Taylor expansion for Gâteaux derivative












0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{X}$ be a normed Space and
$
f: mathbb{X}mapstomathbb{R}
$

is twice Gâteaux differentiable (not necessary Fréchet differentiable). Is it possible to build a Taylorexpansion for $f$ in the following sense



$
f(u)= f(bar{u}) + f'(bar{u})(u-bar{u})+frac{1}{2}f
''(bar{u}+theta(u-bar{u}))(u-bar{u})^2,
$



with $thetain(0,1)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 10 at 13:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
    $endgroup$
    – Bara
    Jan 10 at 14:07










  • $begingroup$
    That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 11 at 14:37
















0












$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{X}$ be a normed Space and
$
f: mathbb{X}mapstomathbb{R}
$

is twice Gâteaux differentiable (not necessary Fréchet differentiable). Is it possible to build a Taylorexpansion for $f$ in the following sense



$
f(u)= f(bar{u}) + f'(bar{u})(u-bar{u})+frac{1}{2}f
''(bar{u}+theta(u-bar{u}))(u-bar{u})^2,
$



with $thetain(0,1)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 10 at 13:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
    $endgroup$
    – Bara
    Jan 10 at 14:07










  • $begingroup$
    That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 11 at 14:37














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Let $mathbb{X}$ be a normed Space and
$
f: mathbb{X}mapstomathbb{R}
$

is twice Gâteaux differentiable (not necessary Fréchet differentiable). Is it possible to build a Taylorexpansion for $f$ in the following sense



$
f(u)= f(bar{u}) + f'(bar{u})(u-bar{u})+frac{1}{2}f
''(bar{u}+theta(u-bar{u}))(u-bar{u})^2,
$



with $thetain(0,1)$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $mathbb{X}$ be a normed Space and
$
f: mathbb{X}mapstomathbb{R}
$

is twice Gâteaux differentiable (not necessary Fréchet differentiable). Is it possible to build a Taylorexpansion for $f$ in the following sense



$
f(u)= f(bar{u}) + f'(bar{u})(u-bar{u})+frac{1}{2}f
''(bar{u}+theta(u-bar{u}))(u-bar{u})^2,
$



with $thetain(0,1)$?







functional-analysis taylor-expansion gateaux-derivative






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 10 at 13:56







Bara

















asked Jan 10 at 13:45









BaraBara

378




378








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 10 at 13:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
    $endgroup$
    – Bara
    Jan 10 at 14:07










  • $begingroup$
    That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 11 at 14:37














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 10 at 13:56








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
    $endgroup$
    – Bara
    Jan 10 at 14:07










  • $begingroup$
    That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
    $endgroup$
    – Giuseppe Negro
    Jan 11 at 14:37








1




1




$begingroup$
Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 10 at 13:56






$begingroup$
Yes. Just Taylor expand the function of one real variable $g(r)=f(overline{u}+r u), $ where $rinmathbb R$.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 10 at 13:56






1




1




$begingroup$
I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
$endgroup$
– Bara
Jan 10 at 14:07




$begingroup$
I am not really sure why this should be the same, since the second Gâteaux dirivative f'' could be discontinuosly.
$endgroup$
– Bara
Jan 10 at 14:07












$begingroup$
That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 11 at 14:37




$begingroup$
That could be a problem even if X is $mathbb R$. My point is that this general case is actually exactly the same as the one-variable case.
$endgroup$
– Giuseppe Negro
Jan 11 at 14:37










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Yes, this holds. It is basically a consequence of Darboux's theorem and the mean value theorem.



As indicated by Giuseppe Negro, it is sufficient to discuss the case of real arguments. Further, by simple transformation, it is sufficient to consider the situation
$$f(0) = f'(0) = 0, quad f(1) = 1$$
and we will show the existence of $t in (0,1)$ with $f''(t) = 2$.



First, we claim that there exists $t_1 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_1) ge 2$.
We argue by contradiction and assume $f''(t) < 2$ for all $t in (0,1)$.
The function $f'$ is differentiable, hence it has the mean value property. For every $t in (0,1)$ we have $hat t in (0,t)$ with
$$ frac{f'(t)-f'(0)}{t} = f''(hat t) < 2,$$
i.e., $f'(t) < 2 , t$. Now, the fundamental theorem of calculus yields
$$f(1) - f(0) = int_0^1 f'(t) , mathrm{d}t < int_0^1 2 , t ,mathrm{d}t < 1$$
which is a contradiction. This shows the existence of $t_1$.



Similarly, we can show the existence of $t_2 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_2) le 2$.



If $f''(t_1) = 2$ or $f''(t_2) = 2$, we are finished. Otherwise,
$f''(t_1) > 2$ and $f''(t_2) < 2$. Hence, Darboux's theorem implies the existence of $t$ between $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that $f''(t) = 2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068657%2ftaylor-expansion-for-g%25c3%25a2teaux-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, this holds. It is basically a consequence of Darboux's theorem and the mean value theorem.



    As indicated by Giuseppe Negro, it is sufficient to discuss the case of real arguments. Further, by simple transformation, it is sufficient to consider the situation
    $$f(0) = f'(0) = 0, quad f(1) = 1$$
    and we will show the existence of $t in (0,1)$ with $f''(t) = 2$.



    First, we claim that there exists $t_1 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_1) ge 2$.
    We argue by contradiction and assume $f''(t) < 2$ for all $t in (0,1)$.
    The function $f'$ is differentiable, hence it has the mean value property. For every $t in (0,1)$ we have $hat t in (0,t)$ with
    $$ frac{f'(t)-f'(0)}{t} = f''(hat t) < 2,$$
    i.e., $f'(t) < 2 , t$. Now, the fundamental theorem of calculus yields
    $$f(1) - f(0) = int_0^1 f'(t) , mathrm{d}t < int_0^1 2 , t ,mathrm{d}t < 1$$
    which is a contradiction. This shows the existence of $t_1$.



    Similarly, we can show the existence of $t_2 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_2) le 2$.



    If $f''(t_1) = 2$ or $f''(t_2) = 2$, we are finished. Otherwise,
    $f''(t_1) > 2$ and $f''(t_2) < 2$. Hence, Darboux's theorem implies the existence of $t$ between $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that $f''(t) = 2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Yes, this holds. It is basically a consequence of Darboux's theorem and the mean value theorem.



      As indicated by Giuseppe Negro, it is sufficient to discuss the case of real arguments. Further, by simple transformation, it is sufficient to consider the situation
      $$f(0) = f'(0) = 0, quad f(1) = 1$$
      and we will show the existence of $t in (0,1)$ with $f''(t) = 2$.



      First, we claim that there exists $t_1 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_1) ge 2$.
      We argue by contradiction and assume $f''(t) < 2$ for all $t in (0,1)$.
      The function $f'$ is differentiable, hence it has the mean value property. For every $t in (0,1)$ we have $hat t in (0,t)$ with
      $$ frac{f'(t)-f'(0)}{t} = f''(hat t) < 2,$$
      i.e., $f'(t) < 2 , t$. Now, the fundamental theorem of calculus yields
      $$f(1) - f(0) = int_0^1 f'(t) , mathrm{d}t < int_0^1 2 , t ,mathrm{d}t < 1$$
      which is a contradiction. This shows the existence of $t_1$.



      Similarly, we can show the existence of $t_2 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_2) le 2$.



      If $f''(t_1) = 2$ or $f''(t_2) = 2$, we are finished. Otherwise,
      $f''(t_1) > 2$ and $f''(t_2) < 2$. Hence, Darboux's theorem implies the existence of $t$ between $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that $f''(t) = 2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Yes, this holds. It is basically a consequence of Darboux's theorem and the mean value theorem.



        As indicated by Giuseppe Negro, it is sufficient to discuss the case of real arguments. Further, by simple transformation, it is sufficient to consider the situation
        $$f(0) = f'(0) = 0, quad f(1) = 1$$
        and we will show the existence of $t in (0,1)$ with $f''(t) = 2$.



        First, we claim that there exists $t_1 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_1) ge 2$.
        We argue by contradiction and assume $f''(t) < 2$ for all $t in (0,1)$.
        The function $f'$ is differentiable, hence it has the mean value property. For every $t in (0,1)$ we have $hat t in (0,t)$ with
        $$ frac{f'(t)-f'(0)}{t} = f''(hat t) < 2,$$
        i.e., $f'(t) < 2 , t$. Now, the fundamental theorem of calculus yields
        $$f(1) - f(0) = int_0^1 f'(t) , mathrm{d}t < int_0^1 2 , t ,mathrm{d}t < 1$$
        which is a contradiction. This shows the existence of $t_1$.



        Similarly, we can show the existence of $t_2 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_2) le 2$.



        If $f''(t_1) = 2$ or $f''(t_2) = 2$, we are finished. Otherwise,
        $f''(t_1) > 2$ and $f''(t_2) < 2$. Hence, Darboux's theorem implies the existence of $t$ between $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that $f''(t) = 2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Yes, this holds. It is basically a consequence of Darboux's theorem and the mean value theorem.



        As indicated by Giuseppe Negro, it is sufficient to discuss the case of real arguments. Further, by simple transformation, it is sufficient to consider the situation
        $$f(0) = f'(0) = 0, quad f(1) = 1$$
        and we will show the existence of $t in (0,1)$ with $f''(t) = 2$.



        First, we claim that there exists $t_1 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_1) ge 2$.
        We argue by contradiction and assume $f''(t) < 2$ for all $t in (0,1)$.
        The function $f'$ is differentiable, hence it has the mean value property. For every $t in (0,1)$ we have $hat t in (0,t)$ with
        $$ frac{f'(t)-f'(0)}{t} = f''(hat t) < 2,$$
        i.e., $f'(t) < 2 , t$. Now, the fundamental theorem of calculus yields
        $$f(1) - f(0) = int_0^1 f'(t) , mathrm{d}t < int_0^1 2 , t ,mathrm{d}t < 1$$
        which is a contradiction. This shows the existence of $t_1$.



        Similarly, we can show the existence of $t_2 in (0,1)$ with $f''(t_2) le 2$.



        If $f''(t_1) = 2$ or $f''(t_2) = 2$, we are finished. Otherwise,
        $f''(t_1) > 2$ and $f''(t_2) < 2$. Hence, Darboux's theorem implies the existence of $t$ between $t_1$ and $t_2$ such that $f''(t) = 2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 17 at 8:08









        gerwgerw

        19.2k11334




        19.2k11334






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3068657%2ftaylor-expansion-for-g%25c3%25a2teaux-derivative%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Mario Kart Wii

            What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

            Antonio Litta Visconti Arese