Find the structure of $ mathbb Z ^{3} / K $ with $K$ the image of a matrix












1












$begingroup$


I have this matrix:
$$
A= begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & -1 & 2\ -2 & -16 & -4 & 4 \ -2 &-2 &0 &6
end{pmatrix}
$$

If we set K as the Image of this matrix, how do you find a basis of $ K $ of this form :
$$( d_1 w_1 , cdots , d_s w_s ), s leq 4$$
such that we have that $( w_1 , cdots , w_4 ) $ is a basis of $ mathbb Z ^{3} $ and that $ d_i | d_{i+1} $



I must use the Smith normal form, but I'm blocked by the fact that I can't find a basis of the Image.
In the correction of this exercice, their are using a method I'm not understanding.



I would firstly determine a basis of the image and then do the same computation as I usually do.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have this matrix:
    $$
    A= begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & -1 & 2\ -2 & -16 & -4 & 4 \ -2 &-2 &0 &6
    end{pmatrix}
    $$

    If we set K as the Image of this matrix, how do you find a basis of $ K $ of this form :
    $$( d_1 w_1 , cdots , d_s w_s ), s leq 4$$
    such that we have that $( w_1 , cdots , w_4 ) $ is a basis of $ mathbb Z ^{3} $ and that $ d_i | d_{i+1} $



    I must use the Smith normal form, but I'm blocked by the fact that I can't find a basis of the Image.
    In the correction of this exercice, their are using a method I'm not understanding.



    I would firstly determine a basis of the image and then do the same computation as I usually do.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have this matrix:
      $$
      A= begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & -1 & 2\ -2 & -16 & -4 & 4 \ -2 &-2 &0 &6
      end{pmatrix}
      $$

      If we set K as the Image of this matrix, how do you find a basis of $ K $ of this form :
      $$( d_1 w_1 , cdots , d_s w_s ), s leq 4$$
      such that we have that $( w_1 , cdots , w_4 ) $ is a basis of $ mathbb Z ^{3} $ and that $ d_i | d_{i+1} $



      I must use the Smith normal form, but I'm blocked by the fact that I can't find a basis of the Image.
      In the correction of this exercice, their are using a method I'm not understanding.



      I would firstly determine a basis of the image and then do the same computation as I usually do.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have this matrix:
      $$
      A= begin{pmatrix} 2 & 5 & -1 & 2\ -2 & -16 & -4 & 4 \ -2 &-2 &0 &6
      end{pmatrix}
      $$

      If we set K as the Image of this matrix, how do you find a basis of $ K $ of this form :
      $$( d_1 w_1 , cdots , d_s w_s ), s leq 4$$
      such that we have that $( w_1 , cdots , w_4 ) $ is a basis of $ mathbb Z ^{3} $ and that $ d_i | d_{i+1} $



      I must use the Smith normal form, but I'm blocked by the fact that I can't find a basis of the Image.
      In the correction of this exercice, their are using a method I'm not understanding.



      I would firstly determine a basis of the image and then do the same computation as I usually do.







      linear-algebra modules smith-normal-form






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 12 at 18:40









      Marine GalantinMarine Galantin

      798216




      798216






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          $DeclareMathOperator{im}{Im}DeclareMathOperator{sp}{Span}require{AMScd}$First, let us understand where all the maps are going in the Smith normal form:



          begin{CD}
          mathbb{Z}^4 @>A>> mathbb{Z}^3\
          @APAA @AAQA \ mathbb{Z}^4 @>>D> mathbb{Z}^3
          end{CD}



          $P$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms (invertible), $D$ is diagonal and $A = QDP^{-1}$. The point of $P$ and $Q$ is that they are a change of basis such that in the new basis, $A$ acts diagonally.



          We want to compute the image of $A$, or equivalently, the image of $QDP^{-1}$.



          First, I claim that $im(A) = im(QD)$ and this is because $P$ is invertible.




          Let $y in im(A)$. Then $y = Ax = QDP^{-1}$ for some $x$. So $y = QD(P^{-1}x)$ is in the image of $QD$. Next, let $y in im(QD)$. Then $y = QDx$ for some $x$. Since $P$ (and also $P^{-1}$) is invertible, there must be some $x'$ such that $x = P^{-1}x'$ (namely: $x' = Px$). Then $y = QDP^{-1}x' = Ax' in im{A}$.




          The general rule here is that if $A = BC$ and $C$ is invertible, then $im(A) = im(B)$.



          Next, given any matrix, the image of that matrix is the same as the column space.




          To demonstrate, let $B$ have columns $v_1, dots, v_n$ and let $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$. Then
          $$ Bx = begin{pmatrix} v_1 & cdots & v_n end{pmatrix} begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{pmatrix} = x_1v_1 + cdots + x_nv_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$$
          And conversely, any element $x_1v_1 + cdots + x_n v_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$ can be written as $Bx$ where $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$.




          So what we have shown is that $im(A) = im(QD) = sp{text{columns of $QD$}}$.



          Now the last step is what I said near the beginning: $P$ and $Q$ represent a change of basis. So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^3$ and the columns of $P$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^4$. (In fact, the same is true for $P^{-1}, Q^{-1}$ as well as $P^T$ and $Q^T$ or, more generally, any invertible matrix.)



          So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z^3}$ and the (non-zero) columns of $QD$ are a basis for $im(A)$. Then it's just a matter of understanding how diagonal matrices act on other matrices. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the right multiplies the columns by the corresponding diagonal element. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the left multiplies the rows by the corresponding diagonal element.



          This is why $QD$ is obtained from $Q$ by multiplying the columns by $-1, -2$, and $2$ respectively.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            I don't know if you are follow the same course as mine but I had this exact exercice this semester with D. Testerman. Here is the solution :



            First Part



            Second Part






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
              $endgroup$
              – Marine Galantin
              Jan 12 at 19:22










            • $begingroup$
              @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
              $endgroup$
              – Trevor Gunn
              Jan 12 at 19:31












            • $begingroup$
              The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
              $endgroup$
              – Marine Galantin
              Jan 12 at 19:34








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
              $endgroup$
              – NotAbelianGroup
              Jan 12 at 21:15



















            0












            $begingroup$

            This took me six elementary column matrices, the 4 by 4 square matrix has determinant $1.$ Actually, I combined some steps, so it might be more reasonable to indicate the square matrix as $R = R_1 R_2R_3R_4R_5R_6R_7 R_8,$ this is the order when using column operations rather than the more familiar row operations.



            $$
            left(
            begin{array}{rrrr}
            2& 5& -1& 2 \
            -2& -16& -4& 4 \
            -2& -2& 0& 6 \
            end{array}
            right)
            left(
            begin{array}{rrrr}
            1 &-3& -10 & -56 \
            0 &1 & 3 & 17 \
            1 &-3 & -9 &-53 \
            0& -1 & -2 & -13 \
            end{array}
            right) =
            left(
            begin{array}{rrrr}
            1 & 0 &0& 0 \
            -6 &-2& 0& 0 \
            -2 &-2& 2 & 0 \
            end{array}
            right)
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for the help. But then?
              $endgroup$
              – Marine Galantin
              Jan 12 at 19:24










            • $begingroup$
              @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 12 at 19:28










            • $begingroup$
              Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
              $endgroup$
              – Marine Galantin
              Jan 12 at 19:29










            • $begingroup$
              @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
              $endgroup$
              – Will Jagy
              Jan 12 at 19:35










            • $begingroup$
              Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
              $endgroup$
              – Marine Galantin
              Jan 12 at 19:37













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071242%2ffind-the-structure-of-mathbb-z-3-k-with-k-the-image-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            $DeclareMathOperator{im}{Im}DeclareMathOperator{sp}{Span}require{AMScd}$First, let us understand where all the maps are going in the Smith normal form:



            begin{CD}
            mathbb{Z}^4 @>A>> mathbb{Z}^3\
            @APAA @AAQA \ mathbb{Z}^4 @>>D> mathbb{Z}^3
            end{CD}



            $P$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms (invertible), $D$ is diagonal and $A = QDP^{-1}$. The point of $P$ and $Q$ is that they are a change of basis such that in the new basis, $A$ acts diagonally.



            We want to compute the image of $A$, or equivalently, the image of $QDP^{-1}$.



            First, I claim that $im(A) = im(QD)$ and this is because $P$ is invertible.




            Let $y in im(A)$. Then $y = Ax = QDP^{-1}$ for some $x$. So $y = QD(P^{-1}x)$ is in the image of $QD$. Next, let $y in im(QD)$. Then $y = QDx$ for some $x$. Since $P$ (and also $P^{-1}$) is invertible, there must be some $x'$ such that $x = P^{-1}x'$ (namely: $x' = Px$). Then $y = QDP^{-1}x' = Ax' in im{A}$.




            The general rule here is that if $A = BC$ and $C$ is invertible, then $im(A) = im(B)$.



            Next, given any matrix, the image of that matrix is the same as the column space.




            To demonstrate, let $B$ have columns $v_1, dots, v_n$ and let $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$. Then
            $$ Bx = begin{pmatrix} v_1 & cdots & v_n end{pmatrix} begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{pmatrix} = x_1v_1 + cdots + x_nv_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$$
            And conversely, any element $x_1v_1 + cdots + x_n v_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$ can be written as $Bx$ where $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$.




            So what we have shown is that $im(A) = im(QD) = sp{text{columns of $QD$}}$.



            Now the last step is what I said near the beginning: $P$ and $Q$ represent a change of basis. So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^3$ and the columns of $P$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^4$. (In fact, the same is true for $P^{-1}, Q^{-1}$ as well as $P^T$ and $Q^T$ or, more generally, any invertible matrix.)



            So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z^3}$ and the (non-zero) columns of $QD$ are a basis for $im(A)$. Then it's just a matter of understanding how diagonal matrices act on other matrices. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the right multiplies the columns by the corresponding diagonal element. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the left multiplies the rows by the corresponding diagonal element.



            This is why $QD$ is obtained from $Q$ by multiplying the columns by $-1, -2$, and $2$ respectively.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              $DeclareMathOperator{im}{Im}DeclareMathOperator{sp}{Span}require{AMScd}$First, let us understand where all the maps are going in the Smith normal form:



              begin{CD}
              mathbb{Z}^4 @>A>> mathbb{Z}^3\
              @APAA @AAQA \ mathbb{Z}^4 @>>D> mathbb{Z}^3
              end{CD}



              $P$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms (invertible), $D$ is diagonal and $A = QDP^{-1}$. The point of $P$ and $Q$ is that they are a change of basis such that in the new basis, $A$ acts diagonally.



              We want to compute the image of $A$, or equivalently, the image of $QDP^{-1}$.



              First, I claim that $im(A) = im(QD)$ and this is because $P$ is invertible.




              Let $y in im(A)$. Then $y = Ax = QDP^{-1}$ for some $x$. So $y = QD(P^{-1}x)$ is in the image of $QD$. Next, let $y in im(QD)$. Then $y = QDx$ for some $x$. Since $P$ (and also $P^{-1}$) is invertible, there must be some $x'$ such that $x = P^{-1}x'$ (namely: $x' = Px$). Then $y = QDP^{-1}x' = Ax' in im{A}$.




              The general rule here is that if $A = BC$ and $C$ is invertible, then $im(A) = im(B)$.



              Next, given any matrix, the image of that matrix is the same as the column space.




              To demonstrate, let $B$ have columns $v_1, dots, v_n$ and let $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$. Then
              $$ Bx = begin{pmatrix} v_1 & cdots & v_n end{pmatrix} begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{pmatrix} = x_1v_1 + cdots + x_nv_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$$
              And conversely, any element $x_1v_1 + cdots + x_n v_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$ can be written as $Bx$ where $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$.




              So what we have shown is that $im(A) = im(QD) = sp{text{columns of $QD$}}$.



              Now the last step is what I said near the beginning: $P$ and $Q$ represent a change of basis. So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^3$ and the columns of $P$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^4$. (In fact, the same is true for $P^{-1}, Q^{-1}$ as well as $P^T$ and $Q^T$ or, more generally, any invertible matrix.)



              So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z^3}$ and the (non-zero) columns of $QD$ are a basis for $im(A)$. Then it's just a matter of understanding how diagonal matrices act on other matrices. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the right multiplies the columns by the corresponding diagonal element. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the left multiplies the rows by the corresponding diagonal element.



              This is why $QD$ is obtained from $Q$ by multiplying the columns by $-1, -2$, and $2$ respectively.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                $DeclareMathOperator{im}{Im}DeclareMathOperator{sp}{Span}require{AMScd}$First, let us understand where all the maps are going in the Smith normal form:



                begin{CD}
                mathbb{Z}^4 @>A>> mathbb{Z}^3\
                @APAA @AAQA \ mathbb{Z}^4 @>>D> mathbb{Z}^3
                end{CD}



                $P$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms (invertible), $D$ is diagonal and $A = QDP^{-1}$. The point of $P$ and $Q$ is that they are a change of basis such that in the new basis, $A$ acts diagonally.



                We want to compute the image of $A$, or equivalently, the image of $QDP^{-1}$.



                First, I claim that $im(A) = im(QD)$ and this is because $P$ is invertible.




                Let $y in im(A)$. Then $y = Ax = QDP^{-1}$ for some $x$. So $y = QD(P^{-1}x)$ is in the image of $QD$. Next, let $y in im(QD)$. Then $y = QDx$ for some $x$. Since $P$ (and also $P^{-1}$) is invertible, there must be some $x'$ such that $x = P^{-1}x'$ (namely: $x' = Px$). Then $y = QDP^{-1}x' = Ax' in im{A}$.




                The general rule here is that if $A = BC$ and $C$ is invertible, then $im(A) = im(B)$.



                Next, given any matrix, the image of that matrix is the same as the column space.




                To demonstrate, let $B$ have columns $v_1, dots, v_n$ and let $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$. Then
                $$ Bx = begin{pmatrix} v_1 & cdots & v_n end{pmatrix} begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{pmatrix} = x_1v_1 + cdots + x_nv_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$$
                And conversely, any element $x_1v_1 + cdots + x_n v_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$ can be written as $Bx$ where $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$.




                So what we have shown is that $im(A) = im(QD) = sp{text{columns of $QD$}}$.



                Now the last step is what I said near the beginning: $P$ and $Q$ represent a change of basis. So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^3$ and the columns of $P$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^4$. (In fact, the same is true for $P^{-1}, Q^{-1}$ as well as $P^T$ and $Q^T$ or, more generally, any invertible matrix.)



                So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z^3}$ and the (non-zero) columns of $QD$ are a basis for $im(A)$. Then it's just a matter of understanding how diagonal matrices act on other matrices. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the right multiplies the columns by the corresponding diagonal element. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the left multiplies the rows by the corresponding diagonal element.



                This is why $QD$ is obtained from $Q$ by multiplying the columns by $-1, -2$, and $2$ respectively.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                $DeclareMathOperator{im}{Im}DeclareMathOperator{sp}{Span}require{AMScd}$First, let us understand where all the maps are going in the Smith normal form:



                begin{CD}
                mathbb{Z}^4 @>A>> mathbb{Z}^3\
                @APAA @AAQA \ mathbb{Z}^4 @>>D> mathbb{Z}^3
                end{CD}



                $P$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms (invertible), $D$ is diagonal and $A = QDP^{-1}$. The point of $P$ and $Q$ is that they are a change of basis such that in the new basis, $A$ acts diagonally.



                We want to compute the image of $A$, or equivalently, the image of $QDP^{-1}$.



                First, I claim that $im(A) = im(QD)$ and this is because $P$ is invertible.




                Let $y in im(A)$. Then $y = Ax = QDP^{-1}$ for some $x$. So $y = QD(P^{-1}x)$ is in the image of $QD$. Next, let $y in im(QD)$. Then $y = QDx$ for some $x$. Since $P$ (and also $P^{-1}$) is invertible, there must be some $x'$ such that $x = P^{-1}x'$ (namely: $x' = Px$). Then $y = QDP^{-1}x' = Ax' in im{A}$.




                The general rule here is that if $A = BC$ and $C$ is invertible, then $im(A) = im(B)$.



                Next, given any matrix, the image of that matrix is the same as the column space.




                To demonstrate, let $B$ have columns $v_1, dots, v_n$ and let $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$. Then
                $$ Bx = begin{pmatrix} v_1 & cdots & v_n end{pmatrix} begin{pmatrix} x_1 \ vdots \ x_n end{pmatrix} = x_1v_1 + cdots + x_nv_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$$
                And conversely, any element $x_1v_1 + cdots + x_n v_n in sp{v_1,dots,v_n}$ can be written as $Bx$ where $x = (x_1,dots,x_n)$.




                So what we have shown is that $im(A) = im(QD) = sp{text{columns of $QD$}}$.



                Now the last step is what I said near the beginning: $P$ and $Q$ represent a change of basis. So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^3$ and the columns of $P$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z}^4$. (In fact, the same is true for $P^{-1}, Q^{-1}$ as well as $P^T$ and $Q^T$ or, more generally, any invertible matrix.)



                So the columns of $Q$ are a basis for $mathbb{Z^3}$ and the (non-zero) columns of $QD$ are a basis for $im(A)$. Then it's just a matter of understanding how diagonal matrices act on other matrices. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the right multiplies the columns by the corresponding diagonal element. Multiplying by a diagonal matrix on the left multiplies the rows by the corresponding diagonal element.



                This is why $QD$ is obtained from $Q$ by multiplying the columns by $-1, -2$, and $2$ respectively.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 12 at 20:06









                Trevor GunnTrevor Gunn

                14.4k32046




                14.4k32046























                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    I don't know if you are follow the same course as mine but I had this exact exercice this semester with D. Testerman. Here is the solution :



                    First Part



                    Second Part






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Trevor Gunn
                      Jan 12 at 19:31












                    • $begingroup$
                      The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:34








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                      $endgroup$
                      – NotAbelianGroup
                      Jan 12 at 21:15
















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    I don't know if you are follow the same course as mine but I had this exact exercice this semester with D. Testerman. Here is the solution :



                    First Part



                    Second Part






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Trevor Gunn
                      Jan 12 at 19:31












                    • $begingroup$
                      The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:34








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                      $endgroup$
                      – NotAbelianGroup
                      Jan 12 at 21:15














                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    I don't know if you are follow the same course as mine but I had this exact exercice this semester with D. Testerman. Here is the solution :



                    First Part



                    Second Part






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    I don't know if you are follow the same course as mine but I had this exact exercice this semester with D. Testerman. Here is the solution :



                    First Part



                    Second Part







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 12 at 19:03









                    NotAbelianGroupNotAbelianGroup

                    15511




                    15511












                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Trevor Gunn
                      Jan 12 at 19:31












                    • $begingroup$
                      The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:34








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                      $endgroup$
                      – NotAbelianGroup
                      Jan 12 at 21:15


















                    • $begingroup$
                      Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:22










                    • $begingroup$
                      @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Trevor Gunn
                      Jan 12 at 19:31












                    • $begingroup$
                      The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:34








                    • 1




                      $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                      $endgroup$
                      – NotAbelianGroup
                      Jan 12 at 21:15
















                    $begingroup$
                    Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:22




                    $begingroup$
                    Yes I do and actually i dont understand this solution. That is why i m asking for another one facepalm ^~^''
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:22












                    $begingroup$
                    @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor Gunn
                    Jan 12 at 19:31






                    $begingroup$
                    @Marine What parts do you understand or not understand? Do you understand how $D$ is computed? How $Q$ is computed? Why $operatorname{Im}(f_A) = operatorname{Im}(f_{QD})$? Why the columns of $Q$ are a basis of $mathbb{Z}^{3}$? Why the columns of $QD$ are a basis of $operatorname{Im}(f_A)$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Trevor Gunn
                    Jan 12 at 19:31














                    $begingroup$
                    The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:34






                    $begingroup$
                    The only thing I understand is : how you do the smith normal form, and how you fins the matrices P and Q. The rest is meaningless for me...
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:34






                    1




                    1




                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                    $endgroup$
                    – NotAbelianGroup
                    Jan 12 at 21:15




                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin Ah sure no problems, good luck for Wednesday!
                    $endgroup$
                    – NotAbelianGroup
                    Jan 12 at 21:15











                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    This took me six elementary column matrices, the 4 by 4 square matrix has determinant $1.$ Actually, I combined some steps, so it might be more reasonable to indicate the square matrix as $R = R_1 R_2R_3R_4R_5R_6R_7 R_8,$ this is the order when using column operations rather than the more familiar row operations.



                    $$
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    2& 5& -1& 2 \
                    -2& -16& -4& 4 \
                    -2& -2& 0& 6 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 &-3& -10 & -56 \
                    0 &1 & 3 & 17 \
                    1 &-3 & -9 &-53 \
                    0& -1 & -2 & -13 \
                    end{array}
                    right) =
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 & 0 &0& 0 \
                    -6 &-2& 0& 0 \
                    -2 &-2& 2 & 0 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Thank you for the help. But then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:28










                    • $begingroup$
                      Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:29










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:35










                    • $begingroup$
                      Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:37


















                    0












                    $begingroup$

                    This took me six elementary column matrices, the 4 by 4 square matrix has determinant $1.$ Actually, I combined some steps, so it might be more reasonable to indicate the square matrix as $R = R_1 R_2R_3R_4R_5R_6R_7 R_8,$ this is the order when using column operations rather than the more familiar row operations.



                    $$
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    2& 5& -1& 2 \
                    -2& -16& -4& 4 \
                    -2& -2& 0& 6 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 &-3& -10 & -56 \
                    0 &1 & 3 & 17 \
                    1 &-3 & -9 &-53 \
                    0& -1 & -2 & -13 \
                    end{array}
                    right) =
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 & 0 &0& 0 \
                    -6 &-2& 0& 0 \
                    -2 &-2& 2 & 0 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$













                    • $begingroup$
                      Thank you for the help. But then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:28










                    • $begingroup$
                      Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:29










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:35










                    • $begingroup$
                      Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:37
















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    This took me six elementary column matrices, the 4 by 4 square matrix has determinant $1.$ Actually, I combined some steps, so it might be more reasonable to indicate the square matrix as $R = R_1 R_2R_3R_4R_5R_6R_7 R_8,$ this is the order when using column operations rather than the more familiar row operations.



                    $$
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    2& 5& -1& 2 \
                    -2& -16& -4& 4 \
                    -2& -2& 0& 6 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 &-3& -10 & -56 \
                    0 &1 & 3 & 17 \
                    1 &-3 & -9 &-53 \
                    0& -1 & -2 & -13 \
                    end{array}
                    right) =
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 & 0 &0& 0 \
                    -6 &-2& 0& 0 \
                    -2 &-2& 2 & 0 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    $$






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    This took me six elementary column matrices, the 4 by 4 square matrix has determinant $1.$ Actually, I combined some steps, so it might be more reasonable to indicate the square matrix as $R = R_1 R_2R_3R_4R_5R_6R_7 R_8,$ this is the order when using column operations rather than the more familiar row operations.



                    $$
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    2& 5& -1& 2 \
                    -2& -16& -4& 4 \
                    -2& -2& 0& 6 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 &-3& -10 & -56 \
                    0 &1 & 3 & 17 \
                    1 &-3 & -9 &-53 \
                    0& -1 & -2 & -13 \
                    end{array}
                    right) =
                    left(
                    begin{array}{rrrr}
                    1 & 0 &0& 0 \
                    -6 &-2& 0& 0 \
                    -2 &-2& 2 & 0 \
                    end{array}
                    right)
                    $$







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Jan 12 at 19:16









                    Will JagyWill Jagy

                    103k5101200




                    103k5101200












                    • $begingroup$
                      Thank you for the help. But then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:28










                    • $begingroup$
                      Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:29










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:35










                    • $begingroup$
                      Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:37




















                    • $begingroup$
                      Thank you for the help. But then?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:24










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:28










                    • $begingroup$
                      Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:29










                    • $begingroup$
                      @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                      $endgroup$
                      – Will Jagy
                      Jan 12 at 19:35










                    • $begingroup$
                      Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                      $endgroup$
                      – Marine Galantin
                      Jan 12 at 19:37


















                    $begingroup$
                    Thank you for the help. But then?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:24




                    $begingroup$
                    Thank you for the help. But then?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:24












                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Will Jagy
                    Jan 12 at 19:28




                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin The nonzero columns of the 3 by 4 matrix on the right give an integral basis for the image, which is what you said you wanted.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Will Jagy
                    Jan 12 at 19:28












                    $begingroup$
                    Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:29




                    $begingroup$
                    Okay and how do you obtain it, did you just reduced the matrix?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:29












                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Will Jagy
                    Jan 12 at 19:35




                    $begingroup$
                    @MarineGalantin experience is best. Can you find an integral matrix $T$ with determinant $1,$ three by three, so that $TAR$ is in Smith form? This $T$ will be the product of two or three elementary integer matrices, for row operations the order will be $T = T_3 T_2 T_1$
                    $endgroup$
                    – Will Jagy
                    Jan 12 at 19:35












                    $begingroup$
                    Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:37






                    $begingroup$
                    Im sorry I don't understand exactly what you re saying. Anyways, if that s what you mean, I know that any integral matrix can be written in it s smith form. This afterwards gives me a decomposition $Q^{-1} AP = D $, is it your $TAR$?
                    $endgroup$
                    – Marine Galantin
                    Jan 12 at 19:37




















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3071242%2ffind-the-structure-of-mathbb-z-3-k-with-k-the-image-of-a-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Mario Kart Wii

                    What does “Dominus providebit” mean?

                    Antonio Litta Visconti Arese