Absolute extrema of $f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$ on the paraboloid $x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$
$begingroup$
I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.
First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.
At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?
Thanks for your help !
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.
First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.
At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?
Thanks for your help !
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
1
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
1
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.
First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.
At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?
Thanks for your help !
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier
$endgroup$
I'm asked to find the global (=absolute) extremas of the function $$f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xz$$ on the domain $$x^2+y^2 leq zleq1$$ which is obviously a paraboloid.
First, I find the extremas in the inside of the domain $$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=(0,0,0)$$ and I get the trivial solution $$x=y=z=0$$. Then I thought about using Lagrange multiplier for the border with constraint $$g(x,y,z)=x^2+y^2-z$$ where where $z leq 1$. So :
$$nabla f=(y,x-z,x-y)=lambda nabla g=lambda(2x,2y,-1)$$ and $$x^2+y^2=z$$ After a bit of solving, I get $y=frac{x}{2x-1}$ and $z=x^2(1+frac{1}{(2x-1)^2})$.
At that point, the problem is that expecially the $x$ equivalence of $z$ seems a bit tricky, so I'm not sure if a made any mistake, took the wrong path or if there is an easier way to proceed in this situation. So my question is if my approach is correct, and if so, how should I proceed next, and also if there is an easier way to proceed on that conic domain than with Lagrange multiplier ?
Thanks for your help !
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier
real-analysis calculus analysis multivariable-calculus lagrange-multiplier
edited Jan 7 at 19:24
Poujh
asked Dec 15 '18 at 19:09
PoujhPoujh
569516
569516
1
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
1
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
1
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30
|
show 4 more comments
1
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
1
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
1
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30
1
1
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
1
1
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
1
1
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30
|
show 4 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.
Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$
We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$
To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.
Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.
Analysis of the minimum.
If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.
Analysis of the maximum.
The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}
For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Interior Critical Points
Let
$$
f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
$$
To find an interior critical point, we need
$$
begin{align}
0
&=delta f\
&=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
end{align}
$$
for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
$$
Surface of the Paraboloid
On the paraboloid
$$
x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
$$
the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
$$
2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
$$
Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
$$
frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
$$
3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
$$
x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
$$
Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
$$
(x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
$$
Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
$$
which has no real solutions.
Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
6x^2-x=0tag{11}
$$
which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
$$
Interior of the Base
On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.
Edge of the Base
Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
$$
y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
$$
Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
$$
x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
$$
Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
$$
left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
$$
where
$$
begin{align}
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
end{align}tag{16}
$$
The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
$$
-sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041826%2fabsolute-extrema-of-fx-y-z-xy-yzxz-on-the-paraboloid-x2y2-leq-z-leq1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.
Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$
We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$
To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.
Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.
Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$
We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$
To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.
Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.
Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$
We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$
To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.
Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.
$endgroup$
We first find any critical point in the interior of the domain, which is $x^2 + y^2 < 1.$ So we have $f'(x, y, z) = (y + z, x - z, x - y)$ and $f'(x, y, z) = 0$ can only happen when $x = y = z$ and $y = -z,$ so $x = y = z = 0,$ but this is not in the interior of the domain. Hence, there are no critical points.
Consider now one part of the frontrier, the one defined by $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ Hence we have to maximise $u(x, y) = f(x, y, 1) = x + xy - y$ with $x^2 + y^2 = 1.$ Set $g(x, y) = x^2 + y^2 - 1.$ Since $g'(x, y) = (2x, 2y),$ the derivative of $g$ is never zero and the Lagrange multipliers method apply. We have to solve $u'(x, y) = dfrac{lambda}{2} g'(x, y),$ which signifies $(1 + y, x - 1) = lambda (x, y).$ Observe that $x = 1$ implies $y = 0$ and so we can consider the point $(1, 0)$ as one of the critical points in the restriction. Putting it aside, we have (by division), $dfrac{1 + y}{x - 1} = dfrac{x}{y}$ or else $y + y^2 = x^2 - x = 1 -y^2 - x$ or $x = 1 - 2y^2 - y.$ From the relation $x^2 + y^2 = 1$ we get $1 + 4y^4 + y^2 - 4y^2-2y+y^2 = 1,$ that is, $4y^4-2y^2-2y=0$ which leads to $y = 0$ (and hence $x = 1$) or else $2y^3-y-1=0.$ By inspection, we can factor $(y - 1)(2y^2+2y+1) = 0$ and the only solution is $y = 1$ with $x = -3,$ which is not in the restriction. Hence, we got only one point so far $(1, 0, 1).$
We finally tackle the other part of the restriction, which is $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ Here we solve $f'(x, y, z) = lambda (2x, 2y, -1)$ and this leads to (upon summing) $y + x = 2lambda(x + y)$ and $y - x = lambda.$ If $x = -y,$ then $z = 2x^2 leq 1$ and we are optimising $h(x) = f(x, -x, 2x^2) = 4x^3 - x^2$ for $|x| leq dfrac{1}{2}$ and the optimisers for $h$ are $x = -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ and $x = sqrt{2} - dfrac{1}{2},$ this allow deducing the critical points for $f$ to be $left(-dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right)$ and $left(dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, -dfrac{1}{sqrt{2}}, 1right).$ If $x neq -y,$ then $lambda = dfrac{1}{2}$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2}.$ Again, substituting $x^2 + y^2 = z leq 1$ leads to the point (details ommited) $left(-dfrac{1+sqrt{7}}{4}, dfrac{1 - sqrt{7}}{4}, 1right).$
To terminate the problem, recall the region is compact and evaluate in each of the four points.
Take my calculations with a grain of salt, I did them and checked them twice, but with calculus of several variables, I always commit arithmetic errors.
answered Dec 15 '18 at 20:39
Will M.Will M.
2,445314
2,445314
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Before even reading your answer, thanks a lot already for taking the time for this horrible problem !
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 20:41
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
$begingroup$
Just a question, shouldn't $|x|$ be $leq frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$ in the last part ?
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:07
1
1
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
I got the equation $2x^2 + x - dfrac{3}{4} leq 0.$
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:11
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
Could you just show how you got that inequality ? I still have some troubles to find it. Thanks
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 21:35
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
$begingroup$
You have $x neq -y$ and $y = x + dfrac{1}{2},$ hence $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1$ (since we are in the frontier) and substitute.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 21:49
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.
Analysis of the minimum.
If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.
Analysis of the maximum.
The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}
For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.
Analysis of the minimum.
If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.
Analysis of the maximum.
The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}
For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.
Analysis of the minimum.
If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.
Analysis of the maximum.
The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}
For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.
$endgroup$
Substitute $x = u - v$ and $y = u + v$ (thus $x^2 + y^2 = 2u^2 + 2v^2$). We extremize $$xy - yz + xz = u^2 - v^2 - 2vz = u^2 - (v + z)^2 + z^2$$
subject to the constraints $2u^2 + 2v^2 leq z leq 1$. Denote this rewritten function $f(u, v, z)$.
Analysis of the minimum.
If $v$ and $z$ are fixed, then $f$ is minimized at $u=0$. Minimizing $f$ for a fixed $z$ (but not $v$) is thus equivalent to maximizing $(v + z)^2$ over $0 leq v leq sqrt{z/2}$. This happens when $v$ is as large as possible, giving a minimum for fixed $z$ of $f(0, sqrt{z/2}, z) = - sqrt{2} z^{3/2} - frac{z}{2}$. The minimum over the whole region is thus $-frac{1}{2} - sqrt{2}$, attained at $(u, v, z) = (0, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (-sqrt{1/2}, sqrt{1/2}, 1)$.
Analysis of the maximum.
The maximum of $f(u, v, z)$ for fixed $z$ is on the boundary $u^2 + v^2 = z/2$; otherwise, we could increase $f$ by making $|u|$ larger. Thus we can substitute $u^2 = z/2 - v^2$ in
begin{align*}
f(u, v, z) &= u^2 - v^2 - 2vz \
&= frac{z}{2} - 2v^2 - 2vz \
&= -2 left(v + frac{z}{2} right)^2 + frac{z^2 + z}{2}.
end{align*}
For a fixed $z$, the maximum of $f$ is $frac{z^2 + z}{2}$, given at $v = -z/2$. (This point always falls within the constraints: $v^2 = z^2/4 < z/2$ for all $z in [0, 2]$.) The maximum over the entire region, therefore, is $1$, given by $(u, v, z) = (1/2, -1/2, 1)$, viz. $(x, y, z) = (1, 0, 1)$.
edited Jan 7 at 20:34
answered Jan 7 at 20:20
Connor HarrisConnor Harris
4,350724
4,350724
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Interior Critical Points
Let
$$
f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
$$
To find an interior critical point, we need
$$
begin{align}
0
&=delta f\
&=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
end{align}
$$
for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
$$
Surface of the Paraboloid
On the paraboloid
$$
x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
$$
the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
$$
2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
$$
Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
$$
frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
$$
3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
$$
x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
$$
Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
$$
(x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
$$
Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
$$
which has no real solutions.
Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
6x^2-x=0tag{11}
$$
which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
$$
Interior of the Base
On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.
Edge of the Base
Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
$$
y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
$$
Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
$$
x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
$$
Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
$$
left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
$$
where
$$
begin{align}
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
end{align}tag{16}
$$
The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
$$
-sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Interior Critical Points
Let
$$
f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
$$
To find an interior critical point, we need
$$
begin{align}
0
&=delta f\
&=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
end{align}
$$
for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
$$
Surface of the Paraboloid
On the paraboloid
$$
x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
$$
the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
$$
2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
$$
Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
$$
frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
$$
3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
$$
x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
$$
Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
$$
(x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
$$
Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
$$
which has no real solutions.
Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
6x^2-x=0tag{11}
$$
which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
$$
Interior of the Base
On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.
Edge of the Base
Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
$$
y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
$$
Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
$$
x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
$$
Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
$$
left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
$$
where
$$
begin{align}
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
end{align}tag{16}
$$
The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
$$
-sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Interior Critical Points
Let
$$
f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
$$
To find an interior critical point, we need
$$
begin{align}
0
&=delta f\
&=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
end{align}
$$
for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
$$
Surface of the Paraboloid
On the paraboloid
$$
x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
$$
the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
$$
2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
$$
Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
$$
frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
$$
3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
$$
x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
$$
Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
$$
(x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
$$
Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
$$
which has no real solutions.
Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
6x^2-x=0tag{11}
$$
which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
$$
Interior of the Base
On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.
Edge of the Base
Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
$$
y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
$$
Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
$$
x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
$$
Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
$$
left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
$$
where
$$
begin{align}
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
end{align}tag{16}
$$
The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
$$
-sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
$$
$endgroup$
Interior Critical Points
Let
$$
f(x,y,z)=xy-yz+xztag1
$$
To find an interior critical point, we need
$$
begin{align}
0
&=delta f\
&=(y+z),delta x+(x-z),delta y+(x-y),delta ztag2
end{align}
$$
for all $delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$. Thus, the only interior critical point is $x=y=z=0$ and
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f(0,0,0)=0}tag3
$$
Surface of the Paraboloid
On the paraboloid
$$
x^2+y^2-z=0tag4
$$
the allowable variations ($delta x$, $delta y$, and $delta z$) satisfy
$$
2x,delta x+2y,delta y-delta z=0tag5
$$
Orthogonality says that at the points for which the variations that satisfy $(5)$ also satisfy $(3)$, we have
$$
frac{y+z}{2x}=frac{x-z}{2y}=y-xtag6
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{y+z}{2x}=y-x$, we get
$$
3x^2-2xy+y^2+y=0tag7
$$
Applying $x^2+y^2=z$ and $frac{x-z}{2y}=y-x$, we get
$$
x^2-2xy+3y^2-x=0tag8
$$
Subtracting $(8)$ from $(7)$ yields
$$
(x+y)(2x-2y+1)=0tag9
$$
Plugging $y=x+frac12$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
2x^2+x+tfrac34=0tag{10}
$$
which has no real solutions.
Plugging $y=-x$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
6x^2-x=0tag{11}
$$
which gives the critical points $(0,0,0)$, which was considered in $(3)$, and $left(frac16,-frac16,frac1{18}right)$ where
$$
bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac16,-tfrac16,tfrac1{18}right)=-tfrac1{108}}tag{12}
$$
Interior of the Base
On the base, where $z=1$ and $delta z=0$, $(2)$ says that the only interior critical point is $(1,-1,1)$, which is outside the base.
Edge of the Base
Using $(2)$ and $(5)$ on the edge of the base, orthogonality says that the critical points are where $frac{y+1}{2x}=frac{x-1}{2y}$; that is,
$$
y(y+1)=x(x-1)tag{13}
$$
Combining $(4)$ and $(13)$ yields
$$
x(x-1)left(4x^2-2right)tag{14}
$$
Combining $(4)$, $(13)$, and $(14)$ says that the critical points are in the set
$$
left{(0,-1,1),(1,0,1),left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right),left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)right}tag{15}
$$
where
$$
begin{align}
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(0,-1,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!(1,0,1)=1}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px dashed #C0A000]{f!left(tfrac1{sqrt2},-tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=sqrt2-tfrac12}\
&bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{f!left(-tfrac1{sqrt2},tfrac1{sqrt2},1right)=-sqrt2-tfrac12}
end{align}tag{16}
$$
The extreme points are given in the solid boxed equations in $(16)$:
$$
-sqrt2-tfrac12le f(x,y,z)le1tag{17}
$$
edited Jan 8 at 18:56
answered Jan 8 at 18:09
robjohn♦robjohn
265k27304626
265k27304626
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3041826%2fabsolute-extrema-of-fx-y-z-xy-yzxz-on-the-paraboloid-x2y2-leq-z-leq1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
(Although it doesn't matter) It'd be a solid cone if there'd be $z^2$ but for $x^2+y^2leq z $it is a solid paraboloid! Simply put $y=0$.
$endgroup$
– Sameer Baheti
Dec 15 '18 at 19:20
$begingroup$
@SameerBaheti Uh it seems you're right, I'll change that. But otherwise, I doesn't really change the problem. Thanks for pointing it out though.
$endgroup$
– Poujh
Dec 15 '18 at 19:23
$begingroup$
This problem is horrible. I was solving it and there are just too many cases. 1) Solve in the interior (no critical points). (Easy.) 2) Solve in the restriction $x^2 + y^2 = z = 1.$ (Easy.) 3) Solve in the other restriction $x^2 + y^2 - z = 0.$ (Laborious, too many cases.)
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:19
1
$begingroup$
@Poujh Having myself written a book in calculus of several variables, I can confirm that almost all problems are horrible to solve.
$endgroup$
– Will M.
Dec 15 '18 at 20:25
1
$begingroup$
I think I've managed to solve it without calculus. The trick is to use a variable substitution that shows the function as a difference of squares, then optimize for each fixed value of $z$.
$endgroup$
– Connor Harris
Jan 7 at 20:30