Is the “tensoring map” from $mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2$ to $mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ a...












2












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}_1$ and $mathcal{H_2}$ two Hilbert spaces. Construct the tensor product $mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ as the set of all bounded antilinear operators from $mathcal{H_2}$ to $mathcal{H_1}$ such that the norm $Vert A Vert_otimes := sqrt{sum_beta Vert Av_beta Vert^2}$ is finite, where $lbrace v_beta rbrace$ is any orthonormal basis of $mathcal{H}_2$ (I followed the construction presented in Folland's A Course in Astract Harmonic Analysis).



Now for all $(u,v) in mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2$ I can consider the antilinear operator $u otimes v : w mapsto langle v, w rangle u$, which is an element of the tensor product.



My question is: if I consider the map $bigotimes : mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2 rightarrow mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ defined in the natural way, is it continuous (w.r.t. the natural topologies on both spaces, i.e. the product topology on the domain and the topology induced by the norm on the codomain)? My guess is that it is continuous, but I can't prove it.



Denoting by:





  • $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ the two projections

  • $f_v = langle v,cdot rangle in mathcal{H}_2^*$


  • $f : v mapsto f_v$ the map which characterizes the dual space of $mathcal{H}_2$


I tried to say that $bigotimes(cdot) = f_{pi_2(cdot)}pi_1(cdot)$ but I'm confused and can't tell if this is sufficient to conclude that $bigotimes$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Jan 22 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I fixed it!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:18
















2












$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}_1$ and $mathcal{H_2}$ two Hilbert spaces. Construct the tensor product $mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ as the set of all bounded antilinear operators from $mathcal{H_2}$ to $mathcal{H_1}$ such that the norm $Vert A Vert_otimes := sqrt{sum_beta Vert Av_beta Vert^2}$ is finite, where $lbrace v_beta rbrace$ is any orthonormal basis of $mathcal{H}_2$ (I followed the construction presented in Folland's A Course in Astract Harmonic Analysis).



Now for all $(u,v) in mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2$ I can consider the antilinear operator $u otimes v : w mapsto langle v, w rangle u$, which is an element of the tensor product.



My question is: if I consider the map $bigotimes : mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2 rightarrow mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ defined in the natural way, is it continuous (w.r.t. the natural topologies on both spaces, i.e. the product topology on the domain and the topology induced by the norm on the codomain)? My guess is that it is continuous, but I can't prove it.



Denoting by:





  • $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ the two projections

  • $f_v = langle v,cdot rangle in mathcal{H}_2^*$


  • $f : v mapsto f_v$ the map which characterizes the dual space of $mathcal{H}_2$


I tried to say that $bigotimes(cdot) = f_{pi_2(cdot)}pi_1(cdot)$ but I'm confused and can't tell if this is sufficient to conclude that $bigotimes$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Jan 22 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I fixed it!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:18














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Let $mathcal{H}_1$ and $mathcal{H_2}$ two Hilbert spaces. Construct the tensor product $mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ as the set of all bounded antilinear operators from $mathcal{H_2}$ to $mathcal{H_1}$ such that the norm $Vert A Vert_otimes := sqrt{sum_beta Vert Av_beta Vert^2}$ is finite, where $lbrace v_beta rbrace$ is any orthonormal basis of $mathcal{H}_2$ (I followed the construction presented in Folland's A Course in Astract Harmonic Analysis).



Now for all $(u,v) in mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2$ I can consider the antilinear operator $u otimes v : w mapsto langle v, w rangle u$, which is an element of the tensor product.



My question is: if I consider the map $bigotimes : mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2 rightarrow mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ defined in the natural way, is it continuous (w.r.t. the natural topologies on both spaces, i.e. the product topology on the domain and the topology induced by the norm on the codomain)? My guess is that it is continuous, but I can't prove it.



Denoting by:





  • $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ the two projections

  • $f_v = langle v,cdot rangle in mathcal{H}_2^*$


  • $f : v mapsto f_v$ the map which characterizes the dual space of $mathcal{H}_2$


I tried to say that $bigotimes(cdot) = f_{pi_2(cdot)}pi_1(cdot)$ but I'm confused and can't tell if this is sufficient to conclude that $bigotimes$ is continuous.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathcal{H}_1$ and $mathcal{H_2}$ two Hilbert spaces. Construct the tensor product $mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ as the set of all bounded antilinear operators from $mathcal{H_2}$ to $mathcal{H_1}$ such that the norm $Vert A Vert_otimes := sqrt{sum_beta Vert Av_beta Vert^2}$ is finite, where $lbrace v_beta rbrace$ is any orthonormal basis of $mathcal{H}_2$ (I followed the construction presented in Folland's A Course in Astract Harmonic Analysis).



Now for all $(u,v) in mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2$ I can consider the antilinear operator $u otimes v : w mapsto langle v, w rangle u$, which is an element of the tensor product.



My question is: if I consider the map $bigotimes : mathcal{H}_1 times mathcal{H}_2 rightarrow mathcal{H}_1 otimes mathcal{H}_2$ defined in the natural way, is it continuous (w.r.t. the natural topologies on both spaces, i.e. the product topology on the domain and the topology induced by the norm on the codomain)? My guess is that it is continuous, but I can't prove it.



Denoting by:





  • $pi_1$ and $pi_2$ the two projections

  • $f_v = langle v,cdot rangle in mathcal{H}_2^*$


  • $f : v mapsto f_v$ the map which characterizes the dual space of $mathcal{H}_2$


I tried to say that $bigotimes(cdot) = f_{pi_2(cdot)}pi_1(cdot)$ but I'm confused and can't tell if this is sufficient to conclude that $bigotimes$ is continuous.







functional-analysis hilbert-spaces tensor-products






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 15:18







M. Rinetti

















asked Jan 22 at 14:52









M. RinettiM. Rinetti

307




307












  • $begingroup$
    You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Jan 22 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I fixed it!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:18


















  • $begingroup$
    You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
    $endgroup$
    – MaoWao
    Jan 22 at 15:05










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I fixed it!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:18
















$begingroup$
You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 22 at 15:05




$begingroup$
You are missing squares on both sides of the definition of $|cdot|_otimes$. Furthermore, $H_1otimes H_2$ is not the set of all bounded antilinear operators, but only those for which $|cdot|_otimes$ is finite.
$endgroup$
– MaoWao
Jan 22 at 15:05












$begingroup$
Thanks, I fixed it!
$endgroup$
– M. Rinetti
Jan 22 at 15:18




$begingroup$
Thanks, I fixed it!
$endgroup$
– M. Rinetti
Jan 22 at 15:18










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

The map $otimes$ is obviously bilinear. A bilinear map $betacolon H_1times H_2to K$ is continuous if and only if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $|beta(u,v)|leq C|u||v|$ for all $uin H_1$, $vin H_2$. The proof is very similar to the characterization of continuous linear maps as bounded operators.



In your case one has $|uotimes v|_otimes=|langle v,frac{v}{|v|}vrangle u|=|u||v|$, which shows that $otimes$ is continuous.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, it is all clear now!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:27











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083267%2fis-the-tensoring-map-from-mathcalh-1-times-mathcalh-2-to-mathcalh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

The map $otimes$ is obviously bilinear. A bilinear map $betacolon H_1times H_2to K$ is continuous if and only if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $|beta(u,v)|leq C|u||v|$ for all $uin H_1$, $vin H_2$. The proof is very similar to the characterization of continuous linear maps as bounded operators.



In your case one has $|uotimes v|_otimes=|langle v,frac{v}{|v|}vrangle u|=|u||v|$, which shows that $otimes$ is continuous.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, it is all clear now!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:27
















2












$begingroup$

The map $otimes$ is obviously bilinear. A bilinear map $betacolon H_1times H_2to K$ is continuous if and only if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $|beta(u,v)|leq C|u||v|$ for all $uin H_1$, $vin H_2$. The proof is very similar to the characterization of continuous linear maps as bounded operators.



In your case one has $|uotimes v|_otimes=|langle v,frac{v}{|v|}vrangle u|=|u||v|$, which shows that $otimes$ is continuous.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, it is all clear now!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:27














2












2








2





$begingroup$

The map $otimes$ is obviously bilinear. A bilinear map $betacolon H_1times H_2to K$ is continuous if and only if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $|beta(u,v)|leq C|u||v|$ for all $uin H_1$, $vin H_2$. The proof is very similar to the characterization of continuous linear maps as bounded operators.



In your case one has $|uotimes v|_otimes=|langle v,frac{v}{|v|}vrangle u|=|u||v|$, which shows that $otimes$ is continuous.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



The map $otimes$ is obviously bilinear. A bilinear map $betacolon H_1times H_2to K$ is continuous if and only if there exists a constant $C>0$ such that $|beta(u,v)|leq C|u||v|$ for all $uin H_1$, $vin H_2$. The proof is very similar to the characterization of continuous linear maps as bounded operators.



In your case one has $|uotimes v|_otimes=|langle v,frac{v}{|v|}vrangle u|=|u||v|$, which shows that $otimes$ is continuous.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 22 at 15:06









MaoWaoMaoWao

3,533617




3,533617












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, it is all clear now!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:27


















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you, it is all clear now!
    $endgroup$
    – M. Rinetti
    Jan 22 at 15:27
















$begingroup$
Thank you, it is all clear now!
$endgroup$
– M. Rinetti
Jan 22 at 15:27




$begingroup$
Thank you, it is all clear now!
$endgroup$
– M. Rinetti
Jan 22 at 15:27


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3083267%2fis-the-tensoring-map-from-mathcalh-1-times-mathcalh-2-to-mathcalh%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Mario Kart Wii

What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

File:Tiny Toon Adventures Wacky Sports JP Title.png