To specify $a,b,k$ in $acos(kx)+b$












1












$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?






functions trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06
















1












$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?






functions trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06














1












1








1





$begingroup$


If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?






functions trigonometry







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




If we have known that $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ for some $
f:(0,infty)to mathbb C$,
is there a method of choosing finite $(x,f(x))$ to know what $a,b,k$ are?






functions trigonometry




functions trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 7 at 13:03









rtybase

10.5k21533




10.5k21533










asked Jan 7 at 13:00









Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘

407




407












  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06


















  • $begingroup$
    How about k in the formula?
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Jan 7 at 13:04










  • $begingroup$
    @RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:05










  • $begingroup$
    what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
    $endgroup$
    – Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
    Jan 7 at 13:06










  • $begingroup$
    @SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
    $endgroup$
    – Yanko
    Jan 7 at 13:06
















$begingroup$
How about k in the formula?
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:04




$begingroup$
How about k in the formula?
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:04




1




1




$begingroup$
Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 7 at 13:04




$begingroup$
Not quite. You can always change $k$ to $-k$.
$endgroup$
– Robert Israel
Jan 7 at 13:04












$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:05




$begingroup$
@RobertIsrael You're absolutely right.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:05












$begingroup$
what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:06




$begingroup$
what I mean is : if there is no k, because you can determine cosx, a and b are easy to be determind. But in this case, cos x cannot be determined because of the existence of k.
$endgroup$
– Steve Cheng 鄭宗弘
Jan 7 at 13:06












$begingroup$
@SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:06




$begingroup$
@SteveCheng鄭宗弘 Looks like I was wrong. As Robert says, the function $f(x)=acos(kx)+b$ equals to the function $g(x)=acos ((-k)x)+b$ and so you can never determine $k$.
$endgroup$
– Yanko
Jan 7 at 13:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



$$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064980%2fto-specify-a-b-k-in-a-coskxb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



    $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



    from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



    Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      2












      $begingroup$

      Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



      $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



      from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



      Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



        $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



        from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



        Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Even if you require $k>0$ to avoid the sign ambiguity, there will be trouble. After eliminating $a$ and $b$ from the equations $f(x_1) = y_1$, $f(x_2) = y_2$, $f(x_3) = y_3$ you get



        $$ (y_2 - y_3) cos(k x_1) + (y_3 - y_1) cos(k x_2) + (y_1 - y_2) cos(k x_3) = 0 $$



        from which you want to determine $k$. However, the left side will usually be $0$ for infinitely many $k$. The exceptions are when one of the $x_i$, let's say $x_1$, is $0$, and $y_3-y_1$ and $y_1-y_2$ have the same sign, in which case the only way to satisfy the equation is for $cos(k x_1)$ and $cos(k x_2)$ to both be $1$, and therefore (if $x_1/x_2$ is irrational) $k = 0$.



        Thus if the answer happens to be $k = 0$ you can choose the $x_i$ and $y_i$ to prove that, but if the correct $k$ is nonzero you can't determine it.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 7 at 15:44









        Robert IsraelRobert Israel

        319k23209459




        319k23209459






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064980%2fto-specify-a-b-k-in-a-coskxb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            Image
            Please consider supporting The Cutting Room Floor on Patreon. Thanks for all your support! Mario Kart Wii From The Cutting Room Floor Jump to: navigation, search Mario Kart Wii Developer : Nintendo Publisher : Nintendo Platform : Wii Released in JP : April 10, 2008 Released in US : April 27, 2008 Released in EU : April 11, 2008 Released in AU : April 24, 2008 Released in KR : April 30, 2009 This game has unused animations. This game has unused areas. This game has unused code. This game has unused objects. This game has unused modes / minigames. This game has unused graphics. This game has unused models. This game has unused items. This game has unused music. This game has regional differences. This game has a notes page This game has a prerelease article Mario Kart Wii is the sixth game in the series (not counting Arcade editions), which intro
            Read more

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Image
            5 Does "Dominus providebit" mean "The Lord will provide" or "The Lord provides"? I once had a bit of an argument with a guy who studied Latin over that. It's an inscription that appears on the rim of some old Swiss coins that I have. meaning latin-to-english-translation grammar-identification share | improve this question edited Jan 18 at 15:27 V2Blast 105 4 asked Jan 17 at 22:49 Donald K. Donald K. 26 1
            Read more

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese

            Image
            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò In carica 1797 – 1820 Predecessore Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Successore Alfonso Litta Visconti Arese Trattamento Sua grazia Altri titoli Duca Litta Conte del Regno napoleonico d'Italia Patrizio milanese Don Nascita Milano, 2 maggio 1748 Morte Milano, 14 agosto 1820 Dinastia Litta Visconti Arese Padre Pompeo Litta Visconti Arese Madre Maria Elisabetta Visconti Borromeo Consorte Barbara Barbiano di Belgioioso Religione cattolicesimo Antonio Litta Visconti Arese , I duca Litta, VII marchese di Gambolò (Milano, 2 maggio 1748 – Milano, 14 agosto 1820), è stato un nobile e politico italiano. Composizione "Il pastore svizzero" di Pietro Morlacchi, con dedica Indice 1 Biografia 2 Onorificenze 3 Araldica 4 Albero genealogico 5 Note 6 Altri progetti Biografia | Antonio Litta Visco
            Read more