On an exercise in section 4 of Chapter I from Hartshorne's Algebraic Geometry












5












$begingroup$


It is about exercise 4.9:




Let $X$ be a projective variety of dimension $r$ in $mathbb{P}^n$ with $ngeq r+2$. Show that for suitable choice of $P notin X$ and a linear $mathbb{P}^{n-1}subseteq mathbb{P}^n$, the projection from $P$ to $mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ induces birational morphism of $X$ onto its image $X' subseteq mathbb{P}^{n-1}$. You will need (4.8A), (4.7A) and (4.6A).




Here is my thinking:



WLOG we can suppose that $X$ is an affine variety. The idea is that after a suitible change of coordinates, we can choose the hyperplane $H$ defined by $lbrace x_n=0 rbrace$ and take $P=(0,dots,0,1)$ so that the projection is defined by $(x_1,dots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,dots,x_{n-1},0)$. We want to prove that the $k$-algebra homomorphism



begin{align}
frac{k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} & hookrightarrow
frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} \
x_i & mapsto x_i
end{align}



induces an isomorphism of extensions of $k$



begin{equation}
phi:text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} right) rightarrow
text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} right)
end{equation}



Now let $K$ be the field of rational fuctions of X. Reasoning as in Proposition 4.9, it is possible to find a trascendence base such that, after changing coordinates, it is formed by rational functions $x_1,dots,x_r in K$ so that $K$ is a finite separable extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_n)$. Consider the following extensions:



begin{equation}
k subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2}) subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n]=K
end{equation}



the second one is a finite separable extension, so by (4.6A) there is a rational fuction $alpha$ which generates K as an extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})$. Furthermore, there exist $f_1,f_2,g_1,g_2 in k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ such that
begin{equation}
alpha = frac{f_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_{n-1} + frac{f_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_n
end{equation}



At this point, I would like to ask if there is some continuation in order to prove that $phi$ is surjective.



Thank you very much for your answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    5












    $begingroup$


    It is about exercise 4.9:




    Let $X$ be a projective variety of dimension $r$ in $mathbb{P}^n$ with $ngeq r+2$. Show that for suitable choice of $P notin X$ and a linear $mathbb{P}^{n-1}subseteq mathbb{P}^n$, the projection from $P$ to $mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ induces birational morphism of $X$ onto its image $X' subseteq mathbb{P}^{n-1}$. You will need (4.8A), (4.7A) and (4.6A).




    Here is my thinking:



    WLOG we can suppose that $X$ is an affine variety. The idea is that after a suitible change of coordinates, we can choose the hyperplane $H$ defined by $lbrace x_n=0 rbrace$ and take $P=(0,dots,0,1)$ so that the projection is defined by $(x_1,dots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,dots,x_{n-1},0)$. We want to prove that the $k$-algebra homomorphism



    begin{align}
    frac{k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} & hookrightarrow
    frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} \
    x_i & mapsto x_i
    end{align}



    induces an isomorphism of extensions of $k$



    begin{equation}
    phi:text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} right) rightarrow
    text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} right)
    end{equation}



    Now let $K$ be the field of rational fuctions of X. Reasoning as in Proposition 4.9, it is possible to find a trascendence base such that, after changing coordinates, it is formed by rational functions $x_1,dots,x_r in K$ so that $K$ is a finite separable extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_n)$. Consider the following extensions:



    begin{equation}
    k subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2}) subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n]=K
    end{equation}



    the second one is a finite separable extension, so by (4.6A) there is a rational fuction $alpha$ which generates K as an extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})$. Furthermore, there exist $f_1,f_2,g_1,g_2 in k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ such that
    begin{equation}
    alpha = frac{f_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_{n-1} + frac{f_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_n
    end{equation}



    At this point, I would like to ask if there is some continuation in order to prove that $phi$ is surjective.



    Thank you very much for your answers.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      It is about exercise 4.9:




      Let $X$ be a projective variety of dimension $r$ in $mathbb{P}^n$ with $ngeq r+2$. Show that for suitable choice of $P notin X$ and a linear $mathbb{P}^{n-1}subseteq mathbb{P}^n$, the projection from $P$ to $mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ induces birational morphism of $X$ onto its image $X' subseteq mathbb{P}^{n-1}$. You will need (4.8A), (4.7A) and (4.6A).




      Here is my thinking:



      WLOG we can suppose that $X$ is an affine variety. The idea is that after a suitible change of coordinates, we can choose the hyperplane $H$ defined by $lbrace x_n=0 rbrace$ and take $P=(0,dots,0,1)$ so that the projection is defined by $(x_1,dots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,dots,x_{n-1},0)$. We want to prove that the $k$-algebra homomorphism



      begin{align}
      frac{k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} & hookrightarrow
      frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} \
      x_i & mapsto x_i
      end{align}



      induces an isomorphism of extensions of $k$



      begin{equation}
      phi:text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} right) rightarrow
      text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} right)
      end{equation}



      Now let $K$ be the field of rational fuctions of X. Reasoning as in Proposition 4.9, it is possible to find a trascendence base such that, after changing coordinates, it is formed by rational functions $x_1,dots,x_r in K$ so that $K$ is a finite separable extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_n)$. Consider the following extensions:



      begin{equation}
      k subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2}) subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n]=K
      end{equation}



      the second one is a finite separable extension, so by (4.6A) there is a rational fuction $alpha$ which generates K as an extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})$. Furthermore, there exist $f_1,f_2,g_1,g_2 in k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ such that
      begin{equation}
      alpha = frac{f_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_{n-1} + frac{f_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_n
      end{equation}



      At this point, I would like to ask if there is some continuation in order to prove that $phi$ is surjective.



      Thank you very much for your answers.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      It is about exercise 4.9:




      Let $X$ be a projective variety of dimension $r$ in $mathbb{P}^n$ with $ngeq r+2$. Show that for suitable choice of $P notin X$ and a linear $mathbb{P}^{n-1}subseteq mathbb{P}^n$, the projection from $P$ to $mathbb{P}^{n-1}$ induces birational morphism of $X$ onto its image $X' subseteq mathbb{P}^{n-1}$. You will need (4.8A), (4.7A) and (4.6A).




      Here is my thinking:



      WLOG we can suppose that $X$ is an affine variety. The idea is that after a suitible change of coordinates, we can choose the hyperplane $H$ defined by $lbrace x_n=0 rbrace$ and take $P=(0,dots,0,1)$ so that the projection is defined by $(x_1,dots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,dots,x_{n-1},0)$. We want to prove that the $k$-algebra homomorphism



      begin{align}
      frac{k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} & hookrightarrow
      frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} \
      x_i & mapsto x_i
      end{align}



      induces an isomorphism of extensions of $k$



      begin{equation}
      phi:text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)cap k[x_1,dots,x_{n-1}]} right) rightarrow
      text{Frac} left( frac{k[x_1,dots,x_n]}{mathcal{I}(X)} right)
      end{equation}



      Now let $K$ be the field of rational fuctions of X. Reasoning as in Proposition 4.9, it is possible to find a trascendence base such that, after changing coordinates, it is formed by rational functions $x_1,dots,x_r in K$ so that $K$ is a finite separable extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_n)$. Consider the following extensions:



      begin{equation}
      k subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2}) subseteq k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n]=K
      end{equation}



      the second one is a finite separable extension, so by (4.6A) there is a rational fuction $alpha$ which generates K as an extension of $k(x_1,dots,x_r,x_{r+1},dots,x_{n-2})$. Furthermore, there exist $f_1,f_2,g_1,g_2 in k[x_1,dots,x_n]$ such that
      begin{equation}
      alpha = frac{f_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_1(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_{n-1} + frac{f_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}{g_2(x_1,dots,x_{n-2})}x_n
      end{equation}



      At this point, I would like to ask if there is some continuation in order to prove that $phi$ is surjective.



      Thank you very much for your answers.







      algebraic-geometry extension-field projective-geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 7 at 13:03







      Javier Linares

















      asked Dec 14 '18 at 18:00









      Javier LinaresJavier Linares

      687




      687






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          We assume $r = n-2$ and that we have $x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}$ algebraically independent over $k$ (selected from $X_1/X_0,ldots, X_n/X_0$):



          $$K(X) = K = k(x_1,ldots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n] = F[x_{n-1},x_n]$$



          with $x_{n-1}, x_{n}$ algebraic and separable over $F$.
          We assume, that $x_{n-1}$ and $x_n$ are linear independent over $k$ otherwise everything would be even easier.



          Consider the linear expression
          $(1-t) x_{n-1} + t x_n = x(t)$ with $t in k$. Let $sigma_1,ldots, sigma_d:K to bar{F}$ be the different embeddings over $F$ of $K$ into the algebraic closure of $F$. Call $W_{ij}$ the $F$-vector space of $x in K$ with $sigma_i(x) = sigma_j(x)$.



          Then $x(t)$ can not lie in a single $W_{ij}$ for all $t$, because otherwise $sigma_i$ would be equal to $sigma_j$ on $K$. So the intersection of $W_{ij}$ with the $x(t)$ is in an affine subspace of $k$, that is in a single $t_{ij}$. Assuming that $k$ is an infinite field (true because $k$ is assumed algebraically closed), we conclude, there is a $t' in k$, such that



          $$x(t') = (1-t') x_{n-1} + t' x_n = alpha$$



          is in no $W_{ij}$ and therefore generates $K$ algebraically over $F$.
          This gives the coefficients of a linear projection:



          $$(x_1,ldots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}, x(t'), 0)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039716%2fon-an-exercise-in-section-4-of-chapter-i-from-hartshornes-algebraic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            We assume $r = n-2$ and that we have $x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}$ algebraically independent over $k$ (selected from $X_1/X_0,ldots, X_n/X_0$):



            $$K(X) = K = k(x_1,ldots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n] = F[x_{n-1},x_n]$$



            with $x_{n-1}, x_{n}$ algebraic and separable over $F$.
            We assume, that $x_{n-1}$ and $x_n$ are linear independent over $k$ otherwise everything would be even easier.



            Consider the linear expression
            $(1-t) x_{n-1} + t x_n = x(t)$ with $t in k$. Let $sigma_1,ldots, sigma_d:K to bar{F}$ be the different embeddings over $F$ of $K$ into the algebraic closure of $F$. Call $W_{ij}$ the $F$-vector space of $x in K$ with $sigma_i(x) = sigma_j(x)$.



            Then $x(t)$ can not lie in a single $W_{ij}$ for all $t$, because otherwise $sigma_i$ would be equal to $sigma_j$ on $K$. So the intersection of $W_{ij}$ with the $x(t)$ is in an affine subspace of $k$, that is in a single $t_{ij}$. Assuming that $k$ is an infinite field (true because $k$ is assumed algebraically closed), we conclude, there is a $t' in k$, such that



            $$x(t') = (1-t') x_{n-1} + t' x_n = alpha$$



            is in no $W_{ij}$ and therefore generates $K$ algebraically over $F$.
            This gives the coefficients of a linear projection:



            $$(x_1,ldots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}, x(t'), 0)$$






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              We assume $r = n-2$ and that we have $x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}$ algebraically independent over $k$ (selected from $X_1/X_0,ldots, X_n/X_0$):



              $$K(X) = K = k(x_1,ldots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n] = F[x_{n-1},x_n]$$



              with $x_{n-1}, x_{n}$ algebraic and separable over $F$.
              We assume, that $x_{n-1}$ and $x_n$ are linear independent over $k$ otherwise everything would be even easier.



              Consider the linear expression
              $(1-t) x_{n-1} + t x_n = x(t)$ with $t in k$. Let $sigma_1,ldots, sigma_d:K to bar{F}$ be the different embeddings over $F$ of $K$ into the algebraic closure of $F$. Call $W_{ij}$ the $F$-vector space of $x in K$ with $sigma_i(x) = sigma_j(x)$.



              Then $x(t)$ can not lie in a single $W_{ij}$ for all $t$, because otherwise $sigma_i$ would be equal to $sigma_j$ on $K$. So the intersection of $W_{ij}$ with the $x(t)$ is in an affine subspace of $k$, that is in a single $t_{ij}$. Assuming that $k$ is an infinite field (true because $k$ is assumed algebraically closed), we conclude, there is a $t' in k$, such that



              $$x(t') = (1-t') x_{n-1} + t' x_n = alpha$$



              is in no $W_{ij}$ and therefore generates $K$ algebraically over $F$.
              This gives the coefficients of a linear projection:



              $$(x_1,ldots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}, x(t'), 0)$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                We assume $r = n-2$ and that we have $x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}$ algebraically independent over $k$ (selected from $X_1/X_0,ldots, X_n/X_0$):



                $$K(X) = K = k(x_1,ldots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n] = F[x_{n-1},x_n]$$



                with $x_{n-1}, x_{n}$ algebraic and separable over $F$.
                We assume, that $x_{n-1}$ and $x_n$ are linear independent over $k$ otherwise everything would be even easier.



                Consider the linear expression
                $(1-t) x_{n-1} + t x_n = x(t)$ with $t in k$. Let $sigma_1,ldots, sigma_d:K to bar{F}$ be the different embeddings over $F$ of $K$ into the algebraic closure of $F$. Call $W_{ij}$ the $F$-vector space of $x in K$ with $sigma_i(x) = sigma_j(x)$.



                Then $x(t)$ can not lie in a single $W_{ij}$ for all $t$, because otherwise $sigma_i$ would be equal to $sigma_j$ on $K$. So the intersection of $W_{ij}$ with the $x(t)$ is in an affine subspace of $k$, that is in a single $t_{ij}$. Assuming that $k$ is an infinite field (true because $k$ is assumed algebraically closed), we conclude, there is a $t' in k$, such that



                $$x(t') = (1-t') x_{n-1} + t' x_n = alpha$$



                is in no $W_{ij}$ and therefore generates $K$ algebraically over $F$.
                This gives the coefficients of a linear projection:



                $$(x_1,ldots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}, x(t'), 0)$$






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                We assume $r = n-2$ and that we have $x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}$ algebraically independent over $k$ (selected from $X_1/X_0,ldots, X_n/X_0$):



                $$K(X) = K = k(x_1,ldots,x_{n-2})[x_{n-1},x_n] = F[x_{n-1},x_n]$$



                with $x_{n-1}, x_{n}$ algebraic and separable over $F$.
                We assume, that $x_{n-1}$ and $x_n$ are linear independent over $k$ otherwise everything would be even easier.



                Consider the linear expression
                $(1-t) x_{n-1} + t x_n = x(t)$ with $t in k$. Let $sigma_1,ldots, sigma_d:K to bar{F}$ be the different embeddings over $F$ of $K$ into the algebraic closure of $F$. Call $W_{ij}$ the $F$-vector space of $x in K$ with $sigma_i(x) = sigma_j(x)$.



                Then $x(t)$ can not lie in a single $W_{ij}$ for all $t$, because otherwise $sigma_i$ would be equal to $sigma_j$ on $K$. So the intersection of $W_{ij}$ with the $x(t)$ is in an affine subspace of $k$, that is in a single $t_{ij}$. Assuming that $k$ is an infinite field (true because $k$ is assumed algebraically closed), we conclude, there is a $t' in k$, such that



                $$x(t') = (1-t') x_{n-1} + t' x_n = alpha$$



                is in no $W_{ij}$ and therefore generates $K$ algebraically over $F$.
                This gives the coefficients of a linear projection:



                $$(x_1,ldots,x_n) mapsto (x_1,ldots,x_{n-2}, x(t'), 0)$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 16 '18 at 20:09

























                answered Dec 16 '18 at 17:15









                Jürgen BöhmJürgen Böhm

                2,258411




                2,258411






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3039716%2fon-an-exercise-in-section-4-of-chapter-i-from-hartshornes-algebraic-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese