup$
Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 7 at 14:58




$begingroup$
Are you asked specifically to use spherical coordinates? I think cylindrical are better here.
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 7 at 14:58












$begingroup$
How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Godfrey
Jan 7 at 15:11




$begingroup$
How are you getting $r^4sin^2{theta}$? I think it should be $r^2sin^2{theta}$.
$endgroup$
– Calvin Godfrey
Jan 7 at 15:11












$begingroup$
you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
$endgroup$
– xotix
Jan 8 at 21:45






$begingroup$
you are right @CalvinGodfrey but the whole idea is wrong anyway and yeah, with cylindrical coordinates where the parabolioid basically is the boundaries of $int dr$ is simpler. It was more about my idea, but that's just rubbish.
$endgroup$
– xotix
Jan 8 at 21:45












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

The volume of a set is the sum of the volume elements into that set! Simply $int_Omegamathbb dV$. The problem is then determine the integration limits for the set $Omega$. As suggested in the comments to your question, it seems easier set the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The limiting surfaces are $r^2+z^2=8$ for the sphere and $4z=r^2+4$ fo the paraboloid. The volume element is $r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$



You are almost in the right path when you consider the surfaces as functions. We have to do so, but for them to determine the integration limits.



We need first the intersection of these surfaces, obtained solving the system of equations formed with the equations for the surfaces



$$begin{matrix}
r^2+z^2=8\
4z=r^2+4
end{matrix}$$



$z^2+4z-12=0$ with solutions $z=-6,2$. For $z=-6$ we have $r^2=-28$ with no solutions. For $z=2$ we have $r^2=4$ giving $r=pm2$. And dropping $-2$ the intersection is a circle with $r=2$ into the plane $z=2$



Then, $r$ runs from $0$ to $2$, $z$ from $r^2/4+1$ to $sqrt{8-r^2}$ (positive root because we are over the plane $z=2$) and $theta$ runs from $0$ to $2pi$.



$$V=int_0^{2pi}int_0^2int_{r^2/4+1}^{sqrt{8-r^2}}r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065012%2fvolume-of-intersection-of-a-sphere-and-a-paraboloid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    The volume of a set is the sum of the volume elements into that set! Simply $int_Omegamathbb dV$. The problem is then determine the integration limits for the set $Omega$. As suggested in the comments to your question, it seems easier set the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The limiting surfaces are $r^2+z^2=8$ for the sphere and $4z=r^2+4$ fo the paraboloid. The volume element is $r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$



    You are almost in the right path when you consider the surfaces as functions. We have to do so, but for them to determine the integration limits.



    We need first the intersection of these surfaces, obtained solving the system of equations formed with the equations for the surfaces



    $$begin{matrix}
    r^2+z^2=8\
    4z=r^2+4
    end{matrix}$$



    $z^2+4z-12=0$ with solutions $z=-6,2$. For $z=-6$ we have $r^2=-28$ with no solutions. For $z=2$ we have $r^2=4$ giving $r=pm2$. And dropping $-2$ the intersection is a circle with $r=2$ into the plane $z=2$



    Then, $r$ runs from $0$ to $2$, $z$ from $r^2/4+1$ to $sqrt{8-r^2}$ (positive root because we are over the plane $z=2$) and $theta$ runs from $0$ to $2pi$.



    $$V=int_0^{2pi}int_0^2int_{r^2/4+1}^{sqrt{8-r^2}}r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      The volume of a set is the sum of the volume elements into that set! Simply $int_Omegamathbb dV$. The problem is then determine the integration limits for the set $Omega$. As suggested in the comments to your question, it seems easier set the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The limiting surfaces are $r^2+z^2=8$ for the sphere and $4z=r^2+4$ fo the paraboloid. The volume element is $r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$



      You are almost in the right path when you consider the surfaces as functions. We have to do so, but for them to determine the integration limits.



      We need first the intersection of these surfaces, obtained solving the system of equations formed with the equations for the surfaces



      $$begin{matrix}
      r^2+z^2=8\
      4z=r^2+4
      end{matrix}$$



      $z^2+4z-12=0$ with solutions $z=-6,2$. For $z=-6$ we have $r^2=-28$ with no solutions. For $z=2$ we have $r^2=4$ giving $r=pm2$. And dropping $-2$ the intersection is a circle with $r=2$ into the plane $z=2$



      Then, $r$ runs from $0$ to $2$, $z$ from $r^2/4+1$ to $sqrt{8-r^2}$ (positive root because we are over the plane $z=2$) and $theta$ runs from $0$ to $2pi$.



      $$V=int_0^{2pi}int_0^2int_{r^2/4+1}^{sqrt{8-r^2}}r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        The volume of a set is the sum of the volume elements into that set! Simply $int_Omegamathbb dV$. The problem is then determine the integration limits for the set $Omega$. As suggested in the comments to your question, it seems easier set the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The limiting surfaces are $r^2+z^2=8$ for the sphere and $4z=r^2+4$ fo the paraboloid. The volume element is $r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$



        You are almost in the right path when you consider the surfaces as functions. We have to do so, but for them to determine the integration limits.



        We need first the intersection of these surfaces, obtained solving the system of equations formed with the equations for the surfaces



        $$begin{matrix}
        r^2+z^2=8\
        4z=r^2+4
        end{matrix}$$



        $z^2+4z-12=0$ with solutions $z=-6,2$. For $z=-6$ we have $r^2=-28$ with no solutions. For $z=2$ we have $r^2=4$ giving $r=pm2$. And dropping $-2$ the intersection is a circle with $r=2$ into the plane $z=2$



        Then, $r$ runs from $0$ to $2$, $z$ from $r^2/4+1$ to $sqrt{8-r^2}$ (positive root because we are over the plane $z=2$) and $theta$ runs from $0$ to $2pi$.



        $$V=int_0^{2pi}int_0^2int_{r^2/4+1}^{sqrt{8-r^2}}r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The volume of a set is the sum of the volume elements into that set! Simply $int_Omegamathbb dV$. The problem is then determine the integration limits for the set $Omega$. As suggested in the comments to your question, it seems easier set the integral in cylindrical coordinates. The limiting surfaces are $r^2+z^2=8$ for the sphere and $4z=r^2+4$ fo the paraboloid. The volume element is $r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$



        You are almost in the right path when you consider the surfaces as functions. We have to do so, but for them to determine the integration limits.



        We need first the intersection of these surfaces, obtained solving the system of equations formed with the equations for the surfaces



        $$begin{matrix}
        r^2+z^2=8\
        4z=r^2+4
        end{matrix}$$



        $z^2+4z-12=0$ with solutions $z=-6,2$. For $z=-6$ we have $r^2=-28$ with no solutions. For $z=2$ we have $r^2=4$ giving $r=pm2$. And dropping $-2$ the intersection is a circle with $r=2$ into the plane $z=2$



        Then, $r$ runs from $0$ to $2$, $z$ from $r^2/4+1$ to $sqrt{8-r^2}$ (positive root because we are over the plane $z=2$) and $theta$ runs from $0$ to $2pi$.



        $$V=int_0^{2pi}int_0^2int_{r^2/4+1}^{sqrt{8-r^2}}r,mathbb dz,mathbb dr,mathbb dtheta$$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 7 at 16:18









        Rafa BudríaRafa Budría

        5,6201825




        5,6201825






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065012%2fvolume-of-intersection-of-a-sphere-and-a-paraboloid%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            Image
            Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
            Read more

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Image
            5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
            Read more

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

            Image
            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
            Read more