Generalized stereographic projection












0












$begingroup$


Let $(M^n,g)$ be a closed (compact, without boundary) Riemannian manifold and let $pin M$. Let
$$
square: =cDelta+S
$$

be the conformal Laplacian of $(M,g)$. Here $c=4frac{n-1}{n-2}$ is a constant, $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $S$ is the scalar curvature defined by $g$. Lastly, let $G_p:Msetminus {p}to mathbb{R}$ be the Green function of $square$, so $square, G_p=0$ everywhere on $Msetminus {p}$. See here for a discussion of the conformal Laplacian $square$ and its Green function $G_p$.



If $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, then the generalized stereographic projection of $(M,g)$ is defined to be the Riemannian manifold $(hat{M},hat{g})$, where
$$
hat{M}=Msetminus {p} qquad text{and} qquad hat{g}=G_p^{k-2}g,
$$

and $k=2n/(n-2)$ is a constant. This is well defined when $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, since in this case the Green function $G_p$ is strictly positive.



Question 1: If $ngeq 4$, is the Riemannian metric $hat{g}$ on $hat{M}$ complete?



I suspect this is the case as Lee and Parker prove that metric $hat{g}$ is asymptotically flat of order at least 2.



My second question is related to the curvature properties of $(hat{M},hat{g})$. Note that $(hat{M},hat{g})$ has zero scalar curvature, as follows from the fact that $square, G_p=0$.



Question 2: How is the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$ related to the Ricci curvature of $g$? More specifically, if $g$ has Ricci curvature bounded above or below, does this give bounds on the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Jan 12 at 22:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Carapetis
    Jan 13 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
    $endgroup$
    – rpf
    Jan 16 at 15:30
















0












$begingroup$


Let $(M^n,g)$ be a closed (compact, without boundary) Riemannian manifold and let $pin M$. Let
$$
square: =cDelta+S
$$

be the conformal Laplacian of $(M,g)$. Here $c=4frac{n-1}{n-2}$ is a constant, $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $S$ is the scalar curvature defined by $g$. Lastly, let $G_p:Msetminus {p}to mathbb{R}$ be the Green function of $square$, so $square, G_p=0$ everywhere on $Msetminus {p}$. See here for a discussion of the conformal Laplacian $square$ and its Green function $G_p$.



If $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, then the generalized stereographic projection of $(M,g)$ is defined to be the Riemannian manifold $(hat{M},hat{g})$, where
$$
hat{M}=Msetminus {p} qquad text{and} qquad hat{g}=G_p^{k-2}g,
$$

and $k=2n/(n-2)$ is a constant. This is well defined when $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, since in this case the Green function $G_p$ is strictly positive.



Question 1: If $ngeq 4$, is the Riemannian metric $hat{g}$ on $hat{M}$ complete?



I suspect this is the case as Lee and Parker prove that metric $hat{g}$ is asymptotically flat of order at least 2.



My second question is related to the curvature properties of $(hat{M},hat{g})$. Note that $(hat{M},hat{g})$ has zero scalar curvature, as follows from the fact that $square, G_p=0$.



Question 2: How is the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$ related to the Ricci curvature of $g$? More specifically, if $g$ has Ricci curvature bounded above or below, does this give bounds on the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Jan 12 at 22:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Carapetis
    Jan 13 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
    $endgroup$
    – rpf
    Jan 16 at 15:30














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $(M^n,g)$ be a closed (compact, without boundary) Riemannian manifold and let $pin M$. Let
$$
square: =cDelta+S
$$

be the conformal Laplacian of $(M,g)$. Here $c=4frac{n-1}{n-2}$ is a constant, $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $S$ is the scalar curvature defined by $g$. Lastly, let $G_p:Msetminus {p}to mathbb{R}$ be the Green function of $square$, so $square, G_p=0$ everywhere on $Msetminus {p}$. See here for a discussion of the conformal Laplacian $square$ and its Green function $G_p$.



If $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, then the generalized stereographic projection of $(M,g)$ is defined to be the Riemannian manifold $(hat{M},hat{g})$, where
$$
hat{M}=Msetminus {p} qquad text{and} qquad hat{g}=G_p^{k-2}g,
$$

and $k=2n/(n-2)$ is a constant. This is well defined when $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, since in this case the Green function $G_p$ is strictly positive.



Question 1: If $ngeq 4$, is the Riemannian metric $hat{g}$ on $hat{M}$ complete?



I suspect this is the case as Lee and Parker prove that metric $hat{g}$ is asymptotically flat of order at least 2.



My second question is related to the curvature properties of $(hat{M},hat{g})$. Note that $(hat{M},hat{g})$ has zero scalar curvature, as follows from the fact that $square, G_p=0$.



Question 2: How is the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$ related to the Ricci curvature of $g$? More specifically, if $g$ has Ricci curvature bounded above or below, does this give bounds on the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $(M^n,g)$ be a closed (compact, without boundary) Riemannian manifold and let $pin M$. Let
$$
square: =cDelta+S
$$

be the conformal Laplacian of $(M,g)$. Here $c=4frac{n-1}{n-2}$ is a constant, $Delta$ is the Laplacian and $S$ is the scalar curvature defined by $g$. Lastly, let $G_p:Msetminus {p}to mathbb{R}$ be the Green function of $square$, so $square, G_p=0$ everywhere on $Msetminus {p}$. See here for a discussion of the conformal Laplacian $square$ and its Green function $G_p$.



If $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, then the generalized stereographic projection of $(M,g)$ is defined to be the Riemannian manifold $(hat{M},hat{g})$, where
$$
hat{M}=Msetminus {p} qquad text{and} qquad hat{g}=G_p^{k-2}g,
$$

and $k=2n/(n-2)$ is a constant. This is well defined when $(M,g)$ has positive scalar curvature, since in this case the Green function $G_p$ is strictly positive.



Question 1: If $ngeq 4$, is the Riemannian metric $hat{g}$ on $hat{M}$ complete?



I suspect this is the case as Lee and Parker prove that metric $hat{g}$ is asymptotically flat of order at least 2.



My second question is related to the curvature properties of $(hat{M},hat{g})$. Note that $(hat{M},hat{g})$ has zero scalar curvature, as follows from the fact that $square, G_p=0$.



Question 2: How is the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$ related to the Ricci curvature of $g$? More specifically, if $g$ has Ricci curvature bounded above or below, does this give bounds on the Ricci curvature of $hat{g}$?







geometry differential-geometry riemannian-geometry smooth-manifolds






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 16 at 15:28







rpf

















asked Jan 12 at 22:14









rpfrpf

1,090512




1,090512












  • $begingroup$
    A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Jan 12 at 22:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Carapetis
    Jan 13 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
    $endgroup$
    – rpf
    Jan 16 at 15:30


















  • $begingroup$
    A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
    $endgroup$
    – Jean Marie
    Jan 12 at 22:40






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
    $endgroup$
    – Anthony Carapetis
    Jan 13 at 7:08










  • $begingroup$
    @JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
    $endgroup$
    – rpf
    Jan 16 at 15:30
















$begingroup$
A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Jan 12 at 22:40




$begingroup$
A naive question : is classical stereographic projection from the sphere minus one of its pole to a plane really a particular case of what you explain ?
$endgroup$
– Jean Marie
Jan 12 at 22:40




1




1




$begingroup$
You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jan 13 at 7:08




$begingroup$
You can establish an asymptotic estimate for $G_p$ near $p,$ which in particular lets you bound it from below by $r^k$ for some constant $k(n).$ (You should definitely be able to find this in Lee-Parker.) You can then verify completeness of the metric by using this bound to show that the length of any curve approaching $p$ is infinite.
$endgroup$
– Anthony Carapetis
Jan 13 at 7:08












$begingroup$
@JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
$endgroup$
– rpf
Jan 16 at 15:30




$begingroup$
@JeanMarie: this is explained very nicely in Section 6 of Lee and Parker's paper (see hyperlink in my question).
$endgroup$
– rpf
Jan 16 at 15:30










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071449%2fgeneralized-stereographic-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071449%2fgeneralized-stereographic-projection%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

Antonio Litta Visconti Arese