If I have a polynom $P(x)$, which zeros have the absolute value $q^{-(frac{n-1}{2})}$. Why is this an accord...
1
$begingroup$
You can read the question above. So I'm really " new in terms of Riemann hypothesis". I have read about the hypothesis in wikipedia. So I know the statement of the Hypothesis : The Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac{1}{2}$. but I dont understand why the statement in the title is an accord for this hypothesis? $q$ is the number of elements in $F$, a finite field.
Thank you for explanation.
number-theory riemann-zeta riemann-hypothesis
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
$endgroup$
|
show 3 more comments
1
$begingroup$
You can read the question above. So I'm really " new in terms of Riemann hypothesis". I have read about the hypothesis in wikipedia. So I know the statement of the Hypothesis : The Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac{1}{2}$. but I dont understand why the statement in the title is an accord for this hypothesis? $q$ is the number of elements in $F$, a finite field.
Thank you for explanation.
number-theory riemann-zeta riemann-hypothesis
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
2
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
1
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17
|
show 3 more comments
1
1
1
$begingroup$
You can read the question above. So I'm really " new in terms of Riemann hypothesis". I have read about the hypothesis in wikipedia. So I know the statement of the Hypothesis : The Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac{1}{2}$. but I dont understand why the statement in the title is an accord for this hypothesis? $q$ is the number of elements in $F$, a finite field.
Thank you for explanation.
number-theory riemann-zeta riemann-hypothesis
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
$endgroup$
You can read the question above. So I'm really " new in terms of Riemann hypothesis". I have read about the hypothesis in wikipedia. So I know the statement of the Hypothesis : The Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac{1}{2}$. but I dont understand why the statement in the title is an accord for this hypothesis? $q$ is the number of elements in $F$, a finite field.
Thank you for explanation.
number-theory riemann-zeta riemann-hypothesis
number-theory riemann-zeta riemann-hypothesis
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
edited Jan 9 at 20:04
RukiaKuchiki
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
asked Jan 9 at 19:34
RukiaKuchikiRukiaKuchiki
337211
337211
3
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
2
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
1
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17
|
show 3 more comments
3
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
2
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
1
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17
3
3
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
2
2
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
1
1
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
1
1
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
1
1
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17
|
show 3 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067864%2fif-i-have-a-polynom-px-which-zeros-have-the-absolute-value-q-fracn-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3067864%2fif-i-have-a-polynom-px-which-zeros-have-the-absolute-value-q-fracn-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
"I know that the Riemann Zeta Function has its zeros only at the negative even integers and complex numbers with real part $frac12$." - Actually, nobody else knows that
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Jan 9 at 19:47
2
$begingroup$
This follows just by a change of variables. This gives the direct analogue of RH (which is for the usual zeta function), i.e., the fact that the roots of $Z_f(u)$ have absolute value $q^{-(n-1)/2}$ is equivalent to the fact that the roots of $zeta_f(s)$ have real part $1/2$.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 19:50
1
$begingroup$
Very poor choice of words, Hagen von Eitzen. I meant I know the statement of the Hypothesis. @DietrichBurde oh. Interesting. Do you have a source where I can see the change of variables for your claim ? :)
$endgroup$
– RukiaKuchiki
Jan 9 at 20:02
1
$begingroup$
The change is $u=q^{-s}$. See "Weil conjectures" in Wikipedia, or at Terry Tao's blog, among other references. You should perhaps clarify your question and give a link to the article you were reading.
$endgroup$
– Dietrich Burde
Jan 9 at 20:08
1
$begingroup$
You should look at the local and global zeta and L-functions of elliptic curves (over finite fields and over $mathbb{Q}$) and search about the analytic continuation, functional equations and Riemann hypothesis of each one (the local and global Riemann hypothesis are analytically unrelated, by you'll see why the wording are the same and how certain concepts transfer from the local to the global case)
$endgroup$
– reuns
Jan 9 at 20:17